Introduction to Discourse Studies

New edition

| University of Tilburg
| University of Vechta
ISBN 9789027201959 | EUR 99.00 | USD 149.00
ISBN 9789027201966 | EUR 36.00 | USD 54.00
ISBN 9789027263100 | EUR 99.00/36.00*
| USD 149.00/54.00*

This new edition of Introduction to Discourse Studies (IDS) is a thoroughly revised and updated version of this successful textbook, which has been published in four languages and has become a must-read for anyone interested in the analysis of texts and discourses. Supported by an international advisory board of 14 leading experts, it deals with all main subdomains in discourse studies, from pragmatics to cognitive linguistics, from critical discourse analysis to stylistics, and many more. The book approaches major issues in this field from the Anglo-American and European as well as the Asian traditions. It provides an ‘academic toolkit’ for future courses on discourse studies and serves as a stepping stone to the independent study of professional literature. The chapters are subdivided in modular sections that can be studied separately. The pedagogical objectives are further supported by

  • over 500 index entries covering frequently used concepts that are accurately defined with examples throughout the text;
  • more than 150 test-yourself questions, all elaborately answered, which are ideal for self-study;
  • nearly 100 assignments that provide ample material for lecturers to focus on specific topics in their courses.

Jan Renkema is Emeritus Professor of Discourse Quality at the Department of Communication and Information Sciences at Tilburg University, The Netherlands. He is also editor of Discourse, of Course (2009) and author of The Texture of Discourse (2009). In 2009, a Chinese edition of Introduction to Discourse Studies was published by Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.

Christoph Schubert is Full Professor of English Linguistics at Vechta University, Germany. He is author of an Introduction to English text linguistics (2nd ed. 2012) and co-editor of Pragmatic Perspectives on Postcolonial Discourse (2016) and Variational Text Linguistics (2016).

This title replaces Introduction to Discourse Studies (2004)

[Not in series, 219]  2018.  xv, 453 pp.
Publishing status: Available
Table of Contents
Advisory board for Introduction to Discourse Studies
Chapter 1. Introduction
Part I. General orientation
Chapter 2. The pragmatic framework
Chapter 3. Discourse in communication
Part II. Backpacking for a journey into discourse studies
Chapter 4. Discourse classification
Chapter 5. Structured content
Chapter 6. Discourse connections
Chapter 7. Contextual phenomena
Chapter 8. Style and stylistics
Part III. Special modes of communication
Chapter 9. Conversation analysis
Chapter 10. Informative discourse
Chapter 11. Narratives
Chapter 12. Argumentation and persuasion
Part IV. Special interests
Chapter 13. Discourse and cognition
Chapter 14. Discourse and institution
Chapter 15. Discourse and culture
Key to the questions
“This revised and expanded new edition of Introduction to Discourse Studies is a testimony to its success. Few introductory texts provide such a clear and accessible introduction to the subject of discourse analysis. The book also offers the broadest coverage of any introductory book. It gives students a thorough grounding in the basics of discourse analysis and acquaints them with the essentials of language studies. The book is an engaging initiation into the study of discourse. It will be appreciated by lecturers and students, but it is also for anyone interested in language.”
“This, the third edition of the Introduction to Discourse Studies will be welcomed by students and teachers alike. It is, by most standards, a long book, and this allows it to cover a commendably wide variety of topics and research traditions – it is more comprehensive than most competitors and will thus allow interested students to venture beyond their prescribed course reading. The writing is clear and engaging and there are frequent well-chosen examples. The lists of recommended readings at the end of chapters, the augmented final bibliography and the very detailed index are excellent features. I would strongly recommend this book.”
“Presenting an even more comprehensive overview of discourse studies than its predecessor, the new edition of Introduction to Discourse Studies will be the go-to reference book in its field. With its up-to-date contents, thoroughly reworked in collaboration with leading experts in the field, the book will provide guidance for students, definitions and examples for teachers and inspiration for researchers. I will be heartily recommending it to my students.”
“A welcome new and updated edition of Renkema’s successful Introduction to Discourse Studies, now co-authored with Christoph Schubert. The book covers a wealth of key concepts and classic approaches to discourse studies, integrating the perspectives of an international advisory board. Each chapter includes suggested questions and assignments as well as recommended readings, which makes the book particularly useful for lecturers and students. Among many other updates, notable new content includes online genres, multimodality, corpus stylistics, populist discourse, and the discursive construction of sexual identities. Providing a broad overview, this is an ideal starting point for anyone ready to explore the rich interdisciplinary field of discourse studies.”


Adler, M.
(2012) The plain language movement. In P. Tiersma & L. M. Solan (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of language and law (pp. 67–83). Oxford: Oxford University Press. [14.4]
Agee, W., Ault, P., & Emery, E.
(1997) Introduction to mass communications (12th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon. [14.6]
Ainsworth-Vaughn, N.
(1998) Claiming power in doctor-patient talk. New York: Oxford University Press. [14.7]
Ajzen, I.
(1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 179–211. [12.4]Crossref link
Alamargot, D., & Chanquoy, L.
(2001) Through the models of writing. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. [13.5]Crossref link
Allen, G.
(2011) Intertextuality (2nd ed.). Oxford: Routledge. [3.7]
Anchimbe, E. A., & Janney, R. W.
(2017) Postcolonial pragmatics. In A. Barron, Y. Gu & G. Steen (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of pragmatics (pp. 105–120). London: Routledge. [8.6.2, 15.6]
Arendholz, J.
(2013) (In)Appropriate online behavior: A pragmatic analysis of message board relations. Amsterdam: Benjamins. [2.6]Crossref link
Arminen, I.
(2005) Institutional interaction: Studies of talk at work. Aldershot: Ashgate. [14.2]
Atkinson, J. M., & Drew, P.
(1979) Order in court: The organisation of verbal interaction in judicial settings. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanity Press. [14.4]Crossref link
Auer, P., & Luzio, A. di
(Eds.) (1992) The contextualization of language. Amsterdam: Benjamins. [3.5]Crossref link
Austin, J. L.
(1976) How to do things with words (2nd ed.). Ed. by J. O. Urmson & M. Sbisà. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [2.3.1]
Ausubel, D.
(1960) The use of advance organizers in the learning and retention of meaningful verbal material. Journal of Educational Psychology, 51, 267–272. [5.5]Crossref link
Baesler, J., & Burgoon, J.
(1994) The temporal effects of story and statistical evidence on belief change. Communication Research, 21, 582–602. [12.5]Crossref link
Bakhtin, M.
(1981) The dialogic imagination: Four essays (M. Holquist, Ed., C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Trans.). Austin: University of Texas Press. [4.3]
(1986) The problem of speech genres. In M. M. Bakthin (C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Eds., V. W. McGee, Trans.), Speech genres and other late essays (pp. 60–102). Austin: University of Texas Press. [4.3]
Bal, M.
(2017) Narratology: Introduction to the theory of narrative (4th ed.). Toronto: University of Toronto Press. [7.5]
Balota, D. A., Flores d’Arcais, G. B., & Rayner, K.
(Eds.) (1990) Comprehension processes in reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. [13.2]
Bamberg, M.
(Ed.) (1997) Oral versions of personal experience: Three decades of narrative analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. [11.3]
Barcelona, A.
(Ed.) (2003) Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads: A cognitive perspective. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. [8.6]Crossref link
Bargiela-Chiappini, F., & Harris, S.
(1997) Managing language: The discourse of corporate meetings. Amsterdam: Benjamins. [14.2]Crossref link
Bar-Hillel, Y.
(1954) Indexical expressions. Mind, 63, 359–379. [7.3]Crossref link
Barron, A.
(2012) Public information messages: A contrastive genre analysis of state-citizen communication. Amsterdam: Benjamins. [14.5]
Bartlett, F. C.
(1932) Remembering. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [13.2]
Bartlett, T., & O’Grady, G.
(Eds.) (2017) The Routledge handbook of systemic functional linguistics. Oxford: Routledge. [3.6]
Bartsch, R.
(1987) Norms of language: Theoretical and practical issues. London: Longman. [3.3]
Bateman, J.
(2008) Multimodality and genre: A foundation for the systematic analysis of multimodal documents. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. [4.5]Crossref link
(2014) Text and image: A critical introduction to the visual/verbal divide. London: Routledge. [4.5]
(2017) The place of systemic functional linguistics as a linguistic theory in the twenty-first century. In T. Bartlett & G. O’Grady (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of systemic functional linguistics (pp. 11–26). Oxford: Routledge. [3.6]
Bateman, J., & Schmidt, K.-H.
(2012) Multimodal film analysis: How films mean. New York: Routledge. [4.5]
Baten, L.
(1981) Text comprehension. The parameters of difficulty in narrative and expository prose texts: A redefinition of readability. Doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois, Urbana. [5.2]
Baus, M., & Sandig, B.
(1985) Gesprächspsychotherapie und weibliches Selbstkonzept: Sozialpsychologische und linguistische Analyse am Beispiel eines Falles [Conversational psychotherapy and female self-concept: Socio-psychological and linguistic analysis of a case example]. Hildesheim: Olms. [14.7]
Beaugrande, R. A. de, & Dressler, W. U.
(1981) Introduction to text linguistics. London: Longman. [1, 3.5, 3.7, 6.2, 6.3]
Bednarek, M., & Caple, H.
(2012) News discourse. London: Bloomsbury. [14.6]
(2017) The discourse of news values: How news organisations create newsworthiness. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [14.6]Crossref link
Bell, A.
(1991) The language of news media. Oxford: Blackwell. [14.6]
Bell, A., & Garrett, P.
(Eds.) (1998) Approaches to media discourse. Oxford: Blackwell. [14.6]
Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M.
(1987) The psychology of written composition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. [13.5, 13.6]
Berzlánovich, I., & Redeker, G.
(2012) Genre-dependent interaction of coherence and lexical cohesion in written discourse. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 8(1), 183–208. [10.2]Crossref link
Bhatia, V. K.
(1993) Analyzing genre: Language use in professional settings. London: Longman. [4.4, 14.4]
(2017) Critical genre analysis: Investigating interdiscursive performance in professional practice. London: Routledge. [4.4]
Biber, D.
(1989) A typology of English texts. Linguistics, 27, 3–43. [4.2, 10.2]Crossref link
(2006) University language: A corpus-based study on spoken and written registers. Amsterdam: Benjamins. [10.2]Crossref link
Biber, D., Connor, U., & Upton, T. A.
(2007) Discourse on the move: Using corpus analysis to describe discourse structure. Amsterdam: Benjamins. [5.6]Crossref link
Biber, D., & Conrad, S.
(2001) Register variation: A corpus approach. In D. Tannen, H. E. Hamilton & D. Schiffrin (Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 175–196). Oxford: Wiley Blackwell. [8.2]
(2009) Register, genre, and style. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [4.6.3, 8.2, 10.2]Crossref link
Biber, D., & Gray, B.
(2016) Grammatical complexity in academic English: Linguistic change in writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [10.2]Crossref link
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E.
(1999) Longman grammar of spoken and written English. London: Longman. [4.3]
Birner, B., & Ward, G.
(Eds.) (1998) Information status and noncanonical word order in English. Amsterdam: Benjamins. [7.4]Crossref link
Black, E.
(2006) Pragmatic stylistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. [8.6.2]
Blakemore, D. L.
(1992) Understanding utterances. Oxford: Blackwell. [2.5]
Blommaert, J.
(2005) Discourse: A critical introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [1]Crossref link
Boden, D.
(1994) The business of talk: Organizations in action. Cambridge: Polity. [14.2]
Bolinger, D.
(1982) Language, the loaded weapon: The use and abuse of language today. London: Longman. [14.3]
Bosch, P.
(1983) Agreement and anaphora: A study in the role of pronouns in syntax and discourse. London: Academic Press. [6.2.2]
Bourdieu, P.
(1991) Language and symbolic power. Cambridge: Polity. [15.3]
Bousfield, D.
(2008) Impoliteness in interaction. Amsterdam: Benjamins. [2.6]Crossref link
Bousfield, D., & Locher, M. A.
(Eds.) (2008) Impoliteness in language: Studies on its interplay with power in theory and practice. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. [2.6]
Bowe, H., Martin, K., & Manns, H.
(2014) Communication across cultures: Mutual understanding in a global world (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [15.6]
Bradac, J.
(Ed.) (1989) Message effects in communication science. London: Sage. [12.4]
Bransford, J., Barclay, J., & Franks, J.
(1972) Sentence memory: A constructive versus interpretative approach. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 193–209. [13.3]Crossref link
Bransford, J., & Johnson, M.
(1973) Considerations of some problems of comprehension. In W. G. Chase (Ed.), Visual information processing (pp. 383–438). London: Academic Press. [3.7, 4.5, 13.2]Crossref link
Briggs, C.
(Ed.) (1996) Disorderly discourse, narrative conflict and inequality. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [11.5]
Brinton, L.
(1996) Pragmatic markers in English: Grammaticalization and discourse functions. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. [9.5]Crossref link
Britton, B. K., & Black, J. B.
(Eds.) (1985) Understanding expository text: A theoretical and practical handbook for analyzing explanatory text. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. [10.4]
Britton, B. K., & Graesser, A. C.
(Eds.) (1996) Models of understanding text. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. [13.3]
Broek, P. van den, Linzie, B., Fletcher, C., & Marsolek, C.
(2000) The role of causal discourse structure in narrative writing. Memory and Cognition, 28, 711–721. [11.4]Crossref link
Brône, G., & Vandaele, J.
(Eds.) (2009) Cognitive poetics: Goals, gains and gaps. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. [8.6]Crossref link
Brown, G., & Yule, G.
(1983) Discourse analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [1, 3.5, 3.7, 5.3, 6.3, 7.4]Crossref link
Brown, P.
(2017) Politeness and impoliteness. In Y. Huang (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of pragmatics (pp. 383–399). Oxford: Oxford University Press. [2.6]
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C.
(1978/1987) Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [2.6]
Bublitz, W.
(2006) It utterly boggles the mind: Knowledge, common ground and coherence. In H. Pishwa (Ed.), Language and memory: Aspects of knowledge representation (pp. 359–386). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. [6.3]Crossref link
Bublitz, W., Jucker, A. H., & Schneider, K. P.
(Eds.) (2010–) Handbooks of pragmatics (HOPS). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. [3.2]
Bublitz, W., Lenk, U., & Ventola, E.
(Eds.) (1999) Coherence in spoken and written discourse: How to create it and how to describe it. Amsterdam: Benjamins. [6.3]Crossref link
Bucholtz, M., Liang, A., & Sutton, L.
(Eds.) (1999) Reinventing identities: The gendered self in discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [15.4]
Bühler, K.
(1934/2011) Theory of language: The representational function of language (D. F. Goodwin and A. Eschbach, Trans.). Amsterdam: Benjamins. (Original work published 1934) [2.2, 6.2, 7.3]
Bultinck, B.
(2005) Numerous meanings: The meanings of English cardinals and the legacy of Paul Grice. Amsterdam: Elsevier. [2.4]
Burgoon, M.
(1989) Messages and persuasive effects. In J. J. Bradac (Ed.), Message effects in communication science (pp. 129–164). London: Sage. [12.4]
Burke, M.
(Ed.) (2014) The Routledge handbook of stylistics. Oxford: Routledge. [8.6, 8.7]
Caldas-Coulthard, C., & Leeuwen, T. van
(2002) Stunning, shimmering, iridescent: Toys as the representation of gendered social actors. In L. Litosseliti & J. Sunderland (Eds.), Gender identity and discourse analysis (pp. 91–108). Amsterdam: Benjamins. [15.4]Crossref link
Candlin, C. N., & Sarangi, S.
(Eds.) (2011) Handbook of communication in organisations and professions. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. [14.7]Crossref link
Canestrelli, A. R., Mak, W. M., & Sanders, T. J.
(2013) Causal connectives in discourse processing: How differences in subjectivity are reflected in eye movements. Language and Cognitive Processes, 28(9), 1394–1413. [6.5]Crossref link
Canning, P., & Whiteley, S.
(Eds.) (2017) Stylistic approaches to reader response research: Special issue. Language and Literature, 26(2). [8.6]
Cap, P., & Dynel, M.
(Eds.) (2017) Implicitness: From lexis to discourse. Amsterdam: Benjamins. [7.6]Crossref link
Carston, R.
(2002) Thoughts and utterances: The pragmatics of explicit communication. Malden, MA: Blackwell. [2.5]Crossref link
Chafe, W. L.
(1976) Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics and point of view. In C. N. Li (Ed.), Subject and topic (pp. 25–55). New York: Academic Press. [7.4.2]
(1982) Integration and involvement in speaking, writing and oral literature. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Spoken and written language: Exploring orality and literacy (pp. 35–53). Norwood, NJ: Ablex. [4.3]
(1994) Discourse, consciousness, and time: The flow and displacement of conscious experience in speaking and writing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. [13.5]
Chandler, D.
(2017) Semiotics: The basics (3rd ed.). London: Routledge. [3.2]
Chapman, S., & Clark, B.
(Eds.) (2014) Pragmatic literary stylistics. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. [8.6]Crossref link
Cherny, L.
(1999) Conversation and community: Chat in a virtual world. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications. [4.6]
Chilton, P.
(2004) Analysing political discourse: Theory and practice. London: Routledge. [14.3]
Chilton, P., & Schäffner, C.
(Eds.) (2002) Politics as text and talk: Analytical approaches to political discourse. Amsterdam: Benjamins. [14.3]Crossref link
(2011) Discourse and politics. In T. A. van Dijk (Ed.), Discourse studies: A multidisciplinary introduction (pp. 303–330). London: Sage. [14.3]Crossref link
Clark, B.
(2013) Relevance theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [2.4, 2.5]Crossref link
Clark, H. H.
(1996) Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [3.4, 9.5]Crossref link
(1997) Dogmas of understanding. Discourse Processes, 23, 567–598. [13.3]Crossref link
Clark, H. H., & Haviland, S. E.
(1977) Comprehension and the given-new contract. In R. O. Freedle (Ed.), Discourse production and comprehension (pp. 1–40). Norwood, NJ: Ablex. [7.4]
Clark, U.
(1996) An introduction to stylistics. Cheltenham: Stanley Thornes. [8.2]
Clayman, S. E., & Gill, V. T.
(2014) Conversation analysis. In J. P. Gee & M. Handford (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 120–134). London: Routledge. [9.2]
Clift, R.
(2014) Conversation analysis. In K. P. Schneider & A. Barron (Eds.), Pragmatics of discourse (pp. 97–124). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. [9.1, 9.2, 9.3]Crossref link
(2016) Conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [9.2]Crossref link
Coates, J. & Pichler, P.
(Ed.) (2011) Language and gender: A reader (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell. [15.4]
Cook, G.
(1989) Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [1, 2.4]
Costermans, J., & Fayol, M.
(2014) Processing interclausal relationships: Studies in the production and comprehension of text. London: Psychology Press. [6.5]
Coulthard, M.
(1985) An introduction to discourse analysis. London: Longman. [1]
Coulthard, M., Johnson, A., & Wright, D.
(2017) An introduction to forensic linguistics: Language in evidence. London: Routledge. [14.4]
Couper-Kuhlen, E., & Kortmann, B.
(Eds.) (2000) Cause, condition, concession, contrast: Cognitive and discourse perspectives. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. [6.3]Crossref link
Crystal, D.
(2005) The stories of English. London: Penguin. [7.3]
(2006) Language and the internet (2nd ed.). Cambridge: University Press. [4.3, 4.6, 4.6.1, 4.6.3]Crossref link
(2008) Txtng: The gr8 db8. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [4.6.3]
(2011) Internet linguistics: A student guide. London: Routledge. [4.6]
Crystal, D., & Davy, D.
(1969) Investigating English style. London: Longman. [8.4]
Culpeper, J.
(2001) Language and characterisation: People in plays and other texts. London: Longman. [8.6.3]
(2011) Impoliteness: Using language to cause offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [2.6]Crossref link
Cutting, J.
(2008) Pragmatics and discourse: A resource book for students (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. [2.5]
Dancygier, B., & Sweetser, E.
(2014) Figurative language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [8.6]
Daneš, F.
(1974) Functional sentence perspective and the organization of the text. In F. Daneš (Ed.), Papers on functional sentence perspective (pp. 106–128). Prague: Academia. [5.3]
Das, D., & Taboada, M.
(2017) Signalling of coherence relations in discourse, beyond discourse markers. Discourse Processes, 1–29. [6.4]Crossref link
Davis, B., & Brewer, J.
(1997) Electronic discourse: Linguistic individuals in virtual space. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press. [4.6]
Davison, A., & Green, A. M.
(Eds.) (1988) Linguistic complexity and text comprehension: Readability issues reconsidered. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. [10.3]
Davison, A., & Kantor, R.
(1982) On the failure of readability formulas to define readable texts: A case study from adaptations. Reading Research Quarterly, 17, 187–209. [10.6]Crossref link
De Fina, A., & Georgakopoulou, A.
(2011) Analyzing narrative: Discourse and sociolinguistic perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [11.3]Crossref link
(Eds.) (2015) The handbook of narrative analysis. Malden, MA: Blackwell. [11.3]Crossref link
Delin, J., & Bateman, J.
(2002) Describing and critiquing multimodal documents. Document Design, 3, 141–155. [4.5]Crossref link
Dennis, E., & Merrill, J.
(2002) Media debates: Issues in mass communication (3rd ed.). White Plains, NY: Longman. [14.6]
Di Blas, N., & Paolini, P.
(2003) There and back again: What happens to phoric elements in a ‘web dialogue’. Document Design, 4, 194–206. [6.2]Crossref link
Diederich, P. B., French, J. W., & Carlton, S. T.
(1961) Factors in judgments of writing ability. ETS Research Bulletin Series, 2, 1–93. [10.5]
Dijk, T. A. van
(1977) Text and context: Explorations in the semantics and pragmatics of discourse. London: Longman. [3.5]
(1980) Macrostructures: An interdisciplinary study of global structures in discourse, interaction and cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. [5.4, 5.5]
(1984) Prejudice in discourse: An analysis of ethnic prejudice in cognition and conversation. Amsterdam: Benjamins. [15.5]Crossref link
(1988) News analysis: Case studies of international and national news in the press. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. [14.6]
(1993) Elite discourse and racism. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. [15.5]Crossref link
(1996) Discourse, power and access. In C. Caldas-Coulthard & M. Coulthard (Eds.), Texts and practices: Readings in critical discourse analysis (pp. 84–104). London: Routledge. [15.3]
(1998) Ideology. London: Sage. [15.3]
(2008) Discourse and context: A sociocognitive approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [7.2]Crossref link
(Ed.) (2011) Discourse studies: A multidisciplinary introduction (2nd ed.). London: Sage. [1]Crossref link
(2014a) Discourse and knowledge. In J. P. Gee & M. Handford (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 587–603). New York: Routledge. [13.2, 13.4]
(2014b) Discourse and knowledge: A sociocognitive approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [15.5]Crossref link
(2018) Socio-cognitive discourse studies. In J. Flowerdew (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of critical discourse studies (pp. 26–43). New York: Routledge. [15.3]
Dillon, G. L.
(1981) Constructing texts: Elements of a theory of composition and style. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. [10.5]
Dimter, M.
(1981) Textklassenkonzepte heutiger Alltagssprache: Kommunikationssituation, Textfunktion und Textinhalt als Kategorien alltagssprachlicher Textklassifikation [Text classification concepts of current colloquial language: Communication situation, text function and text content as categories for text classification of colloquial language]. Tübingen: Niemeyer. [4.2]Crossref link
Donahue, C., & Lillis, T.
(2014) Models of writing and text production. In E.-M. Jakobs & D. Perrin (Eds.), Handbook of writing and text production (pp. 55–78). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. [13.5]Crossref link
Dorgeloh, H.
(2005) Patterns of agentivity and narrativity in early science discourse. In J. Skaffari, M. Peikola, R. Carroll, R. Hiltunen & B. Wårvik (Eds.), Opening windows on texts and discourses of the past (pp. 83–94). Amsterdam: Benjamins. [10.2]Crossref link
Doury, M.
(2009) Argument schemes typologies in practice: The case of comparative arguments. In F. H. van Eemeren & B. Garssen (Eds.), Pondering on problems of argumentation (pp. 141–156). Dordrecht: Springer. [12.5]Crossref link
Downs, C., & Goldhaber, G.
(1994) International Communication Association audit. In R. Rubin, P. Palmgreen & H. Sypher (Eds.), Communication research measures: A sourcebook (pp. 193–205). New York: Guilford. [10.6]
Drew, P., & Heritage, J.
(Eds.) (1992) Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [14.2]
Duchan, J. F., Bruder, G. A., & Hewitt, L. E.
(Eds.) (1995) Deixis in narrative: A cognitive science perspective. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. [7.3]
Duffy, T.
(1985) Readability formulas: What’s the use? In T. Duffy & R. Waller (Eds.), Designing usable texts (pp. 113–143). Orlando, FL: Academic Press. [10.3]Crossref link
Duranti, A.
(Ed.) (2009) Linguistic anthropology: A reader (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press. [15.2]
Duranti, A., & Goodwin, C.
(Eds.) (1992) Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [3.5]
Dušková, L.
(2015) From syntax to text: The Janus face of functional sentence perspective. Prague: Karolinum Press. [5.3]
Duszak, A.
(Ed.) (1997) Culture and styles of academic discourse. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. [14.2]Crossref link
Eckert, P., & McConnell-Ginet, S.
(2013) Language and gender (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [15.4]Crossref link
Eco, U.
(1966) The narrative structure in Fleming. In U. Eco & O. Del Buono (Eds.), The Bond affair. London: McDonald. [11.2]
Edmondson, W. J.
(1981) Spoken discourse: A model for analysis. London: Longman. [9.4]
Eelen, G.
(2001) A critique of politeness theories. Manchester: St. Jerome Publishing. [2.6]
Eemeren, F. H. van
(Ed.) (2002) Advances in pragma-dialectics. Amsterdam: Sic Sat. [12.3]
(Ed.) (2017) Prototypical argumentative patterns: Exploring the relationship between argumentative discourse and institutional context. Amsterdam: Benjamins. [12.3]Crossref link
Eemeren, F. H. van, Garssen, B., Krabbe, E. C. W., Snoeck Henkemans, A. F., Verheij, B., & Wagemans, J. H. M.
(2014) Handbook of argumentation theory. Dordrecht: Springer. [12.1, 12.2, 12.3]Crossref link
Eemeren, F. H. van, & Grootendorst, R.
(1994) Studies in pragma-dialectics. Amsterdam: Sic Sat. [12.3]
Eemeren, F. H. van, Grootendorst, R., Blair, J. A., & Willard, C. A.
(Eds.) (1999) Proceedings of the 4th international conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation. Amsterdam: Sic Sat. [12.3]
Eemeren, F. H. van, Grootendorst, R., & Snoeck Henkemans, F.
(1996) Fundamentals of argumentation theory: A handbook of historical backgrounds and contemporary developments. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. [12.2]
Eemeren, F. H. van, Grootendorst, R., & Snoeck Henkemans, A. F.
(2002) Argumentation: Analysis, evaluation, presentation. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [12.3]
Ehlich, K.
(Ed.) (1980) Erzählen im Alltag [Narrating in everyday life]. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. [11.3]
(1995) The discourse of business negotiation. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. [14.2]Crossref link
Ehlich, K., & Wagner, J.
(Eds.) (1995) The discourse of business communication. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. [12.5]
Ehrlich, S.
(1980) Comprehension of pronouns. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 247–255. [6.2.2]Crossref link
Ehrlich, S., Meyerhoff, M., & Holmes, J.
(Eds.) (2014) The handbook of language, gender, and sexuality (2nd ed.). Malden, MA: Blackwell. [15.4]Crossref link
Eisenlauer, V.
(2013) A critical hypertext analysis of social media: The true colours of Facebook. London: Continuum. [4.6.2, 4.6.3]
Emmott, C., Alexander, M., & Marszalek, A.
(2014) Schema theory in stylistics. In M. Burke (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of stylistics (pp. 268–283). Oxford: Routledge. [8.6.3]
Enkvist, N. E.
(1973) Linguistic stylistics. The Hague: Mouton. [8.3]Crossref link
Epstein, J.
(1995) Altered conditions: Disease, medicine, and storytelling. New York: Routledge. [14.7]
Esser, J.
(2014) Taxonomies of discourse types. In K. P. Schneider & A. Barron (Eds.), Pragmatics of discourse (pp. 443–462). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. [4.2]Crossref link
Everett, C.
(2013) Linguistic relativity: Evidence across languages and cognitive domains. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. [15.2]Crossref link
Eysenck, M. W.
(2012) Fundamentals of cognition (2nd ed.). Hove: Psychology Press. [13.5]
Eysenck, M. W., & Keane, M. T.
(2015) Cognitive psychology: A student’s handbook (7th ed.). London: Psychology Press. [13.2, 13.4, 13.5, 15.2]
Fairclough, N.
(1995/2013) Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. [15.3]
(1992/2015) Language and power (3rd ed.). London: Routledge. [3.7, 15.3]
Fairclough, I., & Fairclough, N.
(2012) Political discourse analysis: A method for advanced students. London: Routledge. [14.3]
Fang, Y.-J.
(2001) Reporting the same events? A critical analysis of Chinese print news media texts. Discourse & Society, 12, 585–613. [14.6]Crossref link
Fauconnier, G.
(1997) Mappings in thought and language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [13.2]Crossref link
Fetzer, A.
(2012) Contexts in interaction: Relating pragmatic wastebaskets. In R. Finkbeiner, J. Meibauer & P. B. Schumacher (Eds.), What is a context? Linguistic approaches and challenges (pp. 105–127). Amsterdam: Benjamins. [7.2]Crossref link
(2017) Context. In Y. Huang (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of pragmatics (pp. 259–276). Oxford: Oxford University Press. [7.2]
Fetzer, A., & Meierkord, C.
(Eds.) (2002) Rethinking sequentiality: Linguistics meets conversational interaction. Amsterdam: Benjamins. [9.5]Crossref link
Fetzer, A., & Oishi, E.
(Eds.) (2011) Context and contexts. Amsterdam: Benjamins. [7.2]Crossref link
Field, J.
(2003) Psycholinguistics: A resource book for students. London: Routledge. [13.5]
Fillenbaum, S.
(1974) Pragmatic normalization: Further results for some conjunctive and disjunctive sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 87, 93–98. [13.3]Crossref link
Finkbeiner, R., Meibauer, J., & Schumacher, P.
(Eds.) (2012) What is a context? Linguistic approaches and challenges. Amsterdam: Benjamins. [7.2]Crossref link
Firbas, J.
(1992) Functional sentence perspective in written and spoken communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [5.3]Crossref link
Fiske, J.
(2011) Introduction to communication studies (3rd ed.) London: Routledge. [3.4]
Flesch, R.
(1962) The art of readable writing. New York: Wiley. [10.3]
Flowerdew, J., Li, D., & Tran, S.
(2002) Discriminatory news discourse: Some Hong Kong data. Discourse & Society, 13, 319–345. [15.5]Crossref link
Flowerdew, J., & Mahlberg, M.
(Eds.) (2009) Lexical cohesion and corpus linguistics. Amsterdam: Benjamins. [6.2]Crossref link
Flowerdew, J., & Richardson, J. E.
(Eds.) (2018) The Routledge handbook of critical discourse studies. London: Routledge. [1, 15.3]
Ford, C.
(1986) Overlapping relations in text structure. In S. DeLancey & R. Tomlin (Eds.), Proceedings of the second annual meeting of the Pacific Linguistics Conference (pp. 107–123). Oregon: University of Oregon. [6.5]
(1993) Grammar in interaction: Adverbial clauses in American English conversations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [6.3]Crossref link
Fowler, H. N.
(1977) Plato in twelve volumes: Vol. 4. Cratilus, Parmenides, Greater Hippias, Lesser Hippias. London: Heinemann. [2.2]
Fowler, R.
(1991) Language in the news: Discourse and ideology in the press. London: Routledge. [7.5]
Fowler, R., Hodge, R., Kress, G., & Trew, T.
(1979) Language and control. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. [15.3]
Fox, B. A.
(1987) Discourse structure and anaphora: Written and conversational English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [6.2]Crossref link
Frank, A. W.
(2013) The wounded storyteller: Body, illness, and ethics (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. [14.7]
Freeman, M. H.
(2014) Cognitive poetics. In M. Burke (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of stylistics (pp. 313–328). Oxford: Routledge. [8.6.3]
Frehner, C.
(2008) E-Mail – SMS – MMS: The linguistic creativity of asynchronous discourse in the New Media Age. Bern: Peter Lang. [4.6.3]
Gabriel, Y.
(2015) Narratives and stories in organizational life. In A. de Fina & A. Georgakopoulou (Eds.), The handbook of narrative analysis (pp. 275–292). Malden, MA: Blackwell. [11.5]
Gardiner, A.
(1969) The theory of speech and language (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. [2.2]
Gee, J. P.
(2014) An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method. (4th ed.). London: Routledge. [1]
Gee, J. P., & Handford, M.
(Eds.) (2014) The Routledge handbook of discourse analysis. Oxford: Routledge. [1]
Geeraerts, D., & Cuyckens, H.
(Eds.) (2007) The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [13.2]
Geis, M.
(1987) The language of politics. New York: Springer. [14.3]Crossref link
Genette, G.
(1980) Narrative discourse: An essay in method. Oxford: Blackwell. [7.5]
Georgakopoulou, A.
(2006) Small and large identities in narrative (inter)action. In A. de Fina, D. Schiffrin & M. Bamberg (Eds.), Discourse and identity (pp. 83–102). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [11.3]Crossref link
(2007) Small stories, interaction and identities. Amsterdam: Benjamins. [11.3]Crossref link
(2015) Small stories research: Methods – analysis – outreach. In A. de Fina & A. Georgakopoulou (Eds.), Handbook of narrative analysis (pp. 255–271). Malden, MA: Blackwell. [11.3]
Georgakopoulou, A., & Goutsos, D.
(2004) Discourse analysis: An introduction (2nd ed.). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. [1]
Gernsbacher, M. A.
(1990) Language comprehension as structure building. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. [13.3]Crossref link
Gernsbacher, M. A., & Givón, T.
(Eds.) (1995) Coherence in spontaneous text. Amsterdam: Benjamins. [13.3]Crossref link
Ghadessy, M.
(Ed.) (1993) Register analysis: Theory and practice. London: Pinter. [8.2]
Gibbons, J.
(Ed.) (1994) Language and the law. London: Longman. [14.4]
(2003) Forensic linguistics: An introduction to language in the justice system. Malden, MA: Blackwell. [14.4]
Giltrow, J.
(2010) Genre as difference: The sociality of linguistic variation. In H. Dorgeloh & A. Wanner (Eds.), Syntactic variation and genre (pp. 29–51). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. [4.4]Crossref link
(2017) Bridge to genre: Spanning technological change. In C. R. Miller & A. R. Kelly (Eds.), Emerging genres in new media environments (pp. 39–61). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. [4.4]Crossref link
Giltrow, J., & Stein, D.
(Eds.) (2009) Genres in the internet. Amsterdam: Benjamins. [4.6.3]Crossref link
Givón, T.
(1989) Mind, code and context: Essays in pragmatics. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. [5.3]
(2005) Context as other minds. Amsterdam: Benjamins. [7.2]Crossref link
Glenberg, A. M.
(2002) The indexical hypothesis: Meaning from language, world, and image. In N. Allen (Ed.), Working with words and images: New steps in an old dance (pp. 27–42). Westport, CT: Ablex. [4.5]
Goatly, A.
(2000) Critical reading and writing: An introductory coursebook. London: Routledge. [1]
Goddard, A., & Patterson, L.
(2000) Language and gender. London: Routledge. [15.4]
Goetz, E., Anderson, R., & Schallert, D.
(1981) The representation of sentences in memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20, 369–385. [13.3]Crossref link
Goffman, E.
(1956) The presentation of self in everyday life. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh Press. [2.6]
(1967) On face-work: An analysis of ritual elements in social interaction. In E. Goffman (Ed.), Interaction ritual: Essays in face-to face behavior (pp. 5–45). Chicago: Aldine. [2.6]
(1974) Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. New York: Harper & Row. [13.3]
(1981) Forms of talk. Oxford: Blackwell. [2.6]
Graesser, A. C., & Bower, G. H.
(Eds.) (1990) Inferences and text comprehension. New York: Academic Press. [7.6]
Graesser, A. C., Gernsbacher, M. A., & Goldman, S. R.
(Eds.) (2003) Handbook of discourse processes. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. [13.3]
Graesser, A. C., McNamara, D. S., Louwerse, M. M., & Cai, Z.
(2004) Coh-metrix: Analysis of text on cohesion and language. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 36(2), 193–202. [13.4]
Graumann, C. F., & Kallmeyer, W.
(Eds.) (2002) Perspective and perspectivation in discourse. Amsterdam: Benjamins. [7.5]Crossref link
Green, G. M.
(1996) Pragmatics and natural language understanding (2nd ed.). New York: Erlbaum. [3.2]
Grice, H. P.
(1975) Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics: Vol. 3. Speech acts (pp. 41–58). New York: Academic Press. [2.4]
(1989) Studies in the way of words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. [2.4]
Grimes, J. E.
(1975) The thread of discourse. The Hague: Mouton. [6.3]Crossref link
Grosz, B., & Sidner, C.
(1986) Attention, intention and the structure of discourse. Computational Linguistics, 12, 175–204. [6.5]
Gruber, H., & Redeker, G.
(2014) (Eds.). The pragmatics of discourse coherence: Theories and applications. Amsterdam: Benjamins. [6.3]Crossref link
Grundy, P.
(2008) Doing pragmatics (3rd ed.). Oxford: Routledge. [2.5, 3.2]
Gumperz, J.
(1982) Discourse strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [15.6]Crossref link
Gumperz, J., & Levinson, S. C.
(Eds.) (1996) Rethinking linguistic relativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [15.2]
Gunnarsson, B. L.
(1984) Functional comprehensibility of legislative texts: Experiments with a Swedish act of parliament. Text, 4, 71–105. [10.6]Crossref link
(1989) Text comprehensibility and the writing process: The case of law and lawmaking. Written Communication, 6, 86–107. [14.4]Crossref link
Habermas, J.
(1981) Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. Bd. 1. Handlungsrationalität und gesellschaftliche Rationalisierung [The theory of communicative action: Vol. 1. Reason and the rationalization of society]. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. [2.2]
Haiman, J., & Thompson, S.
(Eds.) (1988) Clause combining in grammar and discourse. Amsterdam: Benjamins. [6.3]Crossref link
Halliday, M. A. K.
(1978) Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. London: Arnold. [3.6, 8.2]
(2014) Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar (4th ed.), revised by C. M. I. M. Matthiessen. London: Routledge. [3.5, 3.6, 6.2, 15.3]
Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R.
(1976) Cohesion in English. London: Longman. [6.2.1]
(1985) Language, context, and text: Aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective. Victoria: Deakin University. [3.6]
Halliday, M. A. K., & Webster, J. J.
(2014) Text linguistics: The how and why of meaning. Sheffield: Equinox. [3.6, 6.2]
Hamilton, M., Hunter, J., & Burgoon, M.
(1990) An empirical test of an axiomatic model of the relationship between language intensity and persuasion. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 9, 235–255. [8.4]Crossref link
Hargie, O., Tourish, D., & Wilson, N.
(2002) Communication audits and the effects of increased information: A follow-up study. Journal of Business Communication, 39, 414–436. [10.6]Crossref link
Harley, T. A.
(2014) The psychology of language: From data to theory (4th ed.). London: Psychology Press. [13.2]
Harris, Z.
(1952) Discourse analysis. Language, 28, 1–30. [1, 15.3]Crossref link
Hart, C., & Cap, P.
(Eds.) (2014) Contemporary critical discourse studies. London: Bloomsbury. [15.3]
Have, P. ten
(2007) Doing conversation analysis: A practical guide (2nd ed.). London: Sage. [9.2]Crossref link
Haviland, S. E., & Clark, H. H.
(1974) What’s new? Acquiring new information as a process in comprehension. Journal of Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13, 512–521. [7.6.2]Crossref link
Hayes, J. R.
(1996) A new framework for understanding cognition and affect in writing. In C. M. Levy & S. Ransdell (Eds.), The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences, and applications (pp. 1–27). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. [13.5]
(2012) Modeling and remodeling writing. Written Communication, 29(3), 369–388. [13.5]Crossref link
Hayes, J. R., & Flower, L. S.
(1986) Writing research and the writer. American Psychologist, 41, 1106–1113. [13.5, 13.6]Crossref link
Heisler, T.
(1996) OK, a dynamic discourse marker in Montreal French. In J. Arnold, R. Blake, B. Davidson, S. Schwenter & J. Solomon (Eds.), Sociolinguistic variation: Data, theory and analysis (pp. 293–312). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications. [9.5]
Hellinger, M., & Bußmann, H.
(Eds.) (2003) Gender across languages: The linguistic representation of women and men (3 vols.). Amsterdam: Benjamins. [15.4]Crossref link
Heritage, J., & Clayman, S.
(2010) Talk in action: Interactions, identities, and institutions. Chichester: Blackwell. [9.3]Crossref link
Herman, D.
(2009) Basic elements of narrative. Oxford: Blackwell. [11.4]Crossref link
Herring, S.
(1996) Computer-mediated communication: Linguistic, social, and cross-cultural perspectives. Amsterdam: Benjamins. [4.6]Crossref link
Herring, S., & Androutsopoulos, J.
(2015) Computer-mediated discourse 2.0. In D. Tannen, H. E. Hamilton & D. Schiffrin (Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis (2nd ed.) (pp. 127–151). Oxford: Wiley Blackwell. [4.6.1]
Herring, S., Stein, D., & Virtanen, T.
(Eds.) (2013) Pragmatics of computer-mediated communication. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. [4.6]Crossref link
Heyd, T.
(2008) Email hoaxes: Form, function, genre ecology. Amsterdam: Benjamins. [4.6]Crossref link
Hicks, D.
(Ed.) (1996) Discourse, learning, and schooling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [14.2]Crossref link
Hillocks, G.
(1986) Research on written composition: New directions for teaching. New York: NCRE. [13.5]
Hodge, R., & Kress, G.
(1993) Language as ideology (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. [15.3]
Hoeken, H.
(2001) Convincing citizens: The role of argument quality. In D. Janssen & R. Neutelings (Eds.), Reading and writing public documents (pp. 147–169). Amsterdam: Benjamins. [12.5]Crossref link
Hoey, M.
(1983) On the surface of discourse. London: Allen & Unwin. [5.3, 6.3]
(1991) Patterns of lexis in text. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [5.6]
(2001) Textual interaction: An introduction to written discourse analysis. London: Routledge. [1]
Hoffmann, C. R.
(Ed.) (2010) Narrative revisited: Telling a story in the age of new media. Amsterdam: Benjamins. [11.3]Crossref link
(2012) Cohesive profiling: Meaning and interaction in personal weblogs. Amsterdam: Benjamins. [4.6.3, 6.2.1]Crossref link
Hoffmann, C. R., & Bublitz, W.
(Eds.) (2017) Pragmatics of social media. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. [4.6]Crossref link
Hoffmann, L.
(1983) Kommunikation vor Gericht [Communication before the court]. Tübingen: Narr. [14.4]
Hofstede, G.
(2001) Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). London: Sage. [15.6]
Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M.
(2010) Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill. [15.6]
Holstein, J., & Gubrium, J.
(Eds.) (2012) Varieties of narrative analysis. London: Sage. [11.3]Crossref link
Hosman, L., Huebner, T., & Siltanen, S.
(2002) The impact of power-of-speech style, argument strength, and need for cognition on impression formation, cognitive responses, and persuasion. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 21, 361–379. [12.5]Crossref link
Hovy, E., & Scott, D.
(Eds.) (1996) Computational and conversational discourse: Burning issues: An interdisciplinary account. Berlin: Springer. [6.5]Crossref link
Huang, Y.
(2014) Pragmatics (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. [2.4, 3.2, 7.2, 7.3, 7.6.1]
Humboldt, W. von
(1836) Ueber die Verschiedenheit des menschlichen Sprachbaues und ihren Einfluss auf die geistige Entwicklung des Menschengeschlechts (Bd. 7) [On the variety of human language construction and its influence on the mental development of mankind (Vol. 7)]. Berlin: Königliche Akademie der Wissenschaften. [8.2, 15.2]
Hunt, K. W.
(1970) Syntactic maturity in schoolchildren and adults. Monographs of the society for research in child development, 35, 1–67. [13.6]Crossref link
Hutchby, I., & Wooffitt, R.
(2008) Conversation analysis (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Polity Press. [9.2, 9.4]
Hyland, K.
(2005) Metadiscourse. London: Continuum. [10.2]
(2009) Academic discourse: English in a global context. London: Continuum. [10.2]
Hymes, D.
(1972) Models of the interaction of language and social life. In J. J. Gumperz & D. Hymes (Eds.), Directions in sociolinguistics: The ethnography of communication (pp. 35–71). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. [3.5]
Jackson, J.
(Ed.) (2012) The Routledge handbook of language and intercultural communication. London: Routledge. [15.6]
(2014) Introducing language and intercultural communication. London: Routledge. [15.6]
Jakobs, E.-M., & Perrin, D.
(Eds.) (2014) Handbook of writing and text production. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. [13.5]Crossref link
Jakobson, R.
(1960) Closing statement: Linguistics and poetics. In T. A. Sebeok (Ed.), Style in language (pp. 350–377). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. [4.2, 8.5]
Jansen, C., & Steehouder, M.
(2001) How research can lead to better government forms. In D. Janssen & R. Neutelings (Eds.), Reading and writing public documents (pp. 12–36). Amsterdam: Benjamins. [14.5]Crossref link
Janssen, D., & Neutelings, R.
(Eds.) (2001) Reading and writing public documents. Amsterdam: Benjamins. [14.5]Crossref link
Jarvella, R.
(1971) Syntactic processing of connected speech. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 10, 409–416. [13.3]Crossref link
Jaworski, A.
(Ed.) (1997) Silence: Interdisciplinary perspectives. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. [9.3]Crossref link
Jaworski, A., & Coupland, N.
(2014) The discourse reader (3rd ed.). London: Routledge. [1]
Jefferson, G.
(1978) Sequential aspects of storytelling in conversation. In J. Schenkein (Ed.), Studies in the organization of conversational interaction (pp. 219–248). New York: Academic Press. [9.2]Crossref link
Jeffries, L., & McIntyre, D.
(2010) Stylistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [8.4, 8.6]Crossref link
Jespersen, O.
(1924/2007) The philosophy of grammar. London: Allen & Unwin. [2.2]
Johnson-Laird, P. N.
(1983) Mental models: Towards a cognitive science of language, inference, and consciousness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [3.7, 13.2]
Johnstone, B.
(2016) ‘Oral versions of personal experience’: Labovian narrative analysis and its uptake. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 20(4), 542–560. [11.3]Crossref link
(2018) Discourse analysis (3rd ed.). Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons. [1.1, 3.5, 3.7]
Jonassen, D.
(1982) Advance organizers in text. In D. Jonassen (Ed.), The technology of text (pp. 253–275). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology. [5.5]
Jones, J. G., & Simons, H. W.
(2017) Persuasion in society (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge. [12.5]
Jones, R. H.
(2012) Discourse analysis: A resource book for students. Oxford: Routledge. [1]
Jones, S.
(Ed.) (1995) Cybersociety: Computer-mediated communication and community. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. [4.6]
Jong, M. de, & Schellens, P.
(1997) Reader-focused text-evaluation: An overview of goals and methods. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 11, 402–432. [10.4]Crossref link
Jucker, A.
(2002) Hypertextlinguistics: Textuality and typology of hypertexts. In A. Fischer, G. Tottie & H. M. Lehmann (Eds.), Text types and corpora: Studies in honour of Udo Fries (pp. 29–51). Tübingen: Narr. [4.6.2]
Jucker, A., & Smith, S.
(1998) And people just you know like ‘wow’: Discourse markers as negotiating strategies. In A. Jucker & Y. Ziv (Eds.), Discourse markers: Descriptions and theory (pp. 171–202). Amsterdam: Benjamins. [9.5]Crossref link
Jucker, A., & Taavitsainen, I.
(2013) English historical pragmatics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. [7.3]
Jucker, A., & Ziv, Y.
(Eds.) (1998) Discourse markers: Descriptions and theory. Amsterdam: Benjamins. [9.5]Crossref link
Jurafsky, D., & Martin, J.
(2008) Speech and language processing: An introduction to natural language processing, computational linguistics and speech recognition (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. [6.2, 13.4]
Kádár, D. Z., & Haugh, M.
(2013) Understanding politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [2.6]Crossref link
Kallmeyer, W., et al.
(1980) Lektürekolleg zur Textlinguistik. Bd. 1. Einführung [Lecture on text linguistics: Vol. 1. Introduction]. Königstein: Athenäum. [6.2]
Katz Bourns, S., & Myers, L.
(Eds.) (2014) Perspectives on linguistic structure and context. Amsterdam: Benjamins. [7.4]Crossref link
Kennedy, G. A.
(1994) A new history of classical rhetoric. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. [8.2]
Kent, T.
(Ed.) (1999) Post-process theory: Beyond the writing-process paradigm. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press. [13.6]
Kintsch, W.
(1988) The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 95, 163–182. [13.4]Crossref link
(1998) Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [5.2, 13.4]
Kintsch, W., & Dijk, T. A. van
(1978) Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological review, 85, 363–394. [13.3, 13.4]Crossref link
Kintsch, W., & Vipond, D.
(1979) Reading comprehension and readability in educational practice and psychological theory. In L. G. Nilsson (Ed.), Perspectives on memory research (pp. 329–365). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. [5.2, 10.3]
Kirsch, G., & Roen, D. H.
(1990) A sense of audience in written communication. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. [13.5]
Klein-Braley, C.
(1982) On the suitability of cloze tests as measures of reading comprehension. Toegepaste Taalwetenschap in Artikelen, 13, 49–61. [10.4]Crossref link
Knott, A.
(1993) Using cue phrases to determine a set of rhetorical relations. In O. Rambow (Ed.), Intentionality and structure in discourse relations: Proceedings of the ACL SIGGEN Workshop (pp. 48–51). Columbus: Ohio State University. [6.5]
Knott, A., & Sanders, T.
(1998) The classification of coherence relations and their linguistic markers: An exploration of two languages. Journal of Pragmatics, 30, 135–175. [6.5]Crossref link
Koenig, J.-P.
(Ed.) (1998) Discourse and cognition: Bridging the gap. Stanford, CA: CSLI. [13.3]
Koester, A.
(2010) Workplace discourse. London: Continuum. [14.1, 14.2]
Koller, V.
(2008) Lesbian discourses: Images of a community. New York: Routledge. [15.4]
König, E., & Pfister, M.
(2017) Literary analysis and linguistics. Berlin: Erich Schmidt. [8.5]
Kotthoff, H., & Spencer-Oatey, H.
(Eds.) (2007) Handbook of intercultural communication. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. [15.6]Crossref link
Kress, G.
(1989) Linguistic processes in sociocultural practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [3.6, 6.2]
(2010) Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. London: Routledge. [4.5]
Kress, G., & Leeuwen, T. van
(2001) Multimodal discourse: The modes and media of contemporary communication. London: Arnold. [4.5]
(2006) Reading images: The grammar of visual design (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. [4.5]
Krieken, K. van, & Sanders, J.
(2017) Framing narrative journalism as a new genre: A case study of the Netherlands. Journalism, 18(10), 1364–1380. [11.3]Crossref link
Kuno, S.
(1987) Functional syntax: Anaphora, discourse and empathy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. [7.5]
Kuppevelt, J. van
(1995) Discourse structure, topicality and questioning. Journal of Linguistics, 31, 109–147. [4.3]Crossref link
Kurzon, D.
(1998) Discourse of silence. Amsterdam: Benjamins. [9.3]Crossref link
Kyratzis, A.
(1999) Narrative identity: Preschoolers’ self-construction through narrative in friendship group dramatic play. Narrative Inquiry, 9, 427–455. [11.5]Crossref link
Labov, W.
(1972) Language in the inner city: Studies in the Black English vernacular. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. [11.3]
(2013) The language of life and death: The transformation of experience in oral narrative. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [11.3]Crossref link
Labov, W., & Waletzky, J.
(1967) Narrative analysis: Oral versions of personal experience. In J. Helm (Ed.), Essays on the verbal and visual arts (pp. 12–44). Seattle: University of Washington Press. [11.3]
Lakoff, G.
(1987) Women, fire and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. [15.2]Crossref link
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
(1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. [8.6.3]
Lakoff, R. T.
(1975/2004) Language and woman’s place: Text and commentaries (revised and expanded ed.), edited by Mary Bucholtz. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [15.4]
Lambrou, M.
(2014) Stylistics, conversation analysis and the cooperative principle. In M. Burke (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of stylistics (pp. 136–154). Oxford: Routledge. [8.6.2]
Langacker, R. W.
(2002) Concept, image, and symbol: The cognitive basis of grammar (2nd ed.). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. [13.2]
(2008) Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [13.2]Crossref link
Lanham, R. A.
(1991) A handlist of rhetorical terms (2nd ed.). Berkeley: University of California Press. [8.2]
Lasswell, H.
(1948) The structure and function of communication in society. In L. Bryson (Ed.), The communication of ideas. New York: Harper and Row. [12.4]
Lavendera, B.
(1988) The study of language in its socio-cultural context. In F. J. Newmeyer (Ed.), Linguistics: The Cambridge Survey. Vol. 4. Language: The socio-cultural context (pp. 1–13). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [15.6]
Leap, W. L.
(2015) Queer linguistics as critical discourse analysis. In D. Tannen, H. E. Hamilton & D. Schiffrin (Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis (2nd ed.) (pp. 661–680). Oxford: Wiley Blackwell. [15.4]
Leech, G.
(1983) Principles of pragmatics. London: Longman. [2.4, 2.6, 3.2]
(2008) Language in literature: Style and foregrounding. London: Routledge. [8.5]
(2014) The pragmatics of politeness. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [2.6]Crossref link
Leeuwen, T. van
(1996) The representation of social actors. In C. Caldas-Coulthard & M. Coulthard (Eds.), Texts and practices: Readings in critical discourse analysis (pp. 32–70). London: Routledge. [15.3]
(2005) Introducing social semiotics. London: Routledge. [4.5]
(2015) Multimodality. In D. Tannen, H. E. Hamilton & D. Schiffrin (Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis (2nd ed.) (pp. 447–465). Oxford: Wiley Blackwell. [4.5]
Lentz, L., & Pander Maat, H.
(Eds.) (1997) Discourse analysis and evaluation: Functional approaches. Amsterdam: Rodopi. [10.5]
Levelt, W. J. M.
(1982) Cognitive styles in the use of spatial direction terms. In R. J. Jarvella & W. Klein (Eds.), Speech, place and action: Studies in deixis and related topics (pp. 251–268). Chichester: Wiley. [7.3]
(1989) Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. [7.3, 13.5]
Levinson, S. C.
(1983) Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [2.6, 3.2, 7.3, 7.6, 9.3, 9.4]Crossref link
(2004) Deixis. In L. Horn & G. Ward (Eds.), The handbook of pragmatics (pp. 97–121). Oxford: Blackwell. [7.3]
(2017) Speech acts. In Y. Huang (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of pragmatics (pp. 199–216). Oxford: Oxford University Press. [2.3]
Levy, M., & Randell, S.
(Eds.) (1996) The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences, and applications. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. [13.6]
Lewis, D.
(2002) Convention. Oxford: Blackwell. [3.3]Crossref link
Liddicoat, A. J.
(2011) An introduction to conversation analysis. London: Continuum. [9.2, 9.4, 11.3]
Liebert, W.-A., Redeker, G., & Waugh, L.
(Eds.) (1997) Discourse and perspective in cognitive linguistics. Amsterdam: Benjamins. [13.3]Crossref link
Limberg, H.
(2010) The interactional organization of academic talk: Office hour consultations. Amsterdam: Benjamins. [10.2]Crossref link
Linde, C.
(1993) Life stories: The creation of coherence. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [11.5]
(2008) Working the past: Narrative and institutional memory. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [11.5]
Litosseliti, L., & Sunderland, J.
(Eds.) (2002) Gender identity and discourse analysis. Amsterdam: Benjamins. [15.4]Crossref link
Locher, M. A.
(2014) Electronic discourse. In K. P. Schneider & A. Barron (Eds.), Pragmatics of discourse (pp. 555–581). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. [4.6, 4.6.3]Crossref link
Longacre, R. E.
(1996) The grammar of discourse (2nd ed.). New York: Plenum Press. [6.3]Crossref link
Louwerse, M., & Peer, W. van der
(Eds.) (2002) Thematics: Interdisciplinary studies. Amsterdam: Benjamins. [5.3]Crossref link
Luff, P., & Heath, C.
(2015) Transcribing embodied action. In D. Tannen, H. E. Hamilton & D. Schiffrin (Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis (2nd ed.) (pp. 367–390). Oxford: Wiley Blackwell. [9.2]
Luhmann, N.
(1970 and 1975) Soziologische Aufklärung (Bd. 1 & 2) [Sociological enlightenment (Vols. 1 & 2)]. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag. [14.2]
Macdonell, D.
(1986) Theories of discourse: An introduction. Oxford: Blackwell. [3.7]
Mahlberg, M.
(2013) Corpus stylistics and Dickens’s fiction. New York: Routledge. [8.6]
(2014) Corpus stylistics. In M. Burke (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of stylistics (pp. 378–392). Oxford: Routledge. [8.6.1]
Maier, R. M., Hofmockel, C., & Fetzer, A.
(2016) The negotiation of discourse relations in context: Co-constructing degrees of overtness. Intercultural Pragmatics, 13(1), 71–105. [7.2]Crossref link
Malinowski, B.
(1930) The problem of meaning in primitive languages. In C. K. Ogden & I. A. Richards (Eds.), The meaning of meaning (pp. 296–336). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. [4.2]
Mandler, J. M., & Johnson, N. S.
(1977) Remembrance of things parsed: Story structure and recall. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 111–151. [11.4]Crossref link
Mann, W. C., & Thompson, S. A.
(1988) Rhetorical Structure Theory: Toward a functional theory of text organisation. Text, 8, 243–281. [6.4]Crossref link
(Eds.) (1992) Discourse description: Diverse linguistic analyses of a fund-raising text. Amsterdam: Benjamins. [1]Crossref link
(2001) Deux perspectives sur la théorie de la structure Rhétorique [Two views of Rhetorical Structure Theory]. Verbum, 23, 9–30. [6.4]
Markee, N.
(Ed.) (2015) The handbook of classroom discourse and interaction. Malden, MA: Blackwell. [14.2]Crossref link
Marmaridou, S.
(2000) Pragmatic meaning and cognition. Amsterdam: Benjamins. [7.3]Crossref link
Martin, J.
(1992) English text: System and structure. Amsterdam: Benjamins. [3.6]Crossref link
(2015) Cohesion and texture. In D. Tannen, H. E. Hamilton & D. Schiffrin (Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis (2nd ed.). Oxford: Wiley Blackwell. [6.2]
Martin, J., & Rose, D.
(2007) Working with discourse: Meaning beyond the clause (2nd ed.). London: Bloomsbury Academic. [3.6]
Mayer, R.
(1979) Twenty years of research on advance organizers: Assimilation theory is still the best predictor of results. Instructional Science, 8, 133–167. [5.5]Crossref link
Mayr, A.
(2008) Language and power: An introduction to institutional discourse. London: Continuum. [14.1]
(2015) Institutional discourse. In D. Tannen, H. E. Hamilton & D. Schiffrin (Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 755–774). Oxford: Wiley Blackwell. [14.2]
McCarthy, M.
(1991) Discourse analysis for language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [1]
McCroskey, J. C.
(2006) An introduction to rhetorical communication: A Western rhetorical perspective (9th ed.). London: Routledge. [12.2]
McIntyre, D.
(2014) Characterisation. In P. Stockwell & S. Whiteley (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of stylistics (pp. 149–164). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [8.6.3]Crossref link
McIntyre, D., & Busse, B.
(Eds.) (2010) Language and style. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. [8.3]Crossref link
McLaughlin, M. L.
(1984) Conversation: How talk is organized. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. [9.3]
McMenamin, G.
(2002) Forensic linguistics: Advances in forensic stylistics. Boca Raton: CRC. [8.4, 14.4]Crossref link
McNamara, D. S.
(Ed.) (2007) Reading comprehension strategies: Theories, interventions, and technologies. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [13.2]
McNamara, D. S., & Magliano, J.
(2009) Toward a comprehensive model of comprehension. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 51, 297–384. [13.4]Crossref link
Meibauer, J.
(2012) What is a context? Theoretical and empirical evidence. In R. Finkbeiner, J. Meibauer & P. Schumacher (Eds.), What is a context? Linguistic approaches and challenges (pp. 9–32). Amsterdam: Benjamins. [7.2]Crossref link
Miller, C. R.
(1984) Genre as social action. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70(2), 151–167. [4.4]Crossref link
(2017) Where do genres come from? In C. R. Miller & A. R. Kelly (Eds.), Emerging genres in new media environments (pp. 1–34). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. [4.4]Crossref link
Miller, G.
(1956) The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81–97. [13.3]Crossref link
Mishler, E.
(1984) The discourse of medicine. Norwoord, NJ: Ablex. [14.7]
Mondada, L.
(2013) The conversation analytic approach to data collection. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 32–56). Chichester: Blackwell. [9.2]
Moore, J., & Pollack, M.
(1992) A problem for RST: The need for multi-level discourse analysis. Computational Linguistics, 18, 537–544. [6.5]
Morris, C.
(1938) Foundations of the theory of signs. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. [3.2]
Morris, P.
(Ed.) (1994) The Bakhtin reader: Selected writings of Bakhtin, Medvedev and Voloshinov. London: Arnold. [2.5, 4.3]
Moser, M., & Moore, J.
(1996) Toward a synthesis of two accounts of discourse structure. Computational Linguistics, 22, 409–419. [6.5]
Motschenbacher, H.
(2010) Language, gender and sexual identity: Poststructuralist perspectives. Amsterdam: Benjamins. [15.4]Crossref link
Müller, S.
(2005) Discourse markers in native and non-native English discourse. Amsterdam: Benjamins. [9.5]Crossref link
Myers, G.
(2010) Discourse of blogs and wikis. London: Continuum. [4.6]
Myers, J. L., & O’Brien, E. J.
(1998) Accessing the discourse representation during reading. Discourse Processes, 26, 131–157. [13.4]Crossref link
Neumann, S., & Fest, J.
(2016) Cohesive devices across registers and varieties: The role of medium in English. In C. Schubert & C. Sanchez-Stockhammer (Eds.), Variational text linguistics: Revisiting register in English (pp. 195–220). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. [6.2]Crossref link
Ng, S. H., & Bradac, J. J.
(1993) Power in language: Verbal communication and social influence. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. [15.3]
Nielsen, J.
(1999) Designing web usability: The practice of simplicity. Indianapolis, IN: New Riders Press. [4.6]
Niemeier, S., & Dirven, R.
(Eds.) (2000) Evidence for linguistic relativity. Amsterdam: Benjamins. [15.2]Crossref link
Nofsinger, R. E.
(1991) Everyday conversation. London: Sage. [9.4]
Noordman, L., & Vonk, W.
(1992) Reader’s knowledge and the control of inferences in reading. Language and Cognitive Processes, 7, 373–391. [7.6]Crossref link
(1999) Discourse comprehension. In A. Friederici (Ed.), Language comprehension: A biological perspective (pp. 229–263). Berlin: Springer. [13.3]Crossref link
Nørgaard, N., Busse, B. & Montoro, R.
(2010) Key terms in stylistics. London: Continuum. [8.3, 8.6]
Nunan, D.
(1993) Introducing discourse analysis. London: Penguin. [1]
Nystrand, M.
(1986) The structure of written communication: Studies in reciprocity between writers and readers. Orlando, FL: Academic Press. [4.3]
Ochs, E., Schegloff, E. A., & Thompson, S. A.
(Eds.) (1996) Interaction and grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [9.4]Crossref link
O’Keefe, D. J.
(2016) Persuasion: Theory and research (3rd ed.). London: Sage. [12.1, 12.5]
Ordóñez-López, P., & Edo-Marzá, N.
(Eds.) (2016) Medical discourse in professional, academic and popular settings. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. [14.7]Crossref link
Orr, J.
(1996) Talking about machines: An ethnography of a modern job. London: Cornell University Press. [11.5]
Ortony, A.
(Ed.) (1993) Metaphor and thought (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [8.6]Crossref link
Osgood, C.
(1971) Where do sentences come from? In D. Steinberg & L. Jakobovits (Eds.), Semantics: An interdisciplinary reader in philosophy, linguistics and psychology (pp. 497–529). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [7.4.2]
Otero, J., León, J. A., & Graesser, A. C.
(Eds.) (2002) The psychology of science text comprehension. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. [13.3]
Padilla Cruz, M.
(Ed.) (2016) Relevance theory: Recent developments, current challenges and future directions. Amsterdam: Benjamins. [2.5]Crossref link
Page, R.
(2012) Stories and social media: Identities and interaction. Abingdon: Routledge. [11.3]
Paltridge, B.
(2012) Discourse analysis (2nd ed.). London: Bloomsbury. [1]
Paltridge, B., & Starfield, S.
(Eds.) (2013) The handbook of English for specific purposes. Chichester: Blackwell. [10.2]
Partington, A., Duguid, A., & Taylor, C.
(2013) Patterns and meanings in discourse. Amsterdam: Benjamins. [5.6]Crossref link
Peccei, J. S.
(1999) Pragmatics. London: Routledge. [3.2]Crossref link
Peirce, C. S.
(1992) The essential Peirce: Selected philosophical writings. 2 vols. Ed. N. Houser & C. Kloesel. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. [3.2]
Pemberton, L., & Shurville, S.
(Eds.) (2000) Words on the web: Computer-mediated communication. Exeter: Intellect. [4.6]
Pericles Trifonas, P.
(Ed.) (2015) International handbook of semiotics. Dordrecht: Springer. [3.2]Crossref link
Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T.
(1986) Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York: Springer. [12.4]Crossref link
Philips, S.
(1998) Ideology in the language of judges: How judges practice law, politics and courtroom control. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [14.4]
Piller, I.
(2011) Intercultural communication: A critical introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. [15.6]
Platt, F. W.
(Ed.) (1995) Conversation repair: Case studies in doctor-patient communication. Boston: Little, Brown. [14.7]
Polanyi, L., & Berg, M. H. van den
(1996) Discourse structure and discourse contexts. In P. Dekker & M. Stokhof (Eds.), Proceedings of the 10th Amsterdam Colloquium (pp. 113–131). Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam. [5.5]
Ponterotto, D.
(2003) The cohesive role of cognitive metaphor in discourse and conversation. In A. Barcelona (Ed.), Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads: A cognitive perspective (pp. 283–298). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. [8.6.3]Crossref link
Price, J., & Price, L.
(2002) Hot text: Web writing that works. Indianapolis, IN: New Riders Press. [4.6]
Prince, E. F.
(1981) Toward a taxonomy of given-new information. In P. Cole (Ed.), Radical pragmatics (pp. 223–255). New York: Academic Press. [7.4.2, 11.4]
(1997) On the functions of left-dislocation in English discourse. In A. Kamio (Ed.), Directions in functional linguistics (pp. 117–143). Amsterdam: Benjamins. [7.4]Crossref link
Propp, V. J.
(1968) Morphology of the folktale (2nd ed.). (S. Pírková-Jakobsonová, Ed., L. Scott, Trans.). Bloomington: Indiana University. (Original work published 1928) [11.2]
(1984) Theory and history of folklore (A. Liberman, Ed., A. Martin & P. Martin, Trans.). Manchester: Manchester University Press. (Original work published 1946) [11.2]
Queen, R.
(2014) Language and sexual identities. In S. Ehrlich, M. Meyerhoff & J. Holmes (Eds.), The handbook of language, gender, and sexuality (pp. 203–219) (2nd ed.). Malden, MA: Blackwell. [15.4]Crossref link
Queneau, R.
(1947/1981) Exercises in style (B. Wright, Trans.). New York: New Directions. [8.2]
Raffler-Engel, W. von
(Ed.) (1990) Doctor-patient interaction. Amsterdam: Benjamins. [14.7]
Rambow, O.
(Ed.) (1993) Intentionality and structure in discourse relations: Proceedings of the ACL SIGGEN Workshop. Columbus: Ohio State University. [6.5]
Reid, T. B. W.
(1956) Linguistics, structuralism and philology. Archivum Linguisticum, 8, 28–37. [8.2]
Reisigl, M.
(2014) Argumentation analysis and the discourse-historical approach: A methodological framework. In C. Hart & P. Cap (Eds.), Contemporary critical discourse studies (pp. 67–96). London: Bloomsbury. [15.3]
(2018) The discourse-historical approach. In J. Flowerdew (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of critical discourse studies (pp. 44–59). New York: Routledge. [15.5]
Reisigl, M., & Wodak, R.
(2001) Discourse and discrimination: Rhetorics of racism and antisemitism. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. [15.5]
Renkema, J.
(1984) Text linguistics and media: An experimental inquiry into coloured news reporting. In W. van Peer & J. Renkema (Eds.), Pragmatics and stylistics (pp. 317–371). Leuven: Acco. [7.5]
(2009a) The texture of discourse: Towards an outline of connectivity theory. Amsterdam: Benjamins. [6.6]Crossref link
(2009b) Improving the quality of governmental documents: A combined academic and professional approach. In W. Cheng & K. C. C. Kong (Eds.), Professional communication: Collaboration between academics and practitioners (pp. 173–190). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press. [10.5]Crossref link
(Ed.) (2009c) Discourse, of course: An overview of research in discourse studies. Amsterdam: Benjamins. [1]Crossref link
Renkema, J., & Hoeken, H.
(1998) The influence of negative newspaper publicity on corporate image in the Netherlands. Journal of Business Communication, 35, 521–535. [14.6]Crossref link
Richardson, J. E.
(2007) Analysing newspapers: An approach from critical discourse analysis. London: Palgrave Macmillan. [14.6]Crossref link
Rijn-van Tongeren, G. van
(1997) Metaphors in medical texts. Amsterdam: Rodopi. [14.7]
Roberts, C., Davies, E., & Jupp, T.
(1992) Language and discrimination: A study of communication in multi-ethnic workplaces. London: Longman. [15.5]
Roque, G.
(Ed.) (2012) Special issue: Persuasion and argumentation. Argumentation: An International Journal on Reasoning, 26(1). [12.1]
Rouet, J.-F., Levonen, J., & Dillon, A.
(Eds.) (1996) Hypertext and cognition. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. [4.6]
Roulet, E.
(1984) Speech acts, discourse structure, and pragmatic connectives. Journal of Pragmatics, 8, 31–47. [4.3]Crossref link
Sacks, H., Jefferson, G., & Schegloff, E. A.
(1992) Lectures on conversation (2 vols.). Oxford: Blackwell. [9.2, 11.3]
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G.
(1974) A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50, 696–735. [9.3]Crossref link
Salkie, R.
(1995) Text and discourse analysis. London: Routledge. [1]
Sanders, T., Schilperoord, J., & Spooren, W.
(Eds.) (2001) Text representation: Linguistic and psycholinguistic aspects. Amsterdam: Benjamins. [6.5]Crossref link
Sanders, T., & Spooren, W.
(1999) Communicative intentions and coherence relations. In W. Bublitz, U. Lenk & E. Ventola (Eds.), Coherence in spoken and written discourse (pp. 235–250). Amsterdam: Benjamins. [6.5]Crossref link
Sanders, T., Spooren, W., & Noordman, L.
(1992) Toward a taxonomy of coherence relations. Discourse Processes, 15, 1–36. [6.5]Crossref link
Sanford, A. J.
(1990) On the nature of text-driven inference. In D. A. Balota, G. B. Flores d’Arcais & K. Rayner (Eds.), Comprehension processes in reading (pp. 515–535). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. [7.6]
Sanford, A. J., & Garrod, S. C.
(1981) Understanding written language: Explorations of comprehension beyond the sentence. Chichester: Wiley. [6.2, 7.6, 13.3]
Sapir, E.
(1949) Selected writings of Edward Sapir in language, culture, and personality. Berkeley: University of California Press. [15.2]
Sarangi, S., & Slembrouck, S.
(1996) Language, bureaucracy & social control. London: Longman. [14.5]
Sbisà, M., & Turner, K.
(Eds.) (2013) Pragmatics of speech actions. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. [2.3]Crossref link
Schank, R. C., & Abelson, R. P.
(1977) Scripts, plans, goals and understanding: An inquiry into human knowledge structures. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. [13.3]
Schank, R. C., & Lebowitz, M.
(1980) Levels of understanding in computers and people. Poetics, 9, 251–273. [13.2]Crossref link
Schegloff, E. A.
(1977) On some questions and ambiguities in conversation. In W. Dressler (Ed.), Current trends in textlinguistics (pp. 81–102). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. [9.4]
(2007) Sequence organization in interaction. Vol. 1: A primer in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [9.2, 9.5]Crossref link
(2015) Conversational interaction: The embodiment of human sociality. In D. Tannen, H. E. Hamilton & D. Schiffrin (Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis (2nd ed.) (pp. 346–366). Oxford: Wiley Blackwell. [9.3, 9.4]
Schegloff, E. A., & Sacks, H.
(1973) Opening up closings. Semiotica, 8, 289–327. [9.3]Crossref link
Schiffrin, D.
(1987) Discourse markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [9.5]Crossref link
(1997) Stories in answer to questions in research interviews. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 7, 129–137. [11.5]Crossref link
Schleppegrell, M. J.
(2014) Systemic functional linguistics. In J. P. Gee & M. Handford (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 21–34). Oxford: Routledge. [3.6]
Schmolz, H.
(2015) Anaphora resolution and text retrieval: A linguistic analysis of hypertexts. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. [4.6.2, 6.2]Crossref link
Schneider, K. P., & Barron, A.
(Eds.) (2008) Variational pragmatics: A focus on regional varieties in pluricentric languages. Amsterdam: Benjamins. [15.6]Crossref link
(Eds.) (2014) Pragmatics of discourse. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. [1]Crossref link
Schriver, K.
(1997) Dynamics in document design: Creating text for readers. New York: Wiley [10.4]
(2017) Plain language in the US gains momentum: 1940–2015. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 60(4), 343–383. [14.4]Crossref link
Schubert, C.
(2014) Cognitive categorization and prototypicality as persuasive strategies: Presidential rhetoric in the USA. Journal of Language and Politics, 13(2), 313–335. [14.3]Crossref link
(2016) Introduction: Current trends in register research. In C. Schubert & C. Sanchez-Stockhammer (Eds.), Variational text linguistics: Revisiting register in English (pp. 1–15). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. [8.2]Crossref link
(2017a) Constructing Mexican stereotypes: Telecinematic discourse and Donald Trump’s campaign rhetoric. CADAAD Journal: Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis across Disciplines, 8(2), 37–57. [15.5]
(2017b) Discourse and cohesion. In C. R. Hoffmann & W. Bublitz (Eds.), Pragmatics of social media (pp. 317–344). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. [4.6.2]Crossref link
Schubert, C., & Sanchez-Stockhammer, C.
(Eds.) (2016) Variational text linguistics: Revisiting register in English. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. [8.2]Crossref link
Schubert, C., & Volkmann, L.
(Eds.) (2016) Pragmatic perspectives on postcolonial discourse: Linguistics and literature. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars [8.6.2]
Scollon, R., Scollon, S., & Jones, R.
(2001/2012) Intercultural communication: A discourse approach (3rd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell. [15.6]
Searle, J. R.
(1969) Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [2.3.1, 2.3.2]Crossref link
(1975) Indirect speech acts. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics. Vol 3: Speech Acts (pp. 59–82). New York: Academic Press. [2.3.2]
(1976) A classification of illocutionary acts. Language in Society, 5(1), 1–23. [2.3.2]Crossref link
Searle, J. R., et al.
(1992) (On) Searle on conversation. Amsterdam: Benjamins. [9.3]Crossref link
Semino, E., & Culpeper, J.
(Eds.) (2002) Cognitive stylistics: Language and cognition in text analysis. Amsterdam: Benjamins. [8.6]Crossref link
Shannon, C. E., & Weaver, W.
(1949) The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana: University of Illinois Press. [3.4]
Shmelev, A.
(2001) Manipulation in Russian political journalism. Studies in Communication Sciences, 1, 101–116. [14.3]
Short, M.
(1996) Exploring the language of poems, plays and prose. London: Longman. [8.6.2]
(2014) Analysing dialogue. In P. Stockwell & S. Whiteley (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of stylistics (pp. 344–359). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [8.6.2]Crossref link
Shuy, R. W.
(1993) Language crimes: The use and abuse of language evidence in the courtroom. Oxford: Blackwell. [14.4]
Sidnell, J.
(2010) Conversation analysis: An introduction. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. [9.2, 9.4, 9.5]
Sidnell, J., & Stivers, T.
(Eds.) (2013) The handbook of conversation analysis. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. [9.2]
Simon-Vandenbergen, A.-M.
(2014) Systemic-functional approaches to discourse. In K. P. Schneider & A. Barron (Eds.), Pragmatics of discourse (pp. 125–163). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. [3.6]Crossref link
Singer, M.
(1990) Psychology of language: An introduction to sentence and discourse processes. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. [13.2]
Smith, N., & Wilson, D.
(1979) Modern linguistics: The results of Chomsky’s revolution. Brighton: Harvester Press. [2.5]
Smith, R. C.
(1996) The patient’s story: Integrated patient-doctor interviewing. Boston: Little, Brown. [14.7]
Sotirova, V.
(Ed.) (2016) The Bloomsbury companion to stylistics. London: Bloomsbury. [8.3]
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D.
(1986/1995) Relevance: Communication and cognition (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell. [2.5]
Statham, S.
(2016) Redefining trial by media: Towards a critical-forensic linguistic interface. Amsterdam: Benjamins. [14.6]Crossref link
Stede, M.
(2012) Discourse processing. San Rafael, CA: Morgan & Claypool [5.6]
Stein, N. L., & Policastro, M.
(1984) The concept of a story: A comparison between children’s and teachers’ viewpoints. In H. Mandl, N. L. Stein & T. Trabasso (Eds.), Comprehension of text (pp. 113–155). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. [11.4]
Stivers, T., Enfield, N. J., Brown, P., Englert, C., Hayashi, M., Heinemann, T., Hoymann, G., Rossano, F., Ruiter, J. P. de, Yoon, K.-E., & Levinson, S. C.
(2009) Universals and cultural variation in turn-taking in conversation. PNAS, 106(26), 10587–10592. [9.3]Crossref link
Stockwell, P.
(2002) Cognitive poetics: An introduction. London: Routledge. [8.6.3]
Stockwell, P., & Whiteley, S.
(Ed.) (2014) The Cambridge handbook of stylistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [8.6]Crossref link
Strauss, S., & Feiz, P.
(2014) Discourse analysis: Putting our worlds into words. New York: Routledge. [1]
Strunk, W., & White, E.
(2000) The elements of style (4th ed.). Boston: Ellyn and Bacon. [8.4]
Stubbs, M. W.
(1983) Discourse analysis: The sociolinguistic analysis of natural language. Oxford: Blackwell. [1, 3.7]
(1996) Text and corpus analysis: Computer-assisted studies of language and culture. Oxford: Blackwell. [14.2]
(2014) Quantitative methods in literary linguistics. In P. Stockwell & S. Whiteley (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of stylistics (pp. 46–62). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [8.6.1]Crossref link
Stukker, N., Spooren, W., & Steen, G.
(Eds.) (2016) Genre in language, discourse and cognition. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. [6.5]Crossref link
Stygall, G.
(2012) Discourse in the US courtroom. In P. Tiersma & L. M. Solan (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of language and law (pp. 369–380). Oxford: Oxford University Press. [14.4]
Sumner, W. G.
(1906) Folkways. New York: Dover Publications. [14.2]
Sunderland, J.
(2006) Language and gender: An advanced resource book. London: Routledge. [15.4]Crossref link
Svartvik, J., & Quirk, R.
(Eds.) (1980) A corpus of English conversation. Lund: CWK Gleerup. [9.2, 9.3]
Swales, J.
(1990) Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [4.4]
Sweetser, E.
(1990) From etymology to pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [6.3]Crossref link
Taboada, M.
(2004) Building coherence and cohesion: Task-oriented dialogue in English and Spanish. Amsterdam: Benjamins. [6.3]Crossref link
Taboada, M., & Mann, W. C.
(2006a) Rhetorical structure theory: Looking back and moving ahead. Discourse Studies, 8, 423–459. [6.4]Crossref link
(2006b) Applications of rhetorical structure theory. Discourse Studies, 8, 567–588. [6.4]Crossref link
Tagg, C.
(2012) The discourse of text messaging: Analysis of SMS communication. London: Continuum. [4.6]
Tannen, D.
(1988) Linguistics in context: Connecting observation and understanding. Norwood, NJ: Ablex. [3.7]
(1994) Gender and discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [15.4]
Tannen, D., Hamilton, H. E., & Schiffrin, D.
(Eds.) (2015) The handbook of discourse analysis (2nd ed.). Oxford: Wiley Blackwell. [1]
Tanskanen, S.-K.
(2006) Collaborating towards coherence: Lexical cohesion in English discourse. Amsterdam: Benjamins. [6.2.1, 6.3]Crossref link
Taylor, J. R.
(1993) Rethinking the theory of organizational communication: How to read an organization. Norwood, NJ: Ablex. [14.2]
Thurlow, C., & Mroczek, K.
(Eds.) (2011) Digital discourse: Language in the new media. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [4.6]Crossref link
Tiersma, P. M. & Solan, L. M.
(Eds.) (2012) The Oxford handbook of language and law. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [14.4]
Titjen, F.
(2018) Language and gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [15.4]
Toolan, M.
(2001) Narrative: A critical linguistic introduction (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. [11.3]
(Ed.) (2002) Critical discourse analysis: Critical concepts in linguistics (4 vols.). London: Routledge. [15.3]
(2016) Making sense of narrative text: Situation, repetition, and picturing in the reading of short stories. New York: Routledge. [11.4]
Torrance, M., & Galbraith, D.
(Eds.) (1999) Knowing what to write: Cognitive perspectives on conceptual processes in text production. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. [13.6]Crossref link
Toulmin, S. E.
(1958/2003) The uses of argument (updated ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [12.2]
Tseng, C.-I.
(2013) Cohesion in film: Tracking film elements. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. [6.2]Crossref link
Tufte, V.
(1971) Grammar as style. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. [8.4]
Ungerer, F., & Schmid, H.-J.
(2006) An introduction to cognitive linguistics (2nd ed.). Harlow: Pearson Education. [13.2]
Uyl, M. den
(1983) A cognitive perspective on text coherence. In K. Ehlich & H. van Riemsdijk (Eds.), Connectedness in sentence, discourse and text (pp. 259–283). Tilburg: Tilburg University. [3.7]
Vanderveken, D., & Kubo, S.
(Eds.) (2001) Essays in speech act theory. Amsterdam: Benjamins. [2.3]Crossref link
Vanneste, A.
(1980) Unité et multiplicité dans la langue: Essai d’introduction à la problématique de la norme et de la variabilité [Unity and multiplicity in language: Introduction to the problems of norm and variability] (3 vols.). Brussel: Vrije Universiteit. [3.3, 3.5]
Ventola, E., Charles, C., & Kaltenbacher, M.
(Eds.) (2004) Perspectives on multimodality. Amsterdam: Benjamins. [4.5]Crossref link
Verschueren, J.
(1999) Understanding pragmatics. Amsterdam: Benjamins. [3.2]
Verschueren, J., Östman, J. O., & Blommaert, J.
(Eds.) (1995) Handbook of pragmatics. Amsterdam: Benjamins. [3.2]Crossref link
Virtanen, T.
(2010) Variation across texts and discourses: Theoretical and methodological perspectives on text type and genre. In H. Dorgeloh & A. Wanner (Eds.), Syntactic variation and genre (pp. 53–84). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. [10.2]Crossref link
Vonk, W., & Noordman, L.
(1990) On the control of inferences in text understanding. In D. Balota, G. Flores d’Arcais & K. Rayner (Eds.), Comprehension processes in reading (pp. 447–464). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. [7.6]
Vorderer, P., Wulff, H., & Friedrichsen, M.
(Eds.) (1996) Suspense: Conceptualizations, theoretical analyses, and empirical explorations. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. [11.4]
Waes, L. van, Woudstra, E., & Hoven, P. van den
(Eds.) (1994) Functional communication quality. Amsterdam: Rodopi. [10.5]
Wales, K.
(1988) Back to the future: Bakhtin, stylistics and discourse. In W. van Peer (Ed.), The taming of the text (pp. 176–192). London: Routledge. [4.3]
Walsh, S.
(2011) Exploring classroom discourse: Language in action. London: Routledge. [14.2]
Walton, D. N.
(1987) Informal fallacies: Towards a theory of argument criticisms. Amsterdam: Benjamins. [12.3]Crossref link
(2006) Fundamentals of critical argumentation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [12.5]
Watson Todd, R.
(2016) Discourse topics. Amsterdam: Benjamins. [5.6]Crossref link
Watts, R. J.
(2003) Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [2.6]Crossref link
Watzlawick, P., Beavin, J., & Jackson, D.
(1967/2011) Pragmatics of human communication: A study of interactional patterns, pathologies, and paradoxes. New York: Norton. [3.2]
Weaver, C. A., Mannes, S., & Fletcher, C. R.
(Eds.) (1995) Discourse comprehension: Essays in honor of Walter Kintsch. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. [13.3]
Weber, J. J.
(Ed.) (1996) The stylistics reader: From Roman Jakobson to the present. London: Arnold. [8.6]
Wegener, P.
(1885/1991) Untersuchungen über die Grundfragen des Sprachlebens: Reprint from the 1885 edition [Inquiries into the fundamental questions of language survival]. Amsterdam: Benjamins. [2.2]
Werlich, E.
(1982) A text grammar of English. Heidelberg: Quelle and Meyer. [3.7, 4.2, 10.2]
Whorf, B. L.
(1956/2012) Language, thought, and reality: Selected writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf (2nd ed.), edited by J. B. Carroll, S. C. Levinson & P. Lee. Massachusetts: The MIT Press. [15.2]
Widdowson, H.
(1998) The theory and practice of critical discourse analysis. Applied Linguistics, 19, 136–151. [15.3]Crossref link
(2007) Discourse analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [1, 3.7, 6.2]
Wierzbicka, A.
(1986) Does language reflect culture? Evidence from Australian English. Language in Society, 15, 349–374. [15.2]Crossref link
Wijk, C. van
(1999) Conceptual processes in argumentation: A developmental perspective. In M. Torrance & D. Galbraith (Eds.), Knowing what to write: Conceptual processes in text production (pp. 31–50). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. [13.5]
Wildfeuer, J.
(2014) Film discourse interpretation: Towards a new paradigm for multimodal film analysis. London: Routledge. [4.5]
Wilson, D.
(2017) Relevance theory. In Y. Huang (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of pragmatics (pp. 79–100). Oxford: Oxford University Press. [2.5]
Wilson, D., & Sperber, D.
(2012) Relevance and meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [2.5]Crossref link
Winter, E.
(1976) Fundamentals of information structure: Pilot manual for further development according to student need (Mimeograph). Hatfield: Hatfield Polytechnic. [5.3]
Witte, S. P.
(1987) Pre-text and composing. College Composition and Communication, 38, 397–425. [13.6]Crossref link
Wodak, R.
(1996) Disorders of discourse. London: Longman. [14.7]
(Ed.) (1997) Gender and discourse. London: Sage. [15.4]
(2015) The politics of fear: What right-wing populist discourses mean. London: Sage. [15.5]Crossref link
Wodak, R., & Meyer, M.
(Eds.) (2016) Methods of critical discourse studies (3rd ed.). London: Sage. [15.3]
Wodak, R., & Richardson, J. E.
(Eds.) (2013) Analyzing fascist discourse: European fascism in talk and text. New York: Routledge. [15.5]
Yang, A.
(1989) Cohesive chains and writing quality. Word, 40, 235–254. [10.5]Crossref link
Yates, S.
(1996) Oral and written linguistic aspects of computer conferencing: A corpus based study. In S. Herring (Ed.), Computer-mediated communication: Linguistic, social and cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 28–46). Amsterdam: Benjamins. [4.6.1]Crossref link
Yule, G.
(2014) The study of language (5th ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [15.2]
Yus, F.
(2011) Cyberpragmatics: Internet-mediated communication in context. Amsterdam: Benjamins. [4.6.3]Crossref link
(2015) Relevance theory. In B. Heine & H. Narrog (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic analysis (2nd ed.) (pp. 642–662). Oxford: Oxford University Press. [2.5]
Zappavigna, M.
(2012) Discourse of Twitter and social media: How we use language to create affiliation on the web. London: Bloomsbury. [4.6.3]
Zethsen, K. K., & Askehave, I.
(2006) Medical communication: Professional-lay. In K. Brown (Ed.), Encyclopedia of language & linguistics (2nd ed.) (pp. 644–664). Oxford: Elsevier. [14.7]Crossref link
Zimman, L.
(2009) ‘The other kind of coming out’: Transgender people and the coming out narrative genre. Gender and Language, 3(1), 53–80. [15.4]Crossref link
Zwaan, R. A., & Radvansky, G. A.
(1998) Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 123(2), 162–185. [13.4]Crossref link
Cited by

Cited by other publications

Schubert, Christoph
2019. ‘OK, well, first of all, let me say …’: Discursive uses of response initiators in US presidential primary debates. Discourse Studies 21:4  pp. 438 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 october 2019. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.


Communication Studies

Communication Studies
BIC Subject: CFG – Semantics, Pragmatics, Discourse Analysis
BISAC Subject: LAN009030 – LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / Pragmatics
U.S. Library of Congress Control Number:  2018037181