Article published in:
Argument Realization in Baltic
Edited by Axel Holvoet and Nicole Nau
[Valency, Argument Realization and Grammatical Relations in Baltic 3] 2016
► pp. 523550
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Pereltsvaig, Asya, Ekaterina Lyutikova & Anastasia Gerasimova
2018. Case marking in Russian eventive nominalizations: inherent vs. dependent case theory. Russian Linguistics 42:2  pp. 221 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 01 march 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

References
Ambrazas, Vytautas
(ed.) 2006Lithuanian Grammar. Vilnius: Baltos lankos.Google Scholar
Baayen, R. Harald
2009Corpus linguistics in morphology: Morphological productivity. In Corpus Linguistics: An International Handbook, Anke Lüdeling and Merja Kytö (eds.), 899–919. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baker, Mark C. & Vinokurova, Nadya
2009On agent nominalizations and why they are not like event nominalizations (http://​www​.rci​.rutgers​.edu​/~mabaker​/agent​-nominals​-web​.pdf).
Bekenova R.B
2013Valentnostnye svojstva otglagol’nogo imeni dejatelja [Valency properties of the deverbal agent noun]. In Materiály IX mezinárodní vědecko–praktické konference «Efektivní nástroje moderních věd – 2013», 78–82. Praha: Publishing House Education and Science s.r.o. (http://​www​.rusnauka​.com​/13​_EISN​_2013​/Philologia​/4​_137001​.doc​.htm)Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard & Thompson, Sandra A.
2007Lexical nominalization. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Timothy Shopen (ed), vol.3, Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon, 2nd edition, 334–381. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Comrie, Bernard
1980Nominalizations in Russian: lexical noun phrases or transformed sentences?’. In Morphosyntax in Slavic, Catherine V. Chvany and Richard D. Brecht (eds), 212–220. Columbus, OH: Slavica.Google Scholar
Eckhoff, Hanne Martine
2011Old Russian Possessive Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach [Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs, 237]. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grimshaw, Jane
1990Argument Structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT-press.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin & Sims, Andrea D.
2010Understanding Morphology. London: Hodder Education.
Jablonskis, Jonas
1957Rinktiniai raštai [Selected Works]. Vilnius: Valstybinė politinės ir mokslinės literatūros leidykla.Google Scholar
Kolářová, Veronika
2014Special valency behavior of Czech deverbal nouns. In Noun Valency [Studies in Language Companion Series, 158], Olga Spevak (ed), 19–60. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria
2003Action nominal constructions in the languages of Europe. In Noun Phrase Structure in the Languages of Europe, Frans Plank (ed.), 723–759. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Lenartaitė, Kristina
2011Argumentų raiškos alternavimas lietuvių kalboje [Alternations in Argument Realization in Lithuanian]. PhD thesis. Vilnius.
Levin, Beth & Rappaport, Malka
1988Nonevent -er nominals: A probe into argument structure. Linguistics 26, 1067–1083. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nau, Nicole
2013Latvian agent nouns: their meaning, grammar, and use. Baltic Linguistics 4, 79–131.Google Scholar
Pakerys, Jurgis
2006Veiksmo pavadinimo konstrukcija lietuvių kalbos gramatikoje [Action noun constructions in Lithuanian grammar] In Daiktavardinio junginio tyrimai [Lietuvių kalbos gramatikos darbai, 4], Axel Holvoet and Rolandas Mikulskas (eds), 121–149. Vilnius: Lietuvių kalbos instituto leidykla.Google Scholar
Paulauskienė, Aldona
2001Lietuvių kalbos kultūra [Proper usage in Lithuanian]. Kaunas: Technologija.Google Scholar
Pazel’skaja, Anna G.
2005Valentnye svojstva russkix otglagol’nyx imen emocij [Valency properties of Russian deverbal emotion nouns]. In Trudy meždunarodnogo seminara “Dialog” po komp’juternoj lingvistike i ee priloženijam [Proceedings of the International “Dialogue” workshop on Computer Linguistics and its Applications], Irina M. Kobozeva, Alexandr S. Narin’jani, Vladimir P. Selegej (eds), 401–406. Мoscow: Nauka. (newstar.rinet.ru/~bylin/pazelskaya.pdf)Google Scholar
Rainer, Franz
2005Typology, diachrony, and universals of semantic change in word-formation: A Romanist’s look at the polysemy of agent nouns. In Morphology and Linguistic Typology. Online Proceedings of the Mediterranean Morphology Meeting (MMM4), Catania 21–23 September 2003, Geert Booij, Emiliano Guevara, Angela Ralli, Salvatore Sgroi & Sergio Scalise (eds), 21–34. Bologna: Università degli Studi di Bologna.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Maria
2007Agent nouns, productivity and diachrony: An analysis of [VN/A]N/A compounds and -eur derivations in French. In On-Line Proceedings of the Fifth Mediterranean Morphology Meeting (MMM5) Fréjus 15–18 September 2005, Geert Booij, Luca Ducceschi, Bernard Fradin, Emiliano Guevara, Angela Ralli & Sergio Scalise (eds), 359–378. Bologna: Università degli Studi di Bologna.Google Scholar
Roy, Isabelle & Soare, Elena
2013Event related nominalizations. <hal-01058029> (https://​hal​.archives​-ouvertes​.fr​/hal​-01058029​/document).Google Scholar
Seržant, Ilja A.
2013Rise of canonical objecthood with the Lithuanian verbs of pain. Baltic Linguistics, 4, 187–211.Google Scholar
Sleeman, Petra & Brito, Ana Maria
2010Nominalization, event, aspect and argument structure: a syntactic approach. In Argument Structure and Syntactic Relations: A Cross-linguistic Perspective [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 158], Maia Duguine, Susana Huidobro, Nerea Madariaga (eds), 113–130. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sližiene, Nijolė
1994, 1998, 2004Lietuvių kalbos veiksmažodžių junglumo žodynas [Lithuanian dictionary of verbal valency]. Vilnius, Mokslo ir enciklopedijų leidykla.Google Scholar
Tatevosov, Sergej G. & Pazel’skaja, Anna G.
2008Otglagol’noe imja i struktura russkogo glagola [Deverbal nouns and the structure of the Russian verb] In Issledovanija po glagol’noj derivacii [Studies on verbal derivation], Vladimir A. Plungjan and Sergej G. Tatevosov (eds), 348–380. Мoscow: Jazyki slavjanskix kul’tur.Google Scholar
Ulvydas, Kazys
(ed) 1976Lietuvių kalbos gramatika 3. Sintaksė [Lithuanian Grammar. Syntax]. Vilnius: Mokslas.Google Scholar
Vladarskienė, Rasuolė
2010Linksnių vartojimas veiksmažodžių abstraktų junginiuose [The use of cases in abstract phrases of verbal nouns]. Kalbos kultūra 83, 173–184.Google Scholar