Article published in:
Argument Realization in Baltic
Edited by Axel Holvoet and Nicole Nau
[Valency, Argument Realization and Grammatical Relations in Baltic 3] 2016
► pp. 259–332
Published online: 21 January 2016
https://doi.org/10.1075/vargreb.3.06wie
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Schlund, Katrin
2020. Active transitive impersonals in Slavic and beyond: a parallel corpus analysis. Russian Linguistics 44:1 ► pp. 39 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 01 march 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

References
Arkadiev, Peter M. & Pakerys, Jurgis
2015 Lithuanian morphological causatives: A corpus-based study. In Voice and Argument Structure in Baltic [Valency, Argument Realization and Grammatical Relations in Baltic, 2], Axel Holvoet & Nicole Nau (eds), 39–98. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Croft, William
1991 Syntactic Categories and Grammatical Relations: The Cognitive Organization of Information. Chicago-London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
1998 Event structure in argument linking. In The Projection of Arguments. Lexical and Compositional Factors, Miriam Butt and Wilhelm Geuder (eds), 21–63. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
2012 Verbs: Aspect and Causal Structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dowty, David R.
1991 Thematic Proto-Roles and Argument Selection. Language, 67: 547–619. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gliwa, Bernd
2003 Nešinas, vedinas, tekinas. Acta Linguistica Lithuanica, 48: 19–34.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
2001 Non-canonical marking of core arguments in European languages. In Non-Canonical Marking of Subjects and Objects [Typological Studies in Language, 46], Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald, Robert M.W. Dixon & Masayuki Onishi (eds), 53–83. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Holvoet, Axel
1995 On the evolution of the passive in Lithuanian and Latvian. In Analecta Indoeuropaea Cracoviensia I. Safarewicz memoriae dicata, Wojciech Smoczyński (ed.), 173–182. Kraków: Universitas.Google Scholar
2000 Once more the Baltic genitive of agent. Baltistica, 35 (1): 45–58.Google Scholar
Holvoet, Axel, Rembiałkowska, Agnieszka & Grzybowska, Marta
2015 Middle voice reflexives and argument structure in Baltic. In Voice and Argument Structure in Baltic [Valency, Argument Realization and Grammatical Relations in Baltic, 2], Axel Holvoet & Nicole Nau (eds), 181–210. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Thompson, Sandra A.
1980 Transitivity in Grammar and Discourse. Language, 56 (2): 251–295. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Katkuvienė, Laima
1980 Dabartinės lietuvių kalbos beasmeniai veiksmažodiniai sakiniai su įnagininku [Impersonal verbal sentences with the instrumental in contemporary Lithuanian]. Lietuvos TSR Mokslų akademijos darbai, serija A, 1(70): 107–116.Google Scholar
1981 Bezličnye glagol’nye predloženija v sovremennom litovskom jazyke [Impersonal verbal sentences in modern Lithuanian]. Vilnius (unpubl. PhD thesis).Google Scholar
Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria & Wälchli, Bernhard
2001 The Circum-Baltic languages: An areal-typological approach. In Grammar and Typology [The Circum-Baltic Languages, 2], Östen Dahl & Maria Koptjevskaja-Tamm (eds), 615–750. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lenartaitė-Gotaučienė, Kristina
2014 Alternations in argument realization and problematic cases of subjecthood in Lithuanian. In Grammatical Relations and their Non-Canonical Encoding in Baltic [Valency, Argument Realization and Grammatical Relations in Baltic, 1], Axel Holvoet & Nicole Nau (eds), 137–180. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Malchukov, Andrej & Narrog, Heiko
2011 Case polysemy. In The Oxford Handbook of Case, Andrej Malchukov & Andrew Spencer (eds), 518–534. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nedjalkov, Vladimir P. & Comrie, Bernard
eds. 1988 Typology of Resultative Constructions. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Padučeva, Elena V. & Rozina, Raisa I.
1993 Semantičeskij klass glagolov polnogo oxvata: tolkovanie i leksiko-sintaksičeskie svojstva [The semantic class of holistic verbs: explication and lexico-semantic properties]. Voprosy jazykoznanija, 1993 (6): 5–16.Google Scholar
Primus, Beatrice
2009 Case, grammatical relations, and semantic roles. In The Oxford Handbook of Case, Andrej Malchukov & Andrew Spencer (eds), 261–275. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rasimavičius, Antanas
1963 Dėl instrumentinio įnagininko vartojimo [On the use of the instrumental case to denote instruments]. Lietuvos TSR Mokslų akademijos darbai, serija A, 1(14): 239–256.Google Scholar
Seržant, Ilja A.
2014 The independent partitive genitive in Lithuanian. In Grammatical Relations and their Non-Canonical Encoding in Baltic [Valency, Argument Realization and Grammatical Relations in Baltic, 1], Axel Holvoet & Nicole Nau (eds), 257–299. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, Michael
1976 Hierarchy of Features and Ergativity. In Grammatical Categories in Australian Languages, Robert M.W. Dixon (ed.), 112–171. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.Google Scholar
Spraunienė, Birutė, Razanovaitė, Auksė & Jasionytė, Erika
2015 Solving the puzzle of the Lithuanian passive. In Voice and Argument Structure in Baltic [Valency, Argument Realization and Grammatical Relations in Baltic, 2], Axel Holvoet & Nicole Nau (eds), 323–366. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Špokienė, Vitalija
2000 Lietuvių kalbos holistiniai veiksmažodžiai (gretinant su anglų kalba) [Lithuanian holistic verbs (in comparison with English)]. Vilnius (unpubl. PhD thesis).Google Scholar
Tekorienė, Dalija
1983 Lietuvių kalbos būdvardžių semantinis valentingumas [Semantic valency of Lithuanian adjectives]. Kalbotyra, 34 (1): 97–107.Google Scholar
1985 Lietuvių kalbos būdvardžių būtinojo semantinio valentingumo raiška [Expression of the obligatory semantic valency of Lithuanian adjectives]. Kalbotyra, 36 (1): 72–82.Google Scholar
1990 Bevardės giminės būdvardžiai. Sintaksė ir semantika [Neuter adjectives. Syntax and semantics]. Vilnius: Mokslas.Google Scholar
Vaičiulytė-Semėnienė, Loreta
1998 Būdvardžių reikšmė ir valentingumas [Meaning and valency of adjectives]. Lietuvių kalbotyros klausimai, 40: 59–73.Google Scholar
2000 Lietuvių kalbos daugiavalenčių būdvardžių sintaksinis ir semantinis valentingumas [Syntactic and semantic valency of multivalent adjectives in Lithuanian]. Lituanistica, 2000 (3/4): 35–69.
2001 Lietuvių kalbos būdvardžių valentingumas [Valency of Lithuanian adjectives]. Vilnius (summary of unpubl. PhD thesis).Google Scholar
Valiulytė, Elena
1991 Instrumento raiška dabartinėje lietuvių kalboje [Ways to express the instrument in contemporary Lithuanian]. Lietuvių kalbotyros klausimai, 29 (Lietuvių leksikos ir terminologijos problemos): 148–159.Google Scholar
Van Valin, Robert D., Jr
2005 Exploring the Syntax-Semantic Interface. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Valin, Robert D., Jr. & LaPolla, Randy
1997 Syntax. Structure, Meaning and Function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crossref
Wiemer, Björn
2006 Relations between Actor-demoting devices in Lithuanian. In Passivization and Typology (Form and Function), Werner Abraham & Larisa Leisiö (eds), 274–309. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011 The grammaticalization of passives. In Handbook of Grammaticalization, Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog (eds), 535–546. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wiemer, Björn & Bjarnadóttir, Valgerður
2014 On the non-canonical marking of the highest-ranking argument in Lithuanian and Icelandic (Steps toward a database). In Grammatical Relations and their Non-Canonical Encoding in Baltic [Valency, Argument Realization and Grammatical Relations in Baltic, 1], Axel Holvoet & Nicole Nau (eds), 301–361. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wiemer, Björn & Grzybowska, Marta
2015 Converse relations with the reflexive marker in Lithuanian and Polish: between grammar and lexicon. In Voice and Argument Structure in Baltic [Valency, Argument Realization and Grammatical Relations in Baltic, 2], Axel Holvoet & Nicole Nau (eds), 211–286. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar