Article published in:
Argument Realization in Baltic
Edited by Axel Holvoet and Nicole Nau
[Valency, Argument Realization and Grammatical Relations in Baltic 3] 2016
► pp. 107136
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Lavine, James E. & Leonard H. Babby
2019. A New Argument for the Lexical Underspecification of Causers. Linguistic Inquiry 50:4  pp. 803 ff. Crossref logo
Schlund, Katrin
2020. Active transitive impersonals in Slavic and beyond: a parallel corpus analysis. Russian Linguistics 44:1  pp. 39 ff. Crossref logo
Šereikaitė, Milena
2020. Active Existential in Lithuanian: Remarks on Burzio’s Generalization. Linguistic Inquiry  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 01 march 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Alexiadou, Artemis, Anagnostopoulou, Elena & Schäfer, Florian
2006The properties of anticausatives crosslinguistically. In Phases of interpretation, Mara Frascarelli (ed.), 187–211. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015External Arguments in Transitivity Alternations: A Layering Approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Crossref
Ambrazas, Vytautas, et al.
1997Lithuanian Grammar. Vilnius: Baltos lankos.Google Scholar
Babby, Leonard
1989Subjectlessness, external subcategorization, and the projection principle. Zbornik Matice srpske za filologiju i lingvistiku 32: 7–40.Google Scholar
1994A theta-theoretic analysis of adversity impersonal sentences in Russian. Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics 2: 25–67.Google Scholar
2009The Syntax of Argument Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010Prolegomenon to any future typology of impersonal sentences. In Hypothesis A / Hypothesis B: Linguistic Explorations in Honor of David M. Perlmutter, eds. Donna B Gerdts, John C. Moore and Maria Polinsky, 19–40. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Beavers, John & Zubair, Cala
2013Anticausatives in Sinhala: involitivity and causer suppression. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 31: 1–46. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boneh, Nora & Sichel, Ivy
2010Deconstructing possession. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 28: 1–40. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Borer, Hagit
2005Structuring Sense: The Normal Course of Events. New York: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bowers, John
2002Transitivity. Linguistic Inquiry 33: 183–224. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Burzio, Luigi
1986Italian syntax. Dordrecht: Reidel. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1981Lectures on Government and Binding: The Pisa lectures. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
1986Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin, and Use. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
1995The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard
1975The antiergative: Finland’s answer to Basque. Chicago Linguistic Society 11, 112–121.Google Scholar
Cuervo, María Cristina
2003Datives at large. Ph.D. Dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
Everaert, Martin, Marelj, Marijana & Siloni, Tal
2012The Theta System: an introduction. In The Theta System: Argument Structure at the Interface, Martin Everaert, et al. (eds), 1–19. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Folli, Raffaella & Harley, Heidi
2005Flavors of v. In Aspectual inquiries, Paula Kempchinsky and Roumyana Slabakova (eds), 95–120. Dordrecht: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fried, Mirjam
2004Predicate semantics and event construal in Czech case marking. In Construction Grammar in a Cross-Language Perspective, Mirjam Fried and Jan Ola Östman (eds), 78–119. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
1993More on the typology of inchoative/causative verb alternations. In Causatives and Transitivity, Bernard Comrie and Maria Polinsky (eds), 87–120. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Holvoet, Axel
2013Obliqueness, quasi-subjects and transitivity in Baltic and Slavonic. In The Diachronic Typology of Non-Canonical Subjects, Ilja Serzant and Leonid Kulikov (eds), 257–282. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Holvoet, Axel and Artūras Judžentis
2005Beasmeniai sakiniai ir beasmeniškumo sąvoka [Impersonal clauses and the notion of impersonality]. In Gramatinių funkcijų tyrimai, Axel Holvoet and Rolandas Mikulskas (eds), 161–179. Vilnius: Lietuvių kalbos institutas.Google Scholar
Holvoet, Axel and Nicole Nau
2014Argument marking and grammatical relations in Baltic: An overview. In Grammatical Relations and their Non-Canonical Encoding in Baltic, Axel Holvoet and Nicole Nau (eds), 1–41. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jakobson, Roman
(1936/1971): Beitrag zur allgemeinen Kasuslehre. In Selected Writings, II: Word and Language, The Hague-Paris: Mouton, 23–71.Google Scholar
Kibort, Anna
2006On three different types of subjectlessness and how to model them in LFG. Proceedings of LFG06, Miriam Butt and Tracy Holloway King (eds), 289–309. Stanford: CSLI.
Kratzer, Angelika
1996Severing the external argument from its verb. In Phrase Structure and the Lexicon, Johan Rooryck and Laurie Zaring (eds), 109–137. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Landau, Idan
1999Possessor raising and the structure of VP. Lingua 107: 1–37. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lavine, James
2010aCase and events in Transitive Impersonals. Journal of Slavic Linguistics 18 (1): 101–130. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010bMood and a transitivity restriction in Lithuanian: The case of the inferential evidential. Baltic Linguistics 1: 115–142.Google Scholar
2011What does structural accusative mean? An argument against the Aspectual Theory. Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics 19: 66–84.Google Scholar
2013Passives and near-passives in Balto-Slavic: On the survival of accusative. In Non-Canonical Passives, Artemis Alexiadou and Florian Schäfer (eds), 185–211. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014Anti-Burzio predicates: From Russian and Ukrainian to Icelandic. Vestnik MGGU im. Šoloxova, filologičeskie nauki 2: 91–106.Google Scholar
Lavine, James & Babby, Leonard
2015A new argument for the lexical underspecification of Causers. Ms. Bucknell University and Princeton University.
Levin, Beth & Rappaport Hovav, Malka
1995Unaccusativity: At the Syntax–Lexical Semantics Interface. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
2005Argument Realization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crossref
Malchukov, Andrej L. & de Hoop, Helen
2011Tense, aspect, and mood based differential case marking. Lingua 121: 35–47. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Marantz, Alec
1991Case and licensing. In: Proceedings of ESCOL ’91, 234–253.
Markman, Vita
2004Causatives without causers and Burzio’s Generalization. In Proceedings of NELS 34, Keir Moulton and Matthew Wolf (eds), 425–440. Amherst, Mass.: GLSA.Google Scholar
Martin, Fabienne & Schäfer, Florian
2014Causation at the syntax-semantics interface. In Causation in Grammatical Structures, Bridget Copley and Fabienne Martin (eds), 209–244. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mel’čuk, I.A.
1974O sintaksičeskom nule [About syntactic zero]. In Tipologija passivnyx konstrukcii (diatezy i zalogi), ed. Aleksandr A. Xolodovič, 343–361. Leningrad: Nauka.Google Scholar
Neeleman, Ad & van de Koot, Hans
2012The linguistic expression of causation. In The Theta System: Argument Structure at the Interface, Martin Everaert, et al. (eds), 20–51. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ottósson, Kjartan
1988A feature-based approach to thematic roles. Papers from the Tenth Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics, Victoria Rosén (ed), 136–150. Bergen: University of Bergen.Google Scholar
Pesetsky, David
1982Paths and Categories. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
1995Zero syntax: Experiencers and Cascades. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Piccini, Silvia
2008Traces of non-nominative alignment in Lithuanian: The impersonal constructions in Indo-European perspective. Baltistica 43: 437–461.Google Scholar
Pylkkänen, Liina
2008Introducing Arguments. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rappaport Hovav, Malka & Levin, Beth
2012Lexicon uniformity and the causative alternation. In The Theta System: Argument Structure at the Interface, Martin Everaert, et al. (eds), 150–176. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Reinhart, Tanya
2002The Theta System – an overview. Theoretical Linguistics 28: 229–290.Google Scholar
forthcoming. The Theta System: unaccusative and experiencer derivations. In Concepts, Syntax, and their Interface, Martin Everaert, et al. (eds) Cambridge, Mass. MIT Press
Schäfer, Florian
2008The Syntax of (Anti-)Causatives. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012Two types of external argument licensing – the case of causers. Studia Linguistica 66: 128–180. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Seržant, Ilja
2013Rise of canonical objecthood with the Lithuanian verbs of pain. Baltic Linguistics 4: 187–211.Google Scholar
Sigurðsson, Halldór
2005Accusative and the Nom/Acc alternation in Germanic. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 76: 93–133.Google Scholar
2006The Nom/Acc alternation in Germanic. In Comparative Studies in Germanic Syntax, Jutta M. Hartmann and László Molnárfi (eds), 13–50. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011On the New Passive. Syntax 14: 148–178. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Svenonius, Peter
2005The nanosyntax of the Icelandic passive. Paper presented at the Lund Grammar Colloquium.
Wood, Jim
2012Icelandic Morphosyntax and Argument Structure. Ph.D. dissertation, New York University.
Woolford, Ellen
2003Burzio’s Generalization and markedness. In New perspectives on case theory, Ellen Brandner and Heike Zinsmeister (eds), 301–329. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Zaenen, Annie & Maling, Joan
1984Unaccusative, passive, and quirky case. In Proceedings of West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics 3: 317–329.Google Scholar