Article published in:
Argument Realization in Baltic
Edited by Axel Holvoet and Nicole Nau
[Valency, Argument Realization and Grammatical Relations in Baltic 3] 2016
► pp. 107–136
Published online: 21 January 2016
https://doi.org/10.1075/vargreb.3.03lav
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Lavine, James E. & Leonard H. Babby
2019. A New Argument for the Lexical Underspecification of Causers. Linguistic Inquiry 50:4 ► pp. 803 ff. Crossref logo
Schlund, Katrin
2020. Active transitive impersonals in Slavic and beyond: a parallel corpus analysis. Russian Linguistics 44:1 ► pp. 39 ff. Crossref logo
Šereikaitė, Milena
2020. Active Existential in Lithuanian: Remarks on Burzio’s Generalization. Linguistic Inquiry ► pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 01 march 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

References
Alexiadou, Artemis, Anagnostopoulou, Elena & Schäfer, Florian
2006 The properties of anticausatives crosslinguistically. In Phases of interpretation, Mara Frascarelli (ed.), 187–211. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015 External Arguments in Transitivity Alternations: A Layering Approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Crossref
Ambrazas, Vytautas, et al.
1997 Lithuanian Grammar. Vilnius: Baltos lankos.Google Scholar
Babby, Leonard
1989 Subjectlessness, external subcategorization, and the projection principle. Zbornik Matice srpske za filologiju i lingvistiku 32: 7–40.Google Scholar
1994 A theta-theoretic analysis of adversity impersonal sentences in Russian. Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics 2: 25–67.Google Scholar
2009 The Syntax of Argument Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010 Prolegomenon to any future typology of impersonal sentences. In Hypothesis A / Hypothesis B: Linguistic Explorations in Honor of David M. Perlmutter, eds. Donna B Gerdts, John C. Moore and Maria Polinsky, 19–40. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Beavers, John & Zubair, Cala
2013 Anticausatives in Sinhala: involitivity and causer suppression. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 31: 1–46. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boneh, Nora & Sichel, Ivy
2010 Deconstructing possession. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 28: 1–40. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Borer, Hagit
 2005 Structuring Sense: The Normal Course of Events. New York: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bowers, John
2002 Transitivity. Linguistic Inquiry 33: 183–224. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Burzio, Luigi
1986 Italian syntax. Dordrecht: Reidel. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1981 Lectures on Government and Binding: The Pisa lectures. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
1986 Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin, and Use. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
1995 The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard
1975 The antiergative: Finland’s answer to Basque. Chicago Linguistic Society 11, 112–121.Google Scholar
Cuervo, María Cristina
2003 Datives at large. Ph.D. Dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
Everaert, Martin, Marelj, Marijana & Siloni, Tal
2012 The Theta System: an introduction. In The Theta System: Argument Structure at the Interface, Martin Everaert, et al. (eds), 1–19. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Folli, Raffaella & Harley, Heidi
2005 Flavors of v. In Aspectual inquiries, Paula Kempchinsky and Roumyana Slabakova (eds), 95–120. Dordrecht: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fried, Mirjam
2004 Predicate semantics and event construal in Czech case marking. In Construction Grammar in a Cross-Language Perspective, Mirjam Fried and Jan Ola Östman (eds), 78–119. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
1993 More on the typology of inchoative/causative verb alternations. In Causatives and Transitivity, Bernard Comrie and Maria Polinsky (eds), 87–120. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Holvoet, Axel
2013 Obliqueness, quasi-subjects and transitivity in Baltic and Slavonic. In The Diachronic Typology of Non-Canonical Subjects, Ilja Serzant and Leonid Kulikov (eds), 257–282. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Holvoet, Axel and Artūras Judžentis
2005 Beasmeniai sakiniai ir beasmeniškumo sąvoka [Impersonal clauses and the notion of impersonality]. In Gramatinių funkcijų tyrimai, Axel Holvoet and Rolandas Mikulskas (eds), 161–179. Vilnius: Lietuvių kalbos institutas.Google Scholar
Holvoet, Axel and Nicole Nau
2014 Argument marking and grammatical relations in Baltic: An overview. In Grammatical Relations and their Non-Canonical Encoding in Baltic, Axel Holvoet and Nicole Nau (eds), 1–41. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jakobson, Roman
(1936/1971): Beitrag zur allgemeinen Kasuslehre. In Selected Writings, II: Word and Language, The Hague-Paris: Mouton, 23–71.Google Scholar
Kibort, Anna
2006 On three different types of subjectlessness and how to model them in LFG. Proceedings of LFG06, Miriam Butt and Tracy Holloway King (eds), 289–309. Stanford: CSLI.
Kratzer, Angelika
1996 Severing the external argument from its verb. In Phrase Structure and the Lexicon, Johan Rooryck and Laurie Zaring (eds), 109–137. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Landau, Idan
1999 Possessor raising and the structure of VP. Lingua 107: 1–37. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lavine, James
2010a Case and events in Transitive Impersonals. Journal of Slavic Linguistics 18 (1): 101–130. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010b Mood and a transitivity restriction in Lithuanian: The case of the inferential evidential. Baltic Linguistics 1: 115–142.Google Scholar
2011 What does structural accusative mean? An argument against the Aspectual Theory. Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics 19: 66–84.Google Scholar
2013 Passives and near-passives in Balto-Slavic: On the survival of accusative. In Non-Canonical Passives, Artemis Alexiadou and Florian Schäfer (eds), 185–211. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014 Anti-Burzio predicates: From Russian and Ukrainian to Icelandic. Vestnik MGGU im. Šoloxova, filologičeskie nauki 2: 91–106.Google Scholar
Lavine, James & Babby, Leonard
2015 A new argument for the lexical underspecification of Causers. Ms. Bucknell University and Princeton University.
Levin, Beth & Rappaport Hovav, Malka
1995 Unaccusativity: At the Syntax–Lexical Semantics Interface. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
2005 Argument Realization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crossref
Malchukov, Andrej L. & de Hoop, Helen
2011 Tense, aspect, and mood based differential case marking. Lingua 121: 35–47. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Marantz, Alec
1991 Case and licensing. In: Proceedings of ESCOL ’91, 234–253.
Markman, Vita
2004 Causatives without causers and Burzio’s Generalization. In Proceedings of NELS 34, Keir Moulton and Matthew Wolf (eds), 425–440. Amherst, Mass.: GLSA.Google Scholar
Martin, Fabienne & Schäfer, Florian
2014 Causation at the syntax-semantics interface. In Causation in Grammatical Structures, Bridget Copley and Fabienne Martin (eds), 209–244. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mel’čuk, I.A.
1974 O sintaksičeskom nule [About syntactic zero]. In Tipologija passivnyx konstrukcii (diatezy i zalogi), ed. Aleksandr A. Xolodovič, 343–361. Leningrad: Nauka.Google Scholar
Neeleman, Ad & van de Koot, Hans
2012 The linguistic expression of causation. In The Theta System: Argument Structure at the Interface, Martin Everaert, et al. (eds), 20–51. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ottósson, Kjartan
1988 A feature-based approach to thematic roles. Papers from the Tenth Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics, Victoria Rosén (ed), 136–150. Bergen: University of Bergen.Google Scholar
Pesetsky, David
1982 Paths and Categories. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
1995 Zero syntax: Experiencers and Cascades. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Piccini, Silvia
2008 Traces of non-nominative alignment in Lithuanian: The impersonal constructions in Indo-European perspective. Baltistica 43: 437–461.Google Scholar
Pylkkänen, Liina
2008 Introducing Arguments. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rappaport Hovav, Malka & Levin, Beth
2012 Lexicon uniformity and the causative alternation. In The Theta System: Argument Structure at the Interface, Martin Everaert, et al. (eds), 150–176. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Reinhart, Tanya
2002 The Theta System – an overview. Theoretical Linguistics 28: 229–290.Google Scholar
forthcoming. The Theta System: unaccusative and experiencer derivations. In Concepts, Syntax, and their Interface, Martin Everaert, et al. (eds) Cambridge, Mass. MIT Press
Schäfer, Florian
2008 The Syntax of (Anti-)Causatives. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012 Two types of external argument licensing – the case of causers. Studia Linguistica 66: 128–180. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Seržant, Ilja
2013 Rise of canonical objecthood with the Lithuanian verbs of pain. Baltic Linguistics 4: 187–211.Google Scholar
Sigurðsson, Halldór
2005 Accusative and the Nom/Acc alternation in Germanic. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 76: 93–133.Google Scholar
2006 The Nom/Acc alternation in Germanic. In Comparative Studies in Germanic Syntax, Jutta M. Hartmann and László Molnárfi (eds), 13–50. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011 On the New Passive. Syntax 14: 148–178. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Svenonius, Peter
2005 The nanosyntax of the Icelandic passive. Paper presented at the Lund Grammar Colloquium.
Wood, Jim
2012 Icelandic Morphosyntax and Argument Structure. Ph.D. dissertation, New York University.
Woolford, Ellen
2003 Burzio’s Generalization and markedness. In New perspectives on case theory, Ellen Brandner and Heike Zinsmeister (eds), 301–329. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Zaenen, Annie & Maling, Joan
1984 Unaccusative, passive, and quirky case. In Proceedings of West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics 3: 317–329.Google Scholar