Article published in:
Argument Realization in Baltic
Edited by Axel Holvoet and Nicole Nau
[Valency, Argument Realization and Grammatical Relations in Baltic 3] 2016
► pp. 1–34
Published online: 21 January 2016
https://doi.org/10.1075/vargreb.3.001int
References
Alexiadou, Artemis & Rathert, Monika
(eds) 2010 The Syntax of Nominalizations Across Languages and Frameworks. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Cori
2011 Case theory and case alternation: Evidence from Lithuanian. Baltic Linguistics 2: 9–35.Google Scholar
Arkadiev, Peter M.
2014 Case and word order in Lithuanian infinitival clauses revisited. In Grammatical Relations and their Non-Canonical Encoding in Baltic, Axel Holvoet and Nicole Nau (eds), 43–95. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Arkadiev, Peter & Pakerys, Jurgis
2015 Lithuanian morphological causatives. A corpus-based study. In Voice and Argument Structure in Baltic, Axel Holvoet and Nicole Nau (eds), 39–97. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Berg-Olsen, Sturla
1999 A Syntactic Change in Progress: The Decline in the Use of the Non-Prepositional Genitive in Latvian, with a Comparative View on Lithuanian. MA thesis, Oslo University.
Burzio, Luigi
1986 Italian Syntax. Dordrecht: Reidel. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Comrie, Bernard & Thompson, Sandra A.
2007 Lexical nominalization. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Timothy Shopen (ed). Second edition. Volume III: Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon, 334–381. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Croft, William
1991 Syntactic Categories and Grammatical Relations: The Cognitive Organization of Information. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
2001 Radical Construction Grammar. Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cruse, D. Alan
1973: Some thoughts on agentivity. Journal of Linguistics, 9 (1): 1–23. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Culicover, Peter & Jackendoff, Ray
2005 Simpler Syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Crossref
DeLancey, Scott
1984 Notes on agentivity and causation. Studies in Language 8 (2): 181–213. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dik, Simon C.
1985 Formal and semantic adjustment of derived constructions. In Predicates and Terms in Functional Grammar, A. Machtelt Bolkestein, Casper de Groot and J. Lachlan Mackenzie (eds.), 1–28. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.Google Scholar
Endzelin, J[an]
1922 Lettische Grammatik. Riga: Kommissionsverlag A. Gulbis.
Filip, Hana
2005 On accumulating and having it all. Perfectivity, prefixes and bare arguments. In Perspectives on Aspect, Henk J. Verkuyl, Henriëtte de Swart and Angeliek van Hout (eds), 125–148. Dordrecht: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J.
1968 The case for case. In Universals in Linguistic Theory, Emmon Bach and Robert T. Harms (eds), 1–25. London: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Fried, Mirjam
2004 Predicate semantics and event construal in Czech case marking. In Construction Grammar in a Cross-Language Perspective, Mirjam Fried and Jan Ola Östman (eds), 78–119. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grimshaw, Jane
1990 Argument structure. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT-press.
Gruber, Jeffrey
1965/1970 Studies in Lexical Relations. PhD dissertation, MIT. Reprinted as Jeffrey Gruber, Lexical Structures in Syntax and Semantics. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Harris, Alice C. & Campbell, Lyle
1995 Historical Syntax in Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crossref
Haspelmath, Martin
2010 The Behaviour-before-Coding Principle in syntactic change. In Essais de typologie et de linguistique générale. Mélanges offerts à Denis Creissels, Franck Floricic (ed.), 541–554. Lyon: ENS.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd
1993 Auxiliaries. Cognitive Forces and Grammaticalization. Oxford: University Press.Google Scholar
Holvoet, Axel
2000 Once more the Baltic genitive of agent. Baltistica 35 (1): 45–58.Google Scholar
2007 Studies in the Latvian Verb. Cracow: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.Google Scholar
2008 Secondary predicates in Baltic. In Secondary Predicates in Eastern European Languages and Beyond, Christoph Schroeder, Gerd Hentschel and Winfried Boeder (eds.), 125–140. Oldenburg: BIS-Verlag.Google Scholar
2015a Extended uses of morphological causatives in Latvian. In Voice and Argument Structure in Baltic, Axel Holvoet and Nicole Nau (eds), 147–177. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benhamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015b Latvian passives – personal, impersonal and evidential. In Voice and Argument Structure in Baltic, Axel Holvoet and Nicole Nau (eds), 367–394. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Holvoet, Axel & Grzybowska, Marta
2014 Non-canonical grammatical relations in a modal construction. The Latvian debitive. In Grammatical Relations and their Non-Canonical Encoding in Baltic, Axel Holvoet and Nicole Nau (eds), 97–135. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Holvoet, Axel & Nau, Nicole
2014 Argument marking and grammatical relations in Baltic. An overview. In Grammatical Relations and their Non-Canonical Encoding in Baltic, Axel Holvoet and Nicole Nau (eds), 1–41. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Thompson, Sandra A.
1980 Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language 56 (2): 251–299. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jakobson, Roman
(1936/1971) Beitrag zur allgemeinen Kasuslehre. In Selected Writings, II: Word and Language, The Hague-Paris: Mouton, 23–71.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray
1972 Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Janda, Laura A.
1993 A Geography of Case Semantics. The Czech Dative and the Russian Instrumental. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kibort, Anna
2009 Intermediary agents and unexpressed pronouns. In Proceedings of the LFG09 Conference, Trinity College, Cambridge, Miriam Butt and Tracy Holloway King (eds), 289–309. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Kolářová, Veronika
2014 Special valency behavior of Czech deverbal nouns. In Noun Valency, Olga Spevak (ed.), 19–60. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria
1993 Nominalizations. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2013 Action nominal constructions. In The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, Matthew S. Dryer and Martin Haspelmath (eds). Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. (Available online at http://​wals​.info​/chapter​/62, Accessed on 2014-03-30.)Google Scholar
Forthcoming. Nominalizations. To appear in: Word-Formation. A Handbook of the Languages of Europe, Peter O. Müller, et al. (eds) Berlin De Gruyter
Levin, Beth & Rappaport Hovav, Malka
1995 Unaccusativity: At the Syntax–Lexical Semantics Interface. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
McFadden, Thomas
2010 Structural case, locality and cyclicity. In: Explorations of Phase Theory: Features and Arguments, Kleanthes K. Grohmann (ed.), 107–130. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Miklosich, Franz
1926 Vergleichende Grammatik der slavischen Sprachen, vol.4. Syntax. Reprint. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
MLLVG
1959–1962 Mūsdienu latviešu literārās valodas gramatika. Rīga: Latvijas PSR Zinātņu akadēmijas izdevniecība.Google Scholar
Müller, Stefan
2002 Complex Predicates: Verbal Complexes, Resultative Constructions, and Particle Verbs in German. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Nau, Nicole
2013 Latvian agent nouns: their meaning, grammar, and use. Baltic Linguistics 4: 79–131.Google Scholar
2014 Differential object marking in Latgalian. In Grammatical Relations and their Non-Canonical Encoding in Baltic, Axel Holvoet and Nicole Nau (eds), 207–255. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015 Morphological causatives in contemporary Latvian. In Voice and Argument Structure in Baltic, Axel Holvoet and Nicole Nau (eds), 99–145. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nau, Nicole & Holvoet, Axel
2015 Voice in Baltic: An overview. In Voice and Argument Structure in Baltic, Axel Holvoet and Nicole Nau (eds), 1–36. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Noonan, Michael
2007 Complementation. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Timothy Shopen (ed). Second edition. Volume II: Complex Constructions, 52–150. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pakerys, Jurgis
2006 Veiksmo pavadinimo konstrukcija lietuvių kalbos gramatikoje [Action Noun Construction in Lithuanian Grammar]. In Daiktavardinio junginio tyrimai (Lietuvių kalbos gramatikos darbai 4), Axel Holvoet and Rolandas Mikulskas (eds.), 121–149. Vilnius: Lietuvių kalbos instituto leidykla.Google Scholar
Przepiórkowski, Adam
2000 Long-distance genitive of negation in Polish. Journal of Slavic Linguistics 8: 119–158.Google Scholar
Roduner, Markus
2005 Der Nominativ in Zeitadverbien im Litauischen. Acta Linguistica Lithuanica 52: 41–58.Google Scholar
Schmalstieg, William R.
1978 Lithuanian constructions of the type jo būta as a reflection of the Indo-European voice. Baltistica 14 (1): 15–19.Google Scholar
Seržant, Ilja
2014 The independent partitive genitive in Lithuanian. In Grammatical Relations and their Non-Canonical Encoding in Baltic, Axel Holvoet and Nicole Nau (eds), 257–299. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Talmy, Leonard
1991 Path to realization: a typology of event conflation. Berkeley Linguistic Society 17: 480–519. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007 Lexical typologies. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Timothy Shopen (ed). Second edition. Vol. III: Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon, 67–168. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wälchli, Bernhard
1998 Der Synkretismus der Lokalkasus im Lettischen und Livischen. Linguistica Baltica 7: 207–228.Google Scholar
Washio, Ryuichi
1997 Resultatives, compositionality and language variation. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 6: 1–49. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Woolford, Ellen
2003 Burzio’s generalization, markedness and locality constraints on nominative objects. In New Perspectives on Case Theory [CSLI Lecture Notes 156], Ellen Brandner and Heike Zinsmeister (eds), 299–327. Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Zwarts, Joost
2010 A hierarchy of locations: Evidence from the encoding of direction in adpositions and cases. Linguistics 48 (5): 983–1009. CrossrefGoogle Scholar