Article published in:
Grammatical Relations and their Non-Canonical Encoding in Baltic
Edited by Axel Holvoet and Nicole Nau
[Valency, Argument Realization and Grammatical Relations in Baltic 1] 2014
► pp. 43–95

Case and word order in Lithuanian infinitival clauses revisited

| Institute of Slavic Studies, Russian Academy of Sciences | Russian State University for the Humanities | Sholokhov Moscow State University for the Humanities | Vilnius University
This paper considers the Lithuanian constructions with the Dative and Genitive marking of direct objects of transitive verbs in purpose infinitival clauses, studied in Franks and Lavine (2006). I adduce empirical evidence and conceptual arguments both speaking against the analysis proposed by Franks and Lavine (2006), and argue for a different account based on recent “non-orthodox” proposals in case theory. My analysis of the Lithuanian constructions is inspired by a typological comparison with Australian languages possessing “complementizing” and “associating” case marking and morphological case-stacking. I propose that the mechanism of multiple case assignment in syntax is operative in Lithuanian and show how it can naturally account for the Dative-plus-Infinitive and Genitive-plus-Infinitive constructions.
Published online: 16 May 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/vargreb.1.02ark
References

References

Ambrazas, Vytautas
1981 Zur Geschichte einer indogermanischen Konstruktion (Dativus cum infinitivo im Baltischen). Kalbotyra 32(3), 12–24.Google Scholar
1987 Die indogermanische Grundlage des Dativus und Nominativus cum infinitivo im Baltischen. Indogermanische Forschungen 92, 203–219.Google Scholar
(ed) 1997  Lithuanian Grammar . Vilnius: Baltos Lankos.Google Scholar
Anderson, Cori
2011 Case theory and case alternations: Evidence from Lithuanian. Baltic Linguistics 2, 9–35.Google Scholar
Forthcoming. Non-Canonical Case Patterns in Lithuanian. In Contemporary Approaches to Baltic Linguistics , Peter Arkadiev, Axel Holvoet & Björn Wiemer (eds). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Crossref
Arkadiev, Peter
[Arkad’ev P.M.] 2013 O tipologičeskom svoeobrazii litovskoj glagol’noj sistemy [On the typological peculiarity of the Lithuanian verbal system]. In Issledovanija po tipologii slavjanskix, baltijskix i balkanskix jazykov [Studies in the typology of Slavic, Baltic and Balkan Languages], Vjačeslav V. Ivanov, Peter M. Arkad’ev (eds), 320–361. St Petersburg: Aleteia.Google Scholar
Forthcoming. Marking of subjects and objects in Lithuanian non-finite clauses: A typological and diachronic perspective. Linguistic Typology . Crossref
Austin, Peter
2009 Issues in the synchrony and diachrony of case marking in the Mantharta and Kanyara languages, Australia. Handout of talk at Case in and Across Languages , Helsinki.Google Scholar
Babby, Leonard H.
1986 The locus of case assignment and the direction of percolation: Case theory and Russian. In Case in Slavic , Richard Brecht & James Levine (eds), 170–219 . Columbus, OH: Slavica.Google Scholar
1994 Case theory. In Noam Chomsky: Critical assessments . Vol. I: Linguistics: Tome II , Carlos P. Otero (ed), 630–652. London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Béjar, Susanne & Massam, Diane.
1999 Multiple case checking. Syntax 2(2), 65–79. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bobaljik, Jonathan D. & Wurmbrand, Susi.
2009 Case in GB/Minimalism. In The Oxford Handbook of Case , Andrej Malchukov and Andrew Spencer (eds), 44–58. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brezar, Mojca Schlamberger, Pogacnik, Vladimir & Perko, Gregor.
2005  Parlons slovène . Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1981  Lectures on Government and Binding: The Pisa Lectures . Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
2000 Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik , Roger Martin, David Michaels & Juan Uriagereka (eds), 89–115. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
2001 Derivation by phase. In Ken Hale: A Life in Language , Michael Kenstowicz (ed), 1–73. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
den Dikken, Marcel, Larson, Richard K. & Ludlow, Peter.
1996 Intensional ‘transitive’ verbs and concealed complement clauses. Revista di linguistica 8, 29–46.Google Scholar
Dench, Alan
2009 Case in an Australian language. Distribution of case and multiple case marking in Nyamal. In The Oxford Handbook of Case , Andrej Malchukov and Andrew Spencer (eds), 756–769. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dench, Alan & Evans, Nicholas.
1988 Multiple case-marking in Australian languages. Australian Journal of Linguistics 8(1), 1–47. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Erschler, David
2009 On case conflicts in Russian: An Optimality-Theoretic approach. In Studies in Formal Slavic Phonology, Morphology, Syntax, Semantics and Information Structure. Proceedings of FDSL 7, Leipzig 2007 , Gerhild Zybatow, Uwe Junghanns, Denisa Lenertova & Petr Biskup (eds), 119–131. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Evans, Nicholas
1995a  A Grammar of Kayardild . Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1995b Multiple case in Kayardild: Anti-iconic suffix ordering and the diachronic filter. In Double Case. Agreement by Suffixaufnahme , Frans Plank (ed), 396–428. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Franks, Steven & Lavine, James E.
2006 Case and word order in Lithuanian. Journal of Linguistics 42(1), 239–288. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hornstein, Norbert, Nuñes, Jairo & Grohmann, Kleanthes K.
2005  Understanding Minimalism . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ivanov, V. V.
1990  Istoričeskaja grammatika russkogo jazyka . [A Historical Grammar of Russian] 3rd ed. Moscow: Prosveščenie.Google Scholar
Keine, Stefan
2010  Case and Agreement from Fringe to Core. A Minimalist Approach . Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kerevičienė, Jurgita.
2008 The Lithuanian Dative and its English Counterparts (A Case Study in Cognitive Grammar). Doctoral Dissertation, Vilnius University.Google Scholar
Landau, Idan
2006 Severing the distribution of pro from case. Syntax 9(2), 153–170. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lunt, Horace G.
2001  Old Church Slavonic Grammar . 7th edn. rev. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Matushansky, Ora
2008 A case study of predication. In Studies in Formal Slavic Linguistics. Contributions from Formal Description of Slavic Languages 6.5. , Frank Marušič & Rok Žaucer (eds), 213–239. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2010 Russian predicate case, encore. In Formal Studies in Slavic Linguistics, Proceedings of FDSL 7.5 ., Gerhild Zybatow, Philip Dudchuk, Serge Minor & Ekaterina Pshehotskaya (eds), 117–135. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
McCreight Young, Katherine
1988 Multiple Case Assignments. PhD Dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
McFadden, Thomas
2004 The Position of Morphological Case in the Derivation: A Study on the Syntax-Morphology Interface. PhD Dissertation, University of Pennsylvania. ‹http://​www​.ling​.upenn​.edu​/∼tmcfadde​/diss​.html›
2010 Structural case, locality and cyclicity. In Explorations of Phase Theory: Features and Arguments , Kleanthes K. Grohmann (ed), 107–130. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Merchant, Jason
2006 Polyvalent case, geometric hierarchies, and split ergativity. In Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society , Jacqueline Bunting (ed), 47–67. Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Nau, Nicole
2011  A Short Grammar of Latgalian . München & Newcastle: LINCOM.Google Scholar
Preminger, Omer
2011 Agreement as a Fallible Operation. Doctoral dissertation, MIT. ‹http://​dspace​.mit​.edu​/handle​/1721​.1​/68196›
Richards, Norvin
2007 Lardil “case stacking” and the structural/inherent case distinction. Ms. ‹http://​ling​.auf​.net​/lingbuzz​/000405›
2013 Lardil “case stacking” and the timing of case assignment. Syntax 61(1), 42–76. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi
1997 The fine structure of the left periphery. In Elements of Grammar , Liliane Haegeman (ed), 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Round, Erich R.
2010 Kayardild Morphology, Phonology and Morphosyntax. PhD Dissertation, Yale University. http://​www​.academia​.edu​/571105​/Kayardild​_morphology​_phonology​_and​_morphosyntax
Sawicki, Lea
1992 Genitive and dative in goal and purpose expressions in contemporary Lithuanian. Linguistica Baltica 1, 93–101.Google Scholar
Schmalstieg, William R.
1987  A Lithuanian Historical Syntax . Columbus, OH: Slavica.Google Scholar
Schmidtke-Bode, Karsten
2009  A Typology of Purpose Clauses . Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Steenwijk, Han
2003 The use of the supine in Lower Sorbian. In Dutch Contributions to the Thirteenth International Congress of Slavists. Linguistics [ Studies in Slavic and General Linguistics 30], Jos Schaeken, Peter Houtzagers & Janneke Kalsbeek (eds), 331–342.
Stowell, Tim
1981 Origins of Phrase Structure. PhD Dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Szabolcsi, Anna
2006 Strong vs. weak islands. In The Blackwell Companion to Syntax Vol. 4, Martin Everaert & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds), 479–532. Oxford: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vaillant, André
1966  Grammaire comparée des langues slaves. Tome III. Le verbe . Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Vaillant, André.
1977  Grammaire comparée des langues slaves. Tome V. La syntaxe . Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Woolford, Ellen
2006 Lexical case, inherent case, and argument structure. Linguistic Inquiry 37(1), 111–130. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zinkevičius, Zigmas.
1966  Lietuvių dialektologija. Lyginamoji tarmių fonetika ir morfologija [Lithuanian Dialectology: Comparative Phonetics and Morphology of the Dialects]. Vilnius: Mintis.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Arkadiev, Peter M.
2016.  In Argument Realization in Baltic [Valency, Argument Realization and Grammatical Relations in Baltic, 3], ► pp. 37 ff. Crossref logo
Holvoet, Axel & Nicole Nau
2016.  In Argument Realization in Baltic [Valency, Argument Realization and Grammatical Relations in Baltic, 3], ► pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 january 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.