Prototypical Transitivity
| University of Oslo
This book presents a functional analysis of a notion which has gained considerable importance in cognitive and functional linguistics over the last couple of decades, namely 'prototypical transitivity'. It discusses what prototypical transitivity is, why it should exist, and how it should be defined, as well as how this definition can be employed in the analysis of a number of phenomena of language, such as case-marking, experiencer constructions, and so-called ambitransitives. Also discussed is how a prototype analysis relates to other approaches to transitivity, such as that based on markedness. The basic claim is that transitivity is iconic: a construction with two distinct, independent arguments is prototypically used to refer to an event with two distinct, independent participants. From this principle, a unified account of the properties typically associated with transitivity can be derived, and an explanation for why these properties tend to correlate across languages can be given.
[Typological Studies in Language, 72] 2007. x, 240 pp.
Publishing status: Available
© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Table of Contents
Preface
|
ix
|
Chapter 1: Introduction
|
1–9
|
1.1. Why transitivity?
|
1
|
1.2. Theoretical preliminaries
|
3
|
1.3. Structure of the book
|
8
|
Chapter 2: Why a transitive prototype?
|
11–26
|
2.1. Introduction
|
11
|
2.2. Prototype models
|
11
|
2.3. Markedness vs. prototypicality
|
17
|
2.4. Conclusion
|
26
|
Chapter 3: Defining the transitive prototype: The Maximally Distinguished Arguments Hypothesis
|
27–49
|
3.1. Introduction
|
27
|
3.2. The Maximally Distinguished Arguments Hypothesis
|
27
|
3.3. Maximal distinction and functional explanations
|
46
|
Chapter 4: The Affected Agent
|
51–84
|
4.1. Introduction
|
51
|
4.2. "Ingestive verbs" and affected agents
|
52
|
4.3. Crosslinguistic data
|
54
|
4. 4. 'Eat' and markers of agent affectedness
|
72
|
4.5. Alternative analyses
|
77
|
4.6. Other affected-agent constructions
|
82
|
4.7 Concluding remarks
|
83
|
Chapter 5: Transitivity in verbs and clauses
|
85–122
|
5.1. Introduction
|
85
|
5.2. Previous feature-decompositional accounts
|
86
|
5.3. Semantic specifications of participant types
|
89
|
5.4. Semantic features in verb subcategorisation
|
107
|
5.5. Properties of argument NPs
|
111
|
5.6. Clause-level properties
|
114
|
5.7. Formal correlates
|
119
|
5.8. Conclusion
|
122
|
Chapter 6: Ambitransitivity and indefinite object deletion
|
123–151
|
6.1. Introduction
|
123
|
6.2. Indefinite object deletion
|
124
|
6.3. Transitivity and indefinite object deletion
|
134
|
6.4. IOD and S/O ambitransitives
|
145
|
Chapter 7: Maximal semantic distinction in core case-marking
|
153–184
|
7.1. Introduction
|
153
|
7.2. The discriminatory analysis
|
154
|
7.3. The indexing analysis
|
159
|
7.4. Case and the maximal semantic distinction of arguments
|
161
|
7.5. Case and semantic transitivity: Unifying discrimination and indexing
|
166
|
7.6. Semantic extensions
|
168
|
7.7. Discriminatory extensions
|
173
|
7.8. Split ergativity
|
175
|
7.9. A note on case-marking labels
|
182
|
Chapter 8: Experiencers and the dative
|
185–208
|
8.1. Introduction
|
185
|
8.2. The semantic diversity of experience events
|
185
|
8.3. Experience clauses and the transitive prototype
|
189
|
8.4. The dative case
|
197
|
Chapter 9: Beyond prototypical transitivity
|
209–218
|
9.1. From Agent and Patient to subject and object
|
209
|
9.2. Structural vs. semantic case
|
211
|
9.3. Other prototypes
|
213
|
9.4. Concluding remarks
|
217
|
Appendix: Nonstandard abbreviations in glosses
|
219
|
References
|
221–231
|
Author index
|
233–235
|
Language index
|
237–238
|
Subject index
|
239–240
|
“A major and highly original contribution to the understanding of an area of morphosyntax which has, through the last decades, come to be known as notoriously complex.”
Leon Stassen, University of Utrecht
“The book contains a large amount of illuminating data with arguments convincing enough to persuade its readers to take an interest in the question as the author originally hoped. It also successfully demonstrates that how linguistic structure is motivated by aspects of human cognition. It is a welcome and worthy addition to the literature on transitivity, one of the most fundamental aspects of linguistic structure.”
Jaehoon Yeon, SOAS, University of London, in Studies in Language Vol. 33:1, 2009
Cited by
Cited by other publications
Allan, Keith, Julie Bradshaw, Geoffrey Finch, Kate Burridge & Georgina Heydon
Arkadiev, Peter M.
Arkadiev, Peter M. & Jurgis Pakerys
Aryawibawa, I Nyoman & Ben Ambridge
Chai, Neng, Anchalee Wannaruk & Andrew Lian
Chung, Han-byul & Jeong-up Do
Comrie, Bernard, Diana Forker & Zaira Khalilova
Creissels, Denis, F. Neveu, B. Harmegnies, L. Hriba & S. Prévost
Dahl, Eystein
Dahl, Eystein & Chiara Fedriani
Fedden, Sebastian, Dunstan Brown, František Kratochvíl, Laura C. Robinson & Antoinette Schapper
Fedriani, Chiara
Fedriani, Chiara & Michele Prandi
Fedriani, Chiara & Michele Prandi
FULGA, ANGELICA & KIM McDONOUGH
García García, Luisa
García-Miguel, José M.
García-Miguel, José María
Graf, Eileen, Anna Theakston, Daniel Freudenthal & Elena Lieven
Halevy, Rivka
Heaton, Raina
Holvoet, Axel & Nicole Nau
Ibbotson, Paul, Anna Theakston, Elena Lieven & Mike Tomasello
Ibbotson, Paul, Anna L. Theakston, Elena V. M. Lieven & Michael Tomasello
Jerro, Kyle
Jiang, Lu & Etsuko Haryu
Kemmerer, David
Kittilä, Seppo
Kittilä, Seppo
Kittilä, Seppo & Fernando Zúñiga
Kittilä, Seppo & Fernando Zúñiga
Klein, Udo, Dolgor Guntsetseg & Klaus von Heusinger
Kulikov, Leonid
Larjavaara, Meri
Lazard, Gilbert
Letuchiy, Alexander
Li, Yanzhi & Yicheng Wu
LINDSTRÖM, LIINA & VIRVE-ANNELI VIHMAN
Luk, Ellison & Maïa Ponsonnet
MAGNE, CYRILLE, MIREILLE BESSON & STÉPHANE ROBERT
Marten, Lutz & Nancy C. Kula
Melis, Chantal & Marcela Flores
Naess, Åshild
Napoli, Maria
Nau, Nicole
Nau, Nicole
Næss, Åshild
Ovsjannikova, Maria
Park, Chongwon
Romagno, Domenica
Ruiz Narbona, Esaúl
Schwenter, Scott A. & Rena Torres Cacoullos
Seržant, Ilja A., Katarzyna Maria Janic, Darja Dermaku & Oneg Ben Dror
Shain, Cory & Judith Tonhauser
Stenin, Ivan A.
SUPASIRAPRAPA, SARUT
Theakston, Anna L., Paul Ibbotson, Daniel Freudenthal, Elena V. M. Lieven & Michael Tomasello
Vartiainen, Turo & Mikko Höglund
Viti, Carlotta
Västi, Katja & Seppo Kittilä
Västi, Katja & Seppo Kittilä
Wichmann, Søren
Widmer, Manuel
Wiemer, Björn & Marta Grzybowska
Yakpo, Kofi
Ye, Zhengdao
Yu, Shuo
Zakrewska, Ewa D.
Zakrzewska, Ewa
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 08 january 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
Subjects
BIC Subject: CFK – Grammar, syntax
BISAC Subject: LAN009000 – LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General