Sound Patterns in Interaction
Cross-linguistic studies from conversation
Editors
| University of Potsdam
| University of Wisconsin-Madison
This collection of original papers by eminent phoneticians, linguists and sociologists offers the most recent findings on phonetic design in interactional discourse available in an edited collection. The chapters examine the organization of phonetic detail in relation to social actions in talk-in-interaction based on data drawn from diverse languages: Japanese, English, Finnish, and German, as well as from diverse speakers: children, fluent adults and adults with language loss. Because similar methodology is deployed for the investigation of similar conversational tasks in different languages, the collection paves the way towards a cross-linguistic phonology for conversation. The studies reported in the volume make it clear that language-specific constraints are at work in determining exactly which phonetic and prosodic resources are deployed for a given purpose and how they articulate with grammar in different cultures and speech communities.
[Typological Studies in Language, 62] 2004. viii, 406 pp.
Publishing status: Available
© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Table of Contents
|
List of contributors
|
vii–viii
|
|
Introduction
|
|
|
3–25
|
|
|
Practices and resources for turn transition
|
|
|
29–62
|
|
|
63–96
|
|
|
97–117
|
|
|
119–144
|
|
|
Projecting and expanding turns
|
|
|
147–169
|
|
|
171–200
|
|
|
201–231
|
|
|
233–269
|
|
|
Connecting actions across turns
|
|
|
273–298
|
|
|
299–334
|
|
|
335–376
|
|
|
377–400
|
|
|
Index
|
401–404
|
“Sound Patterns in Interaction constitutes a significant step toward expanding the scope of Conversation Analysis to include languages other than English. Aspects of sequencing which are language- or variety-specific are highlighted throughout the volume, pointing the way toward a cross-linguistic 'phonology of conversation'. Concomitantly, readers are encouraged to view linguistics and Conversation Analysis as aspects of a single disciplinary field whose aim it is to illuminate the natural symbiosis between speech sound and the social interactions in which they are used.”
Elizabeth Shipley, UCSB, in Discourse & Society Vol. 19:1.
Cited by
Cited by other publications
No author info given
2012.
In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis,
► pp. 741 ff. 
No author info given
2014.
In Multimodality, Interaction and Turn-taking in Mandarin Conversation [Studies in Chinese Language and Discourse, 3],
No author info given
2016.
In Intonation Units Revisited [Studies in Language and Social Interaction, 29],
Arnhold, Anja & Aki-Juhani Kyröläinen
2017. Modelling the Interplay of Multiple Cues in Prosodic Focus Marking.
Laboratory Phonology 8:1
Beeke, Suzanne, Ray Wilkinson & Jane Maxim
2009. Prosody as a compensatory strategy in the conversations of people with agrammatism.
Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics 23:2 ► pp. 133 ff.
Betz, Emma & Andrea Golato
2008. Remembering Relevant Information and Withholding Relevant Next Actions: The German Tokenachja.
Research on Language & Social Interaction 41:1 ► pp. 58 ff.
Bolden, Galina B.
2009. Beyond Answering: Repeat-Prefaced Responses in Conversation.
Communication Monographs 76:2 ► pp. 121 ff.
Clift, Rebecca, Paul Drew & Ian Hutchby
2006.
In Handbook of Pragmatics,
► pp. 1 ff.
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth
2007.
In Phonology in Context,
► pp. 186 ff.
Curnow, Timothy Jowan
2009. Communication in Introductory Linguistics.
Australian Journal of Linguistics 29:1 ► pp. 27 ff.
De Marco, Anna & Paola Leone
2012.
In CALL: Using, Learning, Knowing, EUROCALL Conference, Gothenburg, Sweden, 22-25 August 2012, Proceedings,
► pp. 70 ff.
De Stefani, Elwys & Anne-Sylvie Horlacher
2008. Topical and sequential backlinking in a French radio phone-in program.
Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 18:3 ► pp. 381 ff.
Deppermann, Arnulf
2011. The Study of Formulations as a Key to an Interactional Semantics.
Human Studies 34:2 ► pp. 115 ff.
Deppermann, Arnulf & Jürgen Streeck
2018.
In Time in Embodied Interaction [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 293],
► pp. 1 ff.
Ford, Cecilia E. & Trini Stickle
2012. Securing recipiency in workplace meetings: Multimodal practices.
Discourse Studies 14:1 ► pp. 11 ff.
Ford, Cecilia E., Sandra A. Thompson & Veronika Drake
2012. Bodily-Visual Practices and Turn Continuation.
Discourse Processes 49:3-4 ► pp. 192 ff.
Frick, Maria
2013. Singing and codeswitching in sequence closings.
Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 23:2 ► pp. 243 ff.
Golato, Andrea
2012. Germanoh: Marking an Emotional Change of State.
Research on Language & Social Interaction 45:3 ► pp. 245 ff.
Golato, Andrea & Zsuzsanna Fagyal
2008. Comparing Single and Double Sayings of the German Response Tokenjaand the Role of Prosody: A Conversation Analytic Perspective.
Research on Language & Social Interaction 41:3 ► pp. 241 ff.
Haugh, Michael & Anthony J. Liddicoat
2009. Examining Conceptualizations of Communication.
Australian Journal of Linguistics 29:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Hellermann, John
2005. Syntactic and Prosodic Practices for Cohesion in Series of Three-Part Sequences in Classroom Talk.
Research on Language & Social Interaction 38:1 ► pp. 105 ff.
Keevallik, Leelo
2012. Compromising progressivity.
Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 22:1 ► pp. 119 ff.
Keevallik, Leelo & Richard Ogden
2020. Sounds on the Margins of Language at the Heart of Interaction.
Research on Language and Social Interaction 53:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Kern, Friederike & Margret Selting
2020.
In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics,
► pp. 1 ff.
Kirkham, Sam
2011. Personal style and epistemic stance in classroom discussion.
Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 20:3 ► pp. 201 ff.
Laury, Ritva, Marja Etelämäki & Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen
2014. Introduction.
Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 24:3 ► pp. 435 ff.
Levis, John M. & Anne Wichmann
2015.
In The Handbook of English Pronunciation,
► pp. 139 ff.
Lindström, Jan K.
2006.
In Handbook of Pragmatics,
► pp. 1 ff.
Local, John & Gareth Walker
2012. How phonetic features project more talk.
Journal of the International Phonetic Association 42:3 ► pp. 255 ff.
Mazeland, Harrie
2007. Parenthetical sequences.
Journal of Pragmatics 39:10 ► pp. 1816 ff.
Ogden, Richard
2012. The Phonetics of Talk in Interaction – Introduction to the Special Issue.
Language and Speech 55:1 ► pp. 3 ff.
Ogden, Richard & Sara Routarinne
2005. The Communicative Functions of Final Rises in Finnish Intonation.
Phonetica 62:2-4 ► pp. 160 ff.
Ono, Tsuyoshi & Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen
2007. Increments in cross-linguistic perspective.
Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 17:4 ► pp. 505 ff.
Pennington, Martha C.
2015.
In Investigating English Pronunciation,
► pp. 149 ff.
Plug, Leendert
2005. From Words to Actions: The Phonetics of Eigenlijk in Two Communicative Contexts.
Phonetica 62:2-4 ► pp. 131 ff.
Raymond, Chase Wesley, Jeffrey D. Robinson, Barbara A. Fox, Sandra A. Thompson & Kristella Montiegel
2020. Modulating action through minimization: Syntax in the service of offering and requesting.
Language in Society ► pp. 1 ff.
Reed, Beatrice Szczepek
2012.
In Pragmatics and Prosody in English Language Teaching [Educational Linguistics, 15],
► pp. 147 ff.
Rowan, Kirsty
2016. “Who are you in this body?”: Identifying demons and the path to deliverance in a London Pentecostal church.
Language in Society 45:2 ► pp. 247 ff.
Rutter, Ben
2009. Repair sequences in dysarthric conversational speech: A study in interactional phonetics.
Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics 23:12 ► pp. 887 ff.
SZCZEPEK REED, BEATRICE
2012.
In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics,
Weatherall, Ann
2011. I don't knowas a Prepositioned Epistemic Hedge.
Research on Language & Social Interaction 44:4 ► pp. 317 ff.
Weiste, Elina & Anssi Peräkylä
2014. Prosody and empathic communication in psychotherapy interaction.
Psychotherapy Research 24:6 ► pp. 687 ff.
Weiste, Elina, Liisa Voutilainen & Anssi Peräkylä
2016. Epistemic asymmetries in psychotherapy interaction: therapists' practices for displaying access to clients' inner experiences.
Sociology of Health & Illness 38:4 ► pp. 645 ff.
Wichmann, Anne
2010. Intonational meaning in institutional settings: the role of syntagmatic relations.
Cultural Studies of Science Education 5:4 ► pp. 849 ff.
Wichmann, Anne
2015.
In The Handbook of English Pronunciation,
► pp. 175 ff.
Wingard, Leah
2019. Reconsidering emotion socialization research using case studies of naturally-occurring parent–child interaction.
Qualitative Research in Psychology ► pp. 1 ff.
Wright, Melissa
2011. On clicks in English talk-in-interaction.
Journal of the International Phonetic Association 41:2 ► pp. 207 ff.
Zawiszová, Halina
2018.
In On ´doing friendship´ in and through talk: Exploring conversational interactions of Japanese young people,
Zinken, Jörg & Eva Ogiermann
2011. How to Propose an Action as Objectively Necessary: The Case of PolishTrzeba x(“One Needs tox”).
Research on Language & Social Interaction 44:3 ► pp. 263 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 08 january 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
Subjects
BIC Subject: CF – Linguistics
BISAC Subject: LAN009000 – LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General