Reconstructing Grammar
Comparative Linguistics and Grammaticalization
Editor
| Rice University, Houston
Comparative linguistics and grammaticalization theory both belong to the broader category of historical linguistics, yet few linguists practice both. The methods and goals of each group seem largely distinct: comparative linguists have by and large avoided reconstructing grammar, while grammaticalization theoreticians have either focused on explaining attested historical change or used internal reconstruction to formulate hypotheses about processes of change. In this collection, some of the leading voices in grammaticalization theory apply their methods to comparative data (largely drawn from indigenous languages of the Americas), showing not only that grammar can be reconstructed, but that the process of reconstructing grammar can yield interesting theoretical and typological insights.
[Typological Studies in Language, 43] 2000. xiv, 269 pp.
Publishing status: Available
© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Table of Contents
Preface
|
vii
|
1
|
|
39
|
|
65
|
|
107
|
|
161
|
|
177
|
|
201
|
|
231
|
|
Language and Language Family Index
|
259
|
Name Index
|
261
|
Subject Index
|
267
|
Cited by
Cited by other publications
Galucio, Ana Vilacy & Antônia Fernanda de Souza Nogueira
Hieber, Daniel W.
Kuteva, Tania, Bernd Heine, Bo Hong, Haiping Long, Heiko Narrog & Seongha Rhee
Nikulin, Andrey & Andrés Pablo Salanova
Sapién, Racquel-María
Sommerer, Lotte
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 08 january 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
Subjects
BIC Subject: CF – Linguistics
BISAC Subject: LAN009000 – LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General