Demonstratives
Form, function and grammaticalization
| Max Planck Institute, Leipzig
All languages have demonstratives, but their form, meaning and use vary tremendously across the languages of the world. This book presents the first large-scale analysis of demonstratives from a cross-linguistic and diachronic perspective. It is based on a representative sample of 85 languages. The first part of the book analyzes demonstratives from a synchronic point of view, examining their morphological structures, semantic features, syntactic functions, and pragmatic uses in spoken and written discourse. The second part concentrates on diachronic issues, in particular on the development of demonstratives into grammatical markers. Across languages demonstratives provide a frequent historical source for definite articles, relative and third person pronouns, nonverbal copulas, sentence connectives, directional preverbs, focus markers, expletives, and many other grammatical markers. The book describes the different mechanisms by which demonstratives grammaticalize and argues that the evolution of grammatical markers from demonstratives is crucially distinct from other cases of grammaticalization.
[Typological Studies in Language, 42] 1999. xii, 205 pp.
Publishing status: Available
© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Table of Contents
|
Acknowledgments
|
ix
|
|
Abbreviations
|
xi
|
|
Introduction
|
1
|
|
Morphology
|
13
|
|
Semantics
|
35
|
|
Syntax
|
57
|
|
Pragmatic use
|
93
|
|
Grammaticalization
|
115
|
|
Conclusion
|
157
|
|
Notes
|
163
|
|
Data sources
|
169
|
|
The inflectional features of pronominal demonstratives
|
171
|
|
References
|
175
|
|
Language Index
|
193
|
|
Name Index
|
197
|
|
Subject Index
|
203
|
“The book is but a first step towards a good understanding of demonstratives in human language. Nevertheless, it is a promising, thought provoking, and wide ranging start. It opens up the basic question of what kind of linguistic phenomenon demonstratives are, a question that has been taken for granted much too long.”
Michael Cysouw, ZAS Berlin, in General Linguistics 39(1-4), 2002
“This is an important book, not only for typologists, but for all linguists, and especially those about to begin fieldwork on undescribed languages.
”
”
Joseph F. Eska in Language 77:4, 2001
Cited by
Cited by 194 other publications
No author info given
2012.
In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis,
► pp. 741 ff. 
No author info given
2014.
In A Grammar of Luwo [Culture and Language Use, 12],
No author info given
2014.
In Beyond 'Khoisan' [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 330],
No author info given
2014.
In Profiling Discourse Participants [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 246],
No author info given
2014.
In Qualitative-Quantitative Analyses of Dutch and Afrikaans Grammar and Lexicon [Studies in Functional and Structural Linguistics, 67],
No author info given
2015.
In Demonstratives and Possessives with Attitude [Human Cognitive Processing, 51],
No author info given
2015.
In Impersonals and other Agent Defocusing Constructions in French [Human Cognitive Processing, 50],
No author info given
2017.
In The Encyclopedic Dictionary of Applied Linguistics: A Handbook for Language Teaching,
► pp. 744 ff.
No author info given
2018.
In Directional Particles in Cantonese [Studies in Chinese Language and Discourse, 9],
No author info given
2019.
In Diachrony of Personal Pronouns in Japanese [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 344],
No author info given
2021.
In Linguistic Categories, Language Description and Linguistic Typology [Typological Studies in Language, 132],
No author info given
2021.
In Psycholinguistic Approaches to Production and Comprehension in Bilingual Adults and Children [Benjamins Current Topics, 117],
Aguilar-Guevara, Ana, Bert Le Bruyn & Joost Zwarts
2014.
In Weak Referentiality [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 219],
► pp. 1 ff.
Aigro, Mari
2020.
POLAR QUESTION PARTICLES AND THEIR SOURCES: A SEMANTIC APPROACH TO GRAMMATICALISATION
1
.
Transactions of the Philological Society 118:2 ► pp. 237 ff.
Andersen, Torben
2015. Syntacticized topics in Kurmuk.
Studies in Language 39:3 ► pp. 508 ff.
Andriani, Luigi, Kim A. Groothuis & Giuseppina Silvestri
2020. Pathways of Grammaticalisation in Italo-Romance.
Probus 32:2 ► pp. 327 ff.
Asiimwe, Allen
2016. Investigating the connection between the demonstrative and the definite morpheme -ain Runyankore-Rukiga.
South African Journal of African Languages 36:1 ► pp. 65 ff.
Auer, Peter
2017.
In Imperative Turns at Talk [Studies in Language and Social Interaction, 30],
► pp. 411 ff.
Baker, Brett & Mark Harvey
2020. Anti-scope prefix order and zero-marked obliques.
Diachronica 37:2 ► pp. 133 ff.
Barbosa, Eduarda Calado & Felipe Nogueira De Carvalho
2020. What we do and presuppose when we demonstrate.
Veritas (Porto Alegre) 65:3 ► pp. e38525 ff.
Bartkutė, Darija & Daiva Verikaitė-Gaigalienė
2020. Spatial deictics in translation.
Languages in Contrast 20:1 ► pp. 84 ff.
Bergqvist, Henrik
2018.
In Evidence for Evidentiality [Human Cognitive Processing, 61],
► pp. 19 ff.
Bergqvist, Henrik & Dominique Knuchel
2019. Explorations of Engagement: Introduction.
Open Linguistics 5:1 ► pp. 650 ff.
Bisang, Walter & Yicheng Wu
2017. Numeral classifiers in East Asia.
Linguistics 55:2 ► pp. 257 ff.
Bocale, Paola
2018. The Irrealis Use of the Deictic TAM in Contemporary Russian.
Scando-Slavica 64:2 ► pp. 175 ff.
Breban, Tine
2010. Reconstructing paths of secondary grammaticalisation ofsamefrom emphasising to phoricity and single-referent-marking postdeterminer uses1.
Transactions of the Philological Society 108:1 ► pp. 68 ff.
Britsch, Susan
2009. Differential discourses: the contribution of visual analysis to defining scientific literacy in the early years classroom.
Visual Communication 8:2 ► pp. 207 ff.
Burenhult, Niclas
2003. Attention, accessibility, and the addressee.
Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 13:3 ► pp. 363 ff.
Calle-Martín, Javier
2019. No Cat Could be That Hungry!This/Thatas Intensifiers in American English.
Australian Journal of Linguistics 39:2 ► pp. 151 ff.
Calude, Andreea S.
2017. Sociolinguistic variation at the grammatical/discourse level.
International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 22:3 ► pp. 429 ff.
Cap, Piotr
2010. Pragmatics, Micropragmatics, Macropragmatics.
Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 6:2
Catasso, Nicholas
2011. The Grammaticalization of Demonstratives: A Comparative Analysis.
Journal of Universal Language 12:1 ► pp. 7 ff.
Chang, Franklin, Gary S. Dell & Kathryn Bock
2006. Becoming syntactic..
Psychological Review 113:2 ► pp. 234 ff.
Chelliah, Shobhana L. & Willem J. de Reuse
2010.
In Handbook of Descriptive Linguistic Fieldwork,
► pp. 279 ff.
Chen, Rong
2020. Plural marking patterns of nouns and their associates in the world’s languages.
Studies in Language 44:1 ► pp. 231 ff.
Christy, T. Craig
2013. Vygotsky, Cognitive Development and Language.
Historiographia Linguistica 40:1-2 ► pp. 199 ff.
Chu, Chia-Ying & Utako Minai
2018. Children’s Demonstrative Comprehension and the Role of Non-linguistic Cognitive Abilities: A Cross-Linguistic Study.
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 47:6 ► pp. 1343 ff.
COLE, MARCELLE
2017. Pronominal anaphoric strategies in the West Saxon dialect of Old English.
English Language and Linguistics 21:2 ► pp. 381 ff.
Consten, Manfred & Maria Averintseva-Klisch
2012. Tentative Reference Acts? ‘Recognitional Demonstratives’ as Means of Suggesting Mutual Knowledge – or Overriding a Lack of It.
Research in Language 10:3 ► pp. 257 ff.
Cooperrider, Kensy
2016. The Co-Organization of Demonstratives and Pointing Gestures.
Discourse Processes 53:8 ► pp. 632 ff.
Cooperrider, Kensy
2017. Foreground gesture, background gesture.
Gesture 16:2 ► pp. 176 ff.
Cornish, Francis
2017.
In Essential Competencies for English-medium University Teaching [Educational Linguistics, 27],
► pp. 65 ff.
CORNISH, FRANCIS
2017. SN démonstratifs et anadeixis: sens ‘spatial’, ou valeurs tributaires d'une stratégie pragmatique potentielle?.
Journal of French Language Studies 27:2 ► pp. 215 ff.
Cuenca, Maria-Josep
2014. The use of demonstratives and context activation in Catalan parliamentary debate.
Discourse Studies 16:6 ► pp. 729 ff.
Cáo 曹羽菲, Yǔfēi
2016. Anáfora con artículo definido y construcción del discurso: comparación entre español y chino.
Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación 67 ► pp. 89 ff.
da Milano, Federica
2007. Demonstratives in parallel texts: a case study.
Language Typology and Universals 60:2 ► pp. 135 ff.
Dachkovsky, Svetlana
2020. From a demonstrative to a relative clause marker.
Sign Language & Linguistics 23:1-2 ► pp. 142 ff.
Dancygier, Barbara
2019. Proximal and distal deictics and the construal of narrative time
.
Cognitive Linguistics 30:2 ► pp. 399 ff.
De Mulder, Walter & Anne Carlier
2006. Du démonstratif à l'article défini : le cas de ce en français moderne.
Langue française 152:4 ► pp. 96 ff.
de Vaan, Michiel
2015. Reduplicated demonstratives in ancient Indo-European languages.
Transactions of the Philological Society 113:1 ► pp. 38 ff.
Diessel, Holger
2013. Where does language come from? Some reflections on the role of deictic gesture and demonstratives in the evolution of language.
Language and Cognition 5:2-3 ► pp. 239 ff.
Diessel, Holger
2014. Demonstratives, Frames of Reference, and Semantic Universals of Space.
Language and Linguistics Compass 8:3 ► pp. 116 ff.
Diessel, Holger
2019.
In The Grammar Network,
Diessel, Holger & Kenny R. Coventry
2020. Demonstratives in Spatial Language and Social Interaction: An Interdisciplinary Review.
Frontiers in Psychology 11
Dékány, Éva
2021.
In The Hungarian Nominal Functional Sequence [Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 100],
► pp. 93 ff.
Dékány, Éva
2021.
In The Hungarian Nominal Functional Sequence [Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 100],
► pp. 213 ff.
EPSTEIN, RICHARD
2011. The distal demonstrative as discourse marker in Beowulf.
English Language and Linguistics 15:1 ► pp. 113 ff.
Estevam, Adriana M.
2019.
In Nominalization in Languages of the Americas [Typological Studies in Language, 124],
► pp. 591 ff.
EVANS, NICHOLAS, HENRIK BERGQVIST & LILA SAN ROQUE
2018. The grammar of engagement I: framework and initial exemplification.
Language and Cognition 10:1 ► pp. 110 ff.
Everett, Daniel L.
2005. Cultural Constraints on Grammar and Cognition in Pirahã.
Current Anthropology 46:4 ► pp. 621 ff.
Flick, Johanna
2019. „Alte“ Daten, neue Methoden.
Jahrbuch für Germanistische Sprachgeschichte 10:1 ► pp. 151 ff.
Forker, Diana
2020. Elevation as a Grammatical and Semantic Category of Demonstratives.
Frontiers in Psychology 11
Fossard, Marion, Alan Garnham & H. Wind Cowles
2012. Between anaphora and deixis … The resolution of the demonstrative noun phrase “that N”.
Language and Cognitive Processes 27:9 ► pp. 1385 ff.
Frajzyngier, Zygmunt, Meichun Liu & Yingying Ye
2020. Reference system in modern Mandarin Chinese.
Australian Journal of Linguistics 40:1 ► pp. 45 ff.
Fretheim, Thorstein, Nana Aba Appiah Amfo & Ildikó Vaskó
2011. Token-reflexive, anaphoric and deictic functions of ‘here’.
Nordic Journal of Linguistics 34:3 ► pp. 239 ff.
García-Castillero, Carlos
2018. On morphological internalization.
Diachronica 35:1 ► pp. 35 ff.
Gelderen, Elly Van
2004. The CP and split CP cross-linguistically: The layer parameter.
<i>WORD</i> 55:3 ► pp. 369 ff.
Georgi, Geoff
2020.
In The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Semantics,
► pp. 1 ff.
Gerner, Matthias
2009. Deictic Features of Demonstratives: A Typological Survey with Special Reference to the Miao Group.
Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique 54:1 ► pp. 43 ff.
Ghesquière, Lobke, An Van linden & Kristin Davidse
2013. Subjective Compounds and Subjectivity/Subjectification in the English Noun Phrase.
English Studies 94:1 ► pp. 90 ff.
Goldstein, David M.
2014. Object agreement in Lycian.
Historical Linguistics 127:1 ► pp. 101 ff.
González Marín, Susana
2019. El epitafio de Ovidio (<em>Trist</em>. III 3.73-76): la complejidad de la deixis al servicio de la sofisticación poética.
Emerita 87:1 ► pp. 99 ff.
Griffiths, Debra, Andre Bester & Kenny R. Coventry
2019. Space Trumps Time When Talking About Objects.
Cognitive Science 43:3 ► pp. e12719 ff.
Guillot, Céline
2006. Démonstratif et déixis discursive : analyse comparée d'un corpus écrit de français médiéval et d'un corpus oral de français contemporain.
Langue française 152:4 ► pp. 56 ff.
Guillot, Céline
2006. Le démonstratif en français ? présentation.
Langue française 152:4 ► pp. 3 ff.
Gómez, Luis Unceta
2017.
In Pragmatic Approaches to Latin and Ancient Greek [Studies in Language Companion Series, 190],
► pp. 63 ff.
Halm, Tamás
2018. From possessive suffix to affective demonstrative suffix in Hungarian: a grammaticalization analysis.
Morphology 28:4 ► pp. 359 ff.
Hanks, William F.
2005. Explorations in the Deictic Field.
Current Anthropology 46:2 ► pp. 191 ff.
Harvey, Mark & Brett Baker
2020. Epenthetic prefixation in Alawa and Marra.
Australian Journal of Linguistics 40:3 ► pp. 273 ff.
Hayward, Rachael, Robin Wooffitt & Catherine Woods
2015. The transgressive that: Making the world uncanny.
Discourse Studies 17:6 ► pp. 703 ff.
Heine, Bernd & Tania Kuteva
2005.
In Language Contact and Grammatical Change,
HEINE, BERND & KYUNG-AN SONG
2011. On the grammaticalization of personal pronouns.
Journal of Linguistics 47:3 ► pp. 587 ff.
Hieber, Daniel W.
2018.
In Category Change from a Constructional Perspective [Constructional Approaches to Language, 20],
► pp. 15 ff.
Hilpert, Martin
2020.
Unity and diversity in grammaticalization scenarios, Bisang, Walter & Andrej
Malchukov.
Diachronica 37:1 ► pp. 127 ff.
Inglis, Douglas
2017. Khamti Shan anti-ergative construction.
Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 40:2 ► pp. 133 ff.
Iraola Azpiroz, Maialen, Mikel Santesteban, Antonella Sorace & Maria-José Ezeizabarrena
2017. Pronoun preferences of children in a language without typical third-person pronouns.
First Language 37:2 ► pp. 168 ff.
Jacques, Guillaume & Aimée Lahaussois
2014. The auditory demonstrative in Khaling.
Studies in Language 38:2 ► pp. 393 ff.
Jarbou, Samer Omar
2018. Time frame as a determinant of accessibility of anaphoric demonstratives in Classical Arabic.
Topics in Linguistics 19:2 ► pp. 57 ff.
Jarbou, Samir O. & Fathi Migdadi
2012. Testing the Limits of Anaphoric Distance in Classical Arabic: A Corpus-Based Study.
Research in Language 10:4 ► pp. 423 ff.
Jarbou, Samir Omar
2012. Medial deictic demonstratives in Arabic.
Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 22:1 ► pp. 103 ff.
Jungbluth, Konstanze
2002. Der Gebrauch von Deiktika in alltäglichen Handlungszusammenhängen. Bericht einer Feldstudie aus der Provinz Toledo.
Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik 32:1 ► pp. 56 ff.
Kahl, Lukas & Bernd Vath
2013. Buchbesprechungen.
Historical Linguistics 126:1 ► pp. 309 ff.
Kaland, Constantijn & Stefan Baumann
2020. Demarcating and highlighting in Papuan Malay phrase prosody.
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 147:4 ► pp. 2974 ff.
Kaneyasu, Michiko & Shoichi Iwasaki
2017. Indexing ‘entrustment’: An analysis of the Japanese formulaic construction [N da yo N].
Discourse Studies 19:4 ► pp. 402 ff.
Kang, Arum
2021. Marking definiteness in an articleless language.
Language and Linguistics. 語言暨語言學 22:2 ► pp. 302 ff.
Khachaturyan, Maria
2019. Knowing Is Belonging: Recognitional Deixis and Emergence of Common Ground in Religious Conversion.
Signs and Society 7:2 ► pp. 186 ff.
Khachaturyan, Maria
2020. Common Ground in Demonstrative Reference: The Case of Mano (Mande).
Frontiers in Psychology 11
Kim, Min-Joo
2019.
In The Syntax and Semantics of Noun Modifiers and the Theory of Universal Grammar [Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 96],
► pp. 301 ff.
Knuchel, Dominique
2019. Kogi Demonstratives and Engagement.
Open Linguistics 5:1 ► pp. 615 ff.
Kobayashi, Harumi, Tetsuya Yasuda, Hiroshi Igarashi & Satoshi Suzuki
2020. Language Use in Joint Action: The Means of Referring Expressions.
International Journal of Social Robotics 12:5 ► pp. 1021 ff.
Kocsány, Piroska
2018. A közelre mutatóeznévmás anaforikus kifejtő szerkezetekben és a diszkurzív kontinuitás fokozatai.
Jelentés és Nyelvhasználat 5:1 ► pp. 117 ff.
Kroon, Caroline
2017. Textual Deixis and the ‘Anchoring’ Use of the Latin Pronoun hic.
Mnemosyne 70:4 ► pp. 585 ff.
Kummerow, David
2012. The Person That Isn't: On Defining the Third-Person, Negatively and Positively So.
Australian Journal of Linguistics 32:2 ► pp. 259 ff.
Kuteva, Tania, Bernd Heine, Bo Hong, Haiping Long, Heiko Narrog & Seongha Rhee
2019.
In World Lexicon of Grammaticalization,
König, Ekkehard
2015.
In Perspectives on Historical Syntax [Studies in Language Companion Series, 169],
► pp. 33 ff.
König, Ekkehard
2017.
In Similative and Equative Constructions [Typological Studies in Language, 117],
► pp. 143 ff.
König, Ekkehard & Jingying Li
2018.
In New Trends in Grammaticalization and Language Change [Studies in Language Companion Series, 202],
► pp. 55 ff.
Lander, Eric & Liliane Haegeman
2018. The Nanosyntax of Spatial Deixis.
Studia Linguistica 72:2 ► pp. 362 ff.
Lin, Lin
2020.
In The German Demonstratives [Peking University Linguistics Research, 2],
► pp. 1 ff.
Lin, Lin
2020.
In The German Demonstratives [Peking University Linguistics Research, 2],
► pp. 65 ff.
Long, Hai-Ping
2013. On the formation of MandarinVdeO focus clefts.
Acta Linguistica Hungarica 60:4 ► pp. 409 ff.
Long, Haiping & Pengfei Kuang
2017. Modern Chinese confirmative shi
.
Functions of Language 24:3 ► pp. 294 ff.
Louagie, Dana
2017. The Status of Determining Elements in Australian Languages.
Australian Journal of Linguistics 37:2 ► pp. 182 ff.
Manfredi, Stefano
2017. Demonstratives and the emergence of a definite article in Juba Arabic and Ki-Nubi.
Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 32:2 ► pp. 205 ff.
Marchello-Nizia, Christiane
2005. Deixis and subjectivity: the semantics of demonstratives in Old French (9th–12th century).
Journal of Pragmatics 37:1 ► pp. 43 ff.
Marchello-Nizia, Christiane
2006. Du subjectif au spatial : l'évolution des formes et du sens des démonstratifs en français.
Langue française 152:4 ► pp. 114 ff.
Mazengia Beyene, Shimelis
2021.
In Grammatical and Sociolinguistic Aspects of Ethiopian Languages [IMPACT: Studies in Language, Culture and Society, 48],
► pp. 245 ff.
McBurney, Susan Lioyd
2002.
In Modality and Structure in Signed and Spoken Languages,
► pp. 329 ff.
McGregor, William B.
2020.
In Handbook of Pragmatics [Handbook of Pragmatics, ],
► pp. 221 ff.
Medrano, Samuel Navas, Max Pfeiffer & Christian Kray
2018.
In [Electronic Workshops in Computing, ],
Meeuwis, Michael & Koen Stroeken
2012. Non-situational functions of demonstrative noun phrases in Lingala (Bantu).
Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 22:1 ► pp. 147 ff.
Meibauer, Jörg, Ulrike Demske, Jochen Geilfuß-Wolfgang, Jürgen Pafel, Karl Heinz Ramers, Monika Rothweiler & Markus Steinbach
2002.
In Einführung in die germanistische Linguistik,
► pp. 208 ff.
Meibauer, Jörg, Ulrike Demske, Jochen Geilfuß-Wolfgang, Jürgen Pafel, Karl Heinz Ramers, Monika Rothweiler & Markus Steinbach
2007.
In Einführung in die germanistische Linguistik,
► pp. 210 ff.
Meier, Richard P., Kearsy Cormier & David Quinto-Pozos
2002.
In Modality and Structure in Signed and Spoken Languages,
► pp. 321 ff.
Mesh, Kate, Emiliana Cruz, Joost van de Weijer, Niclas Burenhult & Marianne Gullberg
2021. Effects of Scale on Multimodal Deixis: Evidence From Quiahije Chatino.
Frontiers in Psychology 11
Michael, Lev
2015.
In Language Structure and Environment [Cognitive Linguistic Studies in Cultural Contexts, 6],
► pp. 99 ff.
Mihas, Elena
2013. Nominal and verbal temporal morphology in Ashéninka Perené (Arawak).
Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 45:1 ► pp. 43 ff.
Nakayasu, Minako
2018.
In Sociocultural Dimensions of Lexis and Text in the History of English [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 343],
► pp. 125 ff.
Naruoka, Keiko
2006. The interactional functions of the Japanese demonstratives in conversation.
Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 16:4 ► pp. 475 ff.
Navas Medrano, Samuel, Max Pfeiffer & Christian Kray
2017.
In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services,
► pp. 1 ff.
Navas Medrano, Samuel, Max Pfeiffer & Christian Kray
2020. Remote Deictic Communication: Simulating Deictic Pointing Gestures across Distances Using Electro Muscle Stimulation.
International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction 36:19 ► pp. 1867 ff.
Nikitina, Tatiana
2018. When Linguists and Speakers Do Not Agree: The Endangered Grammar of Verbal Art in West Africa.
Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 28:2 ► pp. 197 ff.
Nykiel, Jerzy
2019.
In Developments in English Historical Morpho-Syntax [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 346],
► pp. 57 ff.
Loretta O'Connor & Pieter Muysken
1920.
In The Native Languages of South America,
Oshima, David Y. & Eric McCready
2017. Anaphoric demonstratives and mutual knowledge.
Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 35:3 ► pp. 801 ff.
O’Meara, Carolyn, Niclas Burenhult, Mikael Rothstein & Peter Sercombe
2020. Representing space and place: hunter-gatherer perspectives.
Hunter Gatherer Research 4:3 ► pp. 287 ff.
Pafel, Jürgen
2015.
In Einführung in die germanistische Linguistik,
► pp. 212 ff.
Parodi, Giovanni & Gina Burdiles
2019. Los pronombres neutros ‘esto’, ‘eso’ y ‘aquello’ como mecanismos encapsuladores en el discurso de la
economía.
Spanish in Context 16:1 ► pp. 104 ff.
Pavesi, Maria
2014. This and That in the Language of Film Dubbing: A Corpus-Based Analysis.
Meta 58:1 ► pp. 103 ff.
Payne, Doris L.
2020.
In The ‘Noun Phrase’ across Languages [Typological Studies in Language, 128],
► pp. 330 ff.
Peeters, David, Emiel Krahmer & Alfons Maes
2021. A conceptual framework for the study of demonstrative reference.
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 28:2 ► pp. 409 ff.
Peeters, David & Aslı Özyürek
2016. This and That Revisited: A Social and Multimodal Approach to Spatial Demonstratives.
Frontiers in Psychology 7
Penco, Carlo
2021. Indexicals and essential demonstrations.
Semiotica 0:0
Pfau, Roland & Markus Steinbach
2015.
In Signs and Structures [Benjamins Current Topics, 71],
► pp. 71 ff.
Radulescu, Alexandru
2018. The difference between indexicals and demonstratives.
Synthese 195:7 ► pp. 3173 ff.
Real-Puigdollers, Cristina
2021. A minimalist approach to the syntax of p
.
Linguistic Variation 21:1 ► pp. 90 ff.
Reile, Maria, Kristiina Averin & Nele Põldver
2020. Interpreting Estonian Demonstratives: The Effects of Referent’s Distance and Visual Salience.
Frontiers in Psychology 11
Rocca, Roberta, Kristian Tylén, Mikkel Wallentin & Søren Wichmann
2019. This shoe, that tiger: Semantic properties reflecting manual affordances of the referent modulate demonstrative use.
PLOS ONE 14:1 ► pp. e0210333 ff.
Rocca, Roberta & Mikkel Wallentin
2020. Demonstrative Reference and Semantic Space: A Large-Scale Demonstrative Choice Task Study.
Frontiers in Psychology 11
Rocca, Roberta, Mikkel Wallentin, Cordula Vesper & Kristian Tylén
2019. This is for you: Social modulations of proximal vs. distal space in collaborative interaction.
Scientific Reports 9:1
Rochet-Capellan, Amélie, Rafael Laboissière, Arturo Galván & Jean-Luc Schwartz
2008. The Speech Focus Position Effect on Jaw–Finger Coordination in a Pointing Task.
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 51:6 ► pp. 1507 ff.
Roehrs, Dorian
2013. The Inner Makeup of Definite Determiners: The Case of Germanic.
Journal of Germanic Linguistics 25:4 ► pp. 295 ff.
Rosen, Nicole
2003. Demonstrative Position in Michif.
Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique 48:1-2 ► pp. 39 ff.
Saltarelli, Mario
2016.
In Romance Linguistics 2013 [Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory, 9],
► pp. 399 ff.
Schlachter, Eva
2020.
In Walking on the Grammaticalization Path of the Definite Article [Studies in Language Variation, 23],
► pp. 18 ff.
Scott, Kate
2019.
In Referring Expressions, Pragmatics, and Style,
Sengani, T. M.
2008. Zwikumelo—Referential praises for empowerment and talk management strategies for mahosi (royal leaders) with special reference to Thovhele Miḓiyavhathu Tshivhase.
South African Journal of African Languages 28:2 ► pp. 87 ff.
Serhan, Baris & Angelo Cangelosi
2019.
In 2019 Joint IEEE 9th International Conference on Development and Learning and Epigenetic Robotics (ICDL-EpiRob),
► pp. 157 ff.
Sheng, Yimin
2015. The Location morpheme-demonstrative cycle in Wu dialects.
International Journal of Chinese Linguistics 2:1 ► pp. 121 ff.
Shi, Yuzhi
2021. Phonological derivation from proximal to distal demonstratives in Chinese.
Linguistics 0:0
Shibasaki, Reijirou
2014.
In Grammaticalization – Theory and Data [Studies in Language Companion Series, 162],
► pp. 129 ff.
Shin, Naomi, Luis Hinojosa-Cantú, Barbara Shaffer & Jill P. Morford
2020. Demonstratives as indicators of interactional focus: Spatial and social dimensions of Spanish esta and esa
.
Cognitive Linguistics 31:3 ► pp. 485 ff.
Sommerer, Lotte
2015.
In Diachronic Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 18],
► pp. 107 ff.
Souag, Lameen
2014. The development of addressee agreement on demonstratives.
Diachronica 31:4 ► pp. 535 ff.
Speed, Laura J. & Asifa Majid
2017. Dutch modality exclusivity norms: Simulating perceptual modality in space.
Behavior Research Methods 49:6 ► pp. 2204 ff.
Stradioto, Sara
2018. Evidence of a two-way contrast in Mexican Spanish spatial deixis.
Acta Linguistica Hafniensia ► pp. 1 ff.
Stukenbrock, Anja
2020. Deixis, Meta-Perceptive Gaze Practices, and the Interactional Achievement of Joint Attention.
Frontiers in Psychology 11
Sun, Linlin & David Correia Saavedra
2020. Measuring grammatical status in Chinese through quantitative corpus analysis.
Corpora 15:3 ► pp. 317 ff.
Sutarman, Sutarman & Nurachman Hanafi
2020. The Syntactic-Semantic Analyses of Sasak Demonstratives in Lombok.
Ethical Lingua: Journal of Language Teaching and Literature 7:2 ► pp. 200 ff.
Talmy, Leonard
2020. Targeting in Language: Unifying Deixis and Anaphora.
Frontiers in Psychology 11
Tamburelli, Marco
2008. The Role of Paradigm Formation in Lexical Acquisition: Towards a Unified Account of Overgeneralization and Transfer Effects.
Language Acquisition 15:3 ► pp. 130 ff.
Terenghi, Silvia
2019. Demonstrative-reinforcer constructions and the syntactic role of deictic features.
Linguistics in the Netherlands 36 ► pp. 192 ff.
Tizón-Couto, David
2020. Holger Diessel, The grammar network: How linguistic structure is shaped by language use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019. Pp. xvii + 289. ISBN 9781108671040..
English Language and Linguistics ► pp. 1 ff.
Todisco, Emanuela, Pedro Guijarro-Fuentes & Kenny R. Coventry
2021. Analogical Levelling in the Majorcan Catalan Demonstrative System.
Probus 0:0
Torregrossa, Jacopo, Christiane Bongartz & Ianthi Maria Tsimpli
2019. Bilingual reference production.
Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 9:4-5 ► pp. 569 ff.
Tóth, Enikő
2019. Ez vagy az?.
Jelentés és Nyelvhasználat 6:1 ► pp. 129 ff.
Tóth, Enikő & Péter Csatár
2015. Egy interfész jelenség: indexikális demonstratívumok azonosító fókuszban.
Jelentés és Nyelvhasználat 2:1 ► pp. 63 ff.
Urban, Matthias
2020. Mountain linguistics.
Language and Linguistics Compass 14:9
Van de Velde, Freek
2009. Do we need the category of postdeterminer in the NP?.
Transactions of the Philological Society 107:3 ► pp. 293 ff.
VAN DE VELDE, FREEK
2011. Left-peripheral expansion of the English NP.
English Language and Linguistics 15:2 ► pp. 387 ff.
VANDERBAUWHEDE, GUDRUN
2012. Les emplois référentiels du SN démonstratif en français et en néerlandais: pas du pareil au même.
Journal of French Language Studies 22:2 ► pp. 273 ff.
Vanderbauwhede, Gudrun, Piet Desmet & Peter Lauwers
2011. The Shifting of the Demonstrative Determiner in French and Dutch in Parallel Corpora: From Translation Mechanisms to Structural Differences.
Meta 56:2 ► pp. 443 ff.
Vindenes, Urd
2018. Cyclic renewal of demonstratives.
Studies in Language 42:3 ► pp. 641 ff.
Vulchanova, Mila, Pedro Guijarro-Fuentes, Jacqueline Collier & Valentin Vulchanov
2020. Shrinking Your Deictic System: How Far Can You Go?.
Frontiers in Psychology 11
Wall, Albert & Álvaro S. Octavio de Toledo y Huerta
2016.
In Exaptation and Language Change [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 336],
► pp. 341 ff.
Wallentin, Mikkel, Roberta Rocca & Sofia Stroustrup
2019. Grammar, Gender and Demonstratives in Lateralized Imagery for Sentences.
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 48:4 ► pp. 843 ff.
Williams, Nicholas
2020.
In The International Encyclopedia of Linguistic Anthropology,
► pp. 1 ff.
Willis Oko, Christina M.
2015. Deictic expressions in Darma (Almora).
Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 38:1 ► pp. 26 ff.
Wolter, Lynsey
2009. Demonstratives in Philosophy and Linguistics.
Philosophy Compass 4:3 ► pp. 451 ff.
Wu, Tong
2016. Chinese-style topics as indexicality.
International Journal of Chinese Linguistics 3:2 ► pp. 201 ff.
Wu, Yicheng
2017. Numeral classifiers in Sinitic languages: Semantic content, contextuality, and semi-lexicality
.
Linguistics 55:2 ► pp. 333 ff.
Yamaguchi, Toshiko
2015. The rise of demonstrative-based first/second-person markers in the history of Japanese.
Journal of Historical Pragmatics 16:2 ► pp. 250 ff.
Zhan, Fangqiong & Elizabeth Closs Traugott
2019. The development of the Chinese copula shì construction.
Functions of Language 26:2 ► pp. 139 ff.
Çokal, Derya, Patrick Sturt & Fernanda Ferreira
2018. Processing ofItandThisin Written Narrative Discourse.
Discourse Processes 55:3 ► pp. 272 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 may 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
Subjects
BIC Subject: CF – Linguistics
BISAC Subject: LAN009000 – LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General