Chapter published in:
The ‘Noun Phrase’ across Languages: An emergent unit in interaction
Edited by Tsuyoshi Ono and Sandra A. Thompson
[Typological Studies in Language 128] 2020
► pp. 154177
References

Transcription conventions

The paper uses multimodal transcription conventions developed by Lorenza Mondada

References

Auer, Peter
2005Projection in interaction and projection in grammar. Text 25(1): 7–36. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009On-line syntax: Thoughts on the temporality of spoken language. Language Sciences 31(1):1–13. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Broth, Mathias & Keevallik, Leelo
2014Getting ready to move as a couple: Accomplishing mobile formations in a dance class. Space and Culture 17(2): 107–121. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Enfield, Nick
2009The Anatomy of Meaning: Speech, Gesture, and Composite Utterances. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, Charles
2000Action and embodiment within situated human interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 32: 1489–1522. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2002Time in action. Current Anthropology 43: 19–35. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006Human sociality as mutual orientation in a rich interactive environment: Multimodal utterances and pointing in aphasia. In Roots of Human Sociality, Nicholas J. Enfield & Stephen C. Levinson (eds), 96–125. London: Berg Press.Google Scholar
Haviland, John B.
2007Master speakers, master gesturers: A string quartet master class. In Gesture and the Dynamic Dimension of Language: Essays in Honor of David McNeill [Gesture Studies 1], Susan D. Duncan, Justine Cassell & Elena T. Levy (eds), 147–172. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hayashi, Makoto
2005Joint turn construction through language and the body: Notes on embodiment in coordinated participation in situated activities. Semiotica 156: 21–53.Google Scholar
Helasvuo, Marja-Liisa
2001Emerging syntax for interaction: Noun phrases and clauses as a syntactic resource for interaction. In Studies in Interactional Linguistics [Studies in Discourse and Grammar 10], Margret Selting & Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen (eds), 25–50. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul
1998Emergent grammar. In New Psychology of Language: Cognitive and Functional Approaches to Language Structure, Michael Tomasello (ed.), 155–175. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Jones, Stanley E. & LeBaron, Curtis D.
2002Research on the relationship between verbal and nonverbal communication: Emerging integrations. Journal of Communication 52: 499–521. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Genetti, Carol
2015How Languages Work. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Keevallik, Leelo
2010The interactional profile of a placeholder: The Estonian demonstrative see . In Fillers, Pauses and Placeholders [Typological Studies in Language 93], Nino Amiridze, Boyd H. Davis & Margaret Maclagan (eds), 139–172. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011Pro-forms as projective devices in interaction. Discourse Processes 48(6): 404–431. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013The interdependence of bodily demonstrations and clausal syntax. Research on Language and Social Interaction 46(1): 1–21. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015Coordinating the temporalities of talk and dance. In: Temporality in Interaction, A. Deppermann & S. Günthner (eds.), 309–336. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
2017Linking performances: The temporality of contrastive grammar. In Linking Clauses and Actions in Social Interaction, Ritva Laury, Marja Etelämäki & Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen (eds), 54–72. Helsinki: Finnish Literary Society.Google Scholar
2018What does embodied interaction tell us about grammar? Research on Language and Social Interaction 51(1): 1–23.Google Scholar
Lerner, Gene H.
1995Turn design and the organization of participation in instructional activities. Discourse Processes 19: 111–131. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Li, Xiaoting
2013Language and the body in the construction of units in Mandarin face-to-face interaction. In Units of Talk – Units of Action [Studies in Language and Social Interaction 25], Beatrice Szczepek Reed & Geoffrey Raymond (eds), 343–375. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mondada, Lorenza
2014The local constitution of multimodal resources for social interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 65: 137–156. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016Challenges of multimodality: Language and the body in social interaction. Journal of Sociolinguistics 20(3): 336–366. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mori, Junko & Hayashi, Makoto
2006The achievement of intersubjectivity through embodied completions: A study of interactions between first and second language speakers. Applied Linguistics 27: 195–219. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Olsher, David
2004Talk and gesture: The embodied completion of sequential actions in spoken interaction. In Second Language Conversations, Rod Gardner & Johannes Wagner (eds), 221–245. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Pajusalu, Renate
1997Is there an article in (spoken) Estonian? In Estonian Typological Studies II [Tartu Ülikooli eesti keele õppetooli toimetised 8], Mati Erelt (ed.), 146–177. Tartu: Tartu ülikooli kirjastus.Google Scholar
2005Anaphoric pronouns in spoken Estonian. Crossing the paradigms. In Minimal Reference. The Use of Pronouns in Finnish and Estonian Discourse [Studia Fennica Linguistica 12], Ritva Laury (ed.), 107–134. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.Google Scholar
Payne, Thomas
1997Describing Morphosyntax. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, Schegloff, Emanuel A. & Jefferson, Gail
1974A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50(4): 696–735. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Slama-Cazacu, Tatiana
1976Nonverbal components in message sequence: Mixed syntax. In Language and Man: Anthropological Issues, William Charles McCormack & Stephen Wurm (eds), 217–227. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Stivers, Tanya & Sidnell, Jack
2005Multi-modal interaction. Semiotica 156: 1–20. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Streeck, Jürgen & Jordan, J. Scott
(eds) 2009Projection and anticipation in embodied communication. Discourse Processes 46: 93–102. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Weeks, Peter
1996A rehearsal of a Beethoven passage: An analysis of correction talk. Research on Language and Social Interaction 29(3): 247–290. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Tao, Hongyin
2020.  In The ‘Noun Phrase’ across Languages [Typological Studies in Language, 128],  pp. 272 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 06 february 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.