Chapter published in:
The ‘Noun Phrase’ across Languages: An emergent unit in interaction
Edited by Tsuyoshi Ono and Sandra A. Thompson
[Typological Studies in Language 128] 2020
► pp. 1241
References

Data sources

Arkisyn: A morphosyntactically coded database of conversational Finnish
Database compiled at the University of Turku, with material from the Conversation Analysis Archive at the University of Helsinki and the Syntax Archives at the University of Turku. Department of Finnish and Finno-Ugric Languages, University of Turku.
Corpus of Finnish Dialects
Syntax Archives, Department of Finnish and Finno-Ugric Studies. University of Turku.

References

Aijmer, Karin
2007The interface between discourse and grammar. The fact is that. In Connectives as Discourse Landmarks [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 161], Agnès Celle & Ruth Huart (eds), 31–46. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Auer, Peter
1992The neverending sentence. Rightward expansion in spoken language. In Studies in Spoken Languages: English, German, Finno-Ugric, Miklós Kontra (ed.), 41–59. Budapest: Hungarian Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
Auer, Peter & Pfänder, Stefan
2011Constructions: Emerging and Emergent. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Borin, Lars, Forsberg, Markus & Roxendal, Johan
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth & Selting, Margret
2018Interactional Linguistics: Studying Language in Social Interaction. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth & Thompson, Sandra A.
2006“You know it’s funny.” Eine Neubetrachtung der ‘Extraposition’ im Englischen. In Konstruktionen in der Interaktion, Susanne Günthner & Wolfgang Imo (eds), 23–58. Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Etelämäki, Marja
2005Context and referent in interaction: Referential and indexical dimensions of the Finnish demonstrative pronouns. In Minimal Reference. The Use of Pronouns in Finnish and Estonian Discourse, Ritva Laury (ed.), 12–37. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.Google Scholar
Fernandez-Vest, M. M. Jocelyne
2015Detachments for Cohesion. Toward an Information Grammar of Oral Languages. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Günthner, Susanne
2008 “Projektorkonstruktionen im Gespräch: Pseudoclefts, die Sache ist. Konstruktionen und Extrapositionen mit es.” Gesprächsforschung. Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion 9, 86–114. http://​www​.gespraechsforschung​-ozs​.de​/heft2008​/gaguenthner​.pdf
2011N be that constructions in everyday German conversation. In Subordination in Conversation [Studies in Language and Social Interaction 24], Ritva Laury & Ryoko Suzuki (eds), 11–36. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hakulinen, Auli, Vilkuna, Maria, Korhonen, Riitta, Koivisto, Vesa, Heinonen, Tarja Riitta & Alho, Irja
2004Iso suomen kielioppi (Great Finnish Grammar). Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.Google Scholar
Helasvuo, Marja-Liisa
1996A discourse perspective on the grammaticization of the partitive case in Finnish. In SKY 1996 Yearbook of the Linguistic Association of Finland, Timo Haukioja, Marja-Liisa Helasvuo & Elise Kärkkäinen (eds), 7–35.Google Scholar
2001aSyntax in the Making: The Emergence of Syntactic Units in Finnish Conversation [Studies in Discourse and Grammar 9]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2001bEmerging syntax for interaction: Noun phrases and clauses as a syntactic resource for interaction. In Studies in Interactional Linguistics [Studies in Discourse and Grammar 10], Margret Selting & Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen (eds), 25–50. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Helasvuo, Marja-Liisa & Huumo, Tuomas
2010Mikä subjekti on? (On the subject of subject in Finnish). Virittäjä 114(2): 165–195.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Thompson, Sandra A.
1980Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language 56(2): 251–299. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul & Thompson, Sandra A.
2008Projectability and clause combining in interaction. In Crosslinguistic Studies of Clause Combining [Typological Studies in Language 80], Ritva Laury (ed.), 99–123. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul & Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
1993Grammaticalization. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Keevallik, Leelo & Hakulinen, Auli
2018Epistemically reinforced kyl(lä)/küll responses in Estonian and Finnish: Word order and social action. Journal of Pragmatics 123: 121–138. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kuiri, Kaija
1999Ilmaus “x on sellainen että” suomen puhekielessä [The expression “x on sellainen että” in spoken Finnish]. Virittäjä 103(3): 378–401.Google Scholar
Laitinen, Lea
1995Nollapersoona [Zero person]. Virittäjä 99(3): 337–358.Google Scholar
Laury, Ritva
1982Object Case Marking in Finnish. MA Thesis, California State University, Fresno.Google Scholar
1997Demonstratives in Interaction: The Emergence of a Definite Article in Finnish [Studies in Discourse and Grammar 7]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012Taking a stance and getting on with it: The form and function of the Finnish finite clausal extraposition construction. Text & Talk 4(7): 503–524.Google Scholar
Laury, Ritva & Helasvuo, Marja-Liisa
2016Disclaiming epistemic access with ‘know’ and ‘remember’ in Finnish. Journal of Pragmatics 106: 80–96. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leino, Jaakko
1999Mitä tarkoittaa se, että. Se-pronominista subjektina ja objektina toimivan että-lauseen yhteydessä (What does se että mean. About the pronoun se in että clauses functioning as subject and object). Virittäjä 103(1): 27–51.Google Scholar
Mayes, Patricia & Tao, Hongyin
2019Linguistic and non-linguistic aspects of categorizing as a sociocultural practice. Studies in Language 43(2): 329–363.Google Scholar
Pekarek Doehler, Simona
2011Clause combining and the sequencing of actions: Projector constructions in French conversation. In Subordination in Conversation [Studies in Language and Social Interaction 24], Ritva Laury & Ryoko Suzuki (eds), 103–138. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pekarek Doehler, Simona, De Stefani, Elwys & Horlacher, Anne-Sylvie
2015Time and Emergence in Grammar. Dislocation, Topicalization and Hanging Topic in French Talki-in-interaction [Studies in Language and Social Interaction 28]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Priiki, Katri
2017Hän, se, tää vai toi? Vuorovaikutussosiolingvistinen tutkimus henkilöviittauksista Kaakkois-Satakunnan nykypuhekielessä ( Hän, se, tää or toi? An Interactional Sociolinguistic Study of Third-person References to People in Contemporary Spoken Finnish in Southwestern Satakunta). PhD dissertation. Turun yliopiston julkaisuja C432, Turku.Google Scholar
Sidnell, Jack & Stivers, Tanya
(eds) 2013The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Siro, Paavo
1968Suomen kielen että-lauseen ongelmasta. In Fenno-Ugrica. Juhlakirja Lauri Postin kuusikymmenvuotispäiväksi 17.3.1968 [Suomalais-ugrilaisen Seuran Toimituksia 145], 203–205. Helsinki: Finno-Ugrian Society.Google Scholar
Sorjonen, Marja-Leena & Laakso, Minna
2005Katko vai eiku? Itsekorjauksen aloitustavat ja vuorovaikutustehtävät (Cut-off or eiku? The initiation and the interactional functions of self repair). Virittäjä 109(2): 224–271.Google Scholar
Suomalainen, Karita, Vatanen, Anna & Laury, Ritva
2016The Finnish se että as an emerging and emergent construction. Paper given at the Symposium on the emergence of units in social interaction. University of Helsinki, 4–5 August.
Suzuki, Ryoko
1999Grammaticization in Japanese: A Study of Pragmatic Particle-ization. PhD dissertation, University of California, Santa Barbara.Google Scholar
Tao, Hongyin
1996Units in Mandarin Conversation [Studies in Discourse and Grammar 5]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Varjo, Mikael & Suomalainen, Karita
2018From zero to ‘you’ and back: A mixed methods study comparing the use of two open personal constructions in Finnish. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 41(3): 333–366.Google Scholar
Vatanen, Anna, Suomalainen, Karita & Laury, Ritva
Forthcoming. The Finnish projector phrase se että as a fixed expression. In Fixed Expressions: Building Social Action from Language Structure, Ritva Laury & Tsuyoshi Ono eds