Article published in:
Noun-Modifying Clause Constructions in Languages of Eurasia: Rethinking theoretical and geographical boundaries
Edited by Yoshiko Matsumoto, Bernard Comrie and Peter Sells
[Typological Studies in Language 116] 2017
► pp. 355369
Some references on nominalizations in Chantyal and other works referred to in the discussion

Some references on nominalizations in Chantyal and other works referred to in the discussion

DeLancey, Scott
2005Relativization and nominalization in Bodic. Tibeto-Burman Linguistics: Proceedings of the 28th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: Special Session on Tibeto-Burman and Southeast Asian Linguistics in Honor of Prof. James A. Matisoff, 55–72. Berkeley CA: BLS.Google Scholar
Noonan, Michael
1997Versatile nominalizations. In Essays on Language Function and Language Type. In Honor of T. Givón, Joan Bybee, John Haiman & Sandra Thompson (eds), 373–394. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2001The “double demonstratives” of Chantyal. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 24(2): 173–188.Google Scholar
2003Chantyal. In The Sino-Tibetan Languages, Randy J. LaPolla & Graham Thurgood (eds), 315–335. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2005Chantyal discourses. Himalayan Linguistics: Himalayan Linguistics Archive 2. With Ram Prasad Bhulanja. http://​escholarship​.org​/uc​/himalayanlinguistics
2006Direct speech as a rhetorical style in Chantyal. Himalayan Linguistics, Himalayan Linguistics Journal 6. http://​escholarship​.org​/uc​/himalayanlinguistics
2008aCase compounding in the Bodic languages. In Case and Grammatical Relations [Typological Studies in Language 81], Greville G. Corbett & Michael Noonan (eds), 127–147. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008bNominalizations in Bodic languages. In Rethinking Grammaticalization: New Perspectives for the Twenty-first Century [Typological Studies in Language 76], María José López-Couso & Elena Seoane (eds), in collaboration with Teresa Fanego, 219–237. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008cContact-induced change in the Himalayas: The case of the Tamangic languages. In Language Contact and Contact Languages [Hamburg Studies on Multilingualism 7], Peter Siemund & Noemi Kintana (eds), 81–106. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011Aspects of the historical development of nominalizers in the Tamangic languages. In Nominalization in Asian Languages: Diachronic and Typological Perspectives [Typological Studies in Language 96], Foong Ha Yap, Karen Grunow-Hårsta & Janick Wrona (eds), 195–214. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Noonan, Michael MS.
Crosslinguistic investigation of referential density. Paper presented at the meeting of the Association for Linguistic Typology, University of Cagliari, September, 2003. http://​crossasia​-repository​.ub​.uni​-heidelberg​.de​/190​/1​/HandoutReferentialDensity​.pdf (21 April 2016).
Noonan, Michael, with Bhulanja, Ram Prasad, Chhantyal, Jag Man & Pagliuca, William
1999Chantyal Dictionary and Texts. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar