Article published in:
Insubordination
Edited by Nicholas Evans and Honoré Watanabe
[Typological Studies in Language 115] 2016
► pp. 89–112

Chapter 4. Independent si-clauses in Spanish

Functions and consequences for insubordination

| The Ohio State University
This chapter focuses on a particular use of subordinate-marked si ‘if’ clauses in Spanish as independent declaratives, which typically form the second part of a dialogic interaction with adversative speech act function. I provide both syntactic and prosodic evidence for the status of these constructions as insubordinated, and distinguish them from both full and elliptical conditional constructions in order to provide clear evidence of their status as free-standing declaratives. I also discuss the consequences of the (proposed) insubordination process for the creation of a new adversative connective si identical in form but very different in function from the conditional marker. The development of this adversative function has led to other uses of si that ultimately can be related back to the insubordination process. The more general theoretical question for discussion that is considered is this: What happens to the formal markers of adverbial subordination once they (begin to) appear in contexts where their main clauses are elided, i.e. in contexts of insubordination?
Published online: 18 November 2016
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.115.04sch
References

References

Acín Villa, Esperanza
1993 Aspectos de la adversación en español actual. La Coruña: Universidade da Coruña.Google Scholar
Akatsuka, Noriko
1986 Conditionals are discourse-bound. In On Conditionals, Elizabeth Closs Traugott, Alice ter Meulen, Judy Snitzer Reilly & Charles A. Ferguson (eds), 333–351. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Almela Pérez, Ramón
1985 El si introductor de oraciones independientes en español. Lingüística Española Actual 7: 5–13.Google Scholar
Anscombre, Jean-Claude & Ducrot, Oswald
1983 L’argumentation dans la langue. Brussels: Mardaga.Google Scholar
Bello, Andrés
[1847]1984 Gramática de la lengua castellana destinada al uso de los americanos. Madrid: EDAF.Google Scholar
Borrego Nieto, Julio
1980 Las locuciones condicionales con como y siempre que . Studia Philologica Salmanticensia 4: 17–38.Google Scholar
2002 De nuevo sobre las condicionales con como . Revista de Investigación Lingüística 5: 105–120.Google Scholar
Estebas-Vilaplana, Eva & Prieto, Pilar
2010 Castilian Spanish intonation. In Transcription of Intonation of the Spanish Language, Pilar Prieto & Paolo Roseano (eds), 17–48. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Evans, Nicholas
2007 Insubordination and its uses. In Finiteness: Theoretical and Empirical Foundations, Irina Nikolaeva (ed.), 366–431. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2009 Insubordination and the grammaticalisation of interactive presuppositions. Paper presented at Methodologies in Determining Morphosyntactic Change , Osaka.
Gras Manzano, Pedro
2011 Gramática de construcciones en interacción. Propuesta de un modelo y aplicación al análisis de estructuras independientes con marcas de subordinación en español. PhD dissertation, Universitat de Barcelona. http://​www​.tesisenred​.net​/handle​/10803​/1716Google Scholar
Grice, H. Paul
[1975]1989 Logic and conversation. In Studies in the Way of Words, 22–40. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Haiman, John
1994 Ritualization and the development of language. In Perspectives on Grammaticalization [Typological Studies in Language 109], William Pagliuca (ed.), 3–28. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Herrero, Gemma
1991 Análisis de una constante sintáctica en español coloquial: La construcción suspendida. Hispanic Journal 12: 325–340.Google Scholar
Horn, Laurence R.
1989 A Natural History of Negation. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C.
2000 Presumptive Meanings. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Linell, Per
2009 Constructions in dialogues. In Contexts and Constructions [Constructional Approaches to Language 9], Alexander Bergs & Gabriele Diewald (eds), 97–110. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lombardi Vallauri, Edoardo
2004 Grammaticalization of syntactic incompleteness: Free conditionals in Italian and other languages. SKY Journal of Linguistics 17: 189–215.Google Scholar
Mithun, Marianne
2008 The extension of dependency beyond the sentence. Language 84: 69–119. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012 Shifting finiteness in nominalization from definitization to refinitization. Ms, UCSB.Google Scholar
Montolío Durán, Estrella
1999a  ¡Si nunca he dicho que estuviera enamorada de él! Sobre constucciones independientes introducidas por si con valor replicativo. Oralia 2: 37–70.Google Scholar
1999b Las construcciones condicionales. In Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, III, Ignacio Bosque & Violeta Demonte (eds), 3643–3738. Madrid: Espasa-Calpe.Google Scholar
Real Academia Española
2009 Nueva gramática de la lengua española, 2 Vols. Madrid: Espasa-Calpe.Google Scholar
San Roque, Lila
2008 An Introduction to Duna Grammar. PhD dissertation, Australian National University.Google Scholar
Schwenter, Scott A.
1996 The pragmatics of independent si-clauses in Spanish. Hispanic Linguistics 8: 316–351.Google Scholar
1999a Pragmatics of Conditional Marking: Implicature, Scalarity, and Exclusivity. New York, NY: Garland.Google Scholar
1999b Sobre la sintaxis de una construcción coloquial: Oraciones independientes con si . Anuari de Filologia 21: 87–100.Google Scholar
2000 Viewpoints and polysemy: Linking adversative and causal meanings of discourse markers. In Cause-condition-concession-contrast: Cognitive and Discourse Perspectives, Bernd Kortmann & Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen (eds), 257–281. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2001 Expectations and (in)sufficiency: Spanish como-conditionals. Linguistics 39(4): 733–760. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2002 Discourse markers and the PA/SN distinction. Journal of Linguistics 38(1): 43–69. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stirling, Lesley
1999 Isolated if-clauses in Australian English. In The Clause in English: In Honour of Rodney Huddleston [Studies in Language Companion Series 45], Peter Collins & David Lee (eds), 273–294. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sweetser, Eve E.
1990 From Etymology to Pragmatics. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
2010 Dialogic contexts as motivations for syntactic change. In Studies in the History of the English Language, V: Variation and Change in English Grammar and Lexicon, Robert A. Cloutier, Anne Marie Hamilton-Brehm & William A. Kretzschmar (eds), 11–27. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tsunoda, Mie
2012 Five-level classification of clause linkage in Japanese. Studies in Language 36: 382–429. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by other publications

Bossaglia, Giulia, Heliana Mello & Tommaso Raso
2020.  In In Search of Basic Units of Spoken Language [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 94], ► pp. 221 ff. Crossref logo
Cappelle, Bert
2017.  In Semantics and Pragmatics: Drawing a Line [Logic, Argumentation & Reasoning, 11], ► pp. 115 ff. Crossref logo
Fuentes Rodríguez, Catalina
2019. Combinaciones entre operadores argumentativos. Spanish in Context 16:2 ► pp. 151 ff. Crossref logo
Kaltenböck, Gunther
2016.  In Outside the Clause [Studies in Language Companion Series, 178], ► pp. 341 ff. Crossref logo
McGregor, William B.
2017. There’s grammar and there’s grammar just as there’s usage and there’s usage. English Text Construction 10:2 ► pp. 199 ff. Crossref logo
Rodríguez Rosique, Susana
2018.  In Perspectives on Evidentiality in Spanish [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 290], ► pp. 223 ff. Crossref logo
TRAUGOTT, ELIZABETH CLOSS
2017. ‘Insubordination’ in the light of the Uniformitarian Principle. English Language and Linguistics 21:2 ► pp. 289 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 december 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.