Article published in:
Finiteness and Nominalization
Edited by Claudine Chamoreau and Zarina Estrada-Fernández
[Typological Studies in Language 113] 2016
► pp. 205–242

The role of nominalization in theticity

A Sikuani contribution

| CNRS (SeDyL | CELIA)
When speakers need to communicate a piece of information in which they allocate all the components the same degree of informational density – especially the components expressing the state of the world described and the entities associated with it – they rely on linguistic mechanisms that may differ radically from those employed in speech-acts that involve a rhematic element (rather dense informationally) linked to a thematic element (rather thin informationally). In languages where existential predication does not require a verb of existence with the subject as the thematic element, this type of construction is well adapted to the thetic communicative intention, since it is organized around a noun phrase conveying rhematic information that is not connected to any thematic element apart from the world, or the situation. Since this element is not instantiated linguistically, or at least not by expressions capable of referring, the structure of this kind of existential predication is monadic. This is the most striking difference between the formal correlates of thetic constructions and those of the dyadic construction with rheme and theme. The Sikuani language makes a great deal of use of verb nominalization machinery (which provides a way to combine in the most parsimonious way the state of affairs described and the entities associated with it) in order to fulfill the goal of thetic communication. In particular, by playing with these mechanisms this language manages to modulate the degree of semantic reification of the state of the world described by the nominalized verb. Consequently a nominalized form with a thetic function becomes able to express semantic configurations (events, states, etc.) similar to those normally expressed by finite verbs.
Keywords: existential predication, finiteness, nominal predication, nominalization, theticity
Published online: 23 June 2016
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.113.09que
References

References

Baker, Mark
1995 The Polysynthesis Parameter. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Carlin, Eithne
2011 Theticity in Trio (Cariban). International Journal of American Linguistics 77: 1-31. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Casielles, Eugenia & Progovac, Ljiljana
2009 Protosyntax: A thetic (unaccusative) stage. Theoria et Historia Scientiarum 9: 29-48. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chacon, Thiago
2012 The Phonology and Morphology of Kubeo: The Documentation, Theory and Description of an Amazonian Language. PhD dissertation, University of Hawaii.
Chafe, Wallace
1974 Language and consciousness. Language 50: 111-33. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1976 Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects and topics. In Subject and Topic, Charles Li (ed.), 27-55. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
1987 Cognitive constraints on information flow. In Coherence and Grounding in Discourse [Typological Studies in Language 11], Russell Tomlin (ed.), 21-52. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S.
1986 Primary objects, secondary objects, and antidative. Language 62(4): 808-845. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
DuBois, John
1987 The discourse basis of ergativity. Language 63: 805-855. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Erteschik-Shir, Nomi
1997 The Dynamics of Focus Structure. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
2007 Information Structure. The Syntax-Discourse Interface. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Fox, Barbara
1987 The noun phrase accessibility hierarchy reinterpreted: Subject primacy or the absolutive hypothesis. Language 63(4): 856-70. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Givón, T.
1984 Syntax I. A Functional-Typological Introduction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1997 Introduction. In Grammatical Relations: A Functionalist Perspective [Typological Studies in Language 35], T. Givón (ed.), 1-84. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009 The Genesis of Syntactic Complexity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011 Finiteness and nominalization. Workshop on Finitude et nominalisation, PICS CNRS Complexité syntaxique et diversité typologique. Paris, October 12-14.Google Scholar
Jelinek, Eloise
1984 Empty categories, case and configurationality. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 2: 39-76. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, Daniel
2011 Exclamatives and temporal nominalizations in Austronesian. In Nominalization in Asian Languages: Diachronic and Typological Perspectives [Typological Studies in Language 96], Foong Ha Yap, Karen Grunow-Hårsta & Janick Wrona (eds), 721-754. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kuroda, S.-Y.
1972 The categorical and the thetic judgment. Evidence from Japanese syntax. Foundations of Language 9: 153-185.Google Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud
1987 Aboutness as a cognitive category: The thetic-categorical distinction revisited. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society , 366-381.
1988 There was a farmer had a dog: Syntactic amalgams revisited. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society , 319-339.
1994 Information Structure and Sentence Form. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2000 When subjects behave like objects: An analysis of the merging of S and O in sentence focus constructions across languages. Studies in Language 24(3): 611-682. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Launey, Michel
1994 Une grammaire omniprédicative. Essai sur la morphosyntaxe du nahuatl classique. Paris: CNRS Editions.Google Scholar
Lewis, Sean Michael
2001 Rethinking the existence of the thetic judgment. http://​www​.swarthmore​.edu​/SocSci​/Linguistics​/Papers​/2001​/lewis​_sean​-michael​.pdf
Mithun, Marianne
1991 The role of motivation in the emergence of grammatical categories: The grammaticalization of subjects. In Approaches to Grammaticalization, Vol. 2 [Typological Studies in Language 19], Elizabeth Traugott & Bernard Heine (eds), 160-184. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Potsdam, Eric
2011 Expressing exclamatives in Malagasy. In Nominalization in Asian Languages: Diachronic and Typological Perspectives [Typological Studies in Language 96], Foong Ha Yap, Karen Grunow-Hårsta & Janick Wrona (eds), 659-684. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Progovac, Ljiljana
2008 What use is half a clause? In Evolution of Language: Proceedings of EVOLANG 7, Andrew D.M. Smith, Kenny Smith & Ramon Ferrer i Cancho (eds), 259-266. Singapore: World Scientific. Crossref
Queixalós, Francesc
1998 Nom, verbe et prédicat en sikuani. Louvain: Peeters.Google Scholar
2000 Syntaxe sikuani. Louvain: Peeters.Google Scholar
2003 Relations grammaticales et hiérarchie des objets en sikuani. In Faits de Langues: Méso-Amérique, Caraïbes, Amazonie 2, Jon Landaburu & Francesc Queixalós (eds). 77-92.Google Scholar
2005 Posse em Katukína e valência dos nomes. In Novos estudos sobre línguas indígenas brasileiras, Ayron Rodrigues & Ana Cabral (eds), 177-202. Brasilia: University of Brasília.Google Scholar
2012a Notes sur la nominalization. In La structure des langues amazoniennes II, Amerindia 35, Ana Carla Bruno, Frantomé Pacheco, Francesc Queixalós, Stella Telles & Leo Wetzels (eds), 105-110.Google Scholar
Queixalós, F.
2012b Nominalization in Sikuani. In La structure des langues amazoniennes II, Amerindia 35, Ana Carla Bruno, Frantomé Pacheco, Francesc Queixalós, Stella Telles & Leo Wetzels (eds), 153-86.Google Scholar
Queixalós, Francesc & Jimenez Rosalba
1994 Wajaliwaisianü. Sikuani Piatiriwi Pexi Tsipaeba. Bogota: Etnollano.Google Scholar
Rosengren Inger
1997 The thetic / categorical distinction revisited once more. Linguistics 35(3): 439-479.Google Scholar
Sasse, Hans-Jürgen
1987 The thetic / categorical distinction revisited. Linguistics 25: 511-580. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, Anne
2010 Discourse principles in grammar: The thetic/categorical dichotomy. In Proceedings of the Tropics of the Imagination Conference , 2 November 2009, Cairns, James Cook University. http://​www​.jcu​.edu​.au​/etropic​/ET9​/Schwarz​.pdf
Seki, Lucy
2000 Gramática do Kamaiurá. São Paulo: Editora de Unicamp.Google Scholar
Shibatani, Masayoshi
1991 Grammaticization of topic into subject. In Approaches to Grammaticalization, Vol. 2 [Typological Studies in Language 19], Elizabeth Traugott & Bernard Heine (eds), 93-133. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Steele, Susan
1989 Subject values. Language 65(3): 537-578. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wehr, Barbara
2000 Zur Beschreibung der Syntax des français parlé (mit einem Exkurs zu “thetisch” und “kategorisch”). In Diskursanalyse: Untersuchungen zum gesprochenen Französisch, Barbara Wehr & Helga Thomassen (eds), 239-289. Berlin: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Magalhães, Marina, Walkíria Praça & Aline Da Cruz
2019. Gradação da omnipredicatividade na família Tupi-Guarani. Forma y Función 32:2 ► pp. 151 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 04 april 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.