Article published in:
The Linguistics of Temperature
Edited by Maria Koptjevskaja-Tamm
[Typological Studies in Language 107] 2015
► pp. 491–536

Temperature adjectives in Finnish

This paper provides a descriptive and theoretical account of Finnish temperature adjectives as a system consisting of a three-term core and a supplementary set. The former are unrestricted with respect to a number of grammatical and semantic parameters proposed in cross-linguistic and typological studies, whereas the latter have restricted availability in temperature subdomains or express additional semantic distinctions. In metaphorical uses of the adjectives, the base of semantic extensions is argued to be the culturally grounded emotional charge of positive or negative evaluation that gives rise to thermal preferences of different kinds of emotions. Metaphorical extensions not only involve changes in the argument structure of a term, but also significant increase in the use of syntactic frames with abstract situational semantics.
Published online: 11 February 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.107.16juv
References

References

Aitchison, Joan
2003 Words in the Mind: An Introduction to the Mental Lexicon. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bergström, Annika
2010 Temperatur i språk och tanke. En jämförande semantisk studie av svenska temperaturadjektiv [Meijerbergs arkiv för svensk ordforskning 37] (Temperature in language and thought. A comparative semantic study of Swedish temperature adjectives). PhD dissertation, University of Gothenburg.
Booij, Geert E.
2002 Constructional idioms, morphology, and the Dutch lexicon. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 14: 301-329. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Butt, Miriam
2003 The light verb jungle. Harvard Working Papers in Linguistics 9: 1-49.Google Scholar
2010 The light verb jungle: still hacking away. In Complex Predicates: Cross-Linguistic Perspectives on Event Structure, Mengistu Amberber, Brett Baker & Mark Harvey (eds), 48-78. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard
1981 Uralic languages. In Languages of the Soviet Union, Bernard Comrie (ed.), 92-141. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Coulson, Seana
2006 Metaphor and conceptual blending. In Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics, 2nd edn, Keith Brown (ed.), 32-39. Oxford: Elsevier. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cruse, David Alan
1986 Lexical Semantics. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
1992 Antonymy revisited: Some thoughts on the relationship between words and concepts. In Frames, Fields, and Contrasts: New Essays in Semantic and Lexical Organization, Adrienne Lehrer & Eva Feder Kittay (eds), 289-306. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Eriksen, Pål, Kittilä, Seppo & Kolehmainen, Leena
2010 The linguistics of weather: Cross-linguistic patterns of meteorological expressions. Studies in Language 34(3): 565–601. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fauconnier, Gilles & Turner, Mark
2002 The Way We Think: Conceptual Blends and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities. New York NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
2008 Rethinking metaphor. In Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought, Raymond W. Gibbs (ed.), 53-66. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goddard, Cliff & Wierzbicka, Anna
2007 NSM analyses and the semantics of physical qualities: Sweet, hot, hard, heavy, rough, sharp in cross-linguistic perspective. Studies in Language 31(4): 765-800. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grady, Joseph E.
1997 Foundations of Meaning: Primary Metaphors and Primary Scenes. PhD dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
Haarala, Risto
(ed.) 1990 Suomen kielen perussanakirja (Basic dictionary of Finnish)[Kotimaisten kielten tutkimuskeskuksen julkaisuja 55]. Helsinki: Edita.Google Scholar
Hakulinen, Auli, Vilkuna, Maria, Korhonen, Riitta, Koivisto, Vesa, Heinonen, Tarja-Riitta, & Alho, Irja
(eds) 2004 Iso suomen kielioppi. Helsinki: Suomalaisen kirjallisuuden seura.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
2003 Grammaticalization. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Huumo, Tuomas
2005 Onko jäädä-verbin paikallissijamääritteen tulosijalla semanttista motivaatiota? (Can the local case of the verb jäädä be semantically motivated?). Virittäjä 4: 506–524.Google Scholar
2007 Force dynamics, fictive dynamicity, and the Finnish verbs of ‘remaining’. Folia Linguistica 41(1-2): 73-98. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria
2007 Guidelines for collecting linguistic expressions for temperature concepts: Version 1. http://​temperature​.ling​.su​.se​/images​/7​/7c​/Guidelines​.pdf
2011 “It’s boiling hot!” On the structure of the linguistic temperature domain across languages. In Rahmen des Sprechens. Beiträge zur Valenztheorie, Varietätenlinguistik, Kognitiven und Historischen Semantik, Sarah Dessì Schmid, Ulrich Detges, Paul Gévaudan, Wiltrud Mihatsch & Richard Waltereit (eds), 393-410. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria & Rakhilina, Ekaterina V.
2006 "Some like it hot": On the semantics of temperature adjectives in Russian and Swedish. STUF (Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung) 59(2): 253-269. Special issue The Lexicon: Typological and Contrastive Perspectives, Giannoula Giannoulopoulou & Torsten Leuschner (eds).Google Scholar
Kövecses, Zoltán
2000 Metaphor and Emotion: Language, Culture, and Body in Human Feeling. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
2002 Metaphor. A Practical Introduction. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2005 Metaphor and Culture: Universality and Variation. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, George & Johnson, Mark
1980 Metaphors We Live By. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
1999 Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought. New York NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W.
2002 Concept, Image and Symbol: The Cognitive Basis of Grammar, 2nd edn. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Lehrer, Adrienne
1985 Markedness and antonymy. Journal of Linguistics 21: 397–429. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lehrer, Keith & Lehrer, Adrienne
1982 Antonymy. Linguistics and Philosophy 5: 483-501. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leinonen, Marja
2008 Depictive secondary predicates in Finnish. In Secondary Predicates in Eastern European Languages and Beyond [Studia Slavica Oldenburgensia 16], Christoph Schroeder, Gerd Hentschel & Winfried Boeder (eds), 167-187. Oldenburg: BIS.Google Scholar
Nenonen, Marja
2007 Prototypical idioms: Evidence from Finnish. SKY Journal of Linguistics 20: 309-330.Google Scholar
Nunberg, Geoffrey, Sag, Ivan A. & Wasow, Thomas
1994 Idioms. Language 70(3): 491-538. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Plank, Frans
2010 Temperature talk: The basics revisited. Paper presented at the Workshop on Temperature in Language and Cognition . Stockholm University, 19-20 March.
Rakhilina, Ekaterina V.
1999 Xolodno – gorjačo (It's cold – it's hot). Naučno-texničeskaja informacija. Serija 2. 11: 23-30.Google Scholar
2010 Kognitivnyj analiz predmetnyh imën: semantika i sočetaemost’ (Cognitive analysis of presentive nominals: Semantics and combinability). Moscow: Azbukovnik.Google Scholar
Sadeniemi, Matti
(ed.) 1996 Nykysuomen sanakirja (Dictionary of contemporary Finnish), 1–6. Juva: Wsoy.Google Scholar
Smith, Carlota S.
2005 Event structure and morphosyntax in Navaho. In The Syntax of Aspect: Deriving Thematic and Aspectual Interpretation. [Oxford Studies in Theoretical Linguistics 10], Nomi Erteschik-Shir & Tova Rapoport (eds), 190-212. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stubbs, Michael
1986 Educational Linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sutrop, Urmas
1998 Basic temperature terms and subjective temperature scale. Lexicology 4: 60-104.Google Scholar
1999 Temperature terms in the Baltic Area. In Estonian: Typological Studies III [Publications of the Department of Estonian of the University of Tartu 11], Mati Erelt (ed.), 185-203. Tartu: University of Tartu.Google Scholar
Swadesh, Morris
1971 The Origin and Diversification of Language. Chicago IL: Aldine Atherton.Google Scholar
Vendler, Zeno
1957 Verbs and times. The Philosophical Review 66(2): 143-160. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Viberg, Åke
1993 Crosslinguistic perspectives on lexical organization and lexical progression In Progression and Regression in Language, Kenneth Hyltenstam & Åke Viberg (eds), 340-383. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar