Article published in:
The Linguistics of Temperature
Edited by Maria Koptjevskaja-Tamm
[Typological Studies in Language 107] 2015
► pp. 300–332

In the warmth of the Ukrainian temperature domain

This paper aims to outline the temperature domain as it is lexicalised in the Ukrainian language. The temperature domain will be considered in relation to the semantic and morphosyntactic features of temperature terms, their collocational patterns as well as their semantic extensions. This analysis is carried out from the perspective of a Ukrainian world view. It also seeks to address the gradability of temperature intensity which is variably realised across the temperature domain. On the one hand, this variation is rooted in the phenomenological nature of temperature, which is conceptualised via different frames of reference; on the other, it is evaluated diversely as defined by socio-cultural norms.
Published online: 11 February 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.107.10kry
References

References

Carlson-Radvansky, Laura A. & Irwin, David E.
1993 Frames of reference in vision and language: Where is above? Cognition 46: 223–244. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Comrie, Bernard & Corbett, Greville G.
2002 The Slavonic Languages. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fourman, Vitalij V.
2001 Meteorolohija i klimatolohija (Meteorology and Climatology). L'viv: Ivan Franko National University. http://​www​.lnu​.edu​.ua​/faculty​/geology​/phis​_geo​/fourman​/E​-books​-FVV​/Meteorology​/Books​.htm (9 December 2010).Google Scholar
Geeraerts, Dirk & Grondelaers, Stefan
1995 Looking back at anger: Cultural traditions and metaphorical patterns. In Language and the Cognitive Construal of the World, John R. Taylor & Robert E. MacLaury (eds), 153–180. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Goddard, Cliff & Wierzbicka, Anna
2007 NSM analyses of the semantics of physical qualities: Sweet, hot, hard, heavy, rough, sharp in cross-linguistic perspective. Studies in Language 31(4): 765–800. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hampe, Beate
2005 Preface. In From Perception to Meaning: Image Schemas in Cognitive Linguistics, Beate Hampe & Joseph E. Grady (eds), v-viii. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd
1997 Cognitive Foundations of Grammar. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Kimmel, Michael
2005 Culture regained: Situated and compound image schemas. In From Perception to Meaning: Image Schemas in Cognitive Linguistics, Beate Hampe & Joseph E. Grady (eds), 285-311. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria
2007 Guidelines for collecting linguistic expressions for temperature concepts, Version 1. http://​temperature​.ling​.su​.se​/images​/7​/7c​/Guidelines​.pdf (24 October 2010)
2011 “It’s boiling hot!” On the structure of the linguistic temperature domain across languages. In Rahmen des Sprechens: Beiträge zur Valenztheorie, Varietätenlinguistik, Kognitiven und Historischen Semantik. Peter Koch zum 60. Geburtstag, Sarah Dessì Schmid, Ulrich Detges, Paul Gévaudan, Wiltrud Mihatsch & Richard Waltereit (eds), 393–410. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria & Rakhilina, Ekaterina
2006 “Some like it hot”: On the semantics of temperature adjectives in Russian and Swedish. STUF (Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung) 59(2): 253-269. Special issue The Lexicon: Typological and Contrastive Perspectives, Giannoula Giannoulopoulou & Torsten Leuschner (eds).Google Scholar
Kövecses, Zoltán
2006 Metaphor in Culture: Universality and Variation. Budapest: Loránd Eötvös University.Google Scholar
Kravtsiv, Bohdan
1984 Folk calendar. In The Encyclopaedia of Ukraine, Vol. 1., (n.d.; rev. ed. by the Canadian Institute of Ukrainian Studies. Toronto: University of Toronto). http://​www​.encyclopediaofukraine​.com​/display​.asp​?linkpath=​/pages​/f​/o​/folkcalendar​.htm (20 November 2010).
Lakoff, George
1987 Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W.
1987 Foundations of Cognitive Grammar: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Lehrer, Adrienne J.
2002 Paradigmatic relations of exclusion and opposition, I: Gradable antonymy and complementarity. In Lexikologie: Ein internationales Handbuch zur Natur und Struktur von Wörtern und Wortschätzen. D. Alan Cruse, Franz Hundsnurscher, Michael Job & Peter Rolf Lutzeier (eds), 498–507. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C.
2003 Space in Language and Cognition: Explorations in Cognitive Diversity. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Narayanan, Srini
2008 The thermal qualities of substance: A cross-cultural study. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Cognitive Science (CogSci 2008), Chicago. http://​www​.icsi​.berkeley​.edu​/~snarayan​/cogsci​.pdf
Plank, Frans
2003 Temperature talk: The basics. Paper presented at the Workshop on Lexical Typology at the ALT conference in Cagliari, September.
Popova, Yanna
2005 Image schemas and verbal synaesthesia. In From Perception to Meaning: Image Schemas in Cognitive Linguistics, Beate Hampe & Joseph E. Grady (eds), 395–419. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pugh, Stefan M. & Press, Ian
1999 Ukrainian: A Comprehensive Grammar. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sussex, Roland & Cubberley, Paul V.
2006 The Slavic Languages. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, John R.
1995 Linguistic Categorization: Prototypes in Linguistic Theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, Anna
1996 Semantics: Primes and Universals. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Young, Steven R.
2006 Ukrainian. In Encyclopaedia of Language and Linguistics, 2nd ed., Keith Brown (ed.), 13:212. Oxford: Elsevier. CrossrefGoogle Scholar