Article published in:
Information Structure and Reference Tracking in Complex Sentences
Edited by Rik van Gijn, Jeremy Hammond, Dejan Matić, Saskia van Putten and Ana Vilacy Galucio
[Typological Studies in Language 105] 2014
► pp. 341–372

The multiple coreference systems in the Ese Ejja subordinate clauses

| Laboratoire Dynamique Du Langage UMR5596 CNRS – Université de Lyon (Université Lumière Lyon 2) UC Berkeley
In Ese Ejja, an ergative Takanan language spoken in Peru and Bolivia, four subordinators with three allomorphs each mark referential congruence or incongruence vis-à-vis their matrix clause. While same-subject/different-subject systems in subordinate clauses are well attested crosslinguistically, this language also makes further, less usual, distinctions. On the one hand, it displays two distinct tripartite systems rather than a (mere) binary one. On the other hand, these systems display alignment features that differ from the straightforward ergative alignment found in main clauses. Interestingly, highly elaborated switch reference systems including a similar subject-object coreferentiality have been reported for a number of Panoan languages with which the five Takanan languages are claimed to be related. Keywords: Ese Ejja; switch-reference; argument alignment; grammaticalization; subordination
Published online: 05 March 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.105.12vui
References

References

Adelaar, Willem F. H. & Muysken, Pieter C..
2004 The Languages of the Andes. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y..
1999a The Arawak language family. In Dixon & Aikhenvald (eds), 65-106.
1999b Areal diffusion and language contact in the Içana-Vaupés basin north-west Amazonia. In Dixon & Aikhenvald (eds), 384-416.
2012 Languages of the Amazon. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Austin, Peter.
1981 Switch-reference in Australia. Language 57(2): 309-334. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Austin, Peter (ed.).
1988 Complex Sentence Constructions in Australian Languages [Typological Studies in Language 15]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, Janet.
1999 Tucano. In Dixon & Aikhenvald (eds), 207-226.
Creissels, Denis.
2006 Syntaxe générale, une introduction typologique. Paris: Hermès - Lavoisier.Google Scholar
Dixon, Robert M. W. & Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y..
1999 Introduction. In Dixon & Aikhenvald (eds), 1-22.
Dixon, Robert M.W. & Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.. (eds).
The Amazonian Languages. Cambridge: CUP. Crossref
Evans, Nicholas.
2007 Insubordination and its uses. In Finiteness, Irina Nikolaeva (ed.), 366-431. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Fischer, Rafael & van Lier, Eva.
2011 Cofán subordinate clauses in a typology of subordination. In van Gijn, Haude & Muysken (eds), 221-249.
Fleck, David William.
2003 A Grammar of Matses. PhD dissertation, Rice University.Google Scholar
Genetti, Carol.
2005 The participial construction of Dolakha Newar. Studies in Language 29(1): 35-87. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Gijn, Rik.
2006 A Grammar of Yurakaré. PhD dissertation, Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen.Google Scholar
Van Gijn, Rik, Haude, Katharina & Muysken, Pieter.
2011 Subordination in South America: An overview. In van Gijn, Haude & Muysken (eds), 1-23.Crossref
Van Gijn, Rik, Katharina Haude & Pieter Muysken (eds).
2011 Subordination in Native South American Languages[Typological Studies in Language 97]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Girard, Victor.
1971 Proto-Tacanan Phonology. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy.
2001 Syntax: An Introduction, II. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Guillaume, Antoine.
2008 A Grammar of Cavineña. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011 Subordinate clauses, switch-reference, and tail-head linkage in Cavineña narratives. In van Gijn, Haude & Muysken (eds), 109-139.
Haiman, John
1983 On some origins of switch-reference marking. In Haiman & Munro (eds), 105-128.
Haiman, John & Munro, Pamela (eds.)
1983 Switch Reference and Universal Grammar[Typological Studies in Language 2]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hale, Kenneth.
1983 Warlpiri and the grammar of non-configurational languages. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 1: 5-47. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jacobsen, William H..
1967 Switch-reference in Hokan-Coahuiltecan. In Studies in South-Western Ethnolinguistics, Dell H. Hymes & William E. Bittle (eds), 238-263. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
1983 On some origins of switch-reference marking. In Haiman & Munro (eds), 105-128.
Jendraschek, Gerd.
2009 Switch-reference constructions in Iatmul: Forms, functions and development. Lingua 119: 1316-1339. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Key, Mary R..
1968 Comparative Tacanan Phonology: With Cavineña Phonology and Notes on Pano-Tacanan Relationships. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Kroeber, Alfred L..
1911 The languages of the coast of California north of San Francisco. University of California Publications in Archaeology and Ethnology 9(3): 273-435.Google Scholar
Loos, Eugene E..
1999 Pano. In Dixon & Aikhenvald (eds), 227-250.
Mayer, Mercer.
1969 Frog, Where Are You? New York NY: Dial Books.Google Scholar
Munro, Pamela (ed.).
1980 Studies of switch-reference. UCLA Papers in Syntax, Vol. 8.Google Scholar
Oswalt, Robert L..
1976 Switch-reference in Maiduan: An areal and typological contribution. International Journal of American Linguistics 42(4): 297-304. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, John R..
1997 Switch-reference in Papua New Guinea. Papers in Papuan Linguistics 3: 101-241.Google Scholar
Rodrigues, Aryon. D..
1999. Tupí. In Dixon & Aikhenvald (eds), 107-124.
Stirling, Lesley.
1993 Switch-Reference and Discourse Representation. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A., Longacre, Robert E. & Hwang, Shin Ja.
2007 Adverbial clauses. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description: Complex Constructions II, Timothy Shopen (ed.), 237-300. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Valenzuela, Pilar.
2003 Transitivity in Shipibo-Konibo Grammar. PhD dissertation, University of Oregon.Google Scholar
van der Voort, Hein.
2004 A Grammar of Kwaza,Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vuillermet, Marine.
2009 Los verbos de postura Ese Ejja no se quedan inmóviles. Y a veces se desvían. In Proceedings of the Conference on Indigenous Languages of Latin America IV , Austin, Texas . <http://​www​.ailla​.utexas​.org​/site​/cilla4​_toc​.html>
2012 Grammaire de l'Ese Ejja, Langue Takana d’Amazonie Bolivienne. Thèse de Doctorat, Université Lumière Lyon 2.Google Scholar
Wise, Mary Ruth.
1999 Small language families and isolates in Peru. In Dixon & Aikhenvald (eds), 307-340.
Cited by

Cited by 6 other publications

Matić, Dejan
2016.  In Switch Reference 2.0 [Typological Studies in Language, 114], ► pp. 335 ff. Crossref logo
Overall, Simon E.
2016.  In Switch Reference 2.0 [Typological Studies in Language, 114], ► pp. 453 ff. Crossref logo
van Gijn, Rik
2016.  In Switch Reference 2.0 [Typological Studies in Language, 114], ► pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
van Gijn, Rik
2016.  In Switch Reference 2.0 [Typological Studies in Language, 114], ► pp. 153 ff. Crossref logo
Vuillermet, Marine
2014.  In Word Formation in South American Languages [Studies in Language Companion Series, 163], ► pp. 113 ff. Crossref logo
Vuillermet, Marine
2020. Source-Goal asymmetries in Ese Ejja. Studies in Language Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 january 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.