Article published in:
Information Structure and Reference Tracking in Complex Sentences
Edited by Rik van Gijn, Jeremy Hammond, Dejan Matić, Saskia van Putten and Ana Vilacy Galucio
[Typological Studies in Language 105] 2014
► pp. 231–262

Topic management and clause combination in the Papuan language Usan

| EPLC & MPI for Psycholinguistics Nijmegen
This chapter describes topic management in the Papuan language Usan. The notion of ‘topic’ is defined by its pre-theoretical meaning ‘what someone’s speech is about’. This notion cannot be restricted to simple clausal or sentential constructions, but requires the wider context of long stretches of natural text. The tracking of a topic is examined in its relationship to clause combining mechanisms. Coordinating clause chaining with its switch reference mechanism is contrasted with subordinating strategies called ‘domain-creating’ constructions. These different strategies are identified by language-specific signals, such as intonation and morphosyntactic cues like nominalizations and scope of negation and other modalities. Keywords: Switch reference; coordination; subordination; presupposition; assertion; Tail-Head linkage
Published online: 05 March 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.105.08ree
References

References

Berghäll, Liisa.
2010 Mauwake Reference Grammar. PhD dissertation, University of Helsinki.Google Scholar
Cristofaro, Sonia.
2003 Subordination. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
De Vries, Lourens.
2006 Areal pragmatics of New Guinea: Thematization, distribution and recapitulative linkage in Papuan narratives. Journal of Pragmatics 38(6): 811-828. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Evans, Nicholas.
2007 Insubordination and its uses. In Finiteness, Theoretical and Empirical Foundations, Irina Nikolaeva (ed.), 366-431. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Foley, William A..
1986 The Papuan Languages of New Guinea. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
2000 The languages of New Guinea. Annual Review of Anthropology 2000: 357-404. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Givón, Talmy (ed.).
1983 Topic Continuity in Discourse [Typological Studies in Language 3]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gundel, Jeanette K. & Fretheim, Thorstein.
2005 Topic and focus. In The Handbook of Pragmatics, Laurence Horn & Gregory Ward (eds), 175-196. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Haiman, John.
1978 Conditionals are topics. Language 54(3): 564-589.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haiman, John & Thompson, Sandra A..
1984 Subordination in universal grammar. Proceedings of the Tenth Annual Meeting of Berkeley Linguistic Society , 510-523.
Jang, Hong-Tae.
2008 Morphology and Syntax of Wambon, a Grammar Sketch. ms, SIL International Indonesia Branch.Google Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud.
1994 Information Structure and Sentence Form. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lazard, Gilbert.
2006 Qu’est-ce qu’une langue? Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris, Tome C1-2006, Fascicule 1: 1-28. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Reesink, Ger.
1983a Switch reference and topicality hierarchies. Studies in Language 7(2): 215-246. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1983b On subordination in Usan and other Papuan languages. In Advances in Functional Grammar, Simon C. Dik (ed.), 225-243. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
1986 Being negative can be positive. In Pragmatics in Non-Western Perspective, George Huttar & Kenneth Gregerson (eds), 115-143. Dallas TX: SIL/University of Texas, Arlington.Google Scholar
1987 Structures and their Functions in Usan [Studies in Language Companion Series 13]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1993 “Inner Speech” in Papuan languages. Language and Linguistics in Melanesia 24(2): 217-225.Google Scholar
1994 Domain creating constructions in Papuan languages. Topics in Descriptive Papuan Linguistics [Semaian 10], Ger P. Reesink (ed.), 98-121. Leiden: Vakgroep Talen en Culturen van Zuidoost Azië en Oceanië, Leiden University.Google Scholar
2004 Interclausal relations. Morphology. An International Handbook on Inflection and Word-Formation, Geert E. Booij, Christian Lehmann, Joachim Mugadan, Stavros Skopeteas in collaboration with Wolfgang Kesselheim (eds), 1202-1207. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2008 Lexicon and syntax from an emic viewpoint. Studies in Language 32(4): 866-893. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, John R..
1997 Switch-reference in Papua New Guinea: A preliminary survey. Papers in Papuan Linguistics 3, Andrew Pawley (ed.), 101-241. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Ross, Malcolm.
2005 Pronouns as a preliminary diagnostic for grouping Papuan languages. In Papuan Pasts: Cultural, Linguistic and Biological Histories of Papuan-Speaking Peoples, Andrew Pawley, Robert Attenborough, Jack Golson & Robin Hide (eds), 15-65. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Schapper, Antoinette & San Roque, Lila.
2011 Demonstratives and non-embedded nominalisations in three Papuan languages of the Timor-Alor-Pantar family. Studies in Language 35(2): 380-408. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thurman, Robin C..
1975 Chuave medial verbs. Anthropological Linguistics 17: 342-352.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 6 other publications

No author info given
2020.  In Coherence, ► pp. 142 ff. Crossref logo
Daniels, Don
2017. A method for mitigating the problem of borrowing in syntactic reconstruction. Studies in Language 41:3 ► pp. 577 ff. Crossref logo
Givón, T.
2020.  In Coherence, Crossref logo
Margetts, Anna
2020.  In Dynamics of Language Changes, ► pp. 3 ff. Crossref logo
Matić, Dejan
2016.  In Switch Reference 2.0 [Typological Studies in Language, 114], ► pp. 335 ff. Crossref logo
van Gijn, Rik
2016.  In Switch Reference 2.0 [Typological Studies in Language, 114], ► pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 january 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.