Article published in:
Information Structure and Reference Tracking in Complex Sentences
Edited by Rik van Gijn, Jeremy Hammond, Dejan Matić, Saskia van Putten and Ana Vilacy Galucio
[Typological Studies in Language 105] 2014
► pp. 7198
References

References

Chafe, Wallace L..
1976Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics, and point of view. In Subject and Topic, Charles N. Li (ed.), 27–55. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo.
1997‘Topic’ constructions in some European languages and ‘connectedness’. In Materials on Left Dislocation [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 14], Elena Anagnostopoulou, van Riemsdijk, Henk & Zwarts, Frans (eds), 93–118. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cristofaro, Sonia.
2003Subordination [Oxford Studies in Typology and Linguistic Theory]. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Dehé, Nicole & Wichmann, Anne.
2010Sentence-initial I think (that) and I believe (that): Prosodic evidence for use as main clause, comment clause and discourse marker. Studies in Language 34(1): 36–74. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Emonds, Joseph E..
1970Root and Structure-Preserving Transformations. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Foley, William A. & Van Valin, Jr., Robert D..
1984Functional Syntax and Universal Grammar [Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 38]. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Geluykens, Ronald.
1992From Discourse Process to Grammatical Construction: On Left-Dislocation in English [Studies in Discourse and Grammar 1]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Givón, Talmy.
1983Topic continuity in spoken english. In Topic Continuity in Discourse [Typological Studies in Language 3], Talmy Givón (ed.), 343–363. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gregory, Michelle L. & Michaelis, Laura A..
2001Topicalization and left-dislocation: A functional opposition revisited. Journal of Pragmatics 33: 1665–1706. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gundel, Jeanette K..
1975Left dislocation and the role of topic comment structure in linguistic theory. Ohio State University Working Papers in Linguistics 18: 72–131.Google Scholar
Haiman, John.
1978Conditionals are topics. Language 54(3): 564–589.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd.
1968Die Verbreitung und Gliederung der Togorestsprachen. Berlin: Dietrich Reimer.Google Scholar
Hirschbühler, Paul.
1997On the source of lefthand NPs in French. In Materials on Left Dislocation [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 14], Elena Anagnostopoulou, Henk van Riemsdijk & Frans Zwarts (eds), 55–66. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hooper, Joan B. & Thompson, Sandra A..
1973On the applicability of root transformations. Linguistic Inquiry 4(4): 465–497.Google Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud.
1994Information Structure and Sentence Form: Topic, Focus, and the Mental Representations of Discourse Referents [Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 71]. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lord, Carol.
1993Historical Change in Serial Verb Constructions [Typological Studies in Language 26]. John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ogle, Richard.
1981Redefining the scope of root transformations. Linguistics 19: 119–146. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Prince, Ellen F..
1998On the limits of syntax, with reference to left dislocation and topicalization. In The Limits of Syntax, Peter Culicover & Louise McNally (eds), 281–302. San Diego CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Reinhart, Tanya.
1981Pragmatics and linguistics: An analysis of sentence topics. Philosophica 27: 53–94.Google Scholar
Shaer, Benjamin.
2009German and English left-peripheral elements and the ‘orphan’ analysis of non-integration. In Dislocated Elements in Discourse. Syntactic, Semantic, and Pragmatic Perspectives, Benjamin Shaer, Philippa Cook, Werner Frey & Claudia Maienborn (eds), 366–397. New York NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A..
2002“Object complements” and conversation: Towards a realistic account. Studies in Language 26(1): 125–164. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Valin, Robert D., Jr.
2005Exploring the Syntax-Semantics Interface. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar