Article published in:The Acquisition of Relative Clauses: Processing, typology and function
Edited by Evan Kidd
[Trends in Language Acquisition Research 8] 2011
► pp. 39–60
Chapter 2. A connectionist account of the acquisition and processing of relative clauses
Relative clause processing depends on the grammatical role of the head noun in the subordinate clause. This has traditionally been explained in terms of cognitive limitations. We suggest that structure-related processing differences arise from differences in experience with these structures. We present a connectionist model which learns to produce utterances with relative clauses from exposure to message-sentence pairs. The model shows how various factors such as frequent subsequences, structural variations, and meaning conspire to create differences in the processing of these structures. The predictions of this learning-based account have been confirmed in behavioral studies with adults. This work shows that structural regularities that govern relative clause processing can be explained within a usage-based approach to recursion.
Published online: 23 November 2011
Cited by 15 other publications
AMBRIDGE, BEN, EVAN KIDD, CAROLINE F. ROWLAND & ANNA L. THEAKSTON
CHAN, ANGEL, WENCHUN YANG, FRANKLIN CHANG & EVAN KIDD
CHEN, JIDONG & YASUHIRO SHIRAI
Dell, Gary S. & Franklin Chang
Green, Kieran & John W. Schwieter
Hinaut, Xavier, Florian Lance, Colas Droin, Maxime Petit, Gregoire Pointeau & Peter Ford Dominey
Janciauskas, Marius & Franklin Chang
McCauley, Stewart M. & Morten H. Christiansen
Scontras, Gregory, William Badecker, Lisa Shank, Eunice Lim & Evelina Fedorenko
Tooley, Kristen M, Martin J Pickering & Matthew J Traxler
Traxler, Matthew J.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 01 june 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.