Article published in:
The Power of Satire
Edited by Marijke Meijer Drees and Sonja de Leeuw
[Topics in Humor Research 2] 2015
► pp. 217234
References

References

Altena, Peter
2012Gerrit Paape (1752–1803). Levens en werken. Nijmegen: Vantilt.Google Scholar
Amarasingam, Amarnath
(ed.) 2011The Stewart/Colbert Effect. Essays on the Real Impact of Fake News. Jefferson, NC: McFarland & Company.Google Scholar
Amurath-Effendi and Hekim Bachi
[pseudonym of Pieter van Woensel] 1792–1801De Lantaarn voor … [5 parts]. Amsterdam: In ’t Nieuwe Licht. [Online available at http://​www​.dbnl​.org​/tekst​/woen003lant00​_01/]Google Scholar
Andries, Lise
1989 “Almanacs: Revolutionizing a Traditional Genre.” In Revolution in Print. The Press in France, 1775–1800, ed. by Robert Darnton and Daniel Roche, 203–222. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Bosch, René
2007Labyrinth of Digressions: Tristram Shandy As Perceived and Influenced by Sterne’s Early Imitators. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Byrd, Max
1985Tristram Shandy. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Campbell Ross, Ian
2001Laurence Sterne: A Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Capp, Bernard
1979Astrology and the Popular Press: English Almanacs 1500–1800. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
Chartier, Roger
1991The Cultural Origins of the French Revolution. Translated by Lydia G. Cochrane. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Cillessen, W.
2008 “ ‘Holland herboren – Europa in nood.’ Die Hollandia Regenerata des David Hess und ihre europeïsche Rezeption.” In Bilderhandel und Bilderverbreitung im 18. und 19. Jahrhundert, ed. by A. Milano, 333–349. Roverto: Via della Terra.Google Scholar
Connery, Brain A. and Kirk Combe
(eds.) 1995Theorizing Satire. Essays in Literary Criticism. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
De Niet, Marco
1995 “De januskop van de achttiende-eeuwse Nederlandse almanak.” In Dierbaar magazijn. De bibliotheek van de Maatschappij der Nederlandse Letterkunde, ed. by Berry Dongelmans et al., 70–82. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
Day, Amber
2009 “And Now…the News? Mimesis and the Real in The Daily Show .” In Satire TV. Politics and Comedy in the Post-Network Era, ed. by Jonathan Gray, Jeffrey P. Jones and Ethan Thompson, 85–103. New York/London: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Goodnow, Trischa
(ed.) 2011The Daily Show and Rhetoric. Arguments, Issues, and Strategies. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Gray, Jonathan
, Jeffrey P. Jones and Ethan Thompson (eds.) 2009Satire TV. Politics and Comedy in the Post-Network Era. New York/London: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Griffin, Dustin
1994Satire. A Critical Reintroduction. Lexington: University of Kentucky Press.Google Scholar
Hawley, Judith
2009 “ Tristram Shandy, Learned Wit, and Enlightenment Knowledge.” In The Cambridge Companion to Laurence Sterne, ed. by Thomas Keymer, 34–48. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hobsbawm, Eric J.
1962The Age of Revolution, 1789–1848. New York: New American Library.Google Scholar
Israel, Jonathan I.
2001Radical Enlightenment: Philosophy and the Making of Modernity 1650–1750. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006Enlightenment Contested: Philosophy, Modernity and the Emancipation of Man, 1670–1752. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jacob, Margaret C. and Wijnand W. Mijnhardt
(eds.) 1992The Dutch Republic in the Eighteenth Century: Decline, Enlightenment and Revolution. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Jourdan, Annie
2007 “The Batavian Revolution. Typical Dutch, typical French or just Atlantic?Dutch Crossing 31(2): 271–288.Google Scholar
Keymer, Thomas
(ed.) 2009The Cambridge Companion to Laurence Sterne. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nieuwenhuis, Ivo
2012 “Outsiders on the Inside. The Eccentric Enlightenment of Pieter van Woensel.” De Achttiende Eeuw 45(2): 49–63.Google Scholar
2014Onder het mom van satire. Laster, spot en ironie in Nederland, 1780–1800. Hilversum: Verloren.Google Scholar
Oddens, Joris
2012Pioniers in schaduwbeeld. Het eerste parlement van Nederland 1796–1798. Nijmegen: Vantilt.Google Scholar
Outram, Dorinda
2005The Enlightenment. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Palmer, R.R.
1954 “Much in Little. The Dutch Revolution of 1795.” The Journal of Modern History 26(1): 15–35. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Reichardt, Rolf
1998 “Light Against Darkness: The Visual Representation of a Central Enlightenment Concept.” Translated by Deborah Cohen. Representations 61, Special Issue: Practices of Enlightenment: 95–148.Google Scholar
Rutjes, Mart
2012Door gelijkheid gegrepen. Democratie, burgerschap en staat in Nederland 1795–1801. Nijmegen: Vantilt.Google Scholar
Salman, Jeroen
1999Populair drukwerk in de Gouden Eeuw. De almanak als lectuur en handelswaar. Zutphen: Walburg Pers.Google Scholar
Schama, Simon
1977Patriots and Liberators. Revolution in the Netherlands, 1780–1813. London: Collins.Google Scholar
1989Citizens: A Chronicle of the French Revolution. New York: Alfred Knopf.Google Scholar
Walsh, Marcus
2009 “Scriblerian Satire, A Political Romance, ‘Rabelaisian Fragment’, and the Origins of Tristram Shandy ”. In The Cambridge Companion to Laurence Sterne, ed. by Thomas Keymer, 21–33. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Woensel, Pieter van
2002De lantaarn. Satirische teksten uit de achttiende eeuw. Edited by André Hanou. Amsterdam: Athenaeum-Polak & Van Gennep.Google Scholar