Article published in:
The Power of SatireEdited by Marijke Meijer Drees and Sonja de Leeuw
[Topics in Humor Research 2] 2015
► pp. 19–32
Satire and dignity
This chapter examines satire from the target’s point of view: how to respond to
satire without losing dignity? The power of satire lies in its capacity to challenge
dignity, which threatens social position, political legitimacy and individual
well-being. Analysing concrete examples of satire, the essay reviews the merits,
risks and limitations of possible responses: laugh, joke back, argue, retaliate,
show anger, or withdraw. The capacity to respond with dignity is not distributed
evenly: not everyone has the resources to do so. Moreover, there is not
always consensus on what counts as a dignified response. In today’s increasingly
diverse and globalised societies, this makes satire increasingly contested and
risky, but also an increasingly important domain for intercultural encounters
and negotiations.
Published online: 22 October 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/thr.2.02kui
https://doi.org/10.1075/thr.2.02kui
Cited by
Cited by 1 other publications
Ziegele, Marc & Pablo B. Jost
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 january 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
References
References
Andersen, Hans C.
Brillenburg Wurth, Kiene
Condren, Conal
Condren, Conal, Jessica Milner Davis, Sally McCausland and Robert Phiddian
Gray, Jonathan
Gray, Jonathan, Jeffrey Jones and Ethan Thompson
Haugh, Michael
Hay, Jennifer
Meijer Drees, Maaike and Ivo Nieuwenhuis
Simpson, Paul
Test, George
Waters, Clare