Chapter published in:
Emergent Syntax for Conversation: Clausal patterns and the organization of action
Edited by Yael Maschler, Simona Pekarek Doehler, Jan Lindström and Leelo Keevallik
[Studies in Language and Social Interaction 32] 2020
► pp. 221244
References

References

Barth-Weingarten, D., & Couper-Kuhlen, E.
(2011) Action, prosody and emergent constructions: The case of ‘and’. In P. Auer, & S. Pfänder (Eds.), Constructions: Emerging and emergent (pp.264–293). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barth-Weingarten, D.
(2012) Of Ens ‘n’ Ands: Observations on the phonetic make-up of a coordinator and its uses in Talk-in-Interaction. Language and Speech 55(1), 35–36. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Broth, M., Cromdal, J., & Levin, L.
(2017) Starting out as a driver: Progression in instructed pedal work. In Å. Mäkitalo, P. Linell, & R. Säljö (Eds.), Memory practices and learning: Interactional, institutional and sociocultural perspectives (pp.115–152). Charlotte, N.C.: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
Broth, M., & Keevallik, L.
(2014) Getting ready to move as a couple. Accomplishing mobile formations in a dance class. Space and Culture 17(2), 107–121. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Deppermann, A. (2018): Changes in turn-design over interactional histories – the case of instructions in driving school lessons. In A. Deppermann, & J. Streeck (Eds.), Time in embodied interaction: Synchronicity and sequentiality of multimodal resources (pp.293–324). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
EKSS
 – Eesti keele seletav sõnaraamat [Comprehensive dictionary of Estonian]. http://​www​.eki​.ee​/dict​/ekss/ Retrieved 20.052018Google Scholar
Erelt, M., Kasik, R., Metslang, H., Rajandi, H., Ross, K., Saari, H., Tael, K., & Vare, S.
(1993) Eesti keele grammatika II (Estonian grammar II). Tallinn: Eesti Teaduste Akadeemia Eesti Keele Instituut.Google Scholar
Hakulinen, A., Vilkuna, M., Korhonen, R., Koivisto, V., Heinonen, T., & Alho, I.
(2004) Iso suomen kielioppi (The Comprehensive Grammar of Finnish). Helsinki: Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, M.
(2007) Coordination. In T. Shopen (Ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, vol. II: Complex constructions (pp.1–51). 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hennoste, T., Lindström, L., Rääbis, A., Toomet, P., & Vellerind, R.
(2000) Eesti suulise kõne korpus ja mõnede allkeelte võrdluse katse [The corpus of spoken Estonian and an attempt at comparing some varieties]. In T. Hennoste (Ed.), Arvutuslingvistikalt inimesele (pp.245–283). Tartu: Tartu ülikooli üldkeeleteadus õpetooli toimetised 1.Google Scholar
Heritage, J., & Sorjonen, M.-L.
(1994) Constituting and maintaining activities across sequences: And-prefacing as a feature of question design. Language in Society 23(1), 1–29. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kalliokoski, J.
(1989) Ja: Rinnastus ja rinnastuskonjuktion käyttö [Ja. Coordination and the use of the coordinating conjunction in Finnish.]. Helsinki: Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura.Google Scholar
Keevallik, L.
(2000) Keelendid et ja nii et vestluses. [Linguistic units et ‘that’ and nii et ‘so’ in conversation.] Keel ja Kirjandus 43(5), 344–358.Google Scholar
in press). Synchronizing instruction and compliance: The emergence of grammatical structure in a Pilates class. In C. Taleghani-Nikazm, E. Betz, & P. Golato Eds. Mobilizing others Grammar and lexis within larger activities Amsterdam, Philadelphia John Benjamins
Koivisto, A.
(2011) Sanomattakin selvää? Ja,mutta ja että puheenvuoron lopussa [Goes without saying? Finnish conjunctions ja, mutta and että in turn-final position]. Helsinki: Helsingin yliopiston suomen kielen, suomalais-ugrilaisten ja pohjoismaisten kielten ja kirjallisuuksien laitos.Google Scholar
Local, J.
(2004) Getting back to prior talk: And-uh(m) as a back-connecting device in British and American English. In E. Couper-Kuhlen, & C. Ford (Eds.), Sound patterns in interaction (pp.377–400). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mazeland, H., & Huiskes, M.
(2001) Dutch ‘but’ as a sequential conjunction: Its use as a resumption marker. In M. Selting, & E. Couper-Kuhlen (Eds.), Studies in interactional linguistics (pp.141–169). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mondada, L.
(2018) Driving instruction at high speed on a race circuit: Issues in action formation and sequence organization. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 28, 1–22.Google Scholar
Nevile, M.
(2006) Making sequentiality salient: And-prefacing in the talk of airline pilots. Discourse Studies 8(2), 309–332. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Payne, T. E. (1997) Describing morphosyntax: A guide for field linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schiffrin, D.
(1987) Discourse markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Turk, M. J.
(2004) Using and in conversational interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction 37(2), 219–250. CrossrefGoogle Scholar