Article published in:
Language Complexity: Typology, contact, changeEdited by Matti Miestamo, Kaius Sinnemäki and Fred Karlsson
[Studies in Language Companion Series 94] 2008
► pp. 3–22
Complexity in linguistic theory, language learning and language change
In this paper I discuss how the notion of complexity can be defined and operationalized to serve as a concept in linguistic research domains like typology, historical linguistics and language contact and acquisition studies. Elaborating on earlier work (Kusters 2003) I argue that a relative notion of complexity is to be preferred over an absolute one. With such a substantial notion, I show that possible objections raised against the concept of complexity are not valid. I work this further out for complexity in verbal inflectional morphology. Finally I demonstrate some intricacies of complexity with examples from variation and change in Quechua varieties.
Published online: 06 February 2008
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.94.03kus
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.94.03kus
Cited by
Cited by 15 other publications
Blaxter, Tam T. & Peter Trudgill
Cathcart, Chundra, Gerd Carling, Filip Larsson, Niklas Johansson & Erich Round
De Clercq, Bastien & Alex Housen
Denk, Lukas
Do-Hurinville, Danh Thành
Housen, Alex, Bastien De Clercq, Folkert Kuiken & Ineke Vedder
Khushik, Ghulam Abbas & Ari Huhta
Pallotti, Gabriele
Rodríguez-Ordóñez, Itxaso & Lorena Sainzmaza-Lecanda
Siegel, Jeff
Siegel, Jeff, Benedikt Szmrecsanyi & Bernd Kortmann
To, Vinh
van der Slik, Frans, Roeland van Hout & Job Schepens
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 february 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.