Epistemic Modality
Functional properties and the Italian system
| University Rome Three
This volume offers an original theoretical and methodological approach to the hotly debated issue of epistemic modality. The analysis is conducted in a rigorous typological frame developed after a careful consideration of a wealth of cross-linguistic data, and focuses on Italian, a language often disregarded in comparative analyses. The complexity of the Italian epistemic system provides relevant information that will undoubtedly foster a better understanding of the topic. A new definition of epistemic modality is proposed on a functional basis and the structure of the Italian epistemic system is closely described. The morpho-syntactic characteristics of Italian epistemic forms are regarded as the result of the dialectic between universal functional pressures and peculiar system resistances. Shaped by the system, epistemic modality emerges as an intrinsically linguistic category, which cannot be downsized to a mere conceptual notion, as other approaches would propose.
[Studies in Language Companion Series, 74] 2005. xii, 232 pp.
Publishing status: Available
© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Table of Contents
|
Abbreviations
|
xi–xii
|
|
Introduction
|
1–5
|
|
The notional category of epistemic modality
|
6–39
|
|
A typological classification of epistemic systems
|
40–52
|
|
Epistemic modality in Italian
|
53–68
|
|
Semantic oppositions
|
69–99
|
|
A typological characterization of italian epistemic modality
|
100–107
|
|
Inflectional and distributional constraints.: The (low) performativity of italian epistemic modality
|
108–132
|
|
Aspectual constraints on the propositional content
|
133–153
|
|
The incompleteness of the propositional content and the meta-propositionality of epistemic modality
|
154–186
|
|
A diachronic hypothesis
|
187–206
|
|
Conclusions
|
207–209
|
|
Notes
|
210–216
|
|
Bibliography
|
217–229
|
|
Subject Index
|
230–232
|
“This book is a very valuable contribution to the discussion on modality from a functional perspective, which is some parts presents data that should be of interest to anyone researching modality. In the opening chapters, the author reveals a good instinct for topics which are currently relevant in the discussion of modality. In chapters 6 and 7 she comes up with an in-depth analysis of the relationship between modality and other grammatical categories, particularly aspectuality, resulting in the presentation of intriguing data and hypotheses.”
Heiko Narrog, Tohoku University, on Linguist List 17-1542, 2006
Cited by
Cited by other publications
Böhm, Verónica & Anja Hennemann
2014. The Evidential Use of the Spanish Imperfect and the Conditional in Journalistic Contexts.
Studia Neophilologica 86:2 ► pp. 183 ff. 
Cruschina, Silvio & Eva-Maria Remberger
2017.
In Adjective Adverb Interfaces in Romance [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 242],
► pp. 81 ff.
Cruschina, Silvio & Eva-Maria Remberger
2017. The rise and development of evidential and epistemic markers.
Journal of Historical Linguistics 7:1-2 ► pp. 1 ff.
Engerer, Volkmar
2014.
In Events, Arguments, and Aspects [Studies in Language Companion Series, 152],
► pp. 227 ff.
Fiorentini, Ilaria
2017.
In Pragmatic Markers, Discourse Markers and Modal Particles [Studies in Language Companion Series, 186],
► pp. 417 ff.
Giannakidou, Anastasia & Alda Mari
2018. A unified analysis of the future as epistemic modality.
Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 36:1 ► pp. 85 ff.
Jacquin, Jérôme, F. Neveu, B. Harmegnies, L. Hriba, S. Prévost & A. Steuckardt
2020. Withdrawn article: Étudier les marqueurs épistémiques et évidentiels du français tels qu’ils émergent dans la parole-en-interaction. Synthèse critique de la littérature existante.
SHS Web of Conferences 78 ► pp. 01007 ff.
MARI, ALDA
2016. French future: Exploring the future ratification hypothesis.
Journal of French Language Studies 26:3 ► pp. 353 ff.
Miecznikowski, Johanna
2018.
In Argumentation and Language — Linguistic, Cognitive and Discursive Explorations [Argumentation Library, 32],
► pp. 73 ff.
Miecznikowski, Johanna
2020. At the juncture between evidentiality and argumentation.
Journal of Argumentation in Context 9:1 ► pp. 42 ff.
Miecznikowski, Johanna & Elena Musi
2015.
In Reflections on Theoretical Issues in Argumentation Theory [Argumentation Library, 28],
► pp. 259 ff.
Rivero, María Luisa & Milena Milojević Sheppard
2016.
In Formal Studies in Slovenian Syntax [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 236],
► pp. 253 ff.
Rocci, Andrea
2017.
In Modality in Argumentation [Argumentation Library, 29],
► pp. 275 ff.
Rocci, Andrea
2017.
In Modality in Argumentation [Argumentation Library, 29],
► pp. 371 ff.
TANTUCCI, VITTORIO
2015. Epistemic inclination and factualization: a synchronic and diachronic study on the semantic gradience of factuality.
Language and Cognition 7:3 ► pp. 371 ff.
Thegel, Miriam & Josefin Lindgren
2020. Subjective and intersubjective modality: a quantitative approach to Spanish modal verbs.
Studia Neophilologica 92:1 ► pp. 124 ff.
Wiemer, Björn
2013. Review of Boye (2012): Epistemic Meaning: A crosslinguistic and functionalcognitive study.
Studies in Language 37:2 ► pp. 463 ff.
Zeman, Sonja
2014.
In Modes of Modality [Studies in Language Companion Series, 149],
► pp. 457 ff.
Zeman, Sonja
2018.
In Linguistic Foundations of Narration in Spoken and Sign Languages [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 247],
► pp. 173 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 08 january 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
Subjects
BIC Subject: CF – Linguistics
BISAC Subject: LAN009000 – LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General