Linguistic Borrowing in Bilingual Contexts
Author
| California State University, Northridge
Foreword Author
| Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology
A number of previous approaches to linguistic borrowing and contact phenomena in general have concluded that there are no formal boundaries whatsoever to the kinds of material that can pass from one language into another. At the same time, various hierarchies illustrate that some things are indeed more likely to be borrowed than others. Linguistic Borrowing in Bilingual Contexts addresses both, by examining claims of no absolute limits and synthesizing various hierarchies. It observes that all contact phenomena are systematic, and borrowing is no exception. Regarding forms, the determining factors lie in the nature of the morphological systems in contact and how they relate to one another. Two principles are proposed to determine the nature of the systematicity and interaction: the Principle of System Compatibility (PSC), and its corollary, the Principle of System Incompatibility (PSI). Together, these principles provide a consistent account of the possibilities and limits to borrowing.
[Studies in Language Companion Series, 62] 2002. xviii, 252 pp.
Publishing status: Available
© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Table of Contents
|
Foreword
|
ix
|
|
Preface
|
xi
|
|
List of figures
|
xv
|
|
List of tables
|
xvii
|
|
1. Introduction
|
1–24
|
|
2. Morphological structuring and system compatibility
|
25–48
|
|
3. Form classes and semantic types
|
49–82
|
|
4. The identification of form–meaning sets
|
83–121
|
|
5. Borrowing patterns in modern Mexicano
|
123–164
|
|
6. Discussion
|
165–200
|
|
Appendix A: Additional Mexicano text
|
201–203
|
|
Appendix B: Spanish borrowings in the data
|
205–228
|
|
References
|
229–242
|
|
Name index
|
243–244
|
|
Subject index
|
245–252
|
“In Linguistic Borrowing in Bilingual Contexts, Frederick W. Fields presents in-depth discussions of the results of language contact, such as lexical borrowing, code-switching, language change, attrition, and convergence, providing the basis for an extremely well-informed study of linguistic borrowing. The research presented in this work by Fields is far-reaching, going well beyond the Malinche Mexicano data that he examines. The consideration of relevant issues and background literature in a wide range of language contact areas and the inclusion of sociolinguistic as well as linguistic issues in explaining borrowing and mixed languages make this book a significant contribution to the field of language contact. Its logical organization and clear exposition of its subject matter at every turn make it accessible as well.”
MaryEllen Garcia, The University of Texas at San Antonio, in Southwest Journal of Linguistics, Vol.22(2), 2003.
Cited by
Cited by 44 other publications
No author info given
2011.
In The Handbook of Phonological Theory,
► pp. 779 ff. 
No author info given
2021.
In Language Variation – European Perspectives VIII [Studies in Language Variation, 25],
Ahmed, Mohamed A. H.
2018. XML Annotation of Hebrew Elements in Judeo-Arabic Texts.
Journal of Jewish Languages 6:2 ► pp. 221 ff.
Balakrishnan, Hemma
2020. Towards an understanding of the use of English and Malay in Malaysian-Tamil Hip-Hop songs.
South Asian Diaspora 12:1 ► pp. 19 ff.
Balam, Osmer, Ana de Prada Pérez & Dámaris Mayans
2014. A congruence approach to the study of bilingual compound verbs in Northern Belize contact Spanish.
Spanish in Context 11:2 ► pp. 243 ff.
Bhattacharya, Tanmoy, Nancy Retzlaff, Damián E Blasi, William Croft, Michael Cysouw, Daniel Hruschka, Ian Maddieson, Lydia Müller, Eric Smith, Peter F Stadler, George Starostin & Hyejin Youn
2018. Studying language evolution in the age of big data.
Journal of Language Evolution 3:2 ► pp. 94 ff.
Bierge, Stefanie Ramos & Marina Carrillo Díaz
2018. De conectores y marcadores en el discurso del wixárika (huichol).
LIAMES: Línguas Indígenas Americanas 18:2 ► pp. 203 ff.
Cole, Juan
2019. Paradosis and monotheism: a late antique approach to the meaning ofislāmin the Quran.
Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 82:3 ► pp. 405 ff.
DEGANI, MARTA & ALEXANDER ONYSKO
2010. Hybrid compounding in New Zealand English.
World Englishes 29:2 ► pp. 209 ff.
Field, Fredric
2005. Long-term effects of CS: Clues to structural borrowing.
International Journal of Bilingualism 9:3-4 ► pp. 341 ff.
Field, Fredric
2007. Review of Mous (2003): The making of a mixed language: The case of Ma’a/Mbugu.
Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 22:1 ► pp. 186 ff.
Filipović, Luna
2019.
In Bilingualism in Action,
Gardani, Francesco
2018. On morphological borrowing.
Language and Linguistics Compass 12:10 ► pp. e12302 ff.
Gatsalova, Larisa, Tatyana Novikova, Larisa Parsieva, S. Cindori, O. Larouk, E.Yu. Malushko, L.N. Rebrina & N.L. Shamne
2018. Cognitive Basis of Conceptual Borrowing.
SHS Web of Conferences 50 ► pp. 01120 ff.
Gómez, Alfredo Delgado
2020. Get up! Be Opened!: Code-switching and Loanwords in the Gospel of Mark.
Journal for the Study of the New Testament 42:3 ► pp. 390 ff.
Harvey, Mark
2012. Warndarrang and Marra: A Diffusional or Genetic Relationship?.
Australian Journal of Linguistics 32:3 ► pp. 327 ff.
Hentschel, Gerd
2017. Eleven questions and answers about Belarusian-Russian Mixed Speech (‘Trasjanka’).
Russian Linguistics 41:1 ► pp. 17 ff.
Herin, Bruno
2018.
In Arabic in Contact [Studies in Arabic Linguistics, 6],
► pp. 20 ff.
Hickey, Raymond
2020.
In The Handbook of Language Contact,
► pp. 1 ff.
Karatsareas, Petros
2009. The loss of grammatical gender in Cappadocian Greek.
Transactions of the Philological Society 107:2 ► pp. 196 ff.
Kayigema, Jacques Lwaboshi & Davie E. Mutasa
2014. The cohabitation of three official languages in Post-Genocide Rwanda: Kinyarwanda, English and French.
South African Journal of African Languages 34:2 ► pp. 235 ff.
Lev-Ari, Shiri, Marcela San Giacomo & Sharon Peperkamp
2014. The effect of domain prestige and interlocutors' bilingualism on loanword adaptations.
Journal of Sociolinguistics 18:5 ► pp. 658 ff.
Matras, Yaron
2013. Languages in contact in a world marked by change and mobility.
Revue française de linguistique appliquée XVIII:2 ► pp. 7 ff.
Matras, Yaron
2020.
In The Handbook of Historical Linguistics,
► pp. 375 ff.
Meakins, Felicity, Rob Pensalfini, Caitlin Zipf & Amanda Hamilton-Hollaway
2020. Lend me your verbs: Verb borrowing between Jingulu and Mudburra.
Australian Journal of Linguistics 40:3 ► pp. 296 ff.
Muysken, Pieter
2012. Root/affix asymmetries in contact and transfer: case studies from the Andes.
International Journal of Bilingualism 16:1 ► pp. 22 ff.
Nichols, Johanna & Tandy Warnow
2008. Tutorial on Computational Linguistic Phylogeny.
Language and Linguistics Compass 2:5 ► pp. 760 ff.
Padilla-Moyano, Manuel
2019. Mailegatze morfologikoa eta generoa euskaraz.
Fontes Linguae Vasconum :127 ► pp. 229 ff.
Poplack, Shana & Nathalie Dion
2012. Myths and facts about loanword development.
Language Variation and Change 24:3 ► pp. 279 ff.
Quick, Antje Endesfelder & Anna Verschik
2019. Usage-based contact linguistics: An introduction to the special issue
.
Applied Linguistics Review 0:0
Rajko, Ivana Škevin & Lucija Šimičić
2019.
In Language Variation - European Perspectives VII [Studies in Language Variation, 22],
► pp. 204 ff.
Ralli, Angela
2020. Matter versus pattern borrowing in compounding: Evidence from the Asia Minor Greek dialectal variety.
Morphology 30:4 ► pp. 423 ff.
Riksem, Brita Ramsevik, Maren Berg Grimstad, Terje Lohndal & Tor A. Åfarli
2019. Language mixing within verbs and nouns in American Norwegian.
The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 22:2 ► pp. 189 ff.
Roig-Marín, Amanda
2017. Contextualising the emergence of English-induced morphological borrowing in Spanish.
Spanish in Context 14:3 ► pp. 391 ff.
Sakel, Jeanette
2007. Language contact between Spanish and Mosetén: A study of grammatical integration.
International Journal of Bilingualism 11:1 ► pp. 25 ff.
Sevinc, Yesim
2014. Linguistic and social factors in Turkish-Dutch contact across generations.
Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics 3:1 ► pp. 82 ff.
Seza Doğruöz, A. & Ad Backus
2007. Postverbal elements in immigrant Turkish: Evidence of change?.
International Journal of Bilingualism 11:2 ► pp. 185 ff.
Sobkowiak, Elwira & Marcin Kilarski
2018. A ‘Small’ Language in Contact with a ‘Big’ One: The Loss of the Alienability Distinction in Tének (Mayan) under Spanish Influence.
European Review 26:1 ► pp. 147 ff.
Tian, Feiyang
2012. Orthographic Constraints on the Integration of English Loanwords in Mandarin Chinese.
Theory and Practice in Language Studies 2:5
Trips, Carola
2020.
In Historical Linguistics 2017 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 350],
► pp. 410 ff.
Trye, David, Andreea S. Calude, Felipe Bravo-Marquez & Te Taka Keegan
2020. Hybrid Hashtags: #YouKnowYoureAKiwiWhen Your Tweet Contains Māori and English.
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence 3
Verschik, Anna
2004. Aspects of Russian-Estonian codeswitching: Research perspectives.
International Journal of Bilingualism 8:4 ► pp. 427 ff.
Yang, Jian
2005. Lexical innovations in China English.
World Englishes 24:4 ► pp. 425 ff.
YANG, JIAN
2009. Chinese borrowings in English.
World Englishes 28:1 ► pp. 90 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 11 april 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
Subjects
BIC Subject: CF – Linguistics
BISAC Subject: LAN009000 – LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General