Chapter published in:
Normativity in Language and Linguistics
Edited by Aleksi Mäkilähde, Ville Leppänen and Esa Itkonen
[Studies in Language Companion Series 209] 2019
► pp. 183–212

Linguistic variation and change

A normative approach

This chapter offers a preliminary examination of linguistic variation and change from the normative perspective. Both key aspects of normativity, correctness and rationality, are discussed in the context of theoretical discussion and demonstrated by concrete examples drawn from the existing literature on normativity, sociolinguistics and historical linguistics. The goal is to show, how linguistic variation and change can be understood as empirical phenomena involving norms as constitutive (as opposed to merely evaluative or prescriptive) entities in the ontology of language. Of the three variation types thus identified, only the one involving indeterminable correctness appears central to language change. Finally, language change is conceptualized and discussed as a process of norm change (i.e. as an appearance, disappearance or replacement of norms).
Keywords: variation, change, sociolinguistics, historical linguistics, norms, normativity
Published online: 04 December 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.209.07lep
References

References

Adams, James N.
2013 Social Variation and the Latin Language. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Alho, Tommi & Leppänen, Ville
2016 Roman brick stamps: Evidence for the development of Latin case syntax. Glotta 92: 3–15. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017 On Roman brick stamps and the Latin -(a)es genitive. Pallas 103: 87–93.Google Scholar
Anderson, Stephen R. & Lightfoot, David W.
2006 Biology and language: A response to Everett (2005). Journal of Linguistics 42: 377–383. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Anttila, Raimo
1989 Historical and Comparative Linguistics [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 6]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bartsch, Renate
1987 Norms of Language. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, Leonard
1933 Language. New York NY: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
Campbell, Lyle
2013 Historical Linguistics. An Introduction, 3rd edn. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Coseriu, Eugenio
1974 Synchronie, Diachronie und Geschichte. Das Problem des Sprachwandels. München: Fink.Google Scholar
Croft, William
2000 Explaining Language Change: An Evolutionary Approach. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Everett, Daniel L.
2005 Biology and language: A consideration of alternatives. Journal of Linguistics 41: 157–175. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006 Biology and language: Response to Anderson & Lightfoot. Journal of Linguistics 42: 385–393. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fries, Charles C. & Pike, Kenneth L.
1949 Co-existent phonemic systems. Language 25: 29–50. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Givón, Talmy
2002 Bio-linguistics. The Santa Barbara Lectures. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Guy, Gregory R.
2003 Variationist approaches to phonological change. In The Handbook of Historical Linguistics, Brian D. Joseph & Richard D. Janda (eds), 369–400. Malden MA: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Halle, Morris
1962 Phonology in generative grammar. Word 18: 54–72. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
1999 Optimality and diachronic adaptation. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 18(2): 180–205.Google Scholar
Hockett, Charles F.
1958 A course in modern linguistics. New York: MacMillan.Google Scholar
Hoenigswald, Henry M.
1966 Language Change and Linguistic Reconstruction. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Horrocks, Geoffrey
2010 Greek. A History of the Language and its Speakers, 2nd edn. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Itkonen, Esa
1978 Grammatical Theory and Metascience. A Critical Investigation into the Methodological and Philosophical Foundations of ‘Autonomous’ Linguistics [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 5]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1983 Causality in Linguistic Theory. A Critical Investigation into the Philosophical and Methodological Foundations of ‘Non-autonomous’ Linguistics. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
1984 On the ‘rationalist’ conception of language change. Diachronica 1(2): 203–216. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2003 What is Language? A Study in the Philosophy of Linguistics. Turku: University of Turku.Google Scholar
2005 Concerning the synthesis between intuition-based study of norms and observation-based study of corpora. SKY Journal of Linguistics 18: 357–377.Google Scholar
2008 The central role of normativity in language and in linguistics. In The Shared Mind. Perspectives on Intersubjectivity, Jordan Zlatev [Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research 12], Timothy P. Racine, Chris Sinha & Esa Itkonen (eds), 279–305. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013/2014 On explanation in linguistics. Energeia 5: 10–40.Google Scholar
Kauhanen, Irina
2006 Norms and sociolinguistic description. In A Man of Measure. Festschrift in Honour of Fred Karlsson on his 60th Birthday, Mickael Suominen, Antti Arppe, Anu Airola, Orvokki Heinämäki, Matti Miestamo, Urho Määttä, Jussi Niemi, Kari K. Pitkänen and Kaius Sinnemäki (eds). Special supplement to SKY Journal of Linguistics 19: 34–46.Google Scholar
Kauko, Mikko
2015 Jöns Budde och hans skrifter – yngre fornsvenskt textmaterial och mannen bakom det [Annales Universitatis Turkuensis B 402]. PhD Dissertation, University of Turku. http://​www​.doria​.fi​/handle​/10024​/113787> (4 July 2017).
King, Robert D.
1969 Historical Linguistics and Generative Grammar. Englewood Cliffs NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
1990 The transformational-generative model. In Polomé (ed.), 249–256.Google Scholar
Kluge, Friedrich & Seebold, Elmar
2011 Etymologisches Wörterbuch der deutschen Sprache, 25th edn. Berlin: De Gryuter.Google Scholar
Kroch, Anthony S.
1989 Reflexes of grammar in patterns of language change. Journal of Language Variation and Change 1(3): 199–244. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kroonen, Guus
2013 Etymological Dictionary of Proto-Germanic. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Krug, Manfred, Schlüchter, Julia & Rosenbach, Anette
2013 Introduction: Investigating language variation and change. In Research Methods in Language Variation and Change, Manfred Krug & Julia Schlüchter (eds), 1–13. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kuczaj, Stan A.
1977 The acquisition of regular and irregular past tense forms. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 16: 589–600. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Labov, William
1972 Sociolinguistic Patterns. Philadelphia PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
1994 Principles of Linguistic Change, Volume 1: Internal Factors. Malden MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
2001 Principles of Linguistic Change, Volume 2: Social Factors. Malden MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
2006 The Social Stratification of English in New York City, 2nd edn. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007 Transmission and diffusion. Language 83(2): 344–387. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008 Quantitative reasoning in linguistics. http://​www​.ling​.upenn​.edu​/~wlabov​/Papers​/QRL​.pdf> (16 March 2017).
Lass, Roger
1997 Historical Linguistics and Language Change. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leppänen, Ville
2014 Review on Horrocks 2010. Journal of Greek Linguistics 14: 127–135. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017 Gothic evidence for Greek historical phonology. In Ancient Greek Linguistics. New Approaches, Insights, Perspectives, Felicia Logozzo & Paolo Poccetti (eds), 35–56. Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lightfoot, David
1979 Principles of Diachronic Syntax. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
1999 The Development of Language. Acquisition, Change and Evolution. Malden MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Martinet, André
1955 Économie des changements phonétiques. Traité de phonologie diachronique. Berne: Francke.Google Scholar
Meillet, Antoine
1926 Linguistique historique et linguistique générale, 2nd edition. Paris: Librairie Ancienne Honoré Champion.Google Scholar
Milroy, James
2006 Language change and the speaker. In Variation and Reconstruction [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 268], Thomas D. Cravens (ed.), 145–163. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Milroy, James & Milroy, Lesley
1993 Real English. The Grammar of English Dialects in the British Isles. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Opfermann, Andreas
2018 Gedanken über einen oskischen Graffito: ST Po 79 und das Pronomen osk. pis.pis. In Priscis libentius … et liberius novis. Indogermanistische und sprachwissenschaftliche Studien. Festschrift für Gerhard Meiser zum 65. Geburtstag, Olav Hackstein & Andreas Opfermann (eds), 111–130. Hamburg: Baar Verlag.Google Scholar
Pintzuk, Susan
2003 Variationist approaches to syntactic change. In The Handbook of Historical Linguistics, Brian D. Joseph & Richard D. Janda (eds), 509–528. Malden MA: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Polomé, Edgar C.
(ed.) 1990 Research Guide on Language Change. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1990 Language change and the Saussurean dichotomy: Diachrony versus synchrony. In Polomé (ed.), 3–10. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rauch, Irmegard
1990 Evidence of language change. In Polomé (ed.), 37–70.Google Scholar
Ringe, Don & Eska, Joseph F.
2013 Historical Linguistics. Toward a Twenty-First Century Reintegration. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Salmons, Joseph
1990 The context of language change. In Polomé (ed.), 71–96.Google Scholar
Sankoff, Gillian
(ed.) 1980 The Social Life of Language. Philadelphia PA: University of Pennsylvania Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schleicher, August
1861/1862 Compendium der vergleichenden Grammatik der indogermanischen Sprachen. Weimar: H. Boehlau.Google Scholar
Southworth, Franklin C.
1990 Synchronic manifestations of linguistic change. In Polomé (ed.), 25–36.Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali A.
1998 Was/were variation across the generations: View from the city of York. Language Variation and Change 10(2): 153–191. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006 Analysing Sociolinguistic Variation. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012 Variationist Sociolinguistics. Change, Observation, Interpretation. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Walker, James A.
2010 Variation in linguistic systems. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Weinreich, Uriel, Labov, William & Herzog, Marvin I.
1968 Empirical foundations for a theory of language change. In Directions for Historical Linguistics. A Symposium, Winfred P. Lehmann & Yakov Malkiel (eds), 95–195. Austin TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Weiss, Michael
2011 Outline of the Historical and Comparative Grammar of Latin, 2nd corrected printing. Ann Arbor MI: Beech Stave Press.Google Scholar
Winter, Werner
1990 Linguistic reconstruction: The scope of historical and comparative linguistics. In Polomé (ed.), 11–21.Google Scholar
Zipser, Katharina
2012 Spracherwerb und syntaktischer Wandel. Synchronie und Diachronie im Wechselspiel. Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft.Google Scholar