Chapter published in:
Normativity in Language and Linguistics
Edited by Aleksi Mäkilähde, Ville Leppänen and Esa Itkonen
[Studies in Language Companion Series 209] 2019
► pp. 125150
References

References

Astington, Janet W.
2006The developmental interdependence of theory of mind and language. In The Roots of Human Sociality. Culture, Cognition, and Human Interaction, Nick Enfield & Stephen C. Levinson (eds), 179–206. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Banchetti-Robino, Marina
1997Husserl’s theory of language as calculus ratiocinator. Synthese 112: 303–321. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barsalou, Lawrence W.
2010Ad hoc categories. In The Cambridge Encyclopedia of the Language Sciences, Patrick Colm Hogan (ed.), 87–88. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Blomberg, Johan & Zlatev, Jordan
2014Actual and non-actual motion: Why experientialist semantics needs phenomenology (and vice versa). Phenomenology and Cognitive Science 13: 395–418. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Croft, William & Cruse, Alan D.
2004Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De Bruin, Leon & de Haan, Sanneke
2012Enactivism & social cognition: In search of the whole story. Journal of Cognitive Semiotics 4(1): 225–250.Google Scholar
Drummond, John J.
2012Intentionality without Representationalism. In The Oxford Handbook of Contemporary Phenomenology, D. Zahavi (ed.), 115–133. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Etelämäki, Marja & Visapää, Laura
2014Why blend Conversation Analysis with Cognitive Grammar? Pragmatics 24(3): 477–506. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Frege, Gottlob
[1892] 1949On sense and nominatum [‘Über Sinn und Bedeutung’, translated by Herbert Feigl]. In Readings in Philosophical Analysis, Herbert Feigl & Sigfrid Sellars (eds), 85–102. New York NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
Harder, Peter
2010Meaning in Mind and Society. A Functional Contribution to the Social Turn in Cognitive Linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gallagher, Shaun & Hutto, Daniel
2008Understanding others through primary interaction. In The Shared Mind. Perspectives on Intersubjectivity [Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research 12], Jordan Zlatev, Timothy P. Racine, Chris Sinha & Esa Itkonen (eds), 17–38. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Geeraerts, D.
2016The sociosemiotic commitment. Cognitive Linguistics 27(4): 527–542. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K. & Hasan, Ruqaiya
1976Cohesion in English. Longman: London.Google Scholar
Haukioja, Jussi
2000Grammaticality, response-dependence and the ontology of linguistic objects. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 23: 3–25. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Husserl, Edmund
[1900–1901] 2001aLogical Investigations 1. Prolegomena to Pure Logic, Expression and Meaning, The Ideal Unity of the Species and Modern Theories of Abstraction, translated by John Niemeyer Findlay from the second German edition of Logische Untersuchungen. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
[1901] 2001bLogical Investigations 2. On the Theory of Wholes and Parts, The Distinction Between Independent and Non-independent Meanings, On Intentional Experiences and their ‘Contents’, Elements of a Phenomenological Elucidation of Knowledge, translated by John Niemeyer Findlay from the second German edition of Logische Untersuchungen. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Itkonen, Esa
1978Grammatical Theory and Metascience. A Critical Investigation into the Methodological and Philosophical Foundations of ‘Autonomous’ Linguistics [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 5]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1997The social ontology of linguistic meaning. In SKY Yearbook, Timo Haukioja, Marja-Liisa Helasvuo & Matti Miestamo (eds), 49–80. Helsinki: The Linguistic Association of Finland.Google Scholar
2003What is Language? A Study in the Philosophy of Linguistics [Publications in General Linguistics 8]. Turku: University of Turku.Google Scholar
2008aConcerning the role of consciousness in linguistics. Journal of Consciousness studies 15(6): 15–33.Google Scholar
2008bThe central role of normativity in language and linguistics. In The Shared Mind. Perspectives on Intersubjectivity [Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research 12], Jordan Zlatev, Timothy P. Racine, Chris Sinha & Esa Itkonen (eds), 279–305. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jaakola, Minna, Töyry, Maija, Helle, Merja & Onikki-Rantajääskö, Tiina
2014Construing the reader: Multidisciplinary approach to journalistic texts. Discourse & Society 25(5): 640–655. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W.
1987Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol. I: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
1988A Usage Based Model. In Topics in Cognitive Linguistics [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 50], Brygida Rudzka Ostyn (ed.), 127–161. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
2008Cognitive Grammar. A Basic Introduction. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012Interactive cognition: Toward a unified account of structure, processing, and discourse. International Journal of Cognitive Linguistics 3: 95–125.Google Scholar
2016aToward an integrated view of structure, processing, and discourse. In Studies in Lexicogrammar. Theory and Applications [Human Cognitive Processing 54], Grzegorz Drożdż (ed.), 23–53. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016bWorking toward a synthesis. Cognitive Linguistics 27: 465–477. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, David
1969Convention. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Mauri, Caterina
2017Building and interpreting ad hoc categories: A linguistic analysis. In Formal Models in the Study of Language, Joanna Blochowiak, Cristina Grisot, Stéphanie Durrleman & Christopher Laenzlinger (eds), 297–326. Berlin: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Meltzoff, Andrew N. & Moore, M. Keith
1977Imitation of facial and manual gestures by human neonates. Science, New Series 198: 75–78.Google Scholar
1994Imitation, memory, and the representation of persons. Infant Behavior and Development 17: 83–99. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1997Explaining facial imitation: A theoretical model. Early Development and Parenting 6: 179–192. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Möttönen, Tapani
2016aConstrual in Expression: An Intersubjective Approach to Cognitive Grammar. PhD dissertation, University of Helsinki.Google Scholar
2016bDependence of construal on linguistic and pre-linguistic intersubjectivity. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 39(2): 209–229. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, Hilary
1973Meaning and reference. The Journal of Philosophy 70(19): 699–711. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schmid, Hans-Jörg
2016Why Cognitive Linguistics must embrace the social and pragmatic dimensions of language and how it could do so more seriously. Cognitive Linguistics 27(4): 543–557. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stern, Daniel N.
1971A microanalysis of mother-infant interaction. Journal of American Academy of Child Psychiatry 19: 501–517. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1977The First Relationship. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
1985The Interpersonal World of the Infant. A View from Psychoanalysis and Developmental Psychology. New York NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Trevarthen, Colwyn
1979Communication and cooperation in early infancy: A description of early intersubjectivity. In Before Speech. The Beginning of Human Communication, Margaret Bullowa (ed.), 99–136. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
1980The foundations of intersubjectivity. In The Social Foundations of Language and Thought, David R. Olson, Jerome Bruner & George A. Miller (eds), 216–242. New York NY: Norton.Google Scholar
Trevarthen, Colwyn & Aitken, Kenneth J.
2001Infant intersubjectivity: Research, theory, and clinical applications. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 42(1): 3–48. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Verhagen, Arie
2005Constructions of Intersubjectivity. Discourse, Syntax, and Cognition. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2007Construal and perspectivisation. In Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, Dirk Geeraerts & Hubert Cuyckens (eds), 48–81. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Wedgwood, Ralph
2007The Nature of Normativity. Oxford: Clarendon Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zahavi, Dan
1997Horizontal intentionality and transcendental intersubjectivity. Tijdschrift voor Filosofie 59(2): 304–321.Google Scholar
2001Beyond empathy: Phenomenological approaches to intersubjectivity. In Between Ourselves. Second-Person Issues in the Study of of Consciousness, E. Thompson (ed.), 151–167. Thorveton: Imprint Academic.Google Scholar
2003aHusserl’s Phenomenology. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
2003bHusserl’s intersubjective transformation of transcendental philosophy. In The New Husserl. A Critical Reader, edited by Donn Welton, 233–254. Bloomington IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Zlatev, Jordan
2005What’s in a schema? Bodily mimesis and the grounding of language. In From Perception To Meaning. Image Schemas In Cognitive Linguistics, Beate Hampe (ed.), 313–342. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.Google Scholar
2007aEmbodiment, language and mimesis. In Body, Language and Mind. Vol 1: Embodiment, Tom Ziemke, Jordan Zlatev & Roslyn M. Frank (eds), 297–337. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2007bIntersubjectivity, mimetic schemas and the emergence of language. Intellectica 46–47(2–3): 123–152.Google Scholar
2008aThe dependence of language on consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies 15(6): 34–62.Google Scholar
2008bThe co-evolution of intersubjectivity and bodily mimesis. In The Shared Mind. Perspectives on Intersubjectivity [Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research 12], Jordan Zlatev, Timothy P. Racine, Chris Sinha & Esa Itkonen (eds), 215–244. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010Phenomenology and cognitive linguistics. In Handbook of Phenomenology and Cognitive Science, Daniel Schmicking & Shaun Gallagher (eds), 415–446. Dordrecht: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zlatev, Jordan.
2016Turning back to experience in Cognitive Linguistics via phenomenology. Cognitive Linguistics 27(4): 559–572. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zlatev, Jordan & Blomberg, Johan
2016Embodied intersubjectivity, sedimentation and non-actual motion expressions. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 39(2): 185–208. CrossrefGoogle Scholar