Chapter published in:
Reorganising Grammatical Variation: Diachronic studies in the retention, redistribution and refunctionalisation of linguistic variants
Edited by Antje Dammel, Matthias Eitelmann and Mirjam Schmuck
[Studies in Language Companion Series 203] 2018
► pp. 209230
References

References

Anderwald, Lieselotte
2011Are non-standard dialects more ‘natural’ than the standard? A test case from English verb morphology. Journal of Linguistics 47(2): 251–274.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Aronoff, Mark
1994Morphology by Itself. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
2012Morphological stems: What William of Occam really said. Word Structure 5(1): 28–51.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baayen, R. Harald & Moscoso del Prado Martín, Fermín
2005Semantic density and past-tense formation in three Germanic languages. Language 81(3): 666–698.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bjerkan, Kirsten Meyer
2000Verbal Morphology in Specifically Language Impaired Children. Oslo: Unipub.Google Scholar
Carstairs, Andrew
1987Allomorphy in Inflexion. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam A.
1986Knowledge of Language. New York NY: Praeger.Google Scholar
Clark, Eve
1993The Lexicon in Acquisition. Cambridge: CUP.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dahlstedt, Karl-Hampus
1962Det svenska Vilhelmina-målet: språkgeografiska studier över ett norrländskt nybyggarmål och dess granndialekter 2. (The Swedish dialect of Vilhelmina: studies in language geography on a North Swedish dialect and its neighbours). Uppsala: Lundequistska bokh.Google Scholar
Dammel, Antje
2011Konjugationsklassenwandel. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Enger, Hans-Olav
1998The Classification of Strong Verbs in Norwegian with Special Reference to the Oslo Dialect: A Study in Inflectional Morphology. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.Google Scholar
2010aHow do words change inflection class? Diachronic evidence from Norwegian. Language Sciences 32(3): 366–379. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010bPartial and competing motivations for gender. In Kontrastive Germanistische Linguistik, Teilband 2, Antje Dammel, Sebastian Kürschner, Damaris Nübling (eds)], 673–693. Hildesheim: Olms.Google Scholar
Esher, Louise
2013Future and conditional in Occitan: A non-canonical morphome. In The Boundaries of Pure Morphology: Diachronic and Synchronic Perspectives [Oxford Studies in Diachronic and Historical Linguistics 4], Silvio Cruschina, Martin Maiden & John Charles Smith (eds), 95–116. Oxford: OUP.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Faarlund, Jan Terje, Lie, Svein & Vannebo, Kjell Ivar
1997Norsk referansegrammatikk (Norwegian Reference Grammar). Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
Fertig, David
2013Analogy and Morphological Change. Edinburgh: EUP.Google Scholar
Hagen, Jon Erik
1994Svake verb på -Vde og -Vte i bokmål og deres paradigmetilhørighet (Weak verbs in -Vde and -Vte in Bokmål and their inflection class membership). In Helsing til Lars Vassenden på 70-årsdagen, Johan Myking, Helge Sandøy & Ivar Utne (eds), 57–67. Bergen: Nordisk institutt.Google Scholar
Hansen, Erik & Heltoft, Lars
2011Grammatik over det danske sprog (Grammar of the Danish language). Odense: Syddansk Universitetsforlag.Google Scholar
Hilpert, Martin
2010Comparing comparatives: A corpus-based study of comparative constructions in English and Swedish. In Contrastive Studies in Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Grammar 10], Hans C. Boas (ed.), 21–41. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
2003Grammaticalization, 2nd edn. Cambridge: CUP.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Karlsson, Fred & Sahlquist, Åsa
1974Starka verb i förvandling (Strong verbs in change). Nysvenska Studier 54: 44–83.Google Scholar
Maiden, Martin
2001What sort of thing is a derivational affix? In Yearbook of Morphology 1999, Geert E. Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds), 25–52. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013‘Semi-autonomous’ morphology. In The Boundaries of Pure Morphology: Diachronic and Synchronic Perspectives [Oxford Studies in Diachronic and Historical Linguistics 4,], Silvio Cruschina, Martin Maiden & John Charles Smith (eds), 24–45. Oxford: OUP.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mondorf, Britta
2009More Support for more-Support: The Role of Processing Constraints on the Choice between Synthetic and Analytic Comparative Forms [Studies in Language Variation 4]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Newmeyer, Frederick J.
1983Grammatical Theory: Its Limits and its Possibilities. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Nicolay, Nathalie
2007Aktionsarten im Deutschen: Prozessualität und Stativität (Actionality in German: Processuality and stativity) [Linguistische Arbeiten 514]. Tübingen: Niemeyer.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nilsen, Marianne Brodahl
2012Sterke verb og semantiske fellestrekk: Om semantisk motivasjon for bøyingsklassetilhørighet ved norske verb (Strong verbs and semantic commonalities: On semantic motivation for inflection class membership in Norwegian verbs). MA thesis, University of Oslo. https://​www​.duo​.uio​.no​/handle​/10852​/26739Google Scholar
Nordberg, Bengt
1982Vad händer med adjektivets endelseskomparation? [What happens with the adjective’s suffixal comparison?] In Förhandlingar vid trettonde sammankomsten för att dryfta frågor rörande svenskans beskrivning, Hanaholmen 1981, Mirja Saari & Marika Tandefelt (eds), 228–248. Helsinki: Helsingin yliopiston monistuspalvelu.Google Scholar
Pinker, Steven
(1999) Words and Rules: The Ingredients of Language. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph
1970Aspect and variant inflection in English verbs. Language 46(2): 300–311.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ramscar, Michael
2002The role of meaning in inflection: Why the past tense does not require a rule. Cognitive Psychology 45(1): 45–94.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Reitan, Jørgen
1930Interjeksjonsverber i norske målføre (Interjection verbs in Norwegian dialects). Maal og Minne 65–98.Google Scholar
Siemund, Peter
2011Universals and variation: an introduction. In Linguistic Universals and Language Variation [Trends in Linguistics Studies and Monographs 231], Peter Siemund (ed.), 1–21. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Simon, Horst & Wiese, Heike
2011What are exceptions? And what can be done about them? In Expecting the Unexpected: Exceptions in Grammar [Trends in Linguistics Studies and Monographs 216], Simon Horst & Heike Wiese (eds), 3–30. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Spilling, Eivor Finset
2012Gradbøying i norsk: En korpusbasert undersøkelse av talespråk (Comparison in Norwegian: A corpus-based study of spoken language). MA thesis, University of Oslo. https://​www​.duo​.uio​.no​/handle​/10852​/35125Google Scholar
Spilling, Eivor Finset & Haugen, Tor Arne
2013Gradbøying i norsk: en bruksbasert tilnærming (Comparison in Norwegian: A usage-based approach). Maal og Minne 2013(2): 1–40.Google Scholar
2014Metakomparasjon i norsk (Meta-comparison in Norwegian). Norsk Lingvistisk Tidsskrift 32(1): 3–29.Google Scholar
Teleman, Ulf, Hellberg, Staffan & Andersson, Erik
1999Svenska Akademiens Grammatik 2: Ord (The Swedish Academy Grammar vol. 2: Words). Stockholm: Norstedts.Google Scholar
Thornton, Anna M.
2011Overabundance (multiple forms realizing the same cell): a non-canonical phenomenon in Italian verb morphology. In Morphological Autonomy: Perspectives from Romance Inflectional Morphology, Martin Maiden, John Charles Smith, Maria Goldbach & Marc-Olivier Hinzelin (eds), 358–382. Oxford: OUP.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tobin, Yishai
1993Aspect in the English Verb: Process and Result in Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Vendler, Zeno
1967Verbs and times. In Linguistics in Philosophy, Zeno Vendler, 97–121. Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Venås, Kjell
1967Sterke verb i norske målføre (Strong verbs in Norwegian dialects). Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
1974Linne verb i norske målføre (Weak verbs in Norwegian dialects). Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
Vincent, Nigel
2013Compositionality and change in conditionals and counterfactuals in Romance. In The Boundaries of Pure Morphology: Diachronic and Synchronic Perspectives [Oxford Studies in Diachronic and Historical Linguistics 4], Silvio Cruschina, Martin Maiden & John Charles Smith (eds), 116–137. Oxford: OUP.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wurzel, Wolfgang Ullrich
1984Flexionsmorphologie und Natürlichkeit (Inflectional morphology and naturalness) [Studia Grammatica xxi]. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Enger, Hans-Olav
2019.  In Morphological Variation [Studies in Language Companion Series, 207],  pp. 159 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 04 march 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.