Chapter published in:
New Trends in Grammaticalization and Language Change
Edited by Sylvie Hancil, Tine Breban and José Vicente Lozano
[Studies in Language Companion Series 202] 2018
► pp. 185–206

From time to surprise

The case of será posible in Spanish

| University of Alicante
This paper focuses on the meaning and behavior of será posible in Spanish. The structure may have two interpretations: a compositional one (será posible 1 ), which describes a situation that can hold in the future; and a less transparent one (será posible 2 ), related to a negative assessment. The analysis of the different structures invoked by será posible proves that será posible 2 is no longer interpreted as a copula in future plus and adjective, but has been reanalyzed as a mirative marker. Despite its fixed behavior, the mirative value seems to be motivated by the deictic nature of the future. The paper introduces a wide definition of this verb form, based on the deictic instruction of ‘distance forward’. Productive, mirative interpretations of the future are analyzed from this perspective and confronted with the mirative será posible. More generally, this paper shows that if a wide definition of grammar is assumed, será posible 2 can be considered a case of grammaticalization.
Keywords: Spanish future, mirativity, distance, information structure
Published online: 06 December 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.202.08ros
References

References

Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.
2004 Evidentiality. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2012 The essence of mirativity. Linguistic Typology 16: 435–485.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Akatsuka, Noriko
1985 Conditionals and the epistemic scale. Language 61(3): 625–639.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Aksu-Koç, Ayhan & Slobin, Dan
1986 A psychological account of the development and use of evidentials in Turkish. In Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology, Wallace Chafe & Johanna Nichols (eds), 159–167. Norwood NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Alarcos, Emillio
1994 Gramática de la lengua española. Madrid: Espasa-Calpe.Google Scholar
Alonso, Ángel
1999 Las construcciones exclamativas. In Bosque & Demonte (eds), 3993–4050.Google Scholar
Azorín, Maria Dolores
2002 ALCORE. Alicante Corpus del Español. Alicante: Universidad de AlicanteGoogle Scholar
Bello, Andrés
[1847]1970 Gramática de la lengua castellana destinada al uso de los americanos. Buenos Aires: Sopena.Google Scholar
Bertinetto, Pier Marco
1979 Alcune ipotesi sul nostro futuro (con osservazioni su potere e dovere). Rivista di Grammatica Generativa 4 (1–2): 77–138.Google Scholar
Bosque, Ignacio
2017 Spanish exclamatives in perspective: A survey of properties, classes, and current theoretical issues. In Advances in the Analysis of Spanish Exclamatives, Ignacio Bosque (ed.), 1–52. Columbus OH: The Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
Bosque, Ignacio & Demonte, Violeta
(eds) 1999 Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española. Madrid: Espasa-Calpe.Google Scholar
Brisard, Frank
1997 The English tense-system as an epistemic category: The case of futurity. In Lexical and Syntactical Constructions and the Construction of Meaning [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 150], Marjolijn Verspoor, Kee Dong Lee & Eve Sweetser (eds), 271–285. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan, Perkins, Revere Dale & Pagliuca, William
1994 The Evolution of Grammar. Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Castroviejo, Elena
2008 Deconstructing exclamations. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 7: 41–90.Google Scholar
Castroviejo, Elena 2010 An expressive answer. Some considerations on the semantics and pragmatics of wh- exclamatives. Proceedings from the Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society http://​elena​-castroviejo​-miro​.cat​/papers​/cls44​-castroviejo​-DEF​.pdf.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace
1976 Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics, and point of view. In Subject and Topic, Charles N. Li (ed.), 25–55. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
1994 Discourse, Consciousness, and Time. The Flow and Displacement of Conscious Experience in Speaking and Writing. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Clark, Herbert H.
1977 Bridging. In Thinking: Readings in Cognitive Science, Philip N. Johnson-Laird & Peter Cathcart Wason (eds), 411–420. London: CUP.Google Scholar
1996 Using Language. Cambridge: CUP.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Comrie, Bernard
1985 Tense. Cambridge: CUP.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cornillie, Bert
2009 Evidentiality and epistemic modality. On the close relationship between two different categories. Functions of Language 16(1): 44–62.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Östen
1985 Tense and Aspect Systems. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
De Brabanter, Phillipe, Kissine, Mikhail & Sharifzadeh, Saghie
2014 Future tense vs. future time: An introduction. In Future Times, Future tenses, Phillipe De Brabanter, Mikhail Kissine & Saghie Sharifzadeh (eds), 1–25. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
De Saussure, Louis
2013 Perspectival interpretations of tenses. In Time. Language, Cognition and Reality, Kasia Jaszczolt & Louis de Saussure (eds), 46–72. Oxford: OUP.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De Saussure, Louis & Morency, Paul
2012 A cognitive-pragmatic view of the French epistemic future. Journal of French Language Studies 22: 207–223.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
DeLancey, Scott
1997 Mirativity: The grammatical marking of unexpected information. Linguistic Typology 1(1): 33–52.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2001 The mirative and evidentiality. Journal of Pragmatics 33: 369–382.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Diewald, Gabriele
2002 A model for relevant types of contexts in grammaticalization. In New Reflections on Grammaticalization [Typological Studies in Language 49], Ilse Wischer & Gabriele Diewald (eds), 103–120. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dik, Simon
1997 The Theory of Functional Grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Dryer, Matthew
1996 Forms, pragmatic presupposition, and activated propositions. Journal of Pragmatics 26: 475–523.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Escandell, Maria Victoria
1999 Los enunciados interrogativos. Aspectos semánticos y pragmáticos. In Bosque & Demonte (eds), 3929–3991.Google Scholar
2010 Futuro y evidencialidad. Anuario de Lingüística Hispánica 26: 9–34.Google Scholar
2014 Evidential futures: The case of Spanish. In Future Times, Future Tenses, Phillipe De Brabanter, Mikhail Kissine & Saghie Sharifzadeh (eds), 219–246. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Evans, Vyvyan
2003 The Structure of Time. Language, Meaning and Temporal Cognition [Human Cognitive Processing 12]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Fernández Leborans, Maria Jesús
1999 La predicación. Las oraciones copulativas. In Bosque & Demonte (eds), 2357–2461.Google Scholar
Fleischman, Suzanne 1989 Temporal distance: A basic linguistic metaphor. Studies in Language 13(1): 1–50.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Giannakidou, Anastasia & Mari, Alda
2012 The future of Greek and Italian: An epistemic analysis. Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 17: 255–270. http://​semanticsarchive​.net​/Archive​/Dk3NGEwY​/GiannakidouMari​.pdfGoogle Scholar
Ginzburg, Jonathan
2015 The Interactive Stance. Meaning for Conversation. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
González Calvo, José Manuel
1997 Estructuras exclamativas en español. In IV Jornadas de Metodología y Didáctica de la Lengua Española: Sintaxis, José Manuel González Calvo & Jesús Terrón González (eds), 143–177. Cáceres: Universidad de Extremadura.Google Scholar
Gutiérrez Ordóñez, Salvador
1997 Temas, remas, focos, tópicos y comentarios. Madrid: Arco Libros.Google Scholar
Heim, Irene
1983 On the projection problem for presuppositions. WCCFL 2: 114–125.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd
2002 On the role of context in grammaticalization. In New Reflections on Grammaticalization [Typological Studies in Language 49], Ilse Wischer & Gabriele Diewald (eds), 83–101. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd, Kaltenböck, Gunther, Kuteva, Tania & Long, Haiping
2013 An outline of discourse grammar. In Reflections on Functionalism in Linguistics, Shannon Bishoff & Carmen Jeny (eds), 155–206. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hengeveld, Kees & Olbertz, Hella
2012 Didn’t you know? Mirativity does exist! Linguistic Typology 16(3): 487–503.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hernanz, Maria Llouisa
2012 Sobre la periferia izquierda y el movimiento: El complementante si en español. In El movimiento de constituyentes, José M. Brucart & Ángel Gallego (eds), 151–171. Madrid: Visor.Google Scholar
Hill, Nathan
2012 Mirativity does not exist: ḥdug in “Lhasa” Tibetan and other suspects. Linguistic Typology 16 (13): 389–434.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul
1991 On some principles of grammaticization. In Approaches to Grammaticalization, Vol. 1: Theoretical and Methodological Issues [Typological Studies in Language 19:1], Paul Hopper & Elizabeth Closs Traugott (eds), 17–35. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Iglesias Recuero, Silvia
2000 Propiedades interpretativas y discursivas de la estructura ¡(Si) será bobo! In Cien años de investigación semántica: De Michel Bréal a la actualidad, Marcos Martínez Hernández et al.. (eds), 529–542. Madrid: Ediciones Clásicas.Google Scholar
Jaszczolt, Kasia
2009 Representing Time: An Essay on Temporality as Modality. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Kaltenböck, Gunther, Heine, Bernd & Kuteva, Tania
2011 On thetical grammar. Studies in Language 35(4): 852–897.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud
1994 Information Structure and Sentence Form. Topic, Focus and the Mental Representations of Discourse Referents. Cambridge: CUP.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W.
1991 Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol 2. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
2011 The English present: Temporal coincidence vs. epistemic immediacy. In Cognitive Approaches to Tense, Aspect and Epistemic Modality [Human Cognitive Processing 29], Adeline Patard & Frank Brisard (eds), 45–86. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lazard, Gilbert
1999 Mirativity, evidentiality, mediativity, or other. Linguistic Typology 3: 91–109.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, David 1979 Scorekeeping in a language game. Journal of Philosophical Logic 8: 339–359.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lunn, Patricia
1989 Spanish mood and the prototype of assertability. Linguistics 27: 687–702.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Martines, Josep
2017 L’émergence des futurs épistémiques romans. L’exemple du catalan médiéval du XIIIème siècle. In Le futur dans les langues romanes, Laura Baranzini (ed.). Berne: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Michaelis, Laura
2001 Exclamative constructions. In Language Typology and Language Universal: An International Handbook, Martin Haspelmath (ed.), 1038–1050. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Nuyts, Jan
2001 Subjectivity as an evidential dimension in epistemic modal expressions. Journal of Pragmatics 33: 383–400.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008 Qualificational meanings, illocutionary signals, and the cognitive planning of language use. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 6: 185–207.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012 Notions of (inter)subjectivity. English Text Construction 5(1): 53–76.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pérez Saldanya, Manuel
2002 Les relacions temporals i aspectuals. In Gramàtica del català contemporani, Joan Solà, Maria Rosa Lloret, Joan Mascaró & Manuel Pérez Saldanya (eds), 2567–2662. Barcelona: Empúries.Google Scholar
Peterson, Tyler
2013 Rethinking mirativity: The expression and implication of surprise. Ms, University of Toronto. http://​semanticsarchive​.netGoogle Scholar
Portolés, José
1993 Atributos con un enfático. Revue Romane 28(2): 218–236.Google Scholar
Potts, Christopher
2007 Into the Conventional-Implicature dimension. Philosophy Compass 4(2): 665–679.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Prince, Ellen
1992 The ZPG letter: Subjects, definiteness, and information status. In Discourse Description: Discourse Analyses of a Fundraising Text [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 16], William C. Mann & Sandra A. Thompson (eds), 295–325. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Real Academia Española [RAE]
2009 Nueva gramática de la lengua española. Madrid: Espasa-Calpe.Google Scholar
Banco de datos (CREA). Corpus de Referencia del Español Actual. http://​www​.rae​.es
Banco de datos (CORPES XXI. Corpus del Español del siglo XXI. http://​www​.rae​.es
Rett, Jessica
2012 Expressing exceeded expectations in exclamatives and other constructions. Second Cornell Workshop in Linguistics and Philosophy.Google Scholar
Rivero, Maria Luisa
2014 Spanish inferential and mirative futures and conditionals: An evidential gradable modal proposal. Lingua 151: 197–215.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rodríguez Rosique, Susana
2011 Valores epistémicos de las categorías verbales. Cuando la pragmática se integra en la gramática. Verba. Anuario Galego de Filoloxia 38: 243–269.Google Scholar
2015a Distance, evidentiality and counter-argumentation: Concessive future in Spanish. Journal of Pragmatics 85: 181–199 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015b Spanish future in evaluative contexts. E-Humanista/IVITRA 8: 500–516.Google Scholar
Rodríguez Rosique, Susana 2017 The future of necessity in Spanish: Modality, evidentiality and deictic projection at the crossroads. In Evidentiality and Modality in European Languages: Discourse-pragmatic Perspectives, Juana I. Marín-Arrese, Julia Lavid, Marta Carretero, Elena Domínguez Romero, Maria Victoria Martín de la Rosa & Maria Pérez Blanco (eds), 57–86. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2018 Tenses in interaction: Beyond evidentiality. In Perspectives on Evidentiality in Spanish: Evidentiality and Genre [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 290], Adrián Cabedo Nebot & Carolina Figueres Bates (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rojo, Guillermo & Veiga, Alexandre
1999 El tiempo verbal. Los tiempos simples. In Bosque & Demonte (eds), 2867–2934.Google Scholar
Sánchez López, Cristina
2015 Dos tipos de oraciones exclamativas totales en español. In Studium grammaticae. Homenaje al profesor José A. Martínez, Alfredo I. Álvarez, Ramón de Andrés, Álvaro Arias, Félix Fernández de Castro, Teresa Fernández, Serafuba García, Hortensia Martínez, Antonio J. Meilán, Ana I. Ojea, Javier San Julián & Juan Carlos Villaverde (eds), 711–730. Oviedo: Universidad de Oviedo.Google Scholar
<
https://​www​.researchgate​.net​/publication​/311993708​_Studium​_grammaticae​_Homenaje​_al​_profesor​_Jose​_A​_Martinez> (30 April 2018).
Schwenter, Scott
1999 Pragmatics of Conditional Marking. New York NY: Garland.Google Scholar
Smirnova, Elena
2015 Constructionalization and constructional changes. The role of context in the development of constructions. In Diachronic Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language 18], Jóhanna Barðdal, Elena Smirnova, Lotte Sommerer & Spike Gildea (eds), 81–106. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Squartini, Mario
2008 Lexical vs. grammatical evidentiality in French and Italian. Linguistics 46(5): 917–947.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012 Evidentiality in interaction: The concessive use of the Italian future between grammar and discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 44: 2116–2128.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stalnaker, Robert C.
1978 Assertion. In Syntax and Semantics, 9: Pragmatics , Peter Cole (ed.), 315–332. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Sthioul, Bertrand
1998 Temps verbaux et point de vue. In Le temps des événements, Jacques Moeschler (ed.), 197–220. París: Kimé.Google Scholar
Suñer, Avelina
1999 La aposición y otras relaciones de predicación en el sintagma nominal. In Bosque & Demonte (eds), 523–564. Madrid: Espasa-Calpe.Google Scholar
Sweetser, Eve
1990 From Etymology to Pragmatics: Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
1989 On the rise of epistemic meanings in English: An example of subjectification in semantic change. Language 65(1): 31–55.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010 (Inter)subjectivity and (inter)subjectification: A reassessment. In Subjectification, Intersubjectification and Grammaticalization, Kristin Davidse, Lieven Vandelanotte & Hubert Cuyckens (eds), 29–71. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Dasher, Richard B.
2002 Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Trousdale, Graeme
2013 Constructionalization and Constructional Changes. Oxford: OUP.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Weinrich, Herald
[1964]1974 Estructura y función de los tiempos en el lenguaje. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar