Chapter published in:
Changing Structures: Studies in constructions and complementation
Edited by Mark Kaunisto, Mikko Höglund and Paul Rickman
[Studies in Language Companion Series 195] 2018
► pp. 215–232

Anglicising Finnish complementation? Examining the rakastan puhua (‘I love to speak’) structure in present-day Finnish

| University of Helsinki
The paper addresses the question as to whether the complementation system of Finnish is currently undergoing a change which will ultimately lead to Finnish syntax recognising rakastan puhua (‘I love to talk/speak’) as a valid instantiation of the syntactic structure in question in addition to the traditional construction rakastan puhumista (‘I love talking/speaking’). At present, the former type is distinctly a marked type of expression whereas the latter variant is equally unmarked. The paper argues that while the emergence of the new type in Finnish may be attributable to the influence of the corresponding infinitival construction in English via translation, this is so only to some extent, and that the change Finnish syntax is undergoing in this respect is mainly due to some sociolinguistic and ideological considerations whereby users of the construction can identify themselves as belonging to certain subcultures or subgroups of speakers.
Keywords: language change, social identity, translation, verb complementation
Published online: 22 May 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.195.12hie
References

References

Amouzadeh, Mohammad & House, Juliane
2010 Translation as a language contact phenomenon: The case of English and Persian passives. Languages in Contrast 10(1): 54–75. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boyd, Sally
2010 Sociolinguistics in the Nordic region. In The Routledge Handbook of Sociolinguistics around the World, Martin J. Ball (ed.), 281–296. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Brandtzæg, Petter Bae, Heim, Jan & Karahasanović, Amela
2011 Understanding the new digital divide – A typology of Internet users in Europe. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 69: 123–138. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brophy, Jan & Bawden, David
2005 Is Google enough? Comparison of an internet search engine with academic library resources. Aslib Proceedings: New Information Perspectives 57(6): 498–512. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Herbert H.
1996 Using Language. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, Norman
2001 Language and Power, 2nd edn. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
2007 Language and Globalization. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hietaranta, Pertti
2014 Viewing translation problems as threats: a cognitive approach to misunderstandings in translation. Paper presented at the international Translation in Transition: Between Cognition, Computing and Technology conference, Copenhagen, 30–31 January.Google Scholar
House, Juliane
1999 Misunderstanding in intercultural communication: Interactions in English as a lingua franca and the myth of mutual intelligibility. In Teaching and Learning English as a Global Language, Claus Gnutzmann (ed.), 73–89. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Google Scholar
2003 English as lingua franca: A threat to multilingualism? Journal of Sociolinguistics 7(4): 556–578. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Höglund, Mikko, Rickman, Paul, Rudanko, Juhani & Havu, Jukka
2015 Perspectives on Complementation: Structure, Variation and Boundaries. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Institute for the Languages of Finland: corpora and other material
https://​www​.kotus​.fi​/en​/corpora​_and​_other​_material (2 May 2017).
Kaur, Jagdish
2011 Intercultural communication in English a lingua franca: Some sources of misunderstanding. Intercultural Pragmatics 8(1): 93–116. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Korhonen, Riitta
2011 Mehän rakastetaan puhua! (’But we love to speak!’). Blog. http://​www​.kotus​.fi​/nyt​/kotus​-blogi​/blogiarkisto​/riitta​_korhonen​/mehan​_rakastetaan​_puhua!​.8394​.blog (30 June 2016).
Korhonen, Riitta & Maamies, Sari
2015 Kieliopillisten vaihtoehtojen välissä – tiukkoja ja väljiä normeja. (‘Between grammatical choices – strict and loose norms’). Kielikello 2(2015) <http://​www​.kielikello​.fi​/index​.php​?mid​=2​&pid​=11​&aid​=2802 (30 April 2017).
Kristiansen, Tore, Garrett, Peter & Coupland, Nikolas
2005 Introducing subjectivities in language variation and change. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 37(1): 9–35. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kuo, Sai-Hua & Nakamura, Mari
2005 Translation or transformation? A case study of language and ideology in the Taiwanese press. Discourse & Society 16(3): 393–417. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Labov, William
2001 Principles of Linguistic Change, Vol. 2: Social factors. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lindquist, Hans
2009 Corpus Linguistics and the Description of English. Edinburgh: EUP.Google Scholar
Mauranen, Anna
2006 Signaling and preventing misunderstanding in English as lingua franca communication. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 177: 123–150.Google Scholar
Munday, Jeremy
2012 Introducing Translation Studies: Theories and Applications. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mustajoki, Arto
2012 A speaker-oriented multidimensional approach to risks and causes of miscommunication. Language and Dialogue 2(2): 216–243. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu, Raumolin-Brunberg, Helena & Mannila, Heikki
2011 The diffusion of language change in real time: Progressive and conservative individuals and the time depth of change. Language Variation and Change 23: 1–43. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Paunonen, Heikki
2009 Suomalaisen sosiolingvistiikan ja kielisosiologian näkymiä. Virittäjä 113: 557–570.Google Scholar
Rudanko, Juhani
2010 Change and variation in complement selection: a case study from recent English, with evidence from large corpora. In Corpus-linguistic Applications: Current Studies, New Directions, Stefan T. Gries, Stefanie Wulff & Mark Davies (eds), 47–66. Amsterdam: Rodopi.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Syntax Archives of Finnish
. https://​korp​.csc​.fi​/#​/lang​=fi> (2 May 2017).
Taylor, Ann
2008 Contact effects of translation: Distinguishing two kinds of influence in Old English. Language Variation and Change 20: 341–365. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Valerio, Anna
2013 Translation and ideology: A critical reading. Social and Behavioral Sciences 70: 986–996.Google Scholar
van Dijk, Teun A.
2006 Ideology and discourse analysis. Journal of Political Ideologies 11(2): 115–140. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Weatherholtz, Kodi, Campbell-Kibler, Kathryn & Jaeger, T. Florian
2014 Socially-mediated syntactic alignment. Language Variation and Change 26: 387–420. CrossrefGoogle Scholar