Chapter published in:
Changing Structures: Studies in constructions and complementation
Edited by Mark Kaunisto, Mikko Höglund and Paul Rickman
[Studies in Language Companion Series 195] 2018
► pp. 89–107

Complementation of ashamed – diachrony and determinants of variation

| Stockholm University
The present chapter will contribute to the area of English complementation studies by investigating the adjective ashamed. The study focuses on the diachronic development of the use of ashamed during the past two centuries in different environments, and the variation between two rivalling non-finite complements, to infinitive and of -ing. The data was collected from COHA and COCA. The results show that since the 1870s ashamed has been used less and less, and that it occurs nowadays regularly without a complement whereas in the 19th century the to infinitive complement was common. The of -ing complement is not used much, but some contexts such as negation or copula in the complement clause were observed to attract this complement type.
Keywords: complementation, adjective, ashamed , corpus, diachrony
Published online: 22 May 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.195.06hog
References

References

Primary sources

Davies, Mark
2008– The Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA): 520 million words, 1990-2015. http://​corpus​.byu​.edu​/coca/Google Scholar
2010– The Corpus of Historical American English: 400 million words, 1810–2009. http://​corpus​.byu​.edu​/coha/Google Scholar

Secondary sources

Bolinger, Dwight
1968 Entailment and the meaning of structures. Glossa 2: 119–127.Google Scholar
De Smet, Hendrik
2013 Spreading Patterns: Diffusional Change in the English System of Complementation. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Egan, Thomas
2008 Non-finite Complementation. A Usage-based Study of Infinitive and -ing Clauses in English. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Fanego, Teresa
1997 On patterns of complementation with verbs of effort. English Studies 78: 60–67. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Givón, Talmy
1985 Iconicity, isomorphism and non-arbitrary coding in syntax. In Iconicity in Syntax [Typological Studies in Language 6], John Haiman (ed.), 187–219. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1991 Isomorphism in the grammatical code: Cognitive and biological considerations. Studies in Language 15(1): 85–114. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2001 Syntax, Vol. I & II. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Havu, Jukka & Höglund, Mikko
2015 A cross-linguistic perspective on complementation in the tough construction. In Perspectives on Complementation: Structure, Variation and Boundaries, Mikko Höglund, Paul Rickman, Juhani Rudanko & Jukka Havu (eds), 52–74. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Herbst, Thomas, Heath, David, Roe, Ian F. & Götz, Dieter
2004 A Valency Dictionary of English. A Corpus-Based Analysis of the Complementation Patterns of English Verbs, Nouns and Adjectives. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney & Pullum, Geoffrey K.
2002 The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: CUP.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Höglund, Mikko
2014 Active and passive infinitive, ambiguity and non-canonical subject with ready. In Corpus Interrogation and Grammatical Patterns [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 63], Kristin Davidse, Caroline Gentens, Lobke Ghesquière & Lieven Vandelanotte (eds), 239–262. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Kjellmer, Göran
1980 Accustomed to swim; accustomed to swimming: On verbal forms after TO. In ALVAR: A Linguistically Varied Assortment of Readings. Studies Presented to Alvar Ellegård on the Occasion of his 60th Birthday [Stockholm Papers in English Language and Literature 1], Jens Allwood & Magnus Ljung (eds), 75–99. Stockholm: University of Stockholm, Department of English.Google Scholar
Mair, Christian
2006 Twentieth-Century English. History, Variation and Standardization. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mindt, Ilka
2011 Adjective Complementation: An Empirical Analysis of Adjectives Followed by that-Clauses [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 42]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
OED Oxford English Dictionary, online edn. May 2017
Payne, Thomas E.
2006 Exploring Language Structure. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rohdenburg, Günter
1995 On the replacement of finite complement clauses by infinitives in English. English Studies 4: 367–388. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1996 Cognitive complexity and increased grammatical explicitness in English. Cognitive Linguistics 7(2): 149–182. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006 The role of functional constraints in the evolution of the English complementation system. In Syntax, Style and Grammatical Norms: English from 1500–2000, Christiane Dalton-Puffer, Dieter Kastovsky, Nikolaus Ritt & Herbert Schendl (eds), 143–166. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2015 The embedded negation constraint and the choice between more or less explicit clausal structures in English. In Perspectives on Complementation: Structure, Variation and Boundaries, Mikko Höglund, Paul Rickman, Juhani Rudanko & Jukka Havu (eds), 101–127. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Rudanko, Juhani
1999 Diachronic Studies of English Complementation Patterns. Eighteenth Century Evidence in Tracing the Development of Verbs and Adjectives Selecting Prepositions and Complement Clauses. Lanham MD: University Press of America.Google Scholar
2000 Corpora and Complementation. Tracing Sentential Complementation Patterns of Nouns, Adjectives and Verbs over the Last Three Centuries. Lanham MD: University Press of America.Google Scholar
2006 Watching English grammar change: A case study on complement selection in British and American English. English Language and Linguistics 10(1): 31–48. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010 Explaining grammatical variation and change: A case study of complementation in American English over three decades. Journal of English Linguistics 38(1): 4–24. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011 Changes in Complementation in British and American English: Corpus-Based Studies on Non-Finite Complements in Recent English. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012 Exploring aspects of the Great Complement Shift, with evidence from the TIME Corpus and COCA. In The Oxford Handbook of the History of English, Terttu Nevalainen & Elizabeth Closs Traugott (eds), 222–232. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2014 A new angle on infinitival and of -ing complements of afraid, with evidence from the TIME Corpus. In Corpus Interrogation and Grammatical Patterns [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 63], Kristin Davidse, Caroline Gentens, Lobke Ghesquière & Lieven Vandelanotte (eds), 223–238. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
2015 Linking Form and Meaning: Studies on Selected Control Patterns in Recent English. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017 Infinitives and Gerunds in Recent English: Studies on Non-Finite Complements with Data from Large Corpora. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van linden, An.
2010 The rise of the to-infinitive: Evidence from adjectival complementation. English Language and Linguistics 4(1): 19–51. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012 Modal Adjectives: English Deontic and Evaluative Constructions in Diachrony and Synchrony. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van linden, An & Davidse, Kristin
2009 The clausal complementation of deontic-evaluative adjectives in extraposition constructions: A synchronic-diachronic approach. Folia Linguistica 43(1): 175–217.Google Scholar
Vosberg, Uwe
2003 The role of extractions and horror aequi in the evolution of ‑ing complements in Modern English. In Determinants of Grammatical Variation in English [Topics in English Linguistics 43], Günter Rohdenburg & Britta Mondorf (eds), 305–327. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006 Die Große Komplementverschiebung: Außersemantische Einflüsse auf die Entwicklung satzwertiger Ergänzungen im Neuenglischen. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar