Chapter published in:
Space in Diachrony
Edited by Silvia Luraghi, Tatiana Nikitina and Chiara Zanchi
[Studies in Language Companion Series 188] 2017
► pp. 207240
References

Sources [Le Petit Prince]

Aragonese - Aragüés, Chusé
1994O prenzipet. Zaragoza: Gara.Google Scholar
Aranese - Barès, Verònica
2005Eth petit prince. Barcelona: Entuarea Publicaciones.Google Scholar
Aromanian - Bara, Maria
2007Njiclu amirārush. Neckarsteinach: Tintenfass.Google Scholar
Asturian - García Arias, Xosé Lluis, & Suárez Mella, Marta
1994El Principín. Uviéu: Academia de la Llingua Asturiana.Google Scholar
Badiota - Mischì, Giovanni
1993Le Pice Prinz. San Martin de Tor: Istitut Cultural Ladin "Micurá de Rü".Google Scholar
Bergamasco - Recanati, Margherita
2000L’ Prìncep Picinì. Treviglio: Leo Facco Editore.Google Scholar
Bolognese - Serra, Roberto
2003Al pränzip fangén. Gressan: Wesak.Google Scholar
Catalan - Xancó, Juan
1967El Petit Príncep. Barcelona: Editorial Estela.Google Scholar
Corsican - Casta, Santu
1990U principellu. Ajaccio: Akenaton; Squadra di u Finusellu.Google Scholar
Eonaviego - Frías-Conde, Xavier
2008El Principín. Spain: self edited.Google Scholar
Extremaduran - Garríu Correas, Antòniu
1999El prencipinu. Badajoz: Carisma Libros.Google Scholar
French - Saint-Exupéry, Antoine de
1948Le Petit Prince. Paris: Éditions Gallimard.Google Scholar
Friulan - Seravalli, Bruno
1992Il pičul princip. Gemona: Casa per l’Europa.Google Scholar
Galician - Casares, Carlos
2006O principiño. Vigo: Galaxia. Árbore.Google Scholar
Gallurese - Corda, Alessandra
2013Lu Principeddhu. Neckarsteinach: Tintenfass.Google Scholar
Gascon - Morá, Pèir
1995Lo prinçòt. Gradignan: Princi negre. PRI.Google Scholar
Genovese - Garibbo, Alessandro
2011O prinçipìn. Neckarsteinach: Tintenfass.Google Scholar
Gherdeina - Prinoth, Beatrix
1993L Pitl Prinz. San Martin de Tor: Istitut Cultural Ladin "Micurá de Rü".Google Scholar
Italian Bompiani - Bregoli, Nini
2000Il piccolo principe. Milano: Tascabili Bompiani. Tascabili Bompiani.Google Scholar
Languedocien - Blanc, Jòrdi
1994Lo princilhon. Andouque: Vent terral. Mirondèla.Google Scholar
Limousin - Rainal, Pau
2011Lo Prinçonet. Neckarsteinach: Tintenfass.Google Scholar
Milanese - Banfi, Lorenzo
2002El Princip Piscinin. Gressan: Wesak Editions.Google Scholar
Moldavian - Creţu, Igor
1974Микул Принц. Chişinău: Editura Lumina.Google Scholar
Neapolitan - D’Ajello, Roberto
2000O’ princepe piccerillo. Sorrento: F. Di Mauro.Google Scholar
Niçard - Rosso, Albert
2002Lou pichin prince. Pau: Princi negre. Entaus mainadges.Google Scholar
Occitan (Piemonte) - Jayme, Giovanna
2001Ël Pchi Prinsë. Gressan: Éditions Wesak.Google Scholar
Parmigian - Porcari, Paolo
2011Al principén. Neckarsteinach: Tintenfass.Google Scholar
Picardian (Borain) - Capron, André
2010Ël pëtit prēce. Éd. limitée. Neckarsteinach: Tintenfass.Google Scholar
Picardian - Delmotte, Bruno
2010El’ pétit prince. Neckarsteinach: Tintenfass.Google Scholar
Piemontese - Perrini, Gianluca
2000Ël Cit Prinsi. Turin: Gioventura Piemontèisa.Google Scholar
Portuguese - Morais Varela, Joana
1987O Principezinho. Lisboa: Editora Caravela.Google Scholar
Provençal I - Ariès, Andriéu
1995Lou pichot prince. Aix-en-Provence: Édisud.Google Scholar
Provençal II - Vautherin, Raymond
2003Lo petsou prince. Gressan Vallée d’Aoste: Wesak.Google Scholar
Romanian - Creţu, Igor
 1993Micul Prinţ. Chişinău: Editura Făt-Frumos.Google Scholar
Rumantsch - Monn, Ursulina
2005Il pitschen prinzi. Cuira: Lia rumantscha.Google Scholar
Sardinian - Deplano, Andria
1997Su Prinzipeddu. Cagliari: Artigianarte.Google Scholar
Sephardic PeretsAvner, Pimienta, Gladys
2010El princhipiko. Neckarsteinach: Tintenfass.Google Scholar
Sicilian - Gallo, Mario
2010U principinu. Neckarsteinach: Tintenfass.Google Scholar
Spanish - Frances, José Maria
1964El Pequeño Principe. México City: Editorial Diana, S. A.Google Scholar
Surmeiran - Cadotsch, Peder
1977Igl Pitschen Prenci. Cuir: Ediziun Leia Rumantscha.Google Scholar
Valdotain - Vautherin, Raymond
2000Lo Petsou Prince. Gressan, Vallée d’Aoste: Éditions Wesak.Google Scholar
Valenciano - Arabí, Jaume
2007El príncep xiquet. Barcelona: Entuarea Publicaciones.Google Scholar
Venetian - Penello, Nicoletta
2003El Principe Picinin. Gressan: Éditions Wesak.Google Scholar
Wallonian - Fauconnier, Jean-Luc
2008Li p’tit prince. Neckarsteinach: Tintenfass.Google Scholar
Wallonian (Central) - Louis, Bernard
2013Li p’tit prince. Neckarsteinach: Tintenfass.Google Scholar

References

Academia de la Llingua Asturiana
2001Gramática de la llingua Asturiana. Uviéu: Academia de la Llingua Asturiana.Google Scholar
Baerman, Matthew, Brown, Dunstan & Corbett, Greville G.
2005The Syntax-Morphology Interface. A Study of Syncretism. Cambridge: CUP.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bendel, Christiane
2006Baskische Grammatik. Hamburg: Buske.Google Scholar
Bennett, David C.
1989Ablative-locative transfers: Evidence from Slovene and Serbo-Croat. Oxford Slavonic Papers 22: 133–154.Google Scholar
Blasco Ferrer, Eduardo
1986La lingua sarda contemporanea. Grammatica del logudorese e del campidanese. Cagliari: Della Torre.Google Scholar
Booij, Geert
2010Construction Morphology. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Boretzky, Norbert
1977Einführung in die historische Linguistik. Reinbek bei Hamburg: Rowohlt.Google Scholar
Brugmann, Karl
1911Vergleichende Laut-, Stammbildungs- und Flexionslehre nebst Lehre vom Gebrauch der Wortformen der indogermanischen Sprachen, Zweiter Band: Lehre von den Wortformen und ihrem Gebrauch, zweiter Teil. Straßburg: Trübner.Google Scholar
Brumme, Jenny
1997Praktische Grammatik der katalanischen Sprache. Wilhelmsfeld: Egert.Google Scholar
Carballo Calero, Ricardo
1979Gramática elemental del gallego común. Vigo: Galaxia.Google Scholar
Chisholm, William, Milic, Louis T. & Greppin, John A. C.
(eds) 1984Interrogativity: A Colloquium on the Grammar, Typology and Pragmatics of Questions in Seven Diverse Languages [Typological Studies in Language 4]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Comrie, Bernard & Smith, Norval
1977The lingua descriptive series questionnaire. Lingua 42(1): 1–72.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Corbett, Greville G.
2005The canonical approach to typology. In Linguistic Diversity and Language Theories [Studies in Language Companion Series 72], Zygmunt Frajzyngier, Adam Hodges & David S. Rood (eds), 25–50. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007Deponency, syncretism, and what lies between. In Deponency and Morphological Mismatches, Matthew Baerman, Greville G. Corbett, Dunstan Brown & Andrew Hippisley (eds), 21–44. Oxford: OUP.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Creissels, Denis
2006Encoding the distinction between location, source and direction: a typological study. In Space in Languages [Typological Studies in Language 66], Maya Hickman & Stephane Robert (eds), 19–28. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cristofaro, Sonia
2011Language universals and linguistic knowledge. In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Typology, Jae Jung Song (ed.), 227–249. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Cysouw, Michael
2007Content interrogatives in Asénica Campa: corpus study and typological comparison. International Journal of American Linguistics 73(2): 133–163.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, Robert M. W.
2010Basic Linguistic Theory, Vol. 1: Methodology. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2012Basic Linguistic Theory, Vol. 3: Further Grammatical Topics. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Doniyorova, Soadat, Arzikulova, Djamila & Donyorov, Chodiyor
2008Parlons khakas. Une langue de Sibérie. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Doniyorova, Soadat & Qahramonil, Toshtemirov
2004Parlons koumyk (Daghestan). Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Eckhoff, Hanne M., Thomason, Olga A. & de Swart, Peter
2013Mapping out the Source domain. Studies in Language 37(2): 302–355.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ersen-Rasch, Margarete I.
2009Baschkirisch. Lehrbuch für Anfänger und Fortgeschrittene. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
2012Türkische Grammatik. Ausführlich und verständlich. Lernstufen A1 bis C2. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Fähnrich, Heinz
1986Kurze Grammatik der georgischen Sprache. Leipzig: Enzyklopädie.Google Scholar
1994Grammatik der altgeorgischen Sprache. Hamburg: Buske.Google Scholar
Fierro, Aurelio
1989Grammatica della lingua napoletana. Milano: Rusconi.Google Scholar
Fischer, Kerstin & Stefanowitsch, Anatol
2006Konstruktionsgrammatik: ein Überblick. In Konstruktionsgrammatik. Von der Anwendung zur Theorie, Kerstin Fischer & Anatol Stefanowitsch (eds), 3–18. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Google Scholar
Friederich, Michael
2002Uyghurisch Lehrbuch. Wiesbaden: Reichert.Google Scholar
von Gabain, Annemarie
1950Alttürkische Grammatik. Leipzig: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Goldap, Christel
1991Lokale Relationen im Yukatekischen. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Iordan, Iorgu & Robu, Vladimir
1978Limba română contemporană. Bucureşti: Editura didactică şi pedagogică.Google Scholar
Jespersen, Otto
1917Negation in English and Other Languages. København: Høst.Google Scholar
Kabatek, Johannes
2003Gibt es einen Grammatikalisierungszyklus des Artikels in der Romania? Romanistisches Jahrbuch 53: 56–80.Google Scholar
Karanfil, Güllü
2010Parlons gagaouze. Paris: L‘Harmattan.Google Scholar
Kartozia, Guram, Germasia, Rusudan, Lomia, Maia & Tskhadaia, Taia
2010Megrulis lingvisṭuli analizi. Tbilisi: Meridiali.Google Scholar
Khojayori, Nasrullo & Thompson, Mikael
2009Tajiki. Reference Grammar for Beginners. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Kramer, Johannes
2004Das Griechische und das Lateinisch-Romanische auf dem Wege vom synthetischen zum analytischen Sprachtyp? In Die europäischen Sprachen auf dem Weg zum analytischen Sprachtyp, Uwe Hinrichs (ed.), 127–146. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Kutscher, Silvia
2010When ‘towards’ means ‘away from’: The case of directional-ablative syncretism in the Ardeşen-variety of Laz (South Caucasian). Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 63(2): 252–271.Google Scholar
Landmann, Angelika
2010Usbekisch. Kurzgrammatik. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
2011Kirgisisch. Kurzgrammatik. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
2012Kasachisch. Kurzgrammatik. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
2013aAserbaidschanisch. Kurzgrammatik. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
2013bTurkmenisch. Kurzgrammatik. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
2014aTatarisch. Kurzgrammatik. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
2014bTschuwaschisch. Kurzgrammatik. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W.
1986An introduction to Cognitive Grammar. Cognitive Science 10: 1–40. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, Christian
1995Thoughts on Grammaticalization. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Lestrade, Sander
2010The Space of Case. Nijmegen: Radboud Universiteit.Google Scholar
Luraghi, Silvia
1991Paradigm size, possible syncretism, and the use of adpositions with cases in flective languages. In Paradigms. The Economy of Inflection, Frans Plank (ed), 57–74. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009A model for representing polysemy: The Italian preposition da . In Autour de la préposition. Actes du colloque international de Caen (20–22 septembre 2007), Jacques François, Eric Gilbert, Claude Guimier & Maxi Krause (eds), 167–178. Caen: Presses Universitaires de Caen.Google Scholar
2010Adverbial phrases. In A New Historical Syntax of Latin, Philip Baldi & Pierluigi Cuzzolin (eds), 19–107. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2014Plotting diachronic semantic maps: The role of metaphor. In Perspectives on Semantic Roles [Typological Studies in Language 106], Silvia Luraghi & Heiko Narrog (eds), 99–150. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mackenzie, J. Lachlan
1978Ablative-locative transfers and their relevance for the theory of case-grammar. Journal of Linguistics 14: 129–375. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Maj, Émilie & Leberre-Semenov, Marine
2010Parlons sakha. Langue et culture iakoutes. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Mel’čuk, Igor
1994Suppletion: Toward a logical analyses of the concept. Studies in Language 18(2): 339–410. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, Bruce & Robinson, Fred C.
2001A Guide to Old English. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Mossé, Fernand
1969Handbuch des Mittelenglischen. München: Hueber.Google Scholar
Nickel, Klaus Peter
1990Samisk grammatikk. Tromsø: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
Nikitina, Tatiana
2009Subcategorization patterns and lexical meaning of motion verbs: A study of the Source/Goal ambiguity. Linguistics 47(5): 1113–1141. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nikitina, Tatiana & Spano, Marianna
2014‘Behind’ and ‘in front’ in Ancient Greek: a case study in orientation asymmetry. In On Ancient Grammars of Space: Linguistic Research on the Expression of Spatial Relations and Motion in Ancient Languages, Silvia Kutscher & Daniel Werning (eds), 67–82. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Pantcheva, Marina
2010The syntactic structure of Locations, Goals, and Sources. Linguistics 48(5): 1043–1081. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Polinsky, Maria & Kluender, Robert
2007Linguistic typology and theory construction: Common challenges ahead. Linguistic Typology 11(1): 273–284. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Prokosch, Erich
2006Handbuch des Krimtatarischen unter Einschluss des Dobrudschatatarischen. Diachronische Grammatik mit kultur- und realkundlichem Hintergrund. Graz: Universität Graz.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidnely, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan
1978A Grammar of Contemporary English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Robbeets, Martine & Bisang, Walter
2014When paradigms change. In Paradigm Change in the Transeurasian Languages and Beyond [Studies in Language Companion Series 161], Martine Robbeets & Walter Bisang (eds), 1–19. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Romieu, Maurice & Bianchi, André
1995Gramatica de l’occitan gascon contemporanèu. Bordeaux: Presses universitaires de Bordeaux.Google Scholar
Schwegler, Armin
1990Analyticity and Syntheticity. A Diachronic Perspective with Special Reference to Romance Languages. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Siemund, Peter
2001Interrogative constructions. In Language Typology and Language Universals, Vol. 2, Martin Haspelmath, Ekkehard König, Wulf Oesterreicher & Wolfgang Raible (eds), 1010–1028. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Stolz, Thomas, Levkovych, Nataliya, Urdze, Aina, Nintemann, Julia & Robbers, Maja
Forthcoming. Where – Whither – Whence. Spatial Interrogatives in Europe and Beyond. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Stump, Gregory T.
2001Inflectional Morphology: A Theory of Paradigm Structure. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sudlow, David
2009Dictionary of the Tamasheq of North-East Burkina Faso. Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe.Google Scholar
Svorou, Soteria
1993The Grammar of Space [Typological Studies in Language 25]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Talmy, Leonard
1983How language structures space. In Spatial Orientation: Theory, Research and Application, Herbert L. Pick & Linda P. Acredolo (eds), 225–282. New York NY: Plenum Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thornton, Anna
2011Overabundance (multiple forms realizing the same cell): A non-canonical phenomenon in Italian verb morphology. In Morphological Autonomy. Perspectives from Romance Inflectional Morphology, Martin Maiden, John Charles Smith, Maria Goldbach & Marc-Olivier Hinzelin (eds), 358–381. Oxford: OUP.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thornton, Anna M.
2012Overabundance in Italian verb morphology and its interactions with other non-canonical phenomena. In Irregularity in Morphology (and beyond), Thomas Stolz, Hitomi Otsuka, Aina Urdze & Johan van der Auwera (eds), 251–270. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
Tosco, Fiorenzo
1997Grammatica del genovese. Recco: Le mani.Google Scholar
Touratier, Christian
2013Lateinische Grammatik. Linguistische Einführung in die lateinische Sprache. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Ultan, Russell
1978Some general characteristics of interrogative systems. In Universals of Human Language, Vol. 44: Syntax, Joseph Greenberg (ed.), 211–248. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Wälchli, Bernhard & Zuñiga, Fernando
2006Source–goal (in)difference and the typology of motion events in the clause. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 59(3): 284–303.Google Scholar
Wąsik, Zdzisław
1982Zur strukturellen Typologie der Fragen (anhand ausgewählter indoeuropäischer Sprachen der Gegenwart). Zeitschrift für Phonetik, Sprachwissenschaft und Kommunikationsforschung 35(1): 466–475.Google Scholar
Zeshan, Ulrike
2004Interrogative constructions in signed languages: Crosslinguistic perspectives. Language 80(4): 7–39.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar