Chapter published in:
Pragmatic Markers, Discourse Markers and Modal Particles: New perspectives
Edited by Chiara Fedriani and Andrea Sansó
[Studies in Language Companion Series 186] 2017
► pp. 305333
References

References

Beeching, Kate & Detges, Ulrich
(eds) 2014Discourse Functions at the Left and Right Periphery: Crosslinguistic Investigations of Language Use and Language Change. Leiden: Brill. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J.
2010Discourse markers. In Historical Pragmatics, Andreas H. Jucker & Irma Taavitsinen (eds), 285–314. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Carlier, Anne & De Mulder, Walter
2010The emergence of the definite article: ille in competition with ipse in Late Latin. In Subjectification, Intersubjectification and Grammaticalization, Kristin Davidse, Lieven Vandelanotte & Hubert Cuyckens (eds), 241–275. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Degand, Liesbeth
2014 'So very fast very fast then'. Discourse markers at left and right periphery in spoken French. In Beeching & Detges (eds), 151–178. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Doi, Takeo
1971Amae no Koozoo (The anatomy of dependence). Tokyo: Kobundo.Google Scholar
Evans, Nicholas 2007Insubordination and its uses. In Finiteness, Irina Nikolaeva (ed.), 366–431. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Fujii, Seiko
2000Incipient decategorization of MONO and grammaticalization of speaker attitude in Japanese discourse. In Pragmatic Markers and Propositional Attitude, Gisle Andersen & Thorstein Fretheim (eds), 85–118. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, Bruce
1999 What are discourse markers? Journal of Pragmatics 31(7): 931–53. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ghezzi, Chiara & Molinelli, Piera
2014Italian guarda, prego, dai . Pragmatic markers and the left and right periphery. In Beeching & Detges (eds), 117–150.Google Scholar
Haiman, John
1978Conditionals are topics. Language 54: 564–589. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hengeveld, Kees
2005[1989]Layers and operators in Functional Grammar. In Crucial Readings in Functional Grammar, Matthew P. Anstey & J. Lachlan Mackenzie (eds), 1–40. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Higashiizumi, Yuko
2011Are kara ‘because’-clause causal subordinate clauses in present-day Japanese? In Subordination in Conversation: A Cross-linguistic Perspective [Studies in Language and Social Interaction 24], Ritva Laury & Ryoko Suzuki (eds), 191–208. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014Development of discourse-pragmatic markers in Modern Japanese: A corpus-based study of daro(o) and desho(o) . A paper presented at Discourse-Pragmatic Variation & Change 2, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK, April 7–9.
Higashiizumi, Yuko & Onodera, Noriko O.
2013Cross-linguistic approach to form-function-periphery (LP and RP) mapping: With a special focus on ‘exchange structure’ and ‘action structure’. A paper presented at 13th International Pragmatic Conference, New Delhi, September 8–13.
Higashiizumi, Yuko & Takahashi, Keiko
2013“Result, we can say something like that” Usage of sentential-adverb-like nouns in some corpora. The 3rd Corpus Nihongo-gaku Workshop Yokooshuu, 91–96.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J.
1991On some principles of grammaticization. In Approaches to Grammaticalization, Vol. 1 [Typological Studies in Language 19], Elizabeth Closs Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds), 17–36. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ide, Sachiko
1992On the notion of wakimae: Toward an integrated framework of Linguistic politeness. Mosaic of Language: Essays in Honour of Professor Natsuko Okuda. Mejiro Linguistic Society (MLS): 298–305.Google Scholar
Izutsu, Katsunobu & Izutsu, Mitsuko Narita
2013From discourse markers to modal/final particles: What the position reveals about the continuum. In Discourse Markers and Modal Particles: Categorization and Description [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 234], Liesbeth Degand, Bert Cornillie, & Paola Pietrandrea (eds), 217–236. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kindaichi, Haruhiko
1978[1953]Fuhenka jodooshi no honshitsu: Kyakkanteki hyoogen to shukanteki no betsu ni tsuite’ (The essential nature of the conjugationless auxiliaries: On the distinction between objective and subjective expressions). In Iwanami Kooza Nihongo 3 (Bunpoo I), Shiro Hattori et al. (eds), 207–49. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.Google Scholar
Kitano, Hiroaki
2001Quotation in Japanese conversational interaction and its implications for the dialogic nature of language. In Cognitive-functional Linguistics in an East Asian Context, Kaoru Horie & Shigeru Sato (eds), 259–178. Tokyo: Kuroshio.Google Scholar
Martin, Samuel
1975A Reference Grammar of Japanese. New Haven CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Matsumura, Akira 1971Nihon Bunpoo Daijiten (A comprehensive dictionary of Japanese grammar). Tokyo: Meiji Shoin.Google Scholar
Maynard, Senko K.
2002Linguistic Emotivity: Centrality of Place, the Topic-Comment Dynamic, and an Ideology of Pathos in Japanese Discourse [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 97]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McGloin, Naomi H. & Konishi, Yumiko
2010From connective particle to sentence-final particle: A usage-based analysis of shi ‘and’ in Japanese. Language Sciences 32(5): 563–578. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Minami, Fujio
1974Gendai Nihongo no Koozoo (The structure of Modern Japanese). Tokyo: Taishukan Shoten.Google Scholar
Mori, Junko
1996Historical change of the Japanese connective datte: Its form and functions. Japanese/Korean Linguistics 5: 201–18.Google Scholar
Moriyama, Takuro
1997Udon ni mayoneezu kaketari shite: Heiretu no imi (Like putting mayonnaise on Japanese noodles: The meanings of enumeration). Gengo 26(2): 56–61.Google Scholar
Noda, Harumi
1997No (da) no Kinoo (Functions of no (da)). Tokyo: Kurosio Shuppan.Google Scholar
Norrick, Neal R.
2009Conjunctions in final positions in everyday talk. In Language in Life, and a Life in Language: Jacob Mey – A Festschrift, Bruce Fraser & Ken Turner (eds), 319–328. Bingley: Emerald. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ohori, Toshio
1995Remarks on suspended clauses: A contribution to Japanese phraseology. In Essays in Semantics and Pragmatics [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 32], Masayoshi Shibatani & Sandra A. Thompson (eds), 201–218. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Onodera, Noriko O.
2004Japanese Discourse Markers: Synchronic and Diachronic Discourse Analysis [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 132]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011The grammaticalization of discourse markers. In The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization, Heiko Narrog & Bernd Heine (eds), 614–624. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2014Setting up a mental space: A function of discourse markers at the left periphery (LP) and some observations about LP and RP in Japanese. In Beeching & Detges (eds), 92–116.Google Scholar
Rijkhoff, Jan
2005Layers, levels and contexts in Functional Discourse Grammar. In The Noun Phrases in Functional Discourse Grammar, Daniel García Velasco & Jan Rijkhoff (eds), 63–115. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Saegusa, Reiko
2013Meishi kara fukushi, setsuzokushi e [From nouns to adverbs, conjunctions]. Hitotsubashi Daigaku Kokusai Kyooiku Sentaa Kiyoo 4: 49–61.Google Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah
1987Discourse Markers. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shinzato, Rumiko
2006Subjectivity, intersubjectivity, and grammaticalization. In Emotive Communication in Japanese [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 151], Satoko Suzuki (ed.), 15–33. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007(Inter)subjectification, Japanese syntax and syntactic scope increase. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 8(2): 171–206. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011From a manner adverb to a discourse particle: The case of yahari, yappari and yappa . Journal of Japanese Linguistics 27: 17–44. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014From degree/manner adverbs to pragmatic particles in Japanese: A corpus-based approach to the diachronic parallel developments of amari, bakari, and yahari . In Diachronic Corpus Pragmatics, Irma Taavitsainen, Andreas H. Jucker & Jukka Tuominen (eds), 77–105. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shinzato, Rumiko 2015Two types of conditionals and two different grammaticalization paths. In Final Particles, Sylvie Hancil, Alexander Haselow & Margje Post (eds), 157–180. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Shinzato, Rumiko & Suzuki, Satoko
2007From quotative conditionals to emotive topic markers: A case of tteba and ttara in Japanese. Japanese/Korean Linguistics 15: 173–183.Google Scholar
Suzuki, Ryoko
1998From a lexical noun to an utterance-final pragmatic particle: wake . In Studies in Japanese Grammaticalization, Toshio Ohori (ed.), 67–92. Tokyo: Kurosio.Google Scholar
2006How does ‘reason’ become less and less reasonable? In Emotive Communication in Japanese [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 151], Satoko Suzuki (ed.), 35–51. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007(Inter)subjectification in the quotative tte in Japanese conversation. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 8(2): 207–237. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Suzuki, Satoko
1998Pejorative connotation: A case of Japanese. In Discourse Markers: Descriptions and Theory [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 57], Andreas H. Jucker & Yael Ziv (eds), 265–276. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2000Surprise and animosity: The use of the copula da in quotative sentences in Japanese. In Pragmatic Markers and Propositional Attitude [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 79], Gisle Andersen & Thorstein Fretheim (eds), 239–253. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008Expressivity of vagueness: Alienation in the verb-tari suru construction. Japanese Language and Literature 42(1): 157–169.Google Scholar
Takubo, Yukinori
1987Toogo koozoo to bunmyaku joohoo. Nihongogaku 6(5): 37–48.Google Scholar
2011Japanese expression of temporal identity: Aspectual and counterfactual interpretation of tokoro-da . Japanese/Korean Linguistics 18: 392–409.Google Scholar
Tamura, Hiroshi & Kitazawa, Takashi
2011Teinei hyoogen ‘~masu desu’ no hensen ni tsuite: Kokkai kaigiroku 63 nenkan no kiroku kara (History of Japanese polite expression “masu-desu” of 63 year session records in the Diet). Tokyo Gakugei Daigaku Kiyoo 62: 1–12.Google Scholar
Tanabe, Kazuko
2008‘toiuka’ no bunpooka ni tomonau oninteki henka no ichi koosatsu: Shukuyakukei ‘teka’ ‘tsuka’ o megutte (An analysis of phonological changes accompanying the grammaticalization of ‘teiuka’: A case of contracted forms, ‘teka’ and ‘tsuka’). Meikai Nihongo 13: 55–63.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
2003From subjectification to intersubjectification. In Motives for Language Change, Raymond Hickey (ed.), 124–139. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010(Inter)subjectivity and (inter)subjectification: A reassessment. In Subjectification, Intersubjectification and Grammaticalization, Kristin Davidse, Lieven Vandelanotte & Hubert Cuyckens (eds), 29–71. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014On the function of the epistemic adverbs surely and no doubt at the left and right peripheries of the clause. In Beeching & Detges (eds), , 72–91.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Dasher, Richard B.
2002Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Wälchli, Bernhard
2005Co-Compounds and Natural Coordination. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar