Chapter published in:
Pragmatic Markers, Discourse Markers and Modal Particles: New perspectives
Edited by Chiara Fedriani and Andrea Sansó
[Studies in Language Companion Series 186] 2017
► pp. 203228
References

References

Abraham, Werner
2017Discourse marker = discourse particle = thetical = modal particle? A futile comparison. In Discourse Particles – Formal Approaches to their Syntax and Semantics, Josef Bayer & Volker Struckmeier (eds), 241–280. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
In press. Modalpartikel und Mirativeffekte. In MISU-Sammelband, Shin Tanaka & Elisabeth Leiss eds
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.
2004Evidentiality. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2012The essence of mirativity. Linguistic Typology 16: 435–485. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014The grammar of knowledge: A cross-linguistic view of evidentials and the expression of information source. In The Grammar of Knowledge. A Cross-linguistic Typology, Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald & Robert M. W. Dixon (eds), 1–50. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bernini, Giuliano & Ramat, Paolo
1996Negative Sentences in the Languages of Europe. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bianchi, Valentina, Bocci, Giuliano & Cruschina, Silvio
2015Focus fronting and its implicatures. In Romance Languages und Linguistic Theory 2013: Selected papers from Going Romance, Amsterdam 2013 [Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 1], Enoch Aboh, Aafke Hulk, Jeannette Schaeffer & Petra Sleeman (eds), 1–19. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Birner, Betty J.
2006Semantic and pragmatic contributions to information status. In Explorations in the Semantics/Pragmatics Interface, Maj-Britt Mosegaard Hansen & Ken Turner (eds). Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 38: 14–32. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Caffi, Claudia
2006Mitigation. Oxford: Elsevier. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chafe, William L.
1976Givenness, contrastiveness, subject, topic, and point of view. In Subject and Topic, Charles Li (ed.), 27–55. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo
1976[1991] Mica: note di sintassi e pragmatica. In Teoria linguistica e sintassi italiana, Guglielmo Cinque (ed.), 311–323. Bologna: il Mulino.Google Scholar
Coniglio, Marco
2008Modal particles in Italian. Working papers in Linguistics University of Venice 18: 91–129.Google Scholar
Degand, Liesbeth, Cornillie, Bert & Pietrandrea, Paola
2013Discourse Markers and Modal Particles. Categorization and Description [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 234]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
DeLancey, Scott
1997Mirativity: The grammatical marking of unexpected information. Linguistic Typology 1: 33–52. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Detges, Ulrich & Waltereit, Richard
2009Diachronic pathways and pragmatic strategies: different types of pragmatic particles from a diachronic point of view. In Current Trends in Diachronic Semantics and Pragmatics, Maj-Britt Mosegaard Hansen & Jacqueline Visconti (eds), 43–61. Bingley: Emerald. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Diewald, Gabriele
2006Discourse particles and modal particles as grammatical elements. In Approaches to Discourse Particles [Studies in Pragmatics 1], Kerstin Fischer (ed.), 403–425. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S.
1996Focus, pragmatic presupposition, and activated propositions. Journal of Pragmatics 26: 475–523. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Escandell Vidal, María Vitoria 2010Futuro y evidencialidad. Anuario de Lingüística Hispánica 26: 9–34.Google Scholar
Espinal, María Teresa
1993The interpretation of no-pas in Catalan. Journal of Pragmatics 19: 353–369. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2002 La negació . In Gramàtica del català contemporani, Joan Solà, Maria-Rosa Lloret, Joan Mascaró, Manuel Pérez Saldanya (eds), 2727–2797. Barcelona: Empúries.Google Scholar
Fedriani, Chiara & Miola, Emanuele
2014French déjà, Piedmontese Regional Italian già: A case of contact-induced pragmaticalization. In Discourse and Pragmatic Markers from Latin to the Romance languages, Chiara Ghezzi & Piera Molinelli (eds), 166–189. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ghezzi, Chiara
2014The development of discourse and pragmatic markers. In Discourse and Pragmatic Markers from Latin to the Romance Languages, Chiara Ghezzi & Piera Molinelli (eds), 10–26. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hansen Mosegaard, Maj-Britt
2009The grammaticalization of negative reinforcers in Old and Middle French: A discourse-functional approach. In Current Trends in Diachronic Semantics and Pragmatics, Maj-Britt Mosegaard Hansen & Jacqueline Visconti (eds), 227–251. Bingley: Emerald. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hansen Mosegaard, Maj-Britt & Visconti, Jacqueline
2009On the diachrony of reinforced negation in French and Italian. In Grammaticalization and pragmatics. Facts, Approaches, Theoretical Issues, Corinne Rossari, Claudia Ricci & Adriana Spiridon (eds), 137–171. Bingley: Emerald. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012The evolution of negation in French and Italian: Similarities and differences. Folia Linguistica 46: 453–482.Google Scholar
Hare, Richard Mervyn
1970Meaning and speech acts. Philosophical Review 79: 3–24. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hill, Nathan W.
2012Mirativity does not exist: ḥdug in “Lhasa” Tibetan and other suspects. Linguistic Typology 16: 389–433. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Klein, Wolfgang
1994Time in Language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ladd, D. Robert
1981A first look at the semantics and pragmatics of negative questions and tag questions. In Papers from the 17th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 164–171. Chicago IL: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Lyons, John
1977Semantics. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Maiden, Martin & Parry, Mair
1997The Dialects of Italy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Molinelli, Piera
1988Fenomeni della negazione dal latino all’italiano. Florence: La Nuova Italia.Google Scholar
Nocentini, Alberto
2003La cosiddetta negazione espletiva in italiano. Archivio Glottologico Italiano 88: 72–90.Google Scholar
Olbertz, Hella
2009Mirativity and exclamatives in functional discourse grammar: Evidence from Spanish. Web Papers in Functional Discourse Grammar 82: 66–82. Amsterdam: Functional Grammar Foundation.Google Scholar
Parry, Mair
2013Negation in the history of Italo-Romance. In The History of Negation in the Languages of Europe and the Mediterranean, Vol. 1: Case Studies, David Willis, Christopher Lucas & Anne Breitbarth (eds), 77–118. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Pescarini, Diego
2009Presuppositional negation and the {addressee}. Padua Working Papers in Linguistics 3: 22–29.Google Scholar
Pescarini, Diego & Penello, Nicoletta
2008Osservazioni su mica in italiano e alcuni dialetti veneti. Quaderni di Lavoro ASIt 8.Google Scholar
Pescarini, Diego & Penello, Nicoletta 2012L’avverbio mica tra widening semantico e restrizioni sintattiche. In Linguaggio e cervello / Semantica, Atti del XLII Congresso internazionale di studi della Società di Linguistica italiana (SLI), Pisa (25–27 September 2008), Pier Marco Bertinetto, Valentina Bambini & Irene Ricci (eds). Rome: Bulzoni.Google Scholar
Plungian, Vladimir A.
2010Types of verbal evidentiality marking: An overview. In Linguistic Realization of Evidentiality in European Languages, Gabriele Diewald & Elena Smirnova (eds), 15–58. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Prince, Ellen F.
1981Toward a taxonomy of Given-New information. In Radical Pragmatics, Peter Cole (ed.), 223–255. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
1992The ZPG letter: Subjects, definiteness and information-status. In Discourse Description: Diverse Linguistic Analyses of a Fund-raising Text [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 16], William S. Mann & Sandra A. Thompson (eds), 295–325. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Reese, Brian J.
2006The meaning and use of negative polar interrogatives. In Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics 6, Olivier Bonami & Patricia Cabredo Hofherr (eds), 331–354. http://​www​.cssp​.cnrs​.fr​/eiss6​/index​_en​.html
Romero, Maribel & Han, Chung – hye
2004On negative yes/no questions. Linguistics and Philosophy 27: 609–658. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah
1987Discourse Markers. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schwenter, Scott A.
2003 No and Tampoco: A pragmatic distinction in Spanish negation. Journal of Pragmatics 35: 999–1030. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2005The pragmatics of negation in Brazilian Portuguese. Lingua 115: 1427–1456. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006Fine-tuning Jespersen’s cycle. In Drawing the Boundaries of Meaning. Neo-Gricean Studies in Pragmatics and Semantics in Honor of Laurence R. Horn [Studies in Language Companion Series 80], Betty J. Birner & Gregory Ward (eds), 327–344. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Squartini, Mario
2014The pragmaticalization of ‘already’ in Romance: From discourse grammar to illocution. In Discourse and Pragmatic Markers from Latin to the Romance languages, Chiara Ghezzi & Piera Molinelli (eds), 190–210. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Visconti, Jacqueline
2009From ‘textual’ to ‘interpersonal’: On the diachrony of the Italian particle mica . Journal of Pragmatics 41: 937–950. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Waltereit, Richard
2001Modal particles and their functional equivalents: A speech-act-theoretical approach. Journal of Pragmatics 33: 1391–1417. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zanuttini, Raffaella
1997Negation and Clausal Structure. A Comparative Study of Romance Languages. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Zanuttini, Raffaella & Portner, Paul
2000The characterization of exclamative clauses in Paduan. Language 76: 123–132. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2003Exclamative clauses: At the syntax-semantics interface. Language 79: 39–81. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 4 other publications

Cerruti, Massimo
2020.  In Intermediate Language Varieties [Studies in Language Variation, 24],  pp. 125 ff. Crossref logo
Delfitto, Denis, Chiara Melloni & Maria Vender
2019. The (en)rich(ed) meaning of expletive negation. Evolutionary Linguistic Theory 1:1  pp. 57 ff. Crossref logo
Larrivée, Pierre
2019.  In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 15 [Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory, 15],  pp. 114 ff. Crossref logo
Remberger, Eva-Maria
2020.  In Information-Structural Perspectives on Discourse Particles [Studies in Language Companion Series, 213],  pp. 48 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 09 june 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.