Chapter published in:
Imperatives and Directive Strategies
Edited by Daniël Van Olmen and Simone Heinold
[Studies in Language Companion Series 184] 2017

Directive conditional and complement insubordination in Germanic languages

| University of Leuven
This paper deals with independent or insubordinate conditional and complement clauses that express directive meanings. On a descriptive level, I show that a variety of directive subtypes can be distinguished for both strategies, i.e. requests and threats for the conditional constructions and orders, prohibitions, advice and permission structures for the complement constructions. On a theoretical level, this paper investigates to what extent these directive constructions are influenced by their respective “source” semantics, i.e. conditionality and complementation. I show that conditional directives share two typically conditional properties: (1) they always imply a choice between two possible scenarios and (2) they always orient towards a particular consequence. Complement directives, on the other hand, all share an anaphoric property, in the sense that they link the directive back to something that forms part of the (assumed) common ground between speaker and addressee.
Published online: 11 April 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.184.07dhe
References

References

Adriaensen, Kasper
2010 Insubordinated if-Clauses in English from a Typological Perspective. MA dissertation, University of Leuven.Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.
2010 Imperatives and Commands. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Ammann, Andreas & van der Auwera, Johan
2004 Complementizer-headed main clauses for volitional moods in the languages of South-Eastern Europe: A Balkanism? In Balkan Syntax and Semantics [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 67], Olga Mišeka Tomić (ed.), 341–362. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Auer, Peter
1996 The pre-front field in spoken German and its relevance as a grammaticalisation position. Pragmatics 6(3): 295–322. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2000 Pre- and post-positioning of wenn-clauses in spoken and written German. Interaction and Linguistic Structures 15: 1–36.Google Scholar
Birjulin, Leonid A. & Xrakovskij, Victor S.
2001 Imperative sentences: Theoretical problems. In Typology of Imperative Constructions, Victor S. Xrakovskij (ed.), 3–50. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Boogaart, Ronny
2011 Over insubordinatie gesproken! (Talk about insubordination!). Invited talk at the University of Leuven.Google Scholar
Boogaart, Ronny & Verheij, Kim
2013 Als dát geen insubordinatie is! De pragmatiek van zelfstandige conditionele zinnen (If that isn’t insubordination! The pragmatics of independent conditional sentences). In Honderd Jaar Taalwetenschap. Artikelen Aangeboden aan Saskia Daalder bij haar Afscheid van de Vrije Universiteit (A Hundred Years of Linguistics. Articles offered to Saskia Daalder at her Retirement from the Free University), Theo Janssen & Jan Noordegraaf (eds), 13–28. Amsterdam: Stichting Neerlandistiek.Google Scholar
Clancy, Patricia M., Akatsuka, Noriko & Strauss, Susan
1997 Deontic modality and conditionality in discourse: A cross-linguistic study of adult speech to young children. In Directions in Functional Linguistics [Studies in Language Companion Series 136], Akio Kamio (ed.), 19–57. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Comrie, Bernard
1986 Conditionals: A typology. In On Conditionals, Elizabeth Closs Traugott, Alice ter Meulen, Judy S. Reilly & Charles A. Ferguson (eds), 77–99. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
D’Hertefelt, Sarah & Verstraete, Jean-Christophe
2014 Independent complement clauses in Swedish and Danish: Insubordination or dependency shift? Journal of Pragmatics 60: 89–102. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Diessel, Holger
2001 The ordering distribution of main and adverbial clauses: A typological study. Language 77(2): 433–455. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Evans, Nicholas
2007 Insubordination and its uses. In Finiteness. Theoretical and Empirical Foundations, Irina Nikolaeva (ed.), 366–431. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Field, Margaret
1997 The role of factive predicates in the indexicalization of stance: A discourse perspective. Journal of Pragmatics 27(6): 799–814. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fillenbaum, Samuel
1986 The use of conditionals in inducements and deterrents. In On Conditionals, Elizabeth Closs Traugott, Alice ter Meulen, Judy S. Reilly & Charles A. Ferguson (eds), 179–195. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Foolen, Ad
1993 De Betekenis van Partikels: Een Dokumentatie van de Stand van het Onderzoek, met Bijzondere Aandacht voor ‘maar’ (The Meaning of Particles: Documenting the State of Investigation, with Special Attention to ‘maar’). PhD dissertation, University of Nijmegen.Google Scholar
Ford, Cecilia
1997 Speaking conditionally: Some contexts for if-clauses in conversation. In On Conditionals Again [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 143], Angeliki Athanasiadou & René Dirven (eds), 387–413. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ford, Cecilia & Thompson, Sandra
1986 Conditionals in discourse: A text-based study from English. In On Conditionals, Elizabeth Closs Traugott, Alice ter Meulen, Judy S. Reilly & Charles A. Ferguson (eds), 353–372. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grosz, Patrick Georg
2012 On the Grammar of Optative Constructions [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 193]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Günthner, Susanne
1999  Wenn-Sätze im Vor-Vorfeld: Ihre Formen und Funktionen in der gesprochenen Sprache. Deutsche Sprache 27(3): 209–235.Google Scholar
Hansen, Erik & Heltoft, Lars
2011 Grammatik over det Danske Sprog (Grammar of the Danish Language). Odense: University of Southern Denmark Press.Google Scholar
Harder, Peter
1996 Functional Semantics. A Theory of Meaning, Structure and Tense in English. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
König, Ekkehard & Siemund, Peter
2012 Speech act distinctions in grammar. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Timothy Shopen (ed.), 276–324. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Laury, Ritva, Lindholm, Camilla & Lindström, Jan
2013 Syntactically non-integrated conditional clauses in spoken Finnish and Swedish. In Comparing and Contrasting Syntactic Structures. From Dependency to Quasi-subordination, Eva Havu & Irma Hyvärinen (eds), 231–270. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.Google Scholar
Lehti-Eklund, Hanna
2001 Om att som diskursmarkör (About att as a discourse marker). Språk och Stil 11: 81–118.Google Scholar
Lindström, Jan
Ms. Conditional and verb-first clauses in Swedish: A constructional approach to a form-function complex.
Mauri, Caterina & Sansò, Andrea
2011 How directive constructions emerge: Grammaticalization, constructionalization, cooptation. Journal of Pragmatics 43(14): 3489–3521. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Oppenrieder, Wilhelm
1989 Selbständige Verb-Letzt-Sätze: Ihr Platz im Satzmodussystem und ihre intonatorische Kennzeichnung. In Zur Intonation von Modus und Fokus im Deutschen, Hans Altmann, Anton Batliner & Wilhelm Oppenrieder (eds), 163–244. Tübingen: Niemeyer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Panther, Klaus-Uwe & Thornburg, Linda L.
2003 Metonymies as natural inference and activation schemas: The case of dependent clauses as independent speech acts. In Metonymy and Pragmatic Inferencing [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 113], Klaus-Uwe Panther & Linda L. Thornburg (eds), 127–147. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2005 Motivation and convention in some speech act constructions: A cognitive linguistic approach. In Reviewing Linguistic Thought. Converging Trends for the 21st Century, Kiki Nikiforidou, Sophia Marmaridou & Eleni Antonopoulou (eds), 53–76. Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011 Emotion and desire in independent complement clauses: A case-study in German. In Cognitive Linguistics. Convergence and Expansion [Human Cognitive Processing 32], Mario Brdar, Stephan T. Gries & Milena Žic Fuchs (eds), 87–114. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sansiñena, María Sol, Cornillie, Bert & De Smet, Hendrik
2013 Free-standing que-clauses and other directive strategies in Spanish. Leuven Working Papers in Linguistics 2: 50–83.Google Scholar
Stirling, Leslie
1998 Isolated if-clauses in Australian English. In The Clause in English. In Honour of Rodney Huddleston [Studies in Language Companion Series 45] Peter Collins & David Lee (eds), 275–297. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thurmair, Maria
1989 Modalpartikeln und ihre Kombinationen. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Truckenbrodt, Hubert
2013 Selbständige Verb-Letzt-Sätze. In Satztypen des Deutschen, Jörg Meibauer, Markus Steinbach & Hans Altmann (eds), 232–246. Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vallauri, Edoardo Lombardi
2004 Grammaticalization of syntactic incompleteness: Free conditionals in Italian and other languages. SKY Journal of Linguistics 17: 189–215.Google Scholar
2012 Insubordinated conditionals in spoken and non-spoken Italian. Paper Presented at the Symposium Dynamics of Insubordination , Tokyo, October.
Verstraete, Jean-Christophe, D’Hertefelt, Sarah &Van linden, An
2012 A typology of complement insubordination in Dutch. Studies in Language 36(1): 123–153. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Verstraete, Jean-Christophe & D’Hertefelt, Sarah
2014 Polariteitsomkering bij insubordinatie (Polarity reversal with insubordination). In Patroon en Argument. Een Dubbelfeestbundel bij het Emeritaat van William Van Belle en Joop van der Horst (Pattern and Argument. A Double Festschrift upon the Retirement of William Van Belle and Joop van der Horst), Freek Van de Velde, Hans Smessaert, Frank Van Eynde & Sara Verbrugge (eds), 639–651. Leuven: Leuven University Press.Google Scholar
2016 Running in the family: Patterns of complement insubordination in the Germanic languages. In Insubordination [Typological Studies in Language 115], Nicholas Evans & Honoré Watanabe (eds), 65–87. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Weuster, Edith
1983 Nicht-eingebettete Satztypen mit Verb-Endstellung im Deutschen. In Zur Wortstellungsproblematik im Deutschen, Edith Weuster & Klaus Olszok (eds), 7–87. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, Anna
1988 The Semantics of Grammar [Studies in Language Companion Series 18]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar