Article published in:
Negation and Contact: With special focus on Singapore English
Edited by Debra Ziegeler and Zhiming Bao
[Studies in Language Companion Series 183] 2017
► pp. 3361


Aguilar Guevara, Ana, Aloni, Maria, Port, Angelika, Simik, Radek, de Vos, Machteld & Zeijlstra, Hedde
2011Semantics and pragmatics of indefinites: methodology for a synchronic and diachronic corpus study. In Proceedings of Beyond Semantics – Corpus-based investigations of pragmatic and discourse phenomena, 1–16. Special issue of BLA (Bochumer Linguistische Arbeiten).Google Scholar
Bao, Zhiming & Luwen Cao
(2017) Negative Raising in Singapore English. This volume, 151-170.Google Scholar
Bartsch, Renate
1973“Negative transportation” gibt es nicht. Linguistische Berichte 27(7): 1–7.Google Scholar
ter Beek, Janneke
2008Restructuring and Infinitival Complements in Dutch. PhD dissertation, University of Groningen.Google Scholar
Collins, Chris & Postal, Paul M.
2014Classical Neg-Raising. An Essay on the Syntax of Negation. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015Dispelling the cloud of unknowing. Unpublished paper, http://​ling​.auf​.net​/lingbuzz​/002269
Coppen, Peter-Arno
2013De zin die wij merken dat ook voor linguïstische problemen zorgt. Nederlandse Taalkunde 18(2): 193–203. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
den Dikken, Marcel
2002Direct and parasitic polarity item licensing. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 5(1): 35–66. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006Parasitism, secondary triggering and depth of embedding. In Cross-linguistic Research in Syntax and Semantics: Negation, Tense, and Clausal Architecture, Raffaella Zanuttini, Héctor Campos, Elena Herburger & Paul H. Portner (eds), 151–174. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Eckardt, Regine
2006Meaning Change in Grammaticalization: An Enquiry into Semantic Reanalysis. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Emonds, Joseph E.
1976A Transformational Approach to English Syntax: Root, Structure-preserving, and Local Transformations. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
2004Unspecified categories as the key to root constructions. In Peripheries: Syntactic Edges and Their Effects, David Adger, Cécile De Cat & Georges Tsoulas (eds), 75–121. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Evers, Arnold
1975The Transformational Cycle in Dutch and German. PhD dissertation, University of Utrecht.Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles
1963The position of embedding transformations in a grammar. Word 19(2): 208–231. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gajewski, Jon
2007Neg-Raising and Polarity. Linguistics & Philosophy 30(3): 289–328. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011Licensing strong NPIs. Natural Language Semantics 19(2): 109–148. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Giannakidou, Anastasia
1998Polarity Sensitivity as (non) Veridical Dependency [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 23]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Giannakidou, Anastasia & Quer, Josep
1997Long-distance licensing of negative indefinites. In Negation and Polarity. Syntax and Semantics, Danielle Forget, Paul Hirschbühler, France Martineau & María-Luisa Rivero (eds), 95–113. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Giannakidou, Anastasia
2006Only, emotive factive verbs, and the dual nature of polarity dependency. Language 82(3): 575–603. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011Positive polarity items and negative polarity items: Variation, licensing, and compositionality. In Semantics: An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning, 2nd edn, Claudia Maienborn, Klaus von Heusinger & Paul Portner (eds.), 1660–1712. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane
2012Adverbial Clauses, Main Clause Phenomena, and Composition of the Left Periphery: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heycock, Caroline
2006Embedded root phenomena. In The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Martin Everaert & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds), 174–209. Malden MA: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hoeksema, Jack
1999Aantekeningen bij ooit, deel 2: De opkomst van niet-polair ooit . Tabu 29(4): 147–172.Google Scholar
2000Negative polarity items: Triggering, Scope, and C-Command. In Negation and Polarity: Syntactic and Semantic Perspectives, Laurence R. Horn & Yasuhiko Kato (eds), 115–145. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2005 In days, weeks, months, years, ages: A class of temporal negative polarity items. In Rejected Papers: Feestbundel voor Ron van Zonneveld, Dicky Gilbers & Petra Hendriks (eds). Groningen: Rijksuniversiteit Groningen.Google Scholar
2006 Hij zei van niet, maar knikte van ja: Distributie en diachronie van bijwoorden van polariteit ingeleid door van . Tabu 35(3–4): 135–158.Google Scholar
2007Parasitic licensing of negative polarity items. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 10(3): 163–182. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010Dutch ENIG: From nonveridicality to downward entailment. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 28(4): 837–859. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012 Wie dan ook, wat dan ook etc. als free choice indefinites en negatief-polaire uitdrukkingen. Tabu 40(3–4), 89–109.Google Scholar
Hoekstra, Eric
1991Licensing Conditions on Phrase Structure. PhD dissertation, University of Groningen.Google Scholar
Hooper, Joan B. & Thompson, Sandra
1973On the applicability of root transformations. Linguistic inquiry 4(4): 465–497.Google Scholar
Horn, Laurence R.
1971Negative transportation: Unsafe at any speed? Proceedings of the 7th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 120–133. Chicago IL: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
1975NEG-raising predicates: Toward an explanation. In Proceedings of the 11th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society 11, 280–294. Chicago IL: CLS.Google Scholar
1978Remarks on NEG-raising. In Pragmatics, Syntax and semantics 9, Peter Cole (ed.), 129–220. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
2001Flaubert triggers, squatitive negation, and other quirks of grammar. In Perspectives on Negation and Polarity Items [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 40], Jack Hoeksema, Hotze Rullmann, Víctor Sánchez-Valencia & Ton van der Wouden (eds), 173–200. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014The cloud of unknowing. In Black Book: A Festschrift for Frans Zwarts, Jack Hoeksema & Dicky Gilbers (eds), 178–196. Groningen: University of Groningen.Google Scholar
Horn, Laurence R. & Kato, Yasuhiko
2000Introduction: Negation and polarity at the millennium. In Negation and Polarity. Syntactic and Semantic Perspectives, Laurence R. Horn & Yasuhiko Kato (eds), 1–19. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Israel, Michael
2011The Grammar of Polarity: Pragmatics, Sensitivity, and the Logic of Scales. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ladusaw, William A.
1979Polarity Sensitivity as Inherent Scope Relations. PhD dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
Popp, Marie-Luise
2016 NEG-raising in cross-linguistic perspective. MA thesis, University of Leipzig.Google Scholar
Postal, Paul M.
2005Suppose (if only for an hour) that negative polarity items are negation-containing phrases. Ms, New York University.Google Scholar
Prince, Ellen
1976The syntax and semantics of Neg-Raising, with evidence from French. Language 52(2): 404–426. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Progovac, Ljiljana
1994Negative and Positive Polarity: A Binding Approach. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Romoli, Jacopo
2012Soft but Strong: NEG-raising, Soft Triggers, and Exhaustification. PhD dissertation, Harvard University.Google Scholar
2013A scalar implicature-based approach to neg-raising. Linguistics and Philosophy 36: 291–353. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ross, John Robert
1967Constraints on Variables in Syntax. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Seuren, Pieter A.M.
1974Negative’s travels. In Semantic Syntax, Pieter A.M. Seuren (ed.), 96–122. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
2013The Seuren Blog. Neg-Raising 4. December 7, 2013. https://​pieterseuren​.wordpress​.com/
de Swart, Henriëtte E.
1998Licensing of negative polarity items under inverse scope. Lingua 105(3): 175–200. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Uribe-Echevarria, Maria
1993Towards an LF theory of negative polarity licensing. In Proceedings of the 23rd Western Conference on Linguistics, Sharon Hargus, Gerald McMenamin & Vida Samiian (eds), 464–476. Fresno: Department of Linguistics, California State University.Google Scholar
Zwarts, Frans
1995Nonveridical contexts. Linguistic Analysis 25: 286–312.Google Scholar
1998Three types of polarity. In Plurality and Quantification, Fritz Hamm & Erhard Hinrichs (eds.), 177–238. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Osborne, Timothy & Matthew Reeve
2018. Scope domains Toward a Dependency Grammar account of the syntactic distribution of negative polarity items. Acta Linguistica Academica 65:1  pp. 119 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 09 june 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.