Chapter published in:
Lexical Polycategoriality: Cross-linguistic, cross-theoretical and language acquisition approaches
Edited by Valentina Vapnarsky and Edy Veneziano
[Studies in Language Companion Series 182] 2017
► pp. 101153
References

References

Arad, M.
2005Roots and Patterns. Hebrew Morpho-syntax. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Armstrong, G.
2009On copular sentences in Yucatec Maya. Proceedings of the Conference on Indigenous Languages of Latin America-IV . http://​www​.ailla​.utexas​.org​/site​/cilla4​/Armstrong​_CILLA​_IV​.pdf (8 November 2015).
Baker, M.C.
2003Lexical Categories: Verbs, Nouns, and Adjectives. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Becquey, C.
2014Diasystème, diachronie: Etudes comparées dans les langues cholanes. Utrecht: LOT (Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics). http://​www​.lotpublications​.nl​/diasystème​-diachronie​-etudes​-comparées​-dans​-les​-langues​-cholanes.Google Scholar
Berlin, B.
1968Tzeltal Numeral Classifiers. A Study in Ethnographic Semantics. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Berlin, B. & Kaufman, T.
1977Diccionario tzeltal de Tenejapa, Chiapas [Microfilm Collection of Manuscripts on Cultural Anthropology, Series LIII, 281]. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Library.Google Scholar
Bohnemeyer, J.
1998Time Relations in Discourse. Evidence from a Comparative Approach to Yukatek Maya. PhD dissertation, Katholieke Universiteit Brabant.Google Scholar
Briceño Chel, F.
1997De gramaticalización y degramaticalización: Dos procesos en el maya yucateco actual. MA dissertation, Escuela Nacional de Antropología e Historia, México.Google Scholar
Bricker, V.
1978Antipassive constructions in Yucatec Maya. In Papers in Mayan Linguistics, N. England (ed.), 3–24. Columbia MO: University of Missouri.Google Scholar
1981The source of the ergative split in Yukatek Maya. Journal of Mayan Linguistics 2(2): 83–127.Google Scholar
Bruce, R.
1969Gramática del lacandón. México: Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia.Google Scholar
Coon, J.
2010Complementation in Chol (Mayan): A Theory of Split Ergativity. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Croft, W.
1991Syntactic Categories and Grammatical Relations. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Danziger, E.
1996Split intransitivity and active-inactive patterning in Mopan Maya. International Journal of American Linguistics 62(4): 379–414. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
England, N.
1992Autonomía de los idiomas mayas: Historia e identidad. Guatemala: Cholsamaj.Google Scholar
Gutiérrez Sánchez, P.
2004Las clases de verbos intransitivos y el alineamiento agentivo en el Chol de Tila, Chiapas. MA dissertation, CIESAS, Mexico.Google Scholar
Gutiérrez Sánchez, P. & Zavala Maldonado, R.
2005Chol and Chontal: Two Mayan languages of the agentive type. Paper presented at The Typology of Stative-Active Languages . Leipzig: Max-Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.
Haviland, J.
1994“Te xa setel xulem” (The buzzards were circling): Categories of verbal roots in (Zinacantec) Tzotil. Linguistics 32: 691–741. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heine, B. & Kuteva, T.
2002World Lexicon on Grammaticalization. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hofling, C.
1991Itzá Maya Texts. Salt Lake City UT: University of Utah Press.Google Scholar
2000Itzaj Maya Grammar. Salt Lake City UT: University of Utah Press.Google Scholar
Justeson, J., Norman, W., Campbell, L. & Kaufman, T.
1985The Foreign Impact on Lowland Mayan Language and Script. New Orleans LO: Middle American Research Institute, Tulane University.Google Scholar
Kaufman, T.
1971Tzeltal Phonology and Morphology. Berkeley CA: University of California publications in linguistics.Google Scholar
1976Archeological and linguistic correlations in Mayaland and associated areas of Meso-America. World Archeology 8: 101–118. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1990Algunos rasgos estructurales de los idiomas mayances con referencia especial al k’iche. In Lecturas sobre la lingüística maya, N. England & S. Elliot (eds), 9–114. La Antigua, Guatemala: Centro de Investigaciones Regionales de Mesoamérica.Google Scholar
Knowles-Berry, S.
1984A Descriptive Grammar of Chontal Maya, San Carlos Dialect. PhD dissertation, Tulane University, New Orleans.Google Scholar
Langacker, R.
1977Syntactic reanalysis. In Mechanisms of Syntactic Change, C. Li (ed.), 57–139. Austin TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Larsen, T. & Norman, W.
1979Correlates of ergativity in Mayan grammar. In Ergativity: Toward a Theory of Grammatical Relations, F. Plank (ed.), 347–370. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Lehmann, C.
1993Predicate classes in Yucatec Maya. Función 13–14: 195–272.Google Scholar
Leonard, J.L., Gendrot, C. & Polian, G.
2011Voyelles réarticulées en tseltal: Pertinence d'une approche dialectologique et expérimentale pour la typologie phonologique. Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris CVI (1): 395–449.Google Scholar
Lois, X.
2011Roots and patterns in Yucatecan languages. In Proceedings of Formal Approaches to Mayan Linguistics [MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 63], K. Shklovksy, P. Mateo Pedro & J. Coon (eds), 147–169. Cambridge MA: MITWPL.Google Scholar
Lois, X. & Vapnarsky, V.
2003Polyvalence of Root Classes in Yukatekan Mayan Languages [Studies in Native American Linguistics 47]. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
2006Root indeterminacy and polyvalence in Yukatekan Mayan languages. In Lexical Categories and Root Classes in Amerindian Languages, X. Lois & V. Vapnarsky (eds), 69–115. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Lois, X., Vapnarsky, V., Fréger, C. & Atran, S.
2010Itza’ Memorias Mayas. Mérida, México: Universidad Autónoma de México.Google Scholar
Lopéz Sántiz, A. del C.
2005Palabras Tejidas. Jalbil k’opetik. Tuxtla Gutierrez: Gobierno del Estado de Chiapas.Google Scholar
Lucy, J.
1994The role of semantic value in lexical comparison: Motion and position roots in Yucatec maya. Linguistics 32: 623–656. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Marantz, A.
1997No escape from syntax: Don’t try morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon. In Proceedings of the 21th Annual Penn Linguistics Colloquium [Penn Working Papers in Linguistics 4:2], A. Dimitriadis, L. Siegel, C. Surek-Clark & A. Williams (eds), 201–225. Philadelphia PA: University of Pennsilvania.Google Scholar
Monod-Becquelin, A.
1997Parlons tzeltal, une langue Maya du Mexique. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Osorio May, J. del C.
2005Análisis de la morfología verbal del Yokot’an, “Chontal” del Poblado de Tecoluta, Nacajuca, Tabasco. MA dissertation, CIESAS, Mexico.Google Scholar
Polian, G.
2006Éléments de grammaire du tseltal. Une langue maya du Mexique. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Polian, G. & Leonard, J.L.
2009La morphologie dans ALTO (Atlas Linguistique du Tseltal Occidental). Réseau dialectal et systèmes à décideurs multiples. Géolinguistique 11: 149–201.Google Scholar
Polian, G.
2013aInfinitivos transitivos: Innovaciones del Tseltal en la familia Maya. In Clases léxicas, posesión y cláusulas complejas en lenguas de Mesoamérica, E. Palancar & R. Zavala (eds), 339–380. México: CIESAS.Google Scholar
2013bGramática del tseltal de Oxchuc. Mexico: CIESAS.Google Scholar
Pye, C.
2009Cycles of complementation in the Mayan languages. In Cyclical Change [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 146], E. van Gelderen (ed.), 265–284. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011Mayan stative predication. In Proceedings of Formal Approaches to Mayan Linguistics [MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 63], K. Shklovksy, P. Mateo Pedro & J. Coon (eds), 191–207. Cambridge MA: MITWPL.Google Scholar
Quizar, R. & Knowles-Berry, S.
1988Ergativity in the Cholan languages. International Journal of American Linguistics 54(1): 73–85. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1990Ergatividad en los idiomas ch’oles. In Lecturas sobre la lingüística maya, N. England & S.E. Elliott (eds), 301–318. Guatemala: Centro de Investigaciones Regionales de Mesoamérica.Google Scholar
Robertson, J.
1980The Structure of Pronoun Incorporation in the Mayan Verbal Complex. New York NY: Garland.Google Scholar
Robertson. J.
1992The History of Tense/Aspect/Mood/Voice in the Mayan Verbal Complex. Austin TX: University of Texan Press.Google Scholar
Robertson, J.
1998A Ch'olti'an Explanation for Ch'orti'an Grammar: A Postlude to the Language of the Classic Maya. Mayab 11: 5–11.Google Scholar
Robles Uribe, C.
1966La dialectología tzeltal y el diccionario compacto. México: Instituto Nacional de Antropología.Google Scholar
Schumann, O.
1997Introducción al Maya Mopán. México DF: Instituto de Investigaciones Antropológicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.Google Scholar
Shklovsky, K.
2005Person Marking in Petalcingo Tseltal. PhD dissertation, Reed College.Google Scholar
Ulrich. M., Ulrich, R. & Peck, C.
1986Mopan Mayan Verbs. Guatemala: Instituto Linguístico de Verano.Google Scholar
Van Valin Jr., R.D. & LaPolla, R.J.
1997Syntax: Structure, Meaning, and Function. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vapnarsky, V.
1999Expressions et conceptions de la temporalité chez les Mayas Yucatèques du Quintana Roo. PhD dissertation, University of Paris 10, Nanterre.Google Scholar
Vapnarsky, V. & Lois, X.
2009Morphosyntactic and semantic issues on polycategoriality in Yucatecan Mayan languages. Talk presented at ALT 8 , Berkely, July.
Vapnarsky, V.
2013Is Yucatec an omnipredicative language? Predication, the copula and focus constructions. Language Typology and Universals 66: 40–86. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vázquez Álvarez, J.
2002Morfología del verbo de la lengua chol de Tila Chiapas. MA dissertation, CIESAS, México.Google Scholar
Wisdom, C.
1950Materials on the Chorti Languages [Microfilm of the Collection Manuscripts on Middle American Cultural Anthropology 28]. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Library.Google Scholar
Zavala, R.
2007The agentive alignment pattern in Cholan and K’ichean (Mayan). Paper presented in the AALLED conference , Lyon, France, February.
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

van Lier, Eva
2017. Introduction. Studies in Language 41:2  pp. 241 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 03 march 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.