Chapter published in:
Lexical Polycategoriality: Cross-linguistic, cross-theoretical and language acquisition approaches
Edited by Valentina Vapnarsky and Edy Veneziano
[Studies in Language Companion Series 182] 2017
► pp. 35–57

The flexibility of the noun/verb distinction in the lexicon of Mandinka

| Université Lumière (Lyon 2)
In Mandinka, a Mande language, it is easy to identify words fulfilling the function of verbal head of a clause or nominal head of a noun phrase, but the division of lexemes into a class of nominal lexemes and a class of verbal lexemes is problematic, due to their categorial flexibility. This article argues that three major classes or lexemes must be distinguished: verbal lexemes (whose nominal use is fully predictable and can conveniently be analyzed as morphologically unmarked nominalization), nominal lexemes (whose verbal use is limited to the expression of ‘provide someone with X’), and verbo-nominal lexemes (whose nominal and verbal uses are equally productive, and at the same time cannot be related to each other by any general rule).
Keywords: mandinka, noun/verb distinction, unmarked nominalization, verbo-nominal lexemes
Published online: 01 November 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.182.02cre
References

References

Creissels, D.
1983 Eléments de grammaire de la langue mandinka. Grenoble: ELLUG.Google Scholar
2009 Le malinké de Kita. Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe.Google Scholar
In preparation. Origin and evolution of antipassive markers in West Mande languages.
Creissels, D., Jatta, S. & Jobarteh, K.
1982 Lexique mandinka français. Mandenkan 3: 1–207.Google Scholar
Creissels, D. & Sambou, P.
2013 Le mandinka: Phonologie, grammaire, textes. Paris: Karthala.Google Scholar
Dimmendaal, G.
2011 Historical Linguistics and the Comparative Study of African Languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dumestre, G.
2003 Grammaire fondamentale du bambara. Paris: Karthala.Google Scholar
Evans, N. & Osada, T.
2005 Mundari: The myth of a language without word classes. Linguistic Typology 9(3): 351–390.Google Scholar
Houis, M.
1981 Les schèmes d’énoncé en bambara. Mandenkan 1: 17–24.Google Scholar
Launey, M.
1994 Une grammaire omniprédicative. Essai sur la syntaxe du nahuatl classique. Paris: CNRS Editions.Google Scholar
Rowlands, E.C.
1959 A Grammar of Gambian Mandinka. Londen: SOAS.Google Scholar
Tomčina, S.I.
1978 Vvedenie v sintagmatičeskuju morfologiju jazyka maninka. Leningrad: State University of Leningrad.Google Scholar
Vydrine, V.F.
1999 Les parties du discours en bambara: Un essai de bilan. Mandenkan 35: 73–93.Google Scholar