Chapter published in:
Lexical Polycategoriality: Cross-linguistic, cross-theoretical and language acquisition approaches
Edited by Valentina Vapnarsky and Edy Veneziano
[Studies in Language Companion Series 182] 2017
► pp. 1–31

Lexical Polycategoriality: Cross-linguistic, cross-theoretical and language acquisition approaches

An introduction

| LESC/EREA-CNRS & Université Paris Nanterre
| MoDyCo & LPPS, Université Paris Descartes
Published online: 01 November 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.182.01val
References

References

Aksu-Koç, A.
1998 The role of input vs. universal predispositions in the emergence of tense-aspect morphology: Evidence from Turkish. First Language 18: 255–280. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ambridge, B., Pine, J. & Lieven, E.
2014 Child language acquisition: Why universal grammar doesn't help. Language 90(3): e53–e90. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Arad, M.
2005 Roots and Patterns. Hebrew Morpho-syntax. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Armon-Lotem, S. & Berman, R. A.
2003 The emergence of grammar: Early verbs and beyond. Journal of Child Language 30: 845–877. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baker, M.
2003 Lexical Categories. Verbs, Nouns, and Adjectives [Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 102]. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bassano, D.
2000 Early development of nouns and verbs in French: Exploring the interface between lexicon and grammar. Journal of Child Language 27: 521–559. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, L. & Varela, S.
(eds) 2005 Approaches to Conversion/Zero derivation. Münster: Waxmann.Google Scholar
Becquey, C.
2014 Diasystème, diachronie: Etudes comparées dans les langues cholanes. Utrecht: LOT (Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics). http://​www​.lotpublications​.nl​/diasystème​-diachronie​-etudes​-comparées​-dans​-les​-langues​-cholanes Google Scholar
Berman, R. A. & Armon-Lotem, S.
1996 How grammatical are early verbs? In Actes du Colloque International sur L’acquisition de la Syntaxe en Langue Maternelle et en Langue Étrangère, C. Martinot (ed.), 17–59. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Bernal, S., Lidz, J., Millotte, S. & Christophe, A.
2007 Syntax constrains the acquisition of verb meaning. Language Learning and Development 3: 325–341. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bisang, W.
2008 Precategoriality and argument structure. In Archaic Chinese, Constructional Reorganization [Constructional Approaches to Languages 5], J. Leino (ed.), 55–88. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bloom, L.
1971 Why not pivot grammar? Journal of Speech and Disorder 36: 40–50. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1973 One Word at a Time. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Bloom, L. & Harner, L.
1989 On the developmental contour of child language: A reply to Smith & Weist. Journal of Child Language 16: 207–215. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bottari, P., Cipriani, P. & Chilosi, A. M.
1993–1994 Protosyntactic devices in the acquisition of Italian free morphology. Language Acquisition: A Journal of Developmental Linguistics 3: 327–369. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Braine, M. D. S.
1963 The ontogeny of English phrase structure: The first phase. Language 39: 1–13. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1976 Children's first word combinations. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 41(1, serial no. 164). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brown, R.
1973 A First Language: The Early Stages. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brusini, P., de Carvalho, A., Dautriche, I., Gutman, A., Cauvet, E., Millotte, S., Amsili, P. & Christophe, A.
To appear. Bootstrapping lexical and syntactic acquisition. In Sources of Variation in First Language Acquisition: Languages, Contexts, and Learners, M. Hickmann, E. Veneziano & H. Jisa (eds) Amsterdam John Benjamins
Carter, R.
2006 Polycategoriality and predictability: Problems and prospects. In Lexical Categories and Root Classes in Amerindian Languages, X. Lois & V. Vapnarsky (eds), 343–390. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2010 What have we learned, and what do we need to do to learn more about lexical categories? Paper presented at the International Conference on Polycategoriality “How Flexible are Lexical Categories ?” , 4–6 October, ENS, Paris.
Chung, S.
2012 Are lexical categories universal? The view from Chamorro. Theoretical Linguistics 38(1–2): 1–56. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clark, E. V.
1987 The principle of contrast: A constraint on language acquisition. In Mechanisms of language acquisition, B. MacWhinney (ed), 1–33. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Cohen, M.
1969 Sur l'étude du langage enfantin. Enfance 3(3–4): 181–249.Google Scholar
1969 Sur l'étude du langage enfantin. Enfance 22(3–4): 203–272. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Croft, W.
1991 Syntactic Categories and Grammatical Relations: The Cognitive Organization of Information. Chicago IL: University Press of Chicago.Google Scholar
2000 Parts of speech as typological universals and language particular categories. In Approaches to the Typology of Word Classes, P. M. Vogel & B. Comrie (eds), 65–102. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2005 Word classes, parts of speech and syntactic argumentation (Commentary on Evans and Osada, “Mundari: The myth of a language without word classes”). Linguistic Typology 9: 431–41.Google Scholar
Croft, W. & van Lier, E.
2012 Language universal without universal categories. Theoretical Linguistics 38(1–2): 57–72.Google Scholar
Danziger, E.
2008 A person, a place, or a thing? Whorfian consequences of syntactic bootstrapping in Mopan Maya. In Crosslinguistic Perspectives on Argument Structure, M. Bowerman & P. Brown (eds), 29–48. New York NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Demuth, K.
2001 A prosodic approach to filler syllables. Journal of Child Language 28: 246–249. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Don, J.
2005 On conversion, relisting and zero derivation. SKASE 2(2): 2–16. http://​www​.skase​.sk​/jtl​.jpg Google Scholar
Embick, D.
2010 Localism Versus Globalism in Morphology and Phonology. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Evans, N. & Osada, T.
2005 Mundari: The myth of a language without word classes. Linguistic Typology 9(3): 351–390.Google Scholar
Franchetto, B.
2006 Are Kuikuro roots lexical categories? In Lexical Categories and Root Classes in Amerindian Languages, X. Lois & V. Vapnarsky (eds), 33–68. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2010 The ergativity effect in Kuikuro (Southern Carib, Brazil). In Ergativity in Amazonia [Typological Studies in Language 89], S. Gildea & F. Queixalós (eds), 121–158. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gathercole, V. C. M., Sebastian, E. & Soto, P.
1999 The early acquisition of Spanish verbal morphology: Across-the-board or piecemeal knowledge? International Journal of Bilingualism 3: 133–182. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gerken, L. & McIntosh, B.
1993 Interplay of function morphemes and prosody in early language. Developmental Psychology 29(3): 448–457. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gildea, S. O.
1998 On Reconstructing Grammar: Comparative Cariban Morphosyntax. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Gleitman, L. R.
1990 The structural sources of verb meanings. Language Acquisition 1: 3–55. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gold, E. M.
1967 Language identification in the limit. Information and Control 10: 447–474. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grimshaw, J.
1981 Form, function, and the language acquisition device. In The Logical Problem of Language Acquisition, C. L. Baker & J. J. McCarthy (eds), 165–182. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Grégoire, A.
1937 L’apprentissage du langage. Vol. 1. Paris: Librairie Droz.Google Scholar
1947 L’apprentissage du langage. Vol. 2. Paris: Librairie Droz.Google Scholar
Guillaume, P.
1927 Le développement des éléments formels dans le langage de l’enfant. Journal de Psychologie Normale et Pathologique 24: 203–229.Google Scholar
Halle, M. & Marantz, A.
1993 Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In The View from Building 20. Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger, K. Hale & S.J. Keyser (eds), 111–176. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
1994 Some key features of distributed morphology. In Papers on Phonology and Morphology [MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 21], A. Carnie & H. Harley (eds), 275–288. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, M.
2012 Escaping ethnocentrism in the study of word-class universals. Theoretical Linguistics 38(1–2): 91–102. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hengeveld, K.
1992 Non-verbal Predication: Theory, Typology, Diachrony. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008 Prototypical and non-prototypical noun phrases in functional discourse grammar. In The Noun Phrase in Functional Discourse Grammar, D. García Velasco & J. Rijkhoff (eds), 43–62. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hoff-Ginsburg, E. & Shatz, M.
1982 Linguistic input and the child's acquisition of language. Psychological Bulletin 92: 3–26. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Houis, M.
1981 Les schèmes d’énoncé en bambara. Mandenkan 1: 17–24.Google Scholar
Höhle, B., Weissenborn, J., Kiefer, D., Schulz, A. & Schmitz, M.
2004 Functional elements in infants' speech processing: The role of determiners in the syntactic categorization of lexical elements. Infancy 5: 341–353. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Katz, N., Baker, E. & Macnamara, J.
1974 What’s in a name? A study of how children learn common and proper names. Child Development 45: 469–473. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kerleroux, F.
1996 La coupure invisible. Lille: Septentrion, Presses Universitaires de Lille.Google Scholar
2000 Identification d?un procédé morphologique: La conversion. Faits de Langue 14: 89–100.Google Scholar
Küntay, A. & Slobin, D.I.
2002 Putting interaction back into child language: Examples from Turkish. Psychology of Language and Communication 6: 5–14.Google Scholar
Laaha, S., Gillis, S., Kilani-Schoch, M., Korecky-Kröll, K., Xanthos, A. & Dressler, W. U.
2007 Weakly inflecting languages: French, Dutch, and German. In Typological Perspectives on the Acquisition of Noun and Verb Morphology [Antwerp Papers in Linguistics 112], S. Laaha & S. Gillis (eds), 21–33. Antwerp: Antwerp University.Google Scholar
Launey, M.
1994 Une grammaire omniprédicative. Paris: CNRS-Editions.Google Scholar
Lehmann, C.
2008 Roots, stems and word classes. Studies in Languages 32(3): 546–567. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lieber, R.
2006 The category of roots and the roots of categories: What we learn from selection in derivation. Morphology 16: 247–272. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lieven, E.
2014 First language development: A usage-based perspective on past and current research. Journal of Child Language 41: 48–63. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Lier, E.
2012 Reconstructing multifunctionality. Theoretical Linguistics 38(1–2): 119–135. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lléo, C.
1997 Filler syllables, proto-articles and early prosodic constraints in Spanish and German. In Language Acquisition: Knowledge, Representation, and Processing [Proceedings GALA], A. Sorace, C. Heycock & R. Shillcock (eds), 251–256. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Lois, X.
2011 Roots and patterns in Yucatecan languages. In Proceedings of Formal Approaches to Mayan Linguistics [MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 63], K. Shklovksy, P. Mateo Pedro & J. Coon (eds), 147–169. Cambridge MA: MITWPL.Google Scholar
Lois, X. & Vapnarsky, V.
2006 Introduction. In Lexical Categories and Root Classes in Amerindian Languages, X. Lois & V. Vapnarsky (eds), 1–30. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Luuk, E.
2009 The noun/verb and predicate/argument structures. Lingua 119: 1707–1727. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
MacNamara, J.
1982 Names for Things. A Study of Human Learning. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Marantz, A.
1997 No escape from syntax. In University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics, A. Dimitriadis & I. Siegel (eds), 201–225. Philadelphia PA: University of Pennsylvania Department of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Miller, W. & Ervin, S.
1964. The development of grammar in child language. In The Acquisition of Language [Child Development Monographs 29], U. Belugi & R. Brown (eds). Chicago IL: Chicago Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Peters, A. M. & Menn, L.
1993 False starts and filler-syllables: Ways to learn grammatical morphemes. Language 69: 742–777. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pinker, S.
1984 Language Learnability and Language Development. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Pizzuto, E. & Caselli, M. C.
1992 The acquisition of Italian morphology: Implications for models of language development. Journal of Child Language 19: 491–557. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rijkhoff, J. & van Lier, E.
(eds) 2013 Flexible Word Classes: A Typological Study of Underspecified Parts-of-speech. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Robert, S.
(ed) 2003 Perspectives synchroniques sur la grammaticalisation. Polysémie, transcatégorialité et échelles syntaxiques. Louvain: Peeters.Google Scholar
Rumsey, A., San Roque, L., & Schieffelin, B.
2013  The acquisition of ergative marking in Kaluli, Ku Waru and Duna (Trans New Guinea). In The Acquisition of Ergativity, E.. Bavin and S. Stoll (eds), 133–182. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sadock, J. M.
1999 The nominalist theory of Eskimo: A case study of scientific self-deception. International Journal of American Linguistics 65(4): 383–406. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schieffelin, B. B.
1985 The acquisition of Kaluli. In The Crosslinguistic Study of Language Acquisition, Vol. 1, D. Slobin (ed.), 525–593. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
1990 The Give and Take of Everyday Life: Language Socialization of Kaluli Children. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Scholz, B. C.
2004 Gold's theorems and the logical problem of language acquisition. Journal of Child Language 31: 959–961. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shi, R., Werker, J. & Cutler, A.
2006 Recognition and representation of function words in English-learning infants. Infancy 10: 187–198. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shi, R. & Lepage, M.
2008 The effect of functional morphemes on word segmentation in pre-verbal infants. Developmental Science 11(3): 407–413. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shi, R. & Melançon, A.
2010 Syntactic categorization in French-learning infants. Infancy 15: 517–533. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Slobin, D.I.
1973 Cognitive prerequisites for the development of grammar. In Studies of Child Language Development, C. A. Ferguson & D. I. Slobin (eds), 175–208. New York NY: Holt Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Snow, C. E. & Ferguson, C. A.
(eds) 1977 Talking to Children: Language Input and Acquisition. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M.
1992 First Verbs: A Case Study of Early Grammatical Development. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2003 Constructing a Language: A Usage-based Theory of Language Acquisition. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Vapnarsky, V. & Haag, M.
. (org) 2009  Workshop ‘Typological Perspectives on Polycategoriality’ , ALT 8, July, Berkeley CA.
Vapnarsky, V. & Lois, X.
2009 Morphosyntactic and semantic issues on polycategoriality in Yucatecan Mayan languages. Talk presented at Workshop ‘Typological Perspectives on Polycategoriality’ , ALT 8, July, Berkeley CA.
Veneziano, E.
2004 The emergence of expressive options in early child language: A constructivist account. In Perspectives on language and language development: Essays in honor of Ruth A. Berman, D. Ravid & H. Bat-Zeev Shyldkrot (eds), 203–218. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Veneziano, E. & Parisse, C.
In press. Retrieving meaning from noun and verb grammatical contexts: Interindividual variation among 2- to 4-year-old French-speaking children. In Sources of Variation in First Language Acquisition: Languages, Contexts, and Learners, M. Hickmann, E. Veneziano & H. Jisa (eds) Amsterdam John Benjamins
Veneziano, E. & Sinclair, H.
2000 The changing status of 'filler syllables' on the way to grammatical morphemes. Journal of Child Language 27: 461–500. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Veneziano, E. & Parisse, C.
2011 Retrieving the meaning of words from syntactic cues: A comprehension study. XIIIth International Conference on the Study of Child Language , Montreal, Canada.
Waxman, S. R., Lidz, J. L., Braun, I. E. & Lavin, T.
2009 Twenty four-month-old infants' interpretations of novel verbs and nouns in dynamic scenes. Cognitive Psychology 59(1): 67–95. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wexler, K. & Culicover, P.
1980 Formal Principles of Language Acquisition. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar