Article published in:
Argument Realisation in Complex Predicates and Complex Events: Verb-verb constructions at the syntax-semantic interface
Edited by Brian Nolan and Elke Diedrichsen
[Studies in Language Companion Series 180] 2017
► pp. 137–167

Complex predicates in Lithuanian

| Trinity College Dublin
Lithuanian is a highly synthetic language that is morphologically rich. This research revisits a set of specific classification of Lithuanian predicates into complex predicate constructions. The data for the analysis was collected from the publically accessible corpus of Lithuanian language and the examples were analysed using the RRG framework. The discussion revealed that the V + V constructions classified in the traditional Lithuanian grammar need to be reclassified as complex predicate constructions. Furthermore, the research revealed the existence of a type of serial verb construction in the Lithuanian complex predicates. This study discussed nominal complex predicates [V + NP] and verbal complex predicates [V + V inf ]; this research argued that there is a type of complex verbal predicate [V + V inf  + V inf …] which, in some cases, have a serial verb construction embedded in the predication [V + SVC]. The analyses revealed the diverse and layered constructions of Lithuanian predicates where semantics, syntax and morphology play an equally important role.
Keywords: complex predicates, nominal complex predicates, verbal complex predicates, serial verb construction, classification, Lithuanian language, Role and Reference Grammar
Published online: 26 January 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.180.05bru
References

References

Aikhenvald, Alexandra & Dixon, Robert M.W.
(eds) 2006 Serial Verb Constructions: A Cross-Linguistic Typology [Explorations in Linguistic Typology 2]. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Ambrazas, Vytautas
(ed.) 2006 Lithuanian Grammar: Lietuvių Kalbos Gramatika, 2nd edn. Vilnius: Baltos Lankos.Google Scholar
Ambrazas, Vytautas, Garšva, Kazimieras & Girdenis, Aleksas
(eds) 2005 Dabartinės lietuvių kalbos gramatika (The grammar of modern Lithuanian). Vilnius: Mokslo ir Enciklopedijų Leidybos Centras.Google Scholar
Armoskaite, Solveiga & Koskinen, Païvi
2014 Serial verbs in Finnish. Linguistic Discovery 12(1): 1–27. Crossref.1537–0852.Google Scholar
Balkevičius, Jonas
1998 Lietuviu klabos predikatinių konstrukcijų sintaksė (The syntax of the predicative constructions in the Lithuanian language). Vilnius: Mokslo ir Enciklopedijų Leidybos Institutas.Google Scholar
Butt, Miriam
1995 The Structure of Complex Predicates. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Butt, Miriam & Geuder, Wilhelm
2001 On the (semi) lexical status of light verbs. In Corver & van Riemsdijk (eds), 323–414.Google Scholar
Geniušienė, Emma
1971 Lietuvių klabos veiksmažodžių sintaksinė klasifikacija (The syntactic classification of Lithuanian verbs). Kalbotyra 23(1): 7–16.Google Scholar
Hagemeijer, Tjerk
2001 Underspecification in serial verb constructions. Corver & van Riemsdijk (eds), 415–451.Google Scholar
Heim, Irene
2002 On the projection problem for presuppositions. In Formal Semantics: The Essential Readings, Paul Portner & Barbara H. Partee (eds), 249–260. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Labutis, Vitas
2002 Lietuvių kalbos sintaksė (The syntax of Lithuanian). Vilnius: Vinliaus Universiteto Leidykla.Google Scholar
Muysken, Pieter & Veenstra, Tonjes
2006 Serial verb constructions. In The Syntax Companion, Martin Everaert & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds), 234–271. Oxford: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1995 Serial verb constructions. In Pidgins and Creoles: An Introduction [Creole Language Library 15], Jacques Arends, Pieter Muysken & Norval Smith (eds), 289–301. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Nolan, Brian
2012 The Structure of Modern Irish. Sheffield: Equinox.Google Scholar
Pavey, Emma L.
2010 The Structure of Language: An Introduction to Grammatical Analysis. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pawley, Andrew
2011 Event representation in serial verb constructions. In Event Representation in Language and Cognition, Jürgen Bohnemeyer & Eric Pederson (eds). Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Pustejovsky, James
1995 The Generative Lexicon. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Seiss, Melanie
2009 On the difference between the auxiliaries, serial verbs and light verbs. In The Proceedings of the LFG09 Conference, Miriam Butt & Tracy Holloway King (eds), 501–519. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Senn, Alfred
1944 Standard Lithuanian in the making. Slavonic and East European Review. American Series 3(2):102–116. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sirtautas, Vytautas & Česys. Grenda
1988 Lietuvių kalbos sintaksė (The syntax of the Lithuanian Language). Vilnius: MokslasGoogle Scholar
Stalnaker, Robert
2002 Common ground. Linguistics and Philosophy 25: 701–721. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ulvydas, Kazys
(ed.) 1976 Lietuvių kalbos gramatika III [Grammar of the Lithuanian language III]. Vilnius: Mintis.Google Scholar
Utka, Andrius
2009 Dažninis rašytinės Lietuvių kalbos žodynas: 1 milijono žodžių morfologiškai anotuoto tekstyno pagrindu (The dictionary of the frequanty used words in written Lithuanian: Based on the morphologically anotaded corpus of 1 million words). Kaunas: Vytauto Didžiojo Universiteto leidykla. Kompiuterinės Lingvistikos Centras.Google Scholar
Van Valin Jr., Robert D.
2010 Role and Reference Grammar as a framework for linguistic analysis. In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis, Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog (eds), 703–738. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Van Valin Jr., Robert D. & LaPolla, Randy J.
1997 Syntax: Structure, Meaning, and Function. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wójcik, Pawel
2003 Early verb inflection in Lithuanian. In Development of Verb Inflection in First Language Acquisition: A Cross-linguistic Perspective, Dagmar Bittner, Wolfgang U. Dressler & Marianne Kilani-Schoch (eds), 401–420. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar