Article published in:
Outside the Clause: Form and function of extra-clausal constituents
Edited by Gunther Kaltenböck, Evelien Keizer and Arne Lohmann
[Studies in Language Companion Series 178] 2016
► pp. 203240
References

References

Anagnostopoulou, Elena, van Riemsdijk, Henk & Zwarts, Frans
1997Materials on Left Dislocation [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 14]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Andrews, Avery D.
2007Relative clauses. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Vol. 2: Complex Constructions, 2nd edn, Timothy Shopen (ed.), 206-236. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Arnold, Jennifer E., Wasow, Thomas, Losongco, Anthony & Ginstrom, Ryan
2000Heaviness: The effects of structural complexity and discourse status on constituent ordering. Language 76(1): 28-55. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baayen, R. Harald
2008Analyzing Linguistic Data. A Practical Introduction to Statistics Using R. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan & Finegan, Edward
1999Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Birner, Betty & Ward, Gregory
2002Information packaging. In The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language, Rodney Huddleston & Geoffrey Pullum (eds), 1363-1447. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Brown, Cheryl
1983Topic continuity in written English narrative. In Givón (ed.), Topic Continuity in Discourse: A Quantitative Cross-language Study, 313-341. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Crystal, David
2003A Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan & Kytö, Merja
2010Early Modern English Dialogues. Spoken Interaction as Writing. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Diessel, Holger
2005Competing motivations for the ordering of main and adverbial clauses. Linguistics 43(3): 449-470. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dons, Ute
2004Descriptive Adequacy of Early Modern English Grammars [TiEL 47]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, Olga
1992Syntax. In The Cambridge History of the English Language, Vol. 2: 1066–476, Norman Blake (ed.), 207-408. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fonteyn, Lauren & van de Pol, Nikki
2015Divide and conquer: The formation and functional dynamics of the Modern English ing-clause network. English Language and Linguistics. Oct 2015: 1-35. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ford, Cecilia, Fox, Barbara & Thompson, Sandra A.
2003Social interaction and grammar. In The New Psychology of Language. Cognitive and Functional Approaches to Language Structure, Vol. 2, Michael Tomasello (ed.), 119-143. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Geluykens, Ronald
1992From Discourse Process to Grammatical Construction: On Left Dislocation in English [Studies in Discourse Grammar 1]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1993Syntactic, semantic and interactional prototypes: The case of left-dislocation. In Conceptualizations and Mental Processing in Language, Richard Geiger & Brygida Rudzka-Ostyn (eds.), 709-730. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Geurts, Bart
1999Presuppositions and Pronouns. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Gibson, Edward
1998Linguistic complexity: Locality of syntactic dependencies. Cognition 68(1): 1-76. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Givón, Talmy
1979On Understanding Grammar. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
1983Topic Continuity in Discourse: A Quantitative Cross-language Study [Typological Studies in Language 3]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gregory, Michelle & Michaelis, Laura
2001Topicalization and left-dislocation: A functional opposition revisited. Journal of Pragmatics 33(11): 1665-1706. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gómez-González, María Ángeles
2001The Theme-topic Interface: Evidence from English [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 71]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Görlach, Manfred
1999English in Nineteenth-century England. An introduction. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2001Eighteenth-century English. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
Götze, Michael, Weskott, Thomas, Endriss, Cornelia, Fiedler, Ines, Hinterwimmer, Stefan, Petrova, Svetlana, Schwarz, Anne, Skopeteas, Stavros & Stoel, Ruben
2007Information structure. In Information Structure in Cross-linguistic Corpora: Annotation Guidelines for Phonology, Morphology, Syntax, Semantics and Information Structure [Interdisciplinary Studies on Information Structure (ISIS) 7], Stefanie Dipper, Michael Götze & Stavros Skopeteas (eds), 147-188. Potsdam: Universitätsverlag Potsdam.Google Scholar
Gundel, Janette K., Hedberg, Nancy & Zacharski, Ron
1993Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse. Language 69(2): 279-307. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, John A.
1992Syntactic weight and information status in word order variation. Linguistische Berichte 4: 196-219.Google Scholar
Hawkins
2004Efficiency and Complexity in Grammars. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012Patterns of asymmetry in argument structure across languages. Some principles and puzzles. In Argument Structure and Grammatical Relations [Studies in Language Companion Series 126], Pirkko Suihkonen, Bernard Comrie & Valery Solovyev (eds), 133-150. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hidalgo, Raquel
2000Establishing topic in conversation: A contrastive study of left dislocation in English and Spanish. In Talk and Text. Studies on Spoken and Written Discourse, Angela Downing Rothwell, Jesús Moya Guijarro & José I. Albentosa Hernández (eds), 137-158. Cuenca: Ediciones de la Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha.Google Scholar
Hilpert, Martin
2013Constructional Change in English: Developments in Allomorphy, Word Formation, and Syntax [Studies in English Language]. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014Construction Grammar and its Application to English. Edinburgh: EUP.Google Scholar
Hilpert, Martin & Gries, Stefan T.
2009Assessing frequency changes in multi-stage diachronic corpora: Applications for historical corpus linguistics and the study of language acquisition. Literary and Linguistic Computing 24(4): 385-401. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jespersen, Otto
1933Essentials of English grammar. New York NY: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
Keenan-Ochs, Elinor & Schieffelin, Bambi
1976Foregrounding referents: A reconsideration of left dislocation in discourse. Proceedings of the 2nd annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society , 240-257.
Kies, Daniel
1988Marked themes with and without pronominal reinforcement: their meaning and distribution in discourse. In Pragmatics, Discourse and Text: Some Systemically-inspired Approaches, Erich Steiner & Robert Velman (eds), 47-72. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
Kortmann, Bernd
1991Free Adjuncts and Absolutes in English: Problems of Control and Interpretation. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
1995Adverbial participial clauses in English. In Converbs in cross-linguistic perspective, Martin Haspelmath & Ekkehard König (eds), 189-237. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud
1994Information Structure and Sentence Form: Topic, Focus, and the Mental Representations of Discourse Referents. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lennard, John
1995Punctuation: And – ‘pragmatics’. In Historical Pragmatics. Pragmatic Developments in the History of English [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 35 Andreas Jucker (ed.), 65-98. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leonarduzzi, Laetitia & Herry, Nadine
2005Les dislocations: Texts et contexts. In Actes, Congrès de la Société des Anglicistes de l'Enseignement Supérieur, Toulouse: France. http://​hal​.archives​-ouvertes​.fr​/hal​-00484204 (30 March 2008).Google Scholar
Los, Bettelou
2009The consequences of the loss of verb-second in English: Information structure and syntax in interaction. English Language and Linguistics 13(1): 97-125. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Los, Bettelou & Komen, Erwin
2012Clefts as resolution strategies after the loss of a multifunctional first position. In The Oxford Handbook of the History of English, Terttu Nevalainen & Elizabeth Traugott (eds), 884-898. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar
Manetta, Emily
2007Unexpected left dislocation: An English corpus study. Journal of Pragmatics 39: 1029-1035. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Meurman-Solin, Anneli
2012The connectives and, for, but, and only as clause and discourse type indicators in 16th- and 17th-Century epistolary prose. In Meurman-Solin, Lopez-Couso & Los (eds), Information Structure and Syntactic Change in the History of English, 164-198. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Meurman-Solin, Anneli Maria, Lopez-Couso, Jose & Los, Bettelou
2012Information Structure and Syntactic Change in the History of English. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Montgomery, Michael
1982The functions of left dislocation in spontaneous discourse. In The Ninth Lacus Forum, John Morreal (ed), 425-432. Columbia SC: Hornbeam.Google Scholar
Netz, Hadar & Kuzar, Ron
2007Three marked theme constructions in spoken English. Journal of Pragmatics 39(2): 305-335. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Netz, Hadar, Kuzar, Ron & Eviatar, Zohar
2011A recipient-based study of the discourse functions of marked topic constructions. Language Sciences 33(1): 154-166. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nissim, Malvina, Dingare, Shipra, Carletta, Jean & Steedman, Mark
2004An annotation scheme for information status in dialogue. In Proceedings of the 4th language resources and evaluation conference (LREC 2004) , 1023–1026. Lisbon, Portugal.
Ono, Tsuyoshi & Thompson, Sandra
1994Unattached NPs in English conversation. BLS 20: 402-419. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
PPCEME
The Penn–Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Early Modern English, 1500–1710. Department of Linguistics, University of Pennsylvania. CD-ROM, 1st edn. www​.ling​.upenn​.edu​/hist​-corpora/
PPCMBE
The Penn–Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Modern British English, 1700–1914. Department of Linguistics, University of Pennsylvania. CD-ROM, 1st edn. www​.ling​.upenn​.edu​/hist​-corpora/
PCEEC
The Parsed Corpus of Early English Correspondence, 1410-1695. Compiled by the CEEC Project Team. University of York and University of Helsinki. Distributed through the Oxford Text Archive.
Pérez-Guerra, Javier
1999Historical English Syntax: A Statistical Corpus Based Study on the Organisation of Early Modern English Sentences. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Pérez-Guerra, Javier & Tizón-Couto, David
2009On left dislocation in the recent history of English: Theory and data hand in hand. In Dislocated Elements in Discourse: Syntactic, Semantic, and Pragmatic Perspectives, Benjamin Shaer, Philippa Cook, Werner Frey & Claudia Maienborn (eds), 31-48. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pérez-Guerra, Javier
2012Discourse status and syntax in the history of English. Some explorations in topicalization, left-dislocation, and there-constructions. In Meurman-Solin, López-Couso & Los (eds), Information Structure and Syntactic Change in the History of English, 121-138. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Prince, Ellen
1981Toward a taxonomy of given-new information. In Radical Pragmatics, Peter Cole (ed.), 233-235. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
1992The ZPG letter: Subjects, definiteness and information status. In Discourse Description: Diverse Linguistic Analyses of a Fund-Raising Text [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 16], William C. Mann & Sandra A. Thompson (eds), 295-325. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1997On the functions of left-dislocation in English discourse. In Directions in Functional Linguistics [Studies in Language Companion Series 36], Akio Kamio (ed.), 117-144. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1998On the limits of syntax, with reference to left-dislocation and topicalization. In The Limits of Syntax, Peter Culicover & Louise McNally (eds), 281-302. San Diego CA: Academic Press. Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan
1985A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Reinhart, Tanya
1981Pragmatics and linguistics: An analysis of sentence topics. Philosophica 27(1): 53-94.Google Scholar
Riester, Arndt
2008A semantic explication of ‘information status’ and the underspecification of the recip- ients’ knowledge. In Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 12, Alte Grønn (ed.), 508-522. Oslo, Norway.Google Scholar
Riester, Arndt, Lorenz, David & Seemann, Nina
2010A recursive annotation scheme for referential information status. Proceedings of 7th language resources and evaluation conference (LREC) , 717-722. Malta. http://​www​.ims​.uni​-stuttgart​.de​/institut​/mitarbeiter​/arndt​/doc​/riesterLorenzSeemann10​.pdf (30 April 2011).
Río-Rey, Carmen
2002Subject control and coreference in early modern English free adjuncts and absolutes. English Language and Linguistics 6(2): 309-323. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, Ian
1996The Foundations of English Prose. The Art of Prose Writing from the Middle Ages to the Enlightenment. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Rohdenburg, Günter
1995On the replacement of finite complement clauses by infinitives in English. English Studies 76(4): 367-388. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1996Cognitive complexity and increased grammatical explicitness in English. Cognitive Linguistics 7(2): 147-182. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ross, John R.
1967Constraints on Variables in Syntax. PhD dissertation, MIT. (Published as Infinite syntax! 1986. Norton NJ: Ablex).Google Scholar
Snider, Neal
2005A corpus study of left dislocation and topicalization. Stanford University: Linguistics Department. http://​www​.stanford​.edu​/~snider​/pubs​/qp1​.pdf (30 April 2008).
Snider, Neal & Zaenen, Annie
2006Animacy and syntactic structure: Fronted NPs in English. In Intelligent Linguistic Architectures: Variations on Themes by Ronald M. Kaplan, Ronald M. Kaplan, Miriam Butt, Mary Dalrymple & Tracy Holloway King (eds), 323-338. Stanford CA: CSLI. http://​www​.hlp​.rochester​.edu​/~nsnider​/pubs​/snider%2Bzaenen,animacy,2006​.pdf (30 April 2008).Google Scholar
Tizón-Couto, David
2012Left Dislocation in English. A Functional-Discoursal Approach [Linguistic Insights 143]. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2015A corpus-based account of left-detached items in the recent history of English: Left dislocation vs. left detached-sequences. English Text Construction 8(1): 21-64. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016, In press. Complexity and genre distribution of leftdislocated strings after the fixation of SVO syntax. In Explorations in English Historical Syntax, Hubert Cuyckens, Hendrik De Smet, Liesbet Heyvaert & Charlotte Maekelberghe (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
2007Old English left-dislocations: Their structure and information status. Folia Linguistica 41(3-4): 405-441. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Hoorick, Bart
1994Pragmatic positions and the history of English word order. Working Papers in Functional Grammar 56. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Van linden, An & Davidse, Kristin
2012The role of the accessibility of the subject in the development of adjectival complementation from Old English to Present-Day English. In Meurman-Solin, Lopez-Couso & Los (eds), Information Structure and Syntactic Change in the History of English, 199-227. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wasow, Thomas
1997Remarks on grammatical weight. Language Variation and Change 9(1): 81-105. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yaruss, J. Scott
1999Utterance length, syntactic complexity, and childhood stuttering. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 42(2): 329-344. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Tizón-Couto, David
2017. Exploring the Left Dislocation construction by means of multiple linear regression. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 31  pp. 301 ff. Crossref logo
Tizón-Couto, David
2018.  In Explorations in English Historical Syntax [Studies in Language Companion Series, 198],  pp. 203 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 january 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.