Article published in:
Outside the Clause: Form and function of extra-clausal constituents
Edited by Gunther Kaltenböck, Evelien Keizer and Arne Lohmann
[Studies in Language Companion Series 178] 2016
► pp. 5996
References

References

Aijmer, Karin
2007The interface between discourse and grammar: The fact is that. In Connectives as Discourse Landmarks [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 161], Agnes Celle & Ruth Huart (eds), 31-46. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bakker, Dik & Siewierska, Anna
2002Adpositions, the lexicon and expression rules. In New Perspectives on Argument Structure in Functional Grammar, Ricardo Mairal Úson & Maria Jesus Pérez Quintero (eds), 125-177. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan & Finegan, Edward
1999Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight
1987The remarkable double IS. English Today 9(1): 39-40. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boye, Kasper & Harder, Peter
2007Complement-taking predicates. Usage and linguistic structure. Studies in Language 31(3): 569-606. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012A usage-based theory of grammatical status and grammaticalization. Language 88(1): 1-44. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brems, Liselotte
2011Layering of Size and Type Noun Constructions in English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brems, Liselotte & Davidse, Kristin
2010The grammaticalisation of nominal type noun constructions with kind/sort of: Chronology and paths of change. English Studies 91(2): 180-202. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J. & Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
2005Lexicalization and Language Change. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brenier, Jason M. & Michaelis, Laura A.
2005Optimization via syntactic amalgam: Syntax-prosody mismatch and copula doubling. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 1(1): 45-88. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Penelope & Levinson, Stephen C.
1978Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena. In Questions and Politeness: Strategies in Social Interaction, Esther N. Goody (ed.), 6-311. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar
Butler, Christopher S.
2003Structure and Function: A Guide to Three Major Structural-Functional Theories [Studies in Language Companion Series 63-64]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carter, Ronald, & McCarthy, Michael
2006Cambridge Grammar of English. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Cuyckens, Hubert, Davidse, Kristin & Vandelanotte, Lieven
2010Introduction. In Subjectification, Intersubjectification and Grammaticalization, Kristin Davidse, Hubert Cuyckens & Lieven Vandelanotte (eds), 1-26. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Declerck, Renaat
1988Studies on Copular Sentences, Clefts and Pseudoclefts. Dordrecht: Foris. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Degand, Liesbeth & Simon-Vandenbergen, Anne-Marie
2011Introduction: Grammaticalization and (inter)subjectification of discourse markers. Linguistics 42(2): 287–294.Google Scholar
Delahunty, Gerald P.
2012An analysis of The thing is that S sentences. Pragmatics 21(1): 41-78. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dik, Simon C.
1997The Theory of Functional Grammar, Part II: The Structure of the Clause. 2nd, revised edn, Kees Hengeveld (ed.). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Flowerdew, John & Forest, Richard
2015Signalling Nouns in English A Corpus-based Discourse Approach. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, Michael A.K. & Hasan, Ruquia
1976Cohesion in English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Hengeveld, Kees & Mackenzie, J. Lachlan
2008Functional Discourse Grammar. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Higgins, Francis Roger
1979The Pseudo-cleft Construction in English. New York NY: Garland.Google Scholar
Hoeksema, Jack
2000Verplichte topicalisatie van kale enkelvouden: De feit is dat-constructie. TABU 30: 113-142.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul & Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
1993Grammaticalization. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
van der Horst, Joop & van der Horst, Kees
1999Geschiedenis van het Nederlands in de Twintigste eeuw. Den Haag: Sdu Uitgevers.Google Scholar
Kaltenböck, Gunther
2011Explaining diverting evidence. The case of clause-initial I think . In Converging Evidence and Theoretical Issues for Linguistic Research [Human Cognitive Processing 33], Doris Schönefeld (ed.), 81-112. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Keizer, Evelien
1992Reference, Predication and (In)definiteness in Functional Grammar. A Functional Approach to English Copular Sentences. PhD dissertation, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.Google Scholar
2007The English Noun Phrase: The Nature of Linguistic Categorization. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013The X is (is) construction: An FDG account. In Casebook in Functional Discourse Grammar [Studies in Language Companion Series 137], J. Lachlan Mackenzie & Hella Olbertz (eds), 213-248. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015A Functional Discourse Grammar for English [Oxford Textbooks in Linguistics]. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
In preparation. The use of modifiers in the English and Dutch fact-is constructions.
Kroon, Caroline
1995Discourse Particles in Latin [Amsterdam Studies in Classical Philology 4]. Amsterdam: Gieben.Google Scholar
Massam, Diane
1999 Thing is constructions: The thing is, is what’s the right analysis? English Language and Linguistics 3(2): 335-352. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McConvell, Patrick
1988To be or double be? Current changes in the English copula. Australian Journal of Linguistics 8: 287-305. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Jim & Weinert, Regina
1998Spontaneous Spoken Language: Syntax and Discourse. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Schmid, Hans-Jörg
2000English Abstract Nouns as Conceptual Shells: From Corpus to Cognition. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, Michael & Haley, Michael C.
2002The reduplicative copula is is . American Speech 77(3): 305-312. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A. & Mulac, Antony
1991aThe discourse conditions for the use of the complementizer that in conversational English. Journal of Pragmatics 15(3): 237-251. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A. & Mulac, Anthony
1991bA quantitative perspective on the grammaticization of epistemic parentheticals in English. In Approaches to Grammaticalization, Vol. 2, [Typological Studies in Language 19(2)], Elizabeth Closs Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds), 313-329. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thompsom, Sandra A.
2002‘Object complements’ and conversation: Towards a realistic account. Studies in language 26(1): 125-163. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Trousdale, Graeme
2013Constructionalization and Constructional Changes. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tuggy, D.
1996The thing is is that people talk that way. The question is is Why? In Cognitive Linguistics in the Redwoods: The Expansion of a New Paradigm in Linguistics, Eugene H. Casad (ed.), 713-752. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Valin Jr., Robert D.
1993Synopsis of Role and Reference Grammar. In Advances in Role and Reference Grammar [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 82], Robert D. Van Valin Jr. (ed.), 1-164. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Corpora

BYU-BNC: The British National Corpus (1980s-1993)
COCA: The Corpus of Contemporary American English (1990-2012)
Het 38 miljoen woorden corpus
(1996), Instituut voor Nederlandse Lexicologie, LeidenGoogle Scholar
Het Corpus Gesproken Nederlands (CGN)
1998-2003, version 2.0.1 (2009) Nederlandse Taalunie.
Het Corpus Hedendaags Nederlands (CHN)
1814-2013 (2014)Instituut voor Nederlandse Lexicologie, Leiden.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Shibasaki, Reijirou
2018.  In New Trends in Grammaticalization and Language Change [Studies in Language Companion Series, 202],  pp. 333 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 january 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.