Article published in:
Adverbs: Functional and diachronic aspects
Edited by Karin Pittner, Daniela Elsner and Fabian Barteld
[Studies in Language Companion Series 170] 2015
► pp. 133–156

Between inflection and derivation

Adverbial suffixes in English and German

| University of Bochum
The question of whether adverbial suffixes are derivational or inflectional elements has been controversially discussed in recent decades. Based on general differences between inflection and derivation, we argue that the English adverbial suffix -ly has more characteristics of an inflectional than of a derivational element and has acquired great generality as an adverb marker in present-day English. German, in contrast, has not developed a general adverb marker. Due to phonological changes, a widespread adverb marker in earlier stages of German and English (OHG -o, OE and MHG -e) disappeared. The element -lich which was a frequent adverbial suffix in MHG, is no longer productive. Another possible candidate in German for becoming a new adverb marker was -(er)weise, which, however, has been used since the 19th century for a differentiation between sentence adverbs and manner adverbs. We argue that this lexical differentiation between sentence and manner adverbs, which has no parallel in English or the Romance languages, can be related to the more flexible word order in German. Whereas English and some Romance languages differentiate between sentence adverbs and manner adverbs by their positions in the sentence, German employs lexical means for this differentiation.
Published online: 24 September 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.170.06pit
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

De Cesare, Anna-Maria, Ana Albom, Doriana Cimmino & Marta Lupica Spagnolo
2020. Domain adverbials in the news. Languages in Contrast 20:1 ► pp. 31 ff. Crossref logo
Hummel, Martin
2017.  In Adjective Adverb Interfaces in Romance [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 242], ► pp. 13 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 01 march 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

References

References

Alexiadou, Artemis
1997 Adverb Placement: A Case Study in Antisymmetric Syntax [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 18]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2002 On the status of Adverb in a grammar without a lexicon. In Das Adverb. Zentrum und Peripherie einer Wortklasse, Friederike Schmöe (ed.), 25–42. Wien: Edition Praesens.Google Scholar
Baayen, R. Harald & Renouf, Antoinette
1996 Chronicling the Times: productive lexical innovations in an English newspaper. Language 72(1): 69–96. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Behrens, Leila
1998 Ambiguität und Alternation. Methodologie und Theoriebildung in der Lexikonforschung. Habilitation thesis, University of Munich.
Bybee, Joan
1985 Morphology. A Study of the Relation between Meaning and Form [Typological Studies in Language 9]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cinque, Gulielmo
1999 Adverbs and Functional Heads. A Cross-linguistic Perspective. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Confais, Jean Paul
1989 Grammaire explicative. Munich: Max Hueber.Google Scholar
Ernst, Thomas
2002 The Syntax of Adjuncts. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Fleischer, Wolfgang & Barz, Irmhild
2012 Wortbildung der deutschen Gegenwartssprache. Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Frey, Werner
2003 Syntactic conditions on adjunct classes. In Modifying Adjuncts, Cathrine Fabricius-Hansen, Ewald Lang & Claudia Maienborn (eds), 163–209. Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Frey, Werner & Pittner, Karin
1998 Zur Positionierung von Adverbialen im deutschen Mittelfeld. Linguistische Berichte 176: 489–534.Google Scholar
1999 Adverbialpositionen im deutsch-englischen Vergleich. In Sprachspezifische Aspekte der Informationsverteilung [Studia Grammatica 47], Monika Doherty (ed.), 14–40. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.Google Scholar
Giegerich, Heinz J.
2012 The morphology of -ly and the categorial status of ‘adverbs’ in English. English language and linguistics 16(3): 341–359. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grimm, Jacob
1890 Deutsche Grammatik, Teil 3. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann.Google Scholar
Guimier, Claude
1985 On the origin of the suffix -ly . In Historical Semantics, Historical Word Formation, Jaçek Fisiak (ed.), 155–170. Berlin: Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heinle, Eva-Maria
2000 Wortbildung des Neuhochdeutschen bis zur Mitte des 20. Jahrhunderts. In Sprachgeschichte. Ein Handbuch zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und ihrer Erforschung, 2. Vols, Werner Besch, Anne Betten & Oskar Reichmann (eds), 1911–1918. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney & Pullum, Geoffrey K.. et al.
2002 The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Killie, Kristin
1998 The spread of -ly to present participles. In Advances in English Historical Linguistics, Jaçek Fisiak & Marcin Krygier (eds), 119–134. Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hockett, Charles F.
1958 A Course in Modern Linguistics. New York NY: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Kjellmer, Göran
1984 Why great:greatly but not big:*bigly? On the formation of English adverbs in -ly . Studia Linguistica 38: 1–19. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lenker, Ursula
2000 Is it, stylewise or otherwise, wise to use -wise? Domain adverbs and the history of English -wise . In Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on English Historical Linguistics. Santiago de Compostela, 7-11 September, 2000 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 223] Teresa Fanego, Javier Pérez-Guerra & María José López-Couso (eds), 157–180. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011 A focus on adverbial connectors: Connecting, partitioning and focusing attention in the history of English. In Connectives in Synchrony and Diachrony in European Languages [Studies in Variation, Contacts and Change in English 8], Anneli Meurman-Solin & Ursula Lenker (eds). Helsinki: VARIENG. http://​www​.helsinki​.fi​/varieng​/journal​/volumes​/08​/lenker/Google Scholar
2014 Knitting and Splitting Information: Medial Placement of Linking Adverbials in the History of English. In Contact, Variation and Change in the History of English [Studies in Language Companion Series 159], Simone E. Pfenninger, Olga Timofeeva, Anne-Christine Gardner, Alpo Honkapohja, Marianne Hundt & Daniel Schreier (eds), 11–38. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McIntosh, Angus
1991 Old English adjectives with derivative -lic partners: Some semantic problems. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 9(3): 297–310.Google Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu
1994 Aspects of adverbial change in Early Modem English. In Studies in Early Modern English, Dieter Kastovsky (ed.), 243–259. Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Opdahl, Luise
2000 LY or zero suffix? A Study in the Function of Dual Form Adverbs in Present-day English, 2 Vols. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Paraschkewoff, Boris
1976 Zur Entstehungs- und Entwicklungsgeschichte der Bildungen auf -weise (Teil l). Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur (PBB Halle) 97: 165–211.Google Scholar
Paul, Hermann
1920[1968] Deutsche Grammatik, Band V. Teil V: Wortbildungslehre. Reprint Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Payne, John, Huddleston, Rodney & Pullum, Geoffrey K.
2010 The distribution and category status of adjectives and adverbs. Word Structure 3(1): 31–81. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pittner, Karin
2004 Where syntax and semantics meet: Adverbial positions in the German middle field. In Adverbials. The Interplay between Meaning, Context, and Syntactic Structure [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 70], Jennifer R. Austin, Stefan Engelberg & Gisa Rauh (eds), 253–287. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Plag, Ingo
2003 Word-Formation in English. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan
1985 A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. New York NY: Longman.Google Scholar
Pounder, Amanda
2001 Adverb‐marking in German and English. System and standardization. Diachronica 18(2): 301–358. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ramat, Paolo & Ricca, Davide
1994 Prototypical adverbs: On the scalarity/radiality of the notion ADVERB. Rivista di Linguistica 6: 289–326.Google Scholar
1998 Sentence adverbs in the languages of Europe. In Adverbial Constructions in the Languages of Europe, Johan van der Auwera (ed.), 187–275. Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Scalise, Sergio
1988 Inflection and derivation. Linguistics 26: 561–581. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sugioka, Yoko & Lehr, Rachel
1983 Adverbial -ly as an inflectional affix. In Papers from the Parasession on the Interplay of Phonology, Morphology and Syntax, John F. Richardson, Mitchell Marks & Amy Chukerman (eds), 293–300. Chicago IL: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Swan, Toril
1988 Sentence Adverbials in English. Oslo: Novus.Google Scholar
1991 Adverbial shifts: Evidence from Norwegian and English. In Historical English Syntax, Dieter Kastovsky (ed.), 409–438. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali & Ito, Rika
2002 Think really different: Continuity and specialization in the English dual form adverbs. Journal of Sociolinguistics 6(2): 236–266. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C.
1986 From polysemy to internal semantic reconstruction. In Proceedings of the Twelfth Annual Meeting, Mary Niepokuj, Mary VanClay, Vassiliki Nikiforidou & Deborah Feder (eds), 389–405. Berkeley CA: Berkeley Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
1989 On the rise of epistemic meanings in English: An example of subjectification in semantic change. Language 65: 31–55. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Uhler, Karl
1926 Die Bedeutungsgleichheit der altenglischen Adjektiva und Adverbia mit und ohne -lic (-lice). Anglistische Forschungen 62: 1–68.Google Scholar
Wilmanns, Wilhelm
1899 Deutsche Grammatik, 2. Abteilung. Berlin: Truebner.Google Scholar
Zwicky, Arnold M.
1995 Why English -ly is not inflectional. In Papers from the 31st Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society (CLS 31), Vol.1, Audra Dainora, Rachel Hemphill, Barbara Luka, Barbara Need & Sheri Pargman (eds), 523–535. Chicago IL: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar