Article published in:
Causation, Permission, and Transfer: Argument realisation in GET, TAKE, PUT, GIVE and LET verbs
Edited by Brian Nolan, Gudrun Rawoens and Elke Diedrichsen
[Studies in Language Companion Series 167] 2015
► pp. 1351
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Nolan, Brian
2016. Dynamicity in the construal of complex events in Irish English and Modern Irish. English Text Construction 9:1  pp. 165 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 04 june 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.



Cristaforo, Sonia
2003Subordination [Oxford Studies in Typology and Linguistic Theory]. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Dixon, Robert M.W.
2010A typology of causatives: Form, syntax and meaning. In Changing Valency: Case Studies in Transitivity, Robert M.W. Dixon & Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (eds), 30–83. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Givón, T.
1983Topic Continuity in Discourse: A Quantitive Cross-Language Study [Typological Studies in Language 3]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan
1994A Communicative Grammar of English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Margetts, Anna & Austin, Peter K.
2007Three participant events in the languages of the world: Towards a cross-linguistic typology. Linguistics 45: 393– 451. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Newman, John
1998The Linguistics of Giving [Typological Studies in Language 36]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nolan, Brian
2012aThe Structure of Modern Irish: A Functional Account. Sheffield: Equinox.Google Scholar
2012bThe GET constructions of Modern Irish and Irish English: GET passive and GET-recipient variations. In Alexandra N. Lenz & Gudrun Rawoens(eds) 2012, The Art of Getting: GET Verbs in European Languages from a Synchronic and Diachronic Point of View. Special issue of Linguistics 50(6), 1111–1162.Google Scholar
2013aConstructional polysemy and argument realisation with the Irish GET verb. In Argument Structures in Flux: The Naples/Capri Papers [Studies in Language Companion Series 131], Elly van Gelderen, Johanna Barðdal & Michaela Cennamo (eds.), 87–116. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013bConstructions as grammatical objects: A case study of the prepositional ditransitive constructions in Modern Irish. In Nolan & Diedrichsen (eds), 143–178.Google Scholar
Nolan, Brian & Diedrichsen, Elke
(eds) 2013Linking Constructions into Functional Linguistics. The Role of Constructions in Grammar [Studies in Language Companion Series 145]. 
Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Quirk, Randolph & Crystal, David
1985A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Siewierska, Anna
1984The Passive: A Comparative Linguistic Analysis. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Song, Jae Jung
1996Causatives and Causation: A Universal-typological Perspective [Longman Linguistics Library]. London: Addison Wesley Longman.Google Scholar
Talmy, Leonard
2000Toward a Cognitive Semantics, Vol. I: Concept Structuring Systems [Language, Speech, and Communication Series]. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Van Valin, Jr., Robert D.
2005Exploring the Syntax-Semantics Interface. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar