Chapter published in:Paradigm Change: In the Transeurasian languages and beyond
Edited by Martine Robbeets and Walter Bisang
[Studies in Language Companion Series 161] 2014
► pp. 89–102
Chapter 4. On arguing from diachrony for paradigms
Paradigms hold a special place in most linguistic descriptions and are often crucial in linguistic reconstruction and in the determining genealogical relations. Nonetheless, theoreticians debate whether paradigms constitute a necessary basic construct or instead are secondary, deriving from other basic constructs. This debate impacts the usefulness of the paradigm in typological and historical comparisons, for if the paradigm itself is derivative, it may not offer anything tangible for comparison. However, the diachronic evidence from analogical change demonstrates that speakers clearly recognize the importance of paradigms, for analogies often are restricted to just the paradigm, not extending to derivationally related forms. The role of paradigms for cross-linguistic comparisons, for establishing morphological cognates or for determining typological patterns is thus reaffirmed.
Published online: 08 October 2014
Janda, Richard D.
Joseph, Brian D.
2004 Typological and areal perspectives on the reshaping of a Macedonian verbal ending. In Macedonian Studies. Papers from the 5th International Macedonian-North American Conference on Macedonian Studies 1–4 May 2003 at The Ohio State University [Ohio State Working Papers in Slavic Studies 4], Brian D. Joseph & Mary Allen Johnson (eds), 143–51. Columbus OH: The Ohio State University Department of Slavic and East European Languages and Literatures.
2011 On pronoun-personal affix connections: Some light from Algonquian. In Representing Language: Essays in Honor of Judith Aissen, Rodrigo Gutiérrez-Bravo, Line Mikkelsen & Eric Potsdam (eds), 173–179. Santa Cruz CA: California Digital Library eScholarship Repository. Linguistic Research Center, University of California, Santa Cruz.
Rothstein, Robert A.
Stang, Christian S.