Article published in:
Contact, Variation, and Change in the History of English
Edited by Simone E. Pfenninger, Olga Timofeeva, Anne-Christine Gardner, Alpo Honkapohja, Marianne Hundt and Daniel Schreier
[Studies in Language Companion Series 159] 2014
► pp. 163–186

Colloquialization and “decolloquialization”

Phrasal verbs in formal contexts, 1650–1990

Given that phrasal verbs are generally related to colloquial styles in Present-day English, the increase of these structures in a particular text type can be interpreted as a sign of colloquialization. Conversely, a decrease in their use may imply the development of more formal, literate features or a tendency towards “decolloqualization”. The present paper examines the development of phrasal verbs in the most formal genres of ARCHER (A Representative Corpus of English Historical Registers), namely medicine, science and sermons. Findings show that the number of phrasal verbs decreases in medicine and science over time, thus displaying a clear tendency towards more literate styles or “decolloquialization”; in sermons, however, phrasal verbs tend to increase. In the light of this evidence, this paper analyzes the differences in use within formal genres, and also compares the use of phrasal verbs between formal and informal genres over time.
Published online: 11 September 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.159.09rod
References

References

Akimoto, Minoji
2006.“On the decline of after and forth in verb phrases. In Syntax, Style and Grammatical Norms: English from 1500–2000, Christiane Dalton-Puffer, Dieter Kastovsky, Nikolaus Ritt & Herbert Schendl (eds), 11–31. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
ARCHER 3.1 = A Representative Corpus of Historical English Registers 3.1
1990–1993/2002/2007/2010 Originally compiled under the supervision of Douglas Biber & Edward Finegan at Northern Arizona University & the University of Southern California. Modified and expanded by subsequent members of a consortium of universities. Current member universities are Northern Arizona, Southern California, Freiburg, Heidelberg, Helsinki, Uppsala, Michigan, Manchester, Lancaster, Bamberg, Zurich, Trier, Salford, and Santiago de Compostela.
Atkinson, Dwight
1996 The Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 1675–1975: A sociohistorical discourse analysis. Language in Society 2(3): 333–371. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1999 Scientific Discourse in Sociohistorical Context. The Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 1675–1975. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas
1988 Variation across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1989 A typology of English texts. Linguistics 27: 3–43. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2001 Dimensions of variation among Eighteenth-century speech-based and written registers. In Towards a History of English as a History of Genres, Hans-Jürgen Diller & Manfred Görlach (eds), 89–109. Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag C. Winter.Google Scholar
2003 Variation among university spoken and written genres: A new multi-dimensional analysis. In Corpus Analysis. Language Structure and Language Use, Pepi Lestyna & Charles F. Meyer (eds), 47–70. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Clark, Victoria
2002 Historical shifts in modification patterns with complex noun phrase structures: How long can you go without a verb? In English Historical Syntax and Morphology, Teresa Fanego, Javier Pérez-Guerra & María José López-Couso (eds), 43–66. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Finegan, Edward
1989 Drift and the evolution of English style: A history of three genres. Language 65(3): 487–517. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1992 The linguistic evolution of five written and speech-based genres from the seventeenth to the twentieth centuries. In History of Englishes: New Methods and Interpretations in Historical Linguistics [Topics in English Linguistics 10], Matti Rissanen, Ossi Ihalainen, Terttu Nevalainen & Irma Taavitsainen (eds), 688–704. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
1994 Intra-textual variation within medical research articles. In Corpus-based Research into Language, Nelleke Oostdijk & Pieter de Haan (eds), 201–221. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
1997 Diachronic relations among speech-based and written registers in English. In To Explain the Present: Studies in the Changing English Language in Honour of Matti Rissanen, Terttu Nevalainen & Leena Kahlas-Tarkka (eds), 253–275. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.Google Scholar
2001 Diachronic relations among speech-based and written registers in English. In Variation in English: Multi-dimensional Studies, Susan Conrad & Douglas Biber (eds), 66–83. London: Pearson.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Finegan, Edward, Atkinson, Dwight, Beck, Ann, Burges, Dennis & Burges, Jena
1994 The design and analysis of the ARCHER corpus: A progress report. In Corpora across the Centuries: Proceedings of the First International Colloquium on English Diachronic Corpora , St. Catharine’s College Cambridge , 25–27 March 1993, Merja Kytö, Matti Rissanen & Susan Wright (eds), 3–6. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Conrad, Susan & Reppen, Randy
1998 Corpus Linguistics: Investigating Language Structure and Use. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan & Finegan, Edward
1999 Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight
1971 The Phrasal Verb in English. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
BROWN = A Standard Corpus of Present-day Edited American English
Compiled by W. Nelson Francis and Henry Kucera. Department of Linguistics Brown University 1964, revised 1971, revised and amplified 1979.
Claridge, Claudia
2000 Multi-word Verbs in Early Modern English: A Corpus-based Study. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Claridge, Claudia & Wilson, Andrew
2002 Style evolution in the English sermon. In Sounds, Words, Texts and Change. Selected Papers from 11 ICEHL , Santiago de Compostela , 7–11 September 2000, Teresa Fanego, Belén Méndez-Naya & Elena Seoane (eds), 25–44. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
CONCE = A Corpus of Nineteenth-century English
Compiled by Merja Kytö (Uppsala University) and Juhani Rudanko(University of Tampere).
Culpeper, Jonathan & Kytö, Merja
2010 Early Modern English Dialogues. Spoken Interaction as Writing. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Denison, David
1981 Aspects of the History of English Group-verbs, with Particular Attention to the Syntax of the Ormulum . PhD dissertation, Oxford University.Google Scholar
Fraser, Bruce
1976 The Verb-particle Combination in English. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Görlach, Manfred
2001 Eighteenth-century English. Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag C. Winter.Google Scholar
Gotti, Maurizio
2011 The development of specialized discourse in the Philosophical Transactions . In Medical Writing in Early Modern English, Irma Taavitsainen & Päivi Pahta (eds), 204–220. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gray, Bethany, Biber, Douglas & Hiltunen, Turo
2011 The expression of stance in early (1665–1712) publications of the Philosophical Transactions and other contemporary medical prose: Innovations in a pioneering discourse. In Medical Writing in Early Modern English, Irma Taavitsainen & Päivi Pahta (eds), 221–257. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Helsinki Corpus of English Texts 850–1710
1991 Compiled by Matti Rissanen, et al. Department of English, University of Helsinki.Google Scholar
Hiltunen, Risto
1994 Phrasal verbs in Early Modern English: Notes on lexis and style. In Studies in Early Modern English, Dieter Kastovsky (ed.), 129–140. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney & Pullum, Geoffrey K.
2002 The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Hundt, Marianne & Mair, Christian
1999 ‘Agile’ and ‘uptight’ genres: The corpus-based approach to language change in progress. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 4(2): 221–242. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ishizaki, Yasuaki
2009 A usage-based analysis of the distribution of forth in the history of English. Kindai Eigo Kenkyu (Studies in Modern English) 25: 41–61.Google Scholar
2012 A usage-based analysis of phrasal verbs in Early and late Modern English. English Language and Linguistics 16(2): 241–260. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
LOB = Lancaster-Oslo/Bergen Corpus
Compiled by Geoffrey Leech, Roger Garside (University of Lancaster), Stig Johansson (University of Oslo) and Knut Hofland (University of Bergen).
Mair, Christian
1997 Parallel corpora: A real-time approach to the study of language change in progress. In Corpus-based Studies in English: Papers from the Seventeenth International Conference on English Language and Research on Computerized Corpora (ICAME 17) , Magnus Ljung (ed.), 195–209. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
OED = The Oxford English Dictionary
Online edition. <www​.oed​.com>
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan
1985 A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Rodríguez-Puente, Paula
2012 Talking ‘private’ with phrasal verbs: A corpus-based study of English phrasal verbs from 1650 to 1999. In Outposts of Historical Corpus Linguistics: From the Helsinki Corpus to a Proliferation of Resources [Studies in Variation, Contacts and Change in English 10], Jukka Tÿrkkö, Terttu Nevalainen, Matti Rissanen & Matti Kilpiö (eds). Helsinki: University of Helsinki. <http://​www​.helsinki​.fi​/varieng​/journal​/volumes​/10​/rodriguez​-puente​/>Google Scholar
Scott, Michael
1999 WordSmith Tools, Version 3. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Smitterberg, Erik
2008 The progressive and phrasal verbs: Evidence of colloquialization in nineteenth-century English? In The Dynamics of Linguistic Variation. Corpus Evidence on English Past and Present [Studies in Language Variation 2], Terttu Nevalainen, Irma Taavitsainen, Päivi Pahta & Minna Korhonen (eds), 269–289. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma
2001 Changing conventions of writing: The dynamics of genres, text types, and text traditions. European Journal of English Studies 5(2): 139–150. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010 Discourse and genre dynamics in the early modern English medical writing. In Early Modern English Medical Texts: Corpus Description and Studies, Irma Taavitsainen and Päivi Pahta (eds), 29–54. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Thim, Stefan
2006 Phrasal verbs in Everyday English: 1500–1700. In Language and Text: Current Perspectives on English and Germanic Historical Linguistics and Philology, Andrew James Johnston, Ferdinand von Mengden & Stefan Thim (eds), 291–306. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
2012 Phrasal verbs. The English Verb-particle Construction and its History [Topics in English Linguistics 78]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Valle, Ellen
1999 A Collective Intelligence. The Life Sciences in the Royal Society as a Scientific Discourse Community, 1665–1965 [Anglicana Turkuensia 17]. PhD dissertation, University of Turku.Google Scholar
Yáñez-Bouza, Nuria
2007 Preposition Stranding and Prescriptivism in English from 1500 to 1900: A Corpus-based Approach. PhD dissertation, The University of Manchester.Google Scholar
2012 ‘Have you ever written a diary or a journal?’ Modes of diurnal narrative in ARCHER. Paper presented at the VARIENG Research Seminar, May 2012, Helsinki.