Article published in:
Language Description Informed by Theory
Edited by Rob Pensalfini, Myfany Turpin and Diana Guillemin
[Studies in Language Companion Series 147] 2014
► pp. 99–122

Liminal pronoun systems

Evidence from Garrwa

Pronoun systems are often described as a single linguistic category consisting of a paradigm of forms that serve as referential indices, or as “dual” systems consisting of more than one paradigm. In dual systems, a paradigm of “bound” pronouns serves the basic referential functions usually for core grammatical functions, with a paradigm of free pronouns used in contexts of emphasis or contrast, and in oblique grammatical roles (Bresnan 2001; Mushin & Simpson 2008). The same kinds of pragmatic splits can be systematically signalled in single pronoun system for example by means of prosody. Bresnan (2001: 4) claims that a system is only dual when there is a divergence in both form and syntactic distribution. In this chapter I examine the usefulness of this claim in defining pronoun systems as dual (or not dual) using evidence from Garrwa (Northern Australia). Here I argue that Garrwa pronouns function as a liminal system, neither single nor dual. This analysis raises questions about the degree to which categorical distinctions can be made in language description. I also consider implications this has for understanding the typology of pronouns more generally.
Published online: 28 January 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.147.06mus
References

References

Austin, Peter & Bresnan, Joan.
1996. Nonconfigurationality in Australian Aboriginal languages. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 14: 215–268. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Belfrage, Hugh.
1992. Aspects of Verb and Pronoun Morphology, Semantics and Syntax in Garrwa. Honours thesis, University of Melbourne.Google Scholar
Blake, Barry.
1983. Structure and word order in Kalkatungu: The anatomy of a flat language. Australian Journal of Linguistics 3(2): 143–175. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1990. Languages of the Queensland/Northern Territory Border: Updating the Classification. In Language and History: Essays in Honour of Luise A. Hercus , Peter Austin, Robert M.W. Dixon, Tom Dutton & Isobel White (eds), 49–66. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Breen, Gavan.
2003. Wanyi and Garrwa comparative data. In The Non-Pama-Nyungan Languages of Northern Australia , Nicholas Evans (ed.), 425–462. Canberra:Pacific Linguistics.
Bresnan, Joan.
2001. The emergence of the unmarked pronoun. In Optimality-theoretic Syntax , Geraldine Legendre, Jane Grimshaw & Sten Vikner (eds), 113–142. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Choi, Hye-Won.
1999. Optimizing structure in context: Scrambling and information structure. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Crystal, David
1991. A Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics , 3rd edn. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Cysouw, Michael.
2003. The Paradigmatic Status of Person Marking . Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Dench, Alan.
1994. A Grammar of Marthuthunira . Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Dixon, Robert M.W.
2002. Australian Languages: Their Nature and Development . Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Donaldson, Tamsin.
1980. Ngiyambaa: The Language of the Wangaaybuwan . Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Evans, Nicholas.
1995. A Grammar of Kayardild . Berlin: Mouton de Grutyer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Furby, Christine E.
1972. The pronominal system of Garawa. Oceanic Linguistics 11(1): 1–31. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Furby, Edward, S. & Furby, Christine E.
1977. A Preliminary Analysis of Garawa Phrases and Clauses . Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
1983
. Introduction. In Topic Continuity in Discourse [Typological Studies in Language 3], Talmy Givón (ed.), 5–41. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, Mark.
2009. The genetic status of Garrwan. Australian Journal of Linguistics 29(2): 195–244. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jakobson, Roman
1984. Structure of the Russian verb. In Roman Jakobson: Russian and Slavic Grammar Studies 1931–1981 , Linda R. Waugh & Morris Halle (eds), 1–14. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jelinek, Eloise.
1984. Empty categories, case and configurationality. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 2: 39–76. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Keen, Sandra.
1983. Yukulta. In Handbook of Australian Languages , Robert M.W. Dixon & Barry Blake (eds), 191–304. Canberra: ANU press.Google Scholar
Nordlinger, Rachel.
1998a. A Grammar of Wambaya, Northern Territory (Australia) . Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
1998b. Constructive Case . Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Mushin, Ilana.
2006. Motivations for second position: Evidence from North-Central Australia. Linguistic Typology 10: 267–326. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008. Diverging paths: Variation in Garrwa tense/aspect clitic placement. In Discourse and Grammar in Australian Languages [Studies in Language Companion Series 104], Ilana Mushin & Brett Baker (eds), 87–110. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012. A Grammar of (Western) Garrwa [Pacific Linguistics Series]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mushin, Ilana & Simpson, Jane.
2008. Free to bound to free? Interactions between pragmatics and syntax in the development of Australian pronominal systems. Language 84(3):566–596. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pensalfini, Rob.
2004. Towards a typology of nonconfigurationality. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 22(2): 359–408. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, Michael.
1976. Hierarchy of features and ergativity. In Grammatical Categories in Australian languages , Robert M.W Dixon (ed.), 112–171. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.Google Scholar
Simpson, Jane & Mushin, Ilana.
2008. Clause-initial position in four Australian Languages. In Discourse and Grammar in Australian Languages [Studies in Language Companion Series 104], Ilana Mushin & Brett Baker (eds), 25–57. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Swartz, Stephen.
1988. Pragmatic structure and word order in Warlpiri. Papers in Australian Linguistics 17: 151–166.Google Scholar
Van ValinJr., Robert D. & LaPolla, Randy J.
1997. Syntax: Structure, Meaning, and Function . Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar