RPs and the nature of lexical and syntactic categories in Role and Reference Grammar

Robert D. Van Valin Jr. | Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf and University at Buffalo, The State University of New York

Many syntactic theories assume a universal set of lexical categories, and they further assume these lexical categories are the basis of endocentric phrasal projections in the syntax. Role and Reference Grammar [RRG] makes neither of these assumptions, and in this paper an RRG account of lexical categories is developed, and it is argued that only noun and verb can be considered to be truly universal. Furthermore, the non-endocentric syntactic categories of RRG are expanded to include referring expressions, thereby solving problems that have plagued lexical-category-based, endocentric analyses. Finally, the issue of gradience in lexical categories is addressed, and it is argued that category labels like “noun” and “verb” are descriptive labels for words that share a large number of morpholexical and morphosyntactic properties, not theoretical concepts.

Published online: 21 November 2008
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.105.14van

Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

No author info given

2014. In Exploring Functional-Cognitive Space [Studies in Language Companion Series, 157],

Butler, Christopher S.

2019. Does functional linguistics have a ‘fundamental unity’?. Functions of Language 26:1 ► pp. 64 ff.

Kim, Min-Joo

2019. In The Syntax and Semantics of Noun Modifiers and the Theory of Universal Grammar [Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 96], ► pp. 17 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 february 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.